Optics review – this crisis management comedy is smart, funny and grimly realistic
'Never let the truth get in the way of a good story' may be an old adage – but it's never been more relevant. When major corporations are bosom buddies with news outlets and world leaders, when celebrities are protected from bad PR at all costs, when product is more important than people – who knows what's real any more?
Optics, the new series written by Jenna Owen and Vic Zerbst (also known as comedy duo Freudian Nip) and Charles Firth, couldn't be more timely. Following the sudden death of the big boss at crisis management PR firm Fritz & Randell, two young female employees, Greta Goldman (Zerbst) and Nicole Kidman (Owen – and yes, that is the character's name, in a gag that quickly wears thin) are given the top job in a move to shake up the company – or cover an impending PR disaster by a bit of diversity box-ticking.
But their male colleagues, including shunned fortysomething company heir Ian Randell (Firth), lurk in the shadows. The women might be running the show on the surface, but 'board approval' is forever pending, and the men are clearly still pulling the strings. As two of them say in hushed tones: 'It's just optics with the girls – isn't everything?'
In each of the first four episodes, upon which this review is based, Greta and Nicole take on a new client and challenge: a disgraced football player, a high-flying she-EO accused of workplace bullying, an airline with shoddy business practices (it's called Qualitus, probably not a nod to any real airline …), and an actor accused of sending creepy DMs with a cannibalistic air (also probably not a nod to any recent headlines).
For their morally dubious clients, the pair must find ways to skate around the truth – or distort it entirely. Unlike the founders of the company, Greta and Nicole do seem to have some moral compass, and their discomfort is evident – but the show must go on.
It's a smart script, with very funny, zippy one-liners that contain depressing nuggets of truth. An airline executive calls the company's flight statistics 'an aspirational goal, like a new year's resolution or a climate target'. When a woman is interviewed on the news regarding the lecherous actor, she is asked: 'He's the most famous star in Hollywood. Why should our viewers trust your word over his?' Owen and Zerbst are clearly familiar with this world of long sushi lunches, exclusive airline lounges and conspiratorial agreements; the often ridiculous conversations and scenes within the workplace gave me war flashbacks as someone who also once worked in PR.
As Greta and Nicole, Zerbst and Owen embody the tech-savvy, super-online Gen Z-ers who are rapidly ascending the ranks in the corporate world. They bounce off one another effortlessly, with the kind of easy rapport and banter that will feel familiar to viewers of the same generation. Randell is a great foil for the duo, and the power struggle between him and the two women feels as pulled from the real world as some of the PR crises: they're whip-smart and he's bumbling and out of touch ('only wowsers and feminists hate fun,' he says early in the series), but he's the one with the family ties and the clients' respect. Firth plays the character well – a slightly sad and pathetic middle-aged man who's oblivious to the fact that he's had everything handed to him.
Meanwhile, the women have to constantly prove themselves to their clients and colleagues – and the viewer comes to suspect that they're pawns in a bigger game.
Sign up to Saved for Later
Catch up on the fun stuff with Guardian Australia's culture and lifestyle rundown of pop culture, trends and tips
after newsletter promotion
It makes for a fast-paced, intelligent show that reveals the duplicitous underbelly of public relations in Australia, and the way diversity often plays out in the corporate world: as lip service only. Some of the scenarios and characters border on caricature – but when modern life is becoming increasingly cartoonish, maybe that's not a problem.
Optics premieres Wednesday 29 January at 8.30pm on ABC TV and ABC iview
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Skintight leggings or baggy joggers? What your gymwear says about you
Around me, a group of women in skintight gym sets are side planking. Some are wearing full-coverage unitards, others leave slices of midriff bare. No one is wearing a baggy T-shirt from 2008 with a naked Rufus Wainwright on it, and hardened flecks of damp-proof paint. Except me. The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more. If TikTok is to be believed, my gym-mates must be millennials, born between the early 1980s and the mid-1990s; gen Z would find such skin-tightness a bit retro, or basic, or even 'jurassic fitness'. Another generational schism has opened online – to add to socks, jeans and boundaries – this time over what millennials and gen Z are wearing to work out in. Tight-on-tight outfits supposedly single you out as a millennial – it is 'giving middle school', said one gen Z user witheringly – while gen Z prefers something baggier. Looking around me at pilates and in the park, though, I suspect some of the women wearing a second, seal-like skin are younger than 30. And here I am, days after turning 40 – squarely a millennial – wearing an enormous T-shirt. It is a muddled picture. Kelechi Okafor – at 38, a millennial – is a fitness professional, a former personal trainer and the owner of a pole dance studio. She used to wear tighter clothes to exercise but now wears baggy joggers and tops, in the reverse of what TikTok might have you believe. 'The way that the tailoring is done for a lot of gymwear does not have my body size in mind,' she says. 'There was something liberating about saying: 'Actually, I'm not wearing this any more. I'm going to wear baggy things.'' Michelle Carroll, a 29-year-old (millennial) body image coach and nutritionist based in Edinburgh, who typically wears leggings and a vest or cropped top, says that at her gym: 'Younger people tend to wear brighter, shorter and tighter clothes.' She sees it as 'in part, influenced by 'fitness culture' we see online – it's almost a uniform'. Lauren Crowder, managing director of ELEVEN:ELEVEN Studios in Liverpool city centre, says clients in their 20s and early 30s 'tend to embrace the trend of matching activewear sets – brands such as Adanola, Bo+Tee, or Gymshark are really popular' – whereas clients in their late 30s and up 'generally prefer a more relaxed fit'. Georgie Burke, founder of the Barre Fitness Studio in Bristol, says the younger clients there like 'plain colours, white grip ankle socks and tight vest tops' – what she calls the 'Adanola aesthetic', referencing the British activewear brand that seems to be everywhere now, while the 30-plus crowd opt for 'a print legging but with a looser style top'. Farther afield, in the Canadian city of Guelph, Samantha Brennan, a professor of philosophy and co-author of Fit at Mid-Life: A Feminist Fitness Journey, has also noticed young women wearing beautiful sets – the kind of 'workout bikinis' that some men have been complaining are 'intimidating'. It is not so much that they are tight that Brennan notices – though they probably are – but that they all match. Where she sees the gym as 'a place where you get to take a break from fashion', she says, 'they're wearing things I recognise as outfits, and they're specifically bought for wearing at the gym'. It makes a lot of sense that gym wear is being given as much attention as it is. The gym now has such gravitational pull that for many it is seen as – and this is very much gen Z's sentiment, not mine – 'the new club'. It is a place for socialising and dating; some are calling it 'workout-wooing'. A raft of newer brands, such as Toronto's Literary Sport, founded by creatives Deirdre Matthews and M Bechara, and Los Angeles's set up by former American Apparel employees, may be behind the looser lines, popularising casually-fitting track pants, among other items. Some more longstanding, millennial-coded brands, such as Lululemon, are also now offering baggier fits or 'away-from-body styles', as Lululemon's chief merchandising officer put it. But, given the often hefty price tags, they appear to be aimed at older exercisers, who are generally more able to afford them. Meanwhile, other brands, such as Sweaty Betty, have been explicitly marketing the idea of wearing tighter, skimpier clothes, at least as part of an exercise ensemble, and disregarding body hang-ups: 'Wear the damn shorts' is the tagline from a campaign last year. While the generational divide may feel over-egged, what we wear to exercise reveals a lot about where we are at with body image. Several brands, for example, now do bottoms with 'scrunch' designs at the bum, to accentuate curves, because Kardashian-esque glutes remain idealised. It is a style that unites twentysomething 'TikTok gym girlies' and celebrities such as J-Lo. What you wear to exercise also depends on what exercise you are doing. Reformer pilates – the hyper-expensive and highly engineered full-body workout – makes more sense in cinched styles that won't get stuck in equipment. A jog in the park, less so. Subtle flares are becoming a thing for yoga, but they would be annoying on a treadmill, and a trip hazard on a squash court. There are also other, shall we say, external factors. 'There's a fear of people taking advantage and hypersexualising and dehumanising folks, particularly women, in these spaces,' says Samantha Noelle Sheppard, a Cornell professor who writes about sport. What she often sees is a 'mix of tight and baggy, like really tight shorts' with an oversized shirt, as a way to keep unwanted eyes off bodies not looking to be objectified. Shakaila Forbes-Bell, a fashion psychologist, has been seeing more conversations among gen Z about wearing baggier clothing for the gym tied to 'what is for the male gaze and what is for me'. Again, though, this doesn't have to be generational. Navi Ahluwalia, an editor at fashion and sportswear site Hypebae, is a millennial who typically goes for 'leggings with a baggier top'. While she loves 'the way the tighter gym clothes look', she also hates 'the feeling of people looking at me while I exercise, so I personally don't want to draw any attention to myself – particularly not from creepy men'. I would hazard that most, if not all, women who exercise in public will have had similar thoughts. Burke says: 'A fair few of our clients will stay in activewear all day, for coffee, work and the school run, due to our studio being less on the sweaty side.' That tallies with the continued march of gymwear as everyday wear. At least part of this is about comfort; activewear is forgiving when working from home and, at least in my case, practical, when combined with the hope that a trip to the gym (or a 20-minute Yoga with Adriene) is just moments away. It also, consciously or not, broadcasts status. 'You think it shows fitness and the idea of an athletic body and a healthy mind,' says Sheppard. 'But what it shows is a healthy bank account.' '[It is] meant to be performative in all these different kinds of ways,' she says. 'Not only do you look like you have the time to work out, you have the resources to work out – go do your pilates, go do your Peloton class – in a very expensive set.' Looking like a 'gym person', then, perhaps particularly for a younger gen Z crowd, comes with cultural capital. It is not the first time gym gear has been loaded with meaning. In an article in 2019, New Yorker writer Jia Tolentino posited athleisure as a uniform that represented the principle of 'optimisation': 'the process of making something, as the dictionary puts it, 'as fully perfect, functional, or effective as possible''. Athleisure, she said, was designed to optimise your appearance at the same time as your performance. But not on everybody. Lululemon founder Chip Wilson made this explicit. 'The definition of a brand is that you're not everything to everybody … You've got to be clear that you don't want certain customers coming in,' he said in a 2013 interview. As Tolentino wrote: 'Athleisure broadcasts your commitment to controlling your body through working out.' You create – if indeed you can and you want to – a body that fits athleisure rather than the athleisure moulding to fit you. Okafor looks back to her days of trying to make ill-fitting, tight gymwear work. No matter 'how high I pull up the waistband, no matter how much I try to shuffle about with the sports bra, it still doesn't look right to me'. Clothes seemed to have been designed in a way that wasn't 'honouring' her shape. 'It's just like: 'Oh, you're not skinny?' It's the thoughtlessness of how these things are made that reinforces that I wasn't being considered.' A host of brands now make exercise clothes constructed with different bodies in mind. Okafor cites Grrrl as one (tagline: 'We make real clothes for real women who simply don't care'). Forbes-Bell says the brand Curvy Kate has created 'sports bras for larger-chested women at more affordable prices', something that has been a battle for her since she was a teenager. And Gymshark is 'creating a lot of more inclusive clothing: size-inclusive, more modest wear as well. For gym clothing, that was very scarce before.' With all the new and improved tight gym gear out there, if younger women in their 20s are still opting for baggier styles, could it be for other reasons? Okafor sees 'all manners of bodies and ages' at her pole studio and thinks that, in general, younger generations are 'giving themselves more space'. Sheppard sees this as a response to our times. Young people 'are living in a period of global crises that make the focus on themselves seem too indulgent … It's like, just put on clothes. We've got bigger problems.' Ultimately, if there is more room for divergence from a workout uniform, then it might have benefits for all generations. 'How many people would probably want to go to the gym and work out if they could wear clothes that didn't make them feel embarrassed?' asks Okafor. 'It's about questioning the motivations,' says Forbes-Bell. 'And I think that's empowering, whether it's baggy or whether it's tight, that idea of: 'Why am I actually wearing this? What am I trying to achieve?''
The Sun
a day ago
- The Sun
I tried UK's wackiest ice cream flavours from pickled onion to Bisto – the crazy £4.50 winner surprised me
WHATEVER will Mr Whippy say? To compete, he may need to stick more than a 99 Flake in his cone. An ice-cream parlour in posh Knightsbridge, Central London has come up with some very crazy flavours, ranging from, er, Twiglets, to Bisto and Irn-Bru. 11 Summer pop-up The Ice Cream Project is the idea of eccentric fashion designer Anya Hindmarch, as Waitrose recently revealed Gen Z enjoy a twist of baked beans, soya sauce or cheese in their tubs. She bills her ices, at £4.50 a scoop, as 'a celebration of Britain 's kitchen cupboard culture'. But do we likey-lick? Alexander McLeod, right, tries Anya's ice creams and gives his verdicts and marks out of ten . . . Jacob's Twiglets MALTY, yeasty and spiked with a Marmite tang. It's also smooth, which feels strange given how much your brain expects crunch. Oddly, I quite liked it. Rating: 7/10 Punters divided over Scots takeaways loaded ice cream fries Quaker Oats SWEET, toasted oat flavour was bland and packed all the joy of a cold bowl of porridge. This ice cream has a velvety vanilla base but is a little coarse. Rating: 5/10 Filippo Berio Extra Virgin Olive Oil CREAMY base has fruity richness of quality olive oil. Gentle peppery taste lingers to keep you interested. Smooth and balanced. Rating: 8/10 Bisto Gravy SUBTLE gravy flavour brings roast-dinner warmth but frozen into a silky, scoopable form that nearly works. Shows even Bisto can be made posh. Rating: 6/10 Romney's Kendal Mint Cake AS snow-white as the original slab, this captures that sharp mint sweetness. Refreshing palate- cleanser. Rating: 7/10 Flying Goose Sriracha IT'S Sriracha from the first icy hit – tangy, garlicky, with a slow-building heat that creeps up on you. Bold and strange but not entirely unlikeable. Rating: 6/10 Garner's Pickled Onion NORMALLY, when you smell a dish from across the room, it's a good sign. Not here. Vinegary, briny punch feels more like a dare than dessert. Rating: 2/10 Ovaltine MALTED warmth comforts like a favourite jumper. Balances the sweetness and slight earthiness well, and is really quite nice. Rating: 7/10 Irn-Bru BRIGHT orange and proudly so, this sorbet looks and tastes just like the drink. Fizzy on the tongue, and very sweet. Perfect for a hot summer day. Rating: 6/10 McVitie Club Orange NOSTALGIC mix of milk chocolate and zesty orange. The crushed-biscuit pieces provide enjoyable texture and crunch.
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Gen Z are meant to be tech-savvy... but 1.5 million admit they were duped online by social media ticket scams to see their favourite bands
Millions of supposedly tech-savvy Gen Zs admit they have been easily scammed on social media trying to get sold out tickets to see their favourite music artists. A survey found a shocking 1.5 million of the youngsters (21 per cent) admitted to being fooled online by fraudsters last summer when buying tickets for live music events. And 2.2 million of the digital natives (32 per cent) admitted to being scammed on either Facebook Marketplace or Instagram. Despite over half (52 per cent) of Gen Zs having seen an increase in suspicious ticket listings in social media since last year, they are still falling for the scams. As the most prolific social media users, they are set to lose a total of £685.9million to fraudsters tricking them online. The research by StubHub UK found that the younger generation were so desperate to get their hands on the tickets that they failed to do basic due diligence. A quarter (25 per cent) of those that were scammed admitted they didn't check the seller's identity before transferring them the money. What's more, over two in ten (21 per cent) of Gen Z also revealed they would rather risk it in a desperate bid to see their favourite act, than miss out on a must-see concert. How to avoid ticket scams 1. Buy from a trusted marketplace Always use well-established marketplaces which offer secure transactions and good customer ratings on independent review platforms like Trustpilot. 2. Check for buyer protections Ensure the platform offers guarantees against fraud, non-delivery, or cancellation 3. Make sure you can get help if you need it Look for customer support that has a human at the end of the phone, so you are supported if you have any questions or concerns. 4. Pay securely Always use a credit or debit card for additional fraud protection. Avoid bank transfers or cash payments, which offer little recourse in case of scams. 5. Verify ticket information Check that the event details, seat locations, and ticket types match what is advertised on official event pages. Avoid listings with vague information 6. Be wary of prices that seem too good to be true! If a deal looks too cheap compared to market prices, it may not be legitimate 'Remember, don't risk it! Avoid purchasing tickets from social media sites such as Facebook, TikTok and WhatsApp where your transactions are not protected and you are more vulnerable to scams,' say the experts at StubHub UK Meanwhile 30 per cent of Brits between the ages of 25-34 admitted to being scammed when buying tickets for live events last summer on social media - the equivalent of 1.4 million Millennials. It comes as UK music fans could be hit by nine million scam attempts on social media in their search for gig tickets this summer, as it's revealed almost a third (32 per cent) would resort to using social media to find last minute tickets for their favourite artists. While London sees high volumes, scammers are increasingly targeting fans in Leeds, Birmingham and Manchester, which are now the scamming hotspots outside the capital. This will likely spike ahead of major tours set to begin this summer by major artists like Oasis, Billie Eilish, Lana Del Rey and Olivia Rodrigo. The research follows hundreds of Oasis fans who have fallen victim to scams amid the rush to buy tour tickets and lost £346 on average, according to a high street bank's analysis of its own data. Lloyds Bank said hundreds of fans desperate to see the Gallagher brothers' reunion tour had fallen victim to fraudsters, with more than 90 per cent of reported cases starting with fake adverts or posts on social media. Victims have been asked to pay upfront for the tickets and once payment has been made, the scammers vanished, leaving many out of pocket. Scams involved fake adverts, posts or listings on social media, offering tickets at discounted prices or access to events that have already sold out at inflated prices, the bank said. Purchase scams can happen when someone is tricked into sending money via bank transfer to buy goods or services that are fake, shoddy or do not exist. Ticket scams often involve fake adverts, posts or listings on social media, offering tickets or access to sold-out events. Victims are asked to pay up front for the tickets, but once this is done, the scammers disappear. The buyer is left without the tickets and out of pocket.
