UK content creators demand formal recognition from the government
The creator economy in the UK is thought to employ around 45,000 people and contribute over £2bn to the country in one year alone, according to the new research by YouTube and Public First.
But, despite all that value, its workers say they feel underappreciated by the authorities.
"If you look at the viewership, our channel is not too different from a big media company," said Max Klymenko, a content creator with more than 10 million subscribers and half a billion monthly views on average.
"If you look at the relevancy, especially among young audiences, I will say that we are more relevant. That said, we don't really get the same treatment," he told Sky News.
Fifty-six per cent of the more than 10,000 creators surveyed said they do not think UK creators have a "voice in shaping government policies" that affect them.
Only 7% think they get enough support to access finance, while just 17% think there is enough training and skills development here in the UK.
Nearly half think their value is not recognised by the broader creative industry.
The creative industries minister, Sir Chris Bryant, said the government "firmly recognises the integral role that creators play" in the UK's creative industries and the fact that they help "to drive billions into the economy" and support more than 45,000 jobs.
"We understand more can be done to help creators reach their full potential, which is why we are backing them through our new Creative Industries Sector Plan," he said.
"The UK has got a fantastic history of supporting the creative industries," said Ben Woods, a creator economy analyst, Midia Research who was not involved in the report.
"Whether you look at the film side, lots of blockbuster films are being shot here, or television, which is making waves on the global stage.
"But perhaps the government needs to broaden that lens a little bit to look at just what's going on within the creator economy as well, because it is highly valuable, it's where younger audiences are spending a lot of their time and [the UK is] really good at it."
According to YouTube, formal recognition would mean creators are factored into official economic impact data reporting, are represented on government creative bodies, and receive creator-specific guidance from HMRC on taxes and finances.
For some, financial guidance and clarity would be invaluable; the 'creator' job title seems to cause problems when applying for mortgages or bank loans.
"It's really difficult as a freelancer to get things like mortgages and bank accounts and credit and those types of things," said podcaster David Brown, who owns a recording studio for creators.
"A lot of people make very good money doing it," he told Sky News.
"They're very well supported. They have a lot of cash flow, and they are successful at doing that job. It's just the way society and banking and everything is set up. It makes it really difficult."
The creative industries minister said he is committed to appointing a creative freelance champion and increasing support from the British Business Bank in order to "help creators thrive and drive even more growth in the sector".
The government has already pledged to boost the UK's creative industries, launching a plan to make the UK the number one destination for creative investment and promising an extra £14bn to the sector by 2035.
These influencers want to make sure they are recognised as part of that.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
26 minutes ago
- Times
Luxury nappy brand Peachies raises £2.1m to fund growth
A luxury nappy brand that says it helps Gen Z and millennial parents sleep for longer at night from the bottom up has raised £2.1 million to fuel its expansion. Peachies, which styles itself as a 'parent-first' nappy company, has raised the money to lift its nappy subscription service, explore launching into retail and release new products. Morgan Mixon, co-founder of Peachies, said: 'Parenting currencies are sleep, time saved, and the comfort or safety of your child. If we can design clever solutions that focus on those things, we can inject a lot of love and design into everyday essentials at the heart of parenthood.' The number of nappies in Peachies' subscription boxes, which cost £70 a month, changes depending on the size of the infant. Bigger sizes have fewer each month, calculated based on the number of nappy changes. The smallest size costs about 36p per nappy, compared with 17p for a similar size at the major brand Pampers. Initially, the company offers monthly discounts of 20 per cent. Rima Suppan, co-founder of Peachies, said: 'We knew if we wanted to disrupt the market like we've seen in toilet paper and toothbrushes, we had to bring something unique to market. So we spent a year and a half on product development and nerding out on materials.' Peachies emphasises its sustainability, gaining a B Corp certification in November 2024, which Suppan, 27, said helps relieve the 'guilt' parents feel for throwing away nappies. 'We invest in higher quality materials so that the performance of the product is superior to those on the market, so that you do get those longer stretches, particularly overnight, because what parents really want is just to sleep,' Mixon, 35, said. Peachies had an annual recurring revenue of £2 million for 2024 and Mixon said it is on track to hit £8.4 million for 2025. The company has grown its headcount from five in 2024 to 12. Suppan and Mixon met in 2020 while both doing a master's at Imperial College London, where they ran a student entrepreneurs club together. The duo won their first £5,000 for the company during a pitch competition at Imperial. When the pair first came up with the idea for the business, neither of them had children. By the time of the company's launch in 2023, Mixon was seven months pregnant, which she said allowed her to bring a different perspective to the company. This funding round was led by ArmaVir Partners, a New York-based growth investor, and Triple B, a Dutch family investment office. Peachies previously raised £1.3 million in May 2024.
The Sun
30 minutes ago
- The Sun
EastEnders cancelled tonight – and won't be a new episode for almost a week
OFF AIR The BBC soap has fallen victim to sports scheduling chaos across TV EASTENDERS has been cancelled tonight again as the soap struggles in the schedules against sport. The BBC soap has been shifted away from its usual primetime BBC One slot of 7.30pm to iPlayer and BBC Two screenings for the duration of Wimbledon. 2 2 But that means that all of this week's episodes have already aired - with no new editions until next week. Today also marks the last in the week for ITV soaps Emmerdale and Coronation Street. From Thursday the 3rd of July, fans will be left with no soap content for days with ITV and BBC pulling all their coverage across Thursday and Friday. Emmerdale and Coronation Street will both be bumped from air as a result of the UEFA Women's Euro matches. But its fans of EastEnders that will suffer the most. Following the double-bill on Tuesday 1st July, they will have to go a whole eight days before getting their next fix of Albert Square action. The soap won't air again until the 9th July. And because of the UEFA women's matches, Corrie fans won't see their next episode until Thursday July 10 at 9pm. However ITV recently announced that the two soaps would be following in Hollyoaks' footsteps - by going on YouTube. Both Coronation Street and Emmerdale will now be available to watch on the streaming giant at the same time as on ITVX - 7am each morning. The big move comes ahead of ITV launching its soap power hour from January with reductions in episodes for both soaps to just five per week.
BBC News
35 minutes ago
- BBC News
Labour won't break tax pledges after welfare climbdown, minister says
A senior minister has insisted Labour will keep its election tax promises, after a major climbdown over welfare changes left a hole in the government's spending night, ministers offered rebel Labour MPs last-minute concessions to pass a welfare bill that was originally intended to make £5bn a year in benefits savings by concessions mean the savings will now be delayed or lost entirely, which puts pressure on Chancellor Rachel Reeves ahead of the autumn minister Pat McFadden told the BBC there would be "financial consequences" to the decision to water down planned cuts to disability and health-related benefits. But the minister ruled out increases in income tax, National Insurance or VAT in response to the government's decisions on welfare."I'm not going to speculate on the Budget," McFadden said."We will keep to the tax promises that we made in our manifesto when we fought the election last year."Helen Miller, incoming director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank, said the government had moved from a position of saving £5bn to nothing by said: "Come autumn, given the government has not been able to put through the cuts it wanted, and given that the growth might get worse rather than better, it's looking increasingly likely that, if the government needs to do something, it's going to turn to tax rises."In its election manifesto, Labour said it would not raise taxes on "working people", specifically income tax, national insurance or has committed to meeting so-called fiscal rules, which most governments in wealthy nations have in place to try to maintain credibility with financial two main rules are not to borrow to fund day-to-day public spending; and to get debt falling as a share of the UK economic output by 2029/ Reeves's determination to stick to these rules has led to speculation that she will raise taxes or announce spending cuts in her autumn Budget. The Labour government's expensive policy reversals on welfare and the winter fuel allowance for pensioners have made that task more on ITV's Lorraine programme, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said welfare reform was "always difficult", and said the government has to "flatten that curve a bit" of welfare spending said: "Rachel [Reeves] will have to look at those challenges" in the Labour rebellion over the welfare changes undermines the authority of the chancellor and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, and raises questions about their ability to enact key parts of their policy about the challenge to the government from its own backbenchers, Rayner said "to be fair to colleagues many of them have been raising them [concerns] privately", adding that "the process can look aggy but that's the way you get to consensus".The biggest savings in the welfare bill would have come from restricting eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability benefit in England, Wales and Northern in a late concession on Tuesday evening, ministers shelved those plans and said any Pip changes would happen after a review of the the end, MPs gave the government's Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill their initial approval, by 335 votes to it was not enough to stop 49 Labour MPs voting against the legislation, the largest revolt of Sir Keir 's Rachael Maskell had proposed an amendment designed to halt the legislation, which was backed by a total of 44 Labour York Central MP said she had seen the bill "disintegrating before our eyes".Maskell said she was glad there had been a public debate about the issue and "now disabled people should feel empowered to have their voice at long last in an ableist parliament".Labour MP Chris Curtis, who supported the welfare changes, said the government needed to focus on economic growth to put the finances on a stable footing."I hope this government is going to go further and faster, and be bolder and more radical on unlocking growth in this country," he said."The most important thing for financial stability is to ensure we get the economy growing again."
