PM Modi Meets Canadian PM, Calls India-Canada Ties "Extremely Important"
Kananaskis, Canada:
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday said relations between India and Canada are "extremely important" and the two nations should work together to achieve win-win cooperation in various sectors.
Prime Minister Modi and his Canadian counterpart Mark Carney held bilateral discussions on the margins of the G7 Summit here. This was the first meeting between the two leaders since Carney assumed office in May 2025.
Congratulating Carney on his "grand victory" in the election, PM Modi said, "I am sure under your leadership, we will be able to work together in a positive way and take the India-Canada relationship forward." "I believe that India-Canada relations are extremely important and India and Canada should work together and achieve win-win cooperation in several areas," PM Modi said in his remarks ahead of the bilateral meeting.
Sharing my remarks during meeting with PM @MarkJCarney of Canada. https://t.co/rPd42cqsbv
— Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) June 17, 2025
He said Canadian companies have invested in India in a big way, and Indian people have also invested in Canada substantially.
"We both stand for democratic values. Together, we can strengthen democratic values, we can strengthen humanity," PM Modi said, adding that if the two nations work together and optimally utilise all their resources, "We can work for the welfare of the entire humanity." "I am extremely confident that we'll be able to do this task," said PM Modi, who is in Canada at the invitation of Carney to attend the G7 Summit.
"Had an excellent meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney. Complimented him and the Canadian Government for successfully hosting the G7 Summit," PM Modi said in an X post.
"India and Canada are connected by a strong belief in democracy, freedom and rule of law. PM Carney and I look forward to working closely to add momentum to the India-Canada friendship. Areas like trade, energy, space, clean energy, critical minerals, fertilisers and more offer immense potential in this regard," he said.
In his opening remarks ahead of the meeting, Carney said it was a great honour to host PM Modi at the G7.
He said India has been participating in the G7 since 2018, and this is a "testament to the importance of your country, to your leadership, and to the importance of the issues that we look to tackle together - from energy security, from the energy transition that you're hoping to lead, to the future of artificial intelligence, to the fight that we have against transnational repression, against terrorism, against other factors, and the work that we can do together." "It is my great honour to have you here. I enjoyed your intervention just now and look forward to our discussion," Carney said.
PM Modi further said that he was happy to get the opportunity to visit Canada after 2015 and to be in touch with the people of Canada.
This is his first visit to Canada in a decade.
"India is the largest democracy in the world. During our chair of the G20 Summit, we took many initiatives for the welfare of the world, and today we are extending that resolve through the G7 summit and going to execute it through the help of this platform as well." PM Modi said this is a great opportunity "for us to serve the public good, the global good. It has always been India's intention to promote global goods, and today through G7 we have that same opportunity." Carney's invitation to PM Modi to attend the G7 Summit signalled the new government's intent to repair the ties with New Delhi that plummeted to an all-time low over the killing of pro-Khalistani separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar.
In October last year, India recalled its high commissioner and five other diplomats after Ottawa attempted to link them to the Nijjar case. India also expelled an equal number of Canadian diplomats.
India had accused former prime minister Justin Trudeau's government of allowing pro-Khalistani elements to operate from Canadian soil.
Carney, an economist and political newcomer, took charge as Canada's new prime minister in March following the exit of Trudeau from the top office.
After Trudeau's exit, New Delhi said it hoped to rebuild ties with Canada based on "mutual trust and sensitivity".
In the last few months, the security officials of India and Canada resumed contact and both sides were looking at the possibility of appointing new high commissioners.
Describing India and Canada as "vibrant democracies", the external affairs ministry said last week that New Delhi believes the forthcoming meeting between the prime ministers of the two countries on the sidelines of the G7 Summit will offer an important opportunity to exchange views and "explore pathways" to reset bilateral ties.
During PM Modi's last visit in 2015, bilateral ties were elevated to the level of strategic partnership.
Bilateral trade in goods in 2024 stood at USD 8.6 billion. India exported USD 4.2 billion and imported USD 4.4 billion worth of goods. Bilateral trade in services in 2024 stood at USD 14.3 billion, with India exporting USD 2.5 billion and importing USD 11.8 billion worth of services.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
For its economy, India must get closer to the world
There is a general sense that India is an inward-looking economy. After all, agriculture makes up a fifth of the economy, and India is more domestic demand-driven than some export-led Asian neighbours. Having said that, we find that India has grown at its fastest pace in periods of rising integration with the world. We use the rolling correlation between India and world growth as a measure of global integration and find that 2000-2010 stands out as a period of rising global integration. Back then, India was slashing import tariffs and integrating further into global trade networks, resulting in a higher share of global exports and stronger GDP growth. In the following decade, 2010-2020, India became more protectionist and started to raise import tariffs. This period marked a fall in the country's global export share and GDP growth. We also find that in the last few years, those following the pandemic, there has been a move back towards stronger global integration, though so far it remains a tad one-sided — more financial integration, less trade integration. One may argue that higher global integration exposes a country to global volatility, which may be negative for growth. We find that the positive impact of being more integrated with the world outweighs and is longer lasting than the negative impact of being exposed to global shocks. All said, deeper interlinkages with the world have led to higher growth, more than offsetting the negative impact of the rise in volatility. Next, we look at how India's global integration has impacted different sectors. We find that consumption is most integrated with world growth (95 per cent), followed by investment (70 per cent), and then exports (35 per cent). Surprising, as one would imagine exports would be the most globally aligned. One reason for this could be that India's global connections are stronger in finance. Indian equity markets have become far more aligned with global equities over the last two decades. And this impacts consumption. But integration remains weaker in trade, which influences exports and investment. We delve deeper, breaking down consumption into two parts — discretionary (good-to-have) and essentials (must-have) — and find that discretionary consumption has a much higher correlation with world growth. This is understandable. If indeed financial integration has been strong, it is likely to have impacted incomes at the top of the pyramid. High-end consumers, who are typically high-income earners, tend to be better-integrated with (or invested in) financial markets. Meanwhile, those associated with sectors like agriculture and small firms, where incomes may not be as high, are in general limited to consuming the essentials. This consumption group may not have extra money left over to invest in financial markets. Within investment, we find that corporate investment has a higher correlation with world growth compared to household investment. Again, this is not surprising. We find that corporate capex globally moves in unison, driven by common factors like risk sentiment that impact the flow of foreign direct investment (FDI). But household investment, which makes up a larger share of investment, and includes both real estate and investment by small firms, is not as globally integrated. We also look at the surprisingly low level of integration of India's export growth with global growth. The fall in integration here was more pronounced in the decade when India was raising import tariffs, which we believe hurt export performance, especially in a world of value-added supply chains. We divide exports into high-tech exports (like electronics, drugs and pharma and automobiles), and labour-intensive mid-tech exports (textiles, footwear, furniture, and toys). We find that growth in high-tech exports has been strong, but mid-tech exports have been sluggish for a decade. From this, we can deduce that India's trade integration with the world has been weak, mainly due to sluggish mid-tech exports. Bringing all the sectors together, we now have two distinct groups in the economy — one with 'stronger financial integration' with the world, and another with 'weak trade integration'. Those who have been able to enjoy the gains of financial integration have seen incomes and discretionary consumption rise. Many of these individuals are associated with large firms (where global capex is globally correlated) or new businesses (for example, the rapid rise of professional services exports). On the other hand, lower global integration in mid-tech exports explains weaker growth and incomes, and why individuals in these sectors are largely focused on consumption of essentials, without much surplus left over for investment. To us, measures that raise mid-tech labour-intensive exports can boost India's trade interlinkages, mass consumption, and GDP growth. An opportunity to deepen trade linkages is knocking on the door. If supply chains are rejigged during the second Trump presidency due to higher tariffs on large exporters, and the world is looking for new producers, India may get a chance to integrate more deeply with global value chains. If sectors such as electronics, textiles, furniture, and footwear are where global opportunities from potential supply rejigging lie, as we have seen from Vietnam, which made significant progress in the first Trump presidency, it is worth noting that India is already a player, with room to grow further, given advantages such as low wage costs. Incidentally, China's excess capacity in these mid-tech sectors is less pronounced. Space for another manufacturer may well exist. But first, India needs to make changes. And there is good news here. Potential US tariffs may have become a catalyst for external reforms, such as lowering the import tariffs India levies on others and fast-tracking trade deals. Some domestic reforms are also being pursued, for instance, a deregulation drive across the central and state governments, which could help improve the ease of doing business. These are steps in the right direction. But for results, these reforms will have to run deep. The writer is chief India economist, HSBC
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
On Israel-Iran conflict, what Trump does — or does not do — is key
The Israeli government claims its attack on Iran is 'pre-emptive', that it is intended to neutralise Tehran's ability to develop a nuclear bomb. That claim does not stand the test of international law — Israel's aggression is a violation of it. It also thumbed its nose at the Trump administration — the only nuclear-armed state in West Asia began its offensive just days before the US and Iran were due to resume the sixth round of negotiations around the latter's efforts to develop nuclear weapons. US intelligence assessments have reportedly concluded that Iran, which is retaliating with ballistic missiles aimed at Israel, was 'years' away from achieving nuclear strike capability. Israel has been bombing military and governmental installations, while also carrying out a string of assassinations — of nuclear scientists, and also of senior Iranian military officers. Five days into the conflict, it is becoming increasingly apparent that Israel's objective is regime change. The closest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has come to admitting this was in a recent interview to a US TV channel, where he said that regime change 'could certainly be the result because the Iran regime is very weak'. Netanyahu has appealed to the 'proud people of Iran' to rise up for their 'freedom from an evil and repressive regime'. The exhortation is ominous. Time and again, regime change orchestrated or forced upon countries by foreign powers has led to disastrous consequences — political instability, protracted violence, and the collapse of state institutions. From Iraq under Saddam Hussein to Libya under Muammar Gaddafi, and the eventual return of the Taliban in Afghanistan, recent history is replete with cautionary tales. There are serious questions about the legitimacy of the Ali Khamenei regime — the 2022 protests following the death of Mahsa Amini were a clear signal of its growing unpopularity. Yet it is hard to imagine that the Iranian people would be galvanised to align themselves with a foreign power that is bombing their territory. What unfolds next will also largely depend on how the US chooses to navigate this crisis. The 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), signed under Barack Obama, arguably curtailed Iran's nuclear ambitions more effectively than any military campaign could. That deal was unilaterally abandoned by President Donald Trump, prompting Iran to gradually renege on its commitments. Today, Trump shows little inclination to press Netanyahu for a ceasefire — even as he himself has acknowledged receiving signals from Iran seeking de-escalation. His early exit from the G7 summit, ostensibly to focus on 'something bigger', adds to the uncertainty. As the world waits, global powers must urgently press Israel to work towards a ceasefire, open spaces for diplomacy. If not, an entrenched regime in Tehran, weakened post October 7, will be further pushed against the wall by a Tel Aviv that has arrogated to itself a free pass making peace all the more elusive.
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
After PM Modi's meeting with Mark Carney, India, Canada agree to reinstate high commissioners
Following Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his counterpart Mark Carney's bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the G7 Summit, India and Canada Wednesday agreed to designate new high commissioners in their capitals aiming to return to regular services to citizens and businesses in both countries. Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, while speaking about the meeting, said: 'The Prime Ministers agreed to take calibrated steps to restore stability to this very important relationship and the first of these steps that was agreed on was to restore High Commissioners to each other's capitals at an early date. Other diplomatic steps will follow in due course.' A statement in this regard was also issued by the office of the Canadian Prime Minister, stating that Carney and Modi reaffirmed the importance of Canada-India ties based upon mutual respect, the rule of law, and a commitment to the principle of sovereignty and territorial integrity. 'The leaders agreed to designate new high commissioners, with a view to returning to regular services to citizens and businesses in both countries,' the statement added. In October last year, diplomatic ties between the two nations had hit a low after India had expelled six Canadian diplomats. New Delhi had also announced that it was withdrawing its High Commissioner Sanjay Verma and other 'targeted' officials from Canada after strongly dismissing Ottawa's allegations linking the envoy to a probe into the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, in a major downturn in already frosty ties between the two nations. Verma was declared a 'person of interest' by Canada in its investigation into the June 2023 killing of Nijjar, a Canadian citizen who has been declared a Khalistani terrorist by India.
