Airbnb owner forced to tear down 40ft-high ‘monstrous prison camp watchtower' after furious neighbours complained
The "monstrous" structure was built at the £5,000-a-week holiday let in Rhos-on-Sea, North Wales, without planning permission.
2
2
And fuming locals nearby say the eyesore addition is disturbing their day-to-day lives in a seaside town.
Planning permission for the towering "garden room" was turned down last year.
And neighbours are celebrating after another bid has now also been rejected by officials who say the tower must be removed.
Nearby neighbour Nick Whitmore, 35, who lives with his partner and three young children said their "dream home" had been marred by the platform and cabin.
Nick said: "It's advertised on Airbnb year-round, bringing noise, light pollution, and worse.
"The impact on my partner, our three children, and our neighbours is horrendous.
"The structure dominates our house and garden, as well as our neighbours'. It looks into my daughter's bedroom.
He added: "We are a local, hard-working family with three children under the age of 10.
"My partner and I worked very, very hard to buy our dream home, just up the road from the children's school, various public parks, with a bedroom for each of our children, and a nice garden for them to enjoy.
"This has now been taken away from us as we back onto a busy Airbnb and, since Jan 2024, a building site."
The holiday let was purchased by a Sheffield-based property owner in December 2023.
Neighbours reported the structure to the council and JAM Domestic Properties Ltd submitted a planning application - which was refused.
The owners had described the 'breathtaking' £700,000 four-bedroom property as 'the epitome of luxury '.
Nick said: "We alerted Conwy council who asked the company to stop work.
"They did, and submitted a retrospective planning application, which was refused in June 2024 after numerous neighbour objections.
"With no appeal by the 16 December 2024 deadline, we thought the council would follow through and move to enforce their own refusal.
"We assumed relief was near. Instead, two weeks ago, earlier in March 2025, the owner submitted a near-identical planning application.
"We've now endured over 15 months of this situation, with Conwy sitting on their hands while local families and residents suffer daily."
Families living next-door are furious at the13m high 'concrete plateau' giving clear views into their properties and blighting their lives.
Work on the tower - which would provide panoramic views of the village and neighbouring Penrhyn Bay - began last year, only to be paused when a planning application was turned down.
The holiday rental - called Gardd y Llys - is a contemporary property in one of the most upmarket residential areas of Rhos-on-Sea.
'OVERBEARING'
Neighbours Stephen and Hazel Walburn also wrote a letter of objection to the council.
"The cabin is 13m above our main living area and certainly feels to us to be out of character and overbearing," they wrote.
"Its scale and appearance are unlike other garden buildings in the area. It fails to enhance the local environment, commanding attention not unlike a prison camp watchtower."
They added: "It dominates the roofscape and is alien and incongruous."
Conwy council said: "An enforcement notice has been served which requires the removal of the structure."
The notice was served on 17 June and the developer has been given 10 weeks from that date to launch an appeal.
The application by JAM Domestic Properties read: "Views from the raised platform into neighbouring properties were recognised as being available from the initial planning consent.
"The proposed development is not considered to lead to an acceptable increase to this and is not considered to have a detrimental impact on privacy or residential amenity to neighbouring properties, and therefore would be acceptable on this basis."
A Conwy Council spokeswoman previously said: "Planning permission was granted in 2016 for a smaller garden structure on this site.
"In February 2024, it was brought to our attention that a larger outbuilding was being constructed.
"Following an investigation by the planning enforcement officer, the owners agreed to cease work and to submit a planning application to regularise the work.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
21 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's benefits Bill turns to farce
Sir Keir Starmer has rendered his flagship welfare cuts legislation 'pointless' in a farcical climbdown to win the support of Labour rebels. A planned crackdown on the personal independence payment (Pip), which helps disabled people with extra costs, was dropped just 90 minutes before the crunch vote. The late concession came when it appeared dozens of rebels were still willing to vote down the package, even though it had already been gutted last week to appease critics. Even with the change, 49 Labour MPs voted against the Bill – the biggest rebellion of the Starmer premiership, which marks its one-year anniversary this week. Government ministers faced ridicule from Labour critics, who dubbed the handling of the changes 'shambolic', 'unedifying' and a 'total clusterf--- of Godzilla proportions'. The U-turn means that almost all of the £4.6 billion of annual savings the Bill was meant to deliver have been lost, increasing the chance of new tax rises this autumn. Labour Left-wingers are expected to seize on Sir Keir's weakness and push for further policy changes, such as a new raid on wealth or relaxed rules on immigration. The mishandling of the welfare package, despite a working majority in the House of Commons of 165, is also likely to fuel Labour calls for an overhaul in Number 10. The Prime Minister threw his support behind Morgan McSweeney, his chief of staff blamed by some welfare rebels, in Cabinet meeting on Tuesday morning. Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, said: 'This is an utter capitulation. Labour's welfare Bill is now a total waste of time. It effectively saves £0, helps no one into work, and does not control spending. 'It's pointless. They should bin it, do their homework, and come back with something serious. Starmer cannot govern.' Mel Stride, the Tory shadow chancellor, said 'This farcical climbdown is the most humiliating moment of Labour's first year in office.' He added: 'This isn't serious government, it's chaos. Labour has bottled welfare reform, left a multi-billion-pound hole in the nation's finances, and set the country on course for higher taxes or a debt spiral. It doesn't have to be this way.' The total disability and incapacity benefits bill is set to continue rising, from £76 billion last year to £98 billion by the end of the decade, piling pressure on the public finances. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, faces a black hole that some estimates suggest could run to tens of billions of pounds, meaning she risks being forced into a new tax raid in her autumn Budget. Helen Miller, the deputy director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said the changes would not save any money by 2029-30. She said: 'This is a Government with a majority of 165 that is seemingly unable to reform either pensioner winter fuel payments or working-age disability benefits. That doesn't bode well for those hoping this Government will grasp the nettle and address the deeper, structural challenges facing the UK public finances.' Labour rebels, some of whom are emboldened by forcing billion-pound changes on the Starmer administration, told The Telegraph they will push for new wealth taxes this autumn. One Labour rebel told The Telegraph: 'I'd say the new review will last longer than the PM. His sell-by date just got a lot closer after this week.' Andy McDonald, a Labour MP who voted against the welfare plan, said of wealth taxes: 'It is the broadest shoulders argument. 'Distributed to each according to his need.' That's not Marx, it's the Bible.' A second Labour rebel told The Telegraph: 'I think it is inevitable. I don't think the Chancellor has got any options left.' Sir Keir had been facing a huge rebellion last week when 127 Labour MPs – around one in four – signed an amendment to effectively block the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill. In an attempt to quash the revolt last week, Mr McSweeney, Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, and Sir Alan Campbell, the Chief Whip, personally negotiated a compromise that meant all current recipients of disability benefits would not be affected by the changes. Instead, the new system would kick in from November 2026. A review of the most contentious part – toughening the eligibility for Pip – would also return that autumn. But on Tuesday afternoon, ministers were forced to make yet another alteration, removing the entire section of the Bill referring to changes to Pip. The sudden extra concession, which removed the most important part of the legislation just before the key vote, suggested government whips were not confident the legislation would pass. It eventually did by 335 votes in favour and 260 votes against - a much tighter result than expected given how drastically it had been watered down. As well as the 49 Labour MPs who voted against the Bill, 19 abstained. The concession was announced by Sir Stephen Timms, the minister for social security and disability, during the Commons debate just 90 minutes before votes were due to be called. It came just hours after Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Secretary, had insisted there would be no further changes. Ms Kendall, who told broadcasters there were 'lessons to learn' after the result, was the driving force behind the Bill and is likely to face questions over her position. Labour rebels were left infuriated that the Government was continuing to force through a Bill which had lost the vast majority of its major elements, rather than pulling the legislation entirely. Paula Barker, the Labour MP for Liverpool Wavertree: 'Whilst grateful for the concessions, this has further laid bare the incoherent and shambolic nature of this process. It is the most unedifying spectacle that I have ever seen.' Ian Lavery, the Labour MP for Blyth and Ashington, urged the Government to withdraw the 'hodgepodge of a Bill which means nothing to nobody'. Ms Lavery said: 'This is crazy, man. This is outrageous, man. This Bill isn't fit for purpose.' 'I went out for a banana – and the whole thing changed' Mary Kelly Foy, the Labour MP for the City of Durham, expressed shock at what had happened after she returned to the Commons after leaving for a snack. Ms Foy said: 'I popped out for a banana earlier on and, when I came back in, things had changed again. So I'm even more unclear on what I'm voting on.' The Tories were also critical of how the legislation had been handled. Simon Hoare, the Conservative MP for North Dorset: 'I have never seen a Bill butchered and filleted by their own sponsoring ministers in such a cack-handed way. 'Nobody can understand the purpose of this Bill now. In the interest of fairness, simplicity and natural justice, is it not best to withdraw it, redraft it and start again?' Around 800,000 claimants of Pip had been expected to lose money under the original cuts package, including 370,000 current recipients. The changes have now been shelved. It means the Government is still expected to spend £28.5 billion on Pip by the end of the decade. Already 3.8 million people get the payments, according to official figures. Sir Stephen will continue with his review, announced last week as part of the initial concessions deal, into Pip eligibility and report back in Autumn 2026. But government sources were unable to say if any of the original changes would be kept. That includes the most contentious element, which was to increase the number of points someone must get in an assessment for the payments. The legislation still contains the halving of the health top-up in Universal Credit for new claimants and the scrapping of the work capability assessment, as well as an increase in the amount of standard Universal Credit.
The Sun
21 minutes ago
- The Sun
Sainsbury's sees sales boost thank to Marks & Spencer cyber attack
SAINSBURY'S has seen a boost in sales, partly thanks to the cyber attack that disrupted rival Marks & Spencer earlier this year. The supermarket reported a 4.7 per cent rise in group sales for the 16 weeks to June 21, excluding fuel. 1 Grocery sales jumped by 5 per cent, while Argos saw a 4.4 per cent increase as shoppers bought fans and paddling pools during the warm weather. Sainsbury's said it had achieved its highest market share since 2016, growing share three years in a row. Boss Simon Roberts admitted that the M&S disruption had helped, saying: 'If a store is low on stock, customers will go somewhere nearby. 'We've had a little bit of benefit.' At yesterday's annual general meeting, M&S boss Stuart Machin said he expects online services to be fully restored within four weeks. Sainsbury's said strong first quarter performers included Taste the Difference fresh food, which saw sales surge 20 per cent as customers snapped up picnic and deli ranges in the sunny weather. Tu Clothing sales jumped 8 per cent, driven by a 13 per cent womenswear leap. Sainsbury's also confirmed it is on track to meet its £1billion profit target for the year, despite the impact of price cuts. Meanwhile, food price inflation rose 3.7 per cent in June, up from 2.8 per cent in May. RATE CUT HINT MILLIONS of borrowers could see their costs drop as interest rate cuts look more likely next month. Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey said the labour market is 'softening', with pay rises slowing down. Markets now predict a 75 per cent chance of rates being cut from 4.25 per cent to four per cent. Mr Bailey said: 'The path of interest rates will be gradually downwards.' PLUGS A HOLE SOUTHERN WATER's owner has pumped £1.2billion into the struggling utility to shore up its finances. Australian firm Macquaire, which used to own Thames Water, has already handed over £655million, with another £545million expected by December. Southern Water, which serves 4.7 million people in the South and South East, has built up nearly £9billion in debt. SQUEEZE ON CASH ISAS SAVERS are set to be dealt a blow as the Chancellor plans to slash the cash ISA allowance. Right now, you can save up to £20,000-a-year tax-free across four ISAs: cash, stocks and shares, lifetime, and innovative finance. The £20,000 limit will stay, but the amount allowed in cash ISAs is set to be reduced, according to The Financial Times. It is intended to encourage more money into stocks and shares ISAs, which potentially offer better returns and more support to the economy. Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme - Sun Club.
Sky News
25 minutes ago
- Sky News
UK content creators demand formal recognition from the government
The UK's YouTubers, TikTok creators and Instagram influencers have been surveyed on mass for the first time ever, and are demanding formal recognition from the government. The creator economy in the UK is thought to employ around 45,000 people and contribute over £2bn to the country in one year alone, according to the new research by YouTube and Public First. But, despite all that value, its workers say they feel underappreciated by the authorities. "If you look at the viewership, our channel is not too different from a big media company," said Max Klymenko, a content creator with more than 10 million subscribers and half a billion monthly views on average. "If you look at the relevancy, especially among young audiences, I will say that we are more relevant. That said, we don't really get the same treatment," he told Sky News. Fifty-six per cent of the more than 10,000 creators surveyed said they do not think UK creators have a "voice in shaping government policies" that affect them. Only 7% think they get enough support to access finance, while just 17% think there is enough training and skills development here in the UK. Nearly half think their value is not recognised by the broader creative industry. The creative industries minister, Sir Chris Bryant, said the government "firmly recognises the integral role that creators play" in the UK's creative industries and the fact that they help "to drive billions into the economy" and support more than 45,000 jobs. "We understand more can be done to help creators reach their full potential, which is why we are backing them through our new Creative Industries Sector Plan," he said. "The UK has got a fantastic history of supporting the creative industries," said Ben Woods, a creator economy analyst, Midia Research who was not involved in the report. "Whether you look at the film side, lots of blockbuster films are being shot here, or television, which is making waves on the global stage. "But perhaps the government needs to broaden that lens a little bit to look at just what's going on within the creator economy as well, because it is highly valuable, it's where younger audiences are spending a lot of their time and [the UK is] really good at it." According to YouTube, formal recognition would mean creators are factored into official economic impact data reporting, are represented on government creative bodies, and receive creator-specific guidance from HMRC on taxes and finances. For some, financial guidance and clarity would be invaluable; the 'creator' job title seems to cause problems when applying for mortgages or bank loans. "It's really difficult as a freelancer to get things like mortgages and bank accounts and credit and those types of things," said podcaster David Brown, who owns a recording studio for creators. "A lot of people make very good money doing it," he told Sky News. "They're very well supported. They have a lot of cash flow, and they are successful at doing that job. It's just the way society and banking and everything is set up. It makes it really difficult." The creative industries minister said he is committed to appointing a creative freelance champion and increasing support from the British Business Bank in order to "help creators thrive and drive even more growth in the sector". The government has already pledged to boost the UK's creative industries, launching a plan to make the UK the number one destination for creative investment and promising an extra £14bn to the sector by 2035. These influencers want to make sure they are recognised as part of that.
