Couple charged with submitting false claims
The couple aged 54 and 57 pleaded not guilty to all their separate and joint charges before judge Jason Juga today.
On the first count, they were accused of abetting a company manager in submitting a set of documents containing false particulars, namely claims for MeSTI and Halal certification services in the food industry for entrepreneurs under the Sabah SMI Assistance Programme (BAIKS) 2022, including renovation works when in fact the alleged services were never carried out.
The alleged offence was committed at a department's office here on November 11, 2022.
On the second count, they were alleged to have committed a similar offence by submitting a set of documents containing false particulars, namely claims for MeSTI, My Food Tag and Halal certification under BAIKS 2023, including renovation works which allegedly was never carried out.
This alleged offence was committed at the same department on November 2, 2023.
As for their joint charge, the couple is accused of submitting an invoice from another company dated Nov 7, 2023, along with 13 supporting delivery order documents containing false particulars.
These involved claims for the supply of 11 units of 100-litre machine retorts, two units of 150-litre machine retorts, registration and approval from the Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH), hydrostatic tests by DOSH, and premises registration for 13 units which were never carried out.
The alleged offence was committed at the same department on November 10, 2023.
The court set September 23 for pre-trial of the cases management.
For the first and second charges, the court set bail at RM20,000 with a RM3,000 deposit and one local surety each.
For their joint charge, the accused were released on RM20,000 bail with a RM3,000 deposit and one local surety.
The court had imposed additional conditions for the couple, including to report themselves to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission office every two months, to surrender their passports, if any, and not to contact the prosecution's witnesses.
The couple was represented by counsel Azhier Farhan Arisin.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
36 minutes ago
- The Star
Scam victims face trauma of losses
This visual is human-created, AI-aided. M'sians whose money vanished also have sleepless nights and trust issues PETALING JAYA: At 5am on April 1, 2023, Lawrence was jolted awake by a call from an unknown number. The voice on the line claimed to be from the Inland Revenue Board (LHDN), alleging there were irregularities in his taxes. Within minutes, the officer's tone hardened, telling him that unless he could prove his innocence, police would be sent and legal action taken. A few days earlier, Lawrence's sister had transferred a large sum to his account for a life insurance payment. Strangely, the caller seemed to know about this transaction. Shaken and afraid, the young professional – who was then less than a year into his first job – complied when asked to provide his online banking user ID and password. Moments later, the balance in his account was 'transferred out for investigation purposes'. The call was then passed to a man claiming to be a police officer, who sent over a photo ID. The image, Lawrence later discovered through a reverse search, was lifted from an old news report and bore no connection to the name given. Over eight hours, the line shuffled between supposed LHDN staff and police personnel, each reinforcing the elaborate fiction. When the realisation hit, Lawrence lodged a police report. Two weeks later, he was interviewed by an investigating officer, but he has heard nothing since. For Nisa (identity withheld for privacy), the trap came wrapped in opportunity. Two years ago, the administrative assistant saw messages on WhatsApp promising 'easy money' by liking and sharing YouTube videos. The senders claimed to represent a legitimate-sounding company, and small payments did land in her account after she completed tasks. Soon, the offer escalated: a group investment scheme in a Telegram chat, filled with glowing success stories. At first, small investments brought small returns. Then came the pressure – warnings that her earlier gains would vanish unless she invested more. By the time she realised she had lost RM14,000, the so-called 'investment guru' was still urging her to send more to recover her funds. A visit to the company's listed address revealed an empty office. Like Lawrence, she lodged a police report, only to be told little could be done. They are just two of thousands of Malaysians caught in the web of online scams, which have evolved from crude phishing emails to highly targeted, psychologically-manipulative operations. Despite record-breaking enforcement – 2.1 billion suspicious calls and messages blocked between 2022 and August 2025, and over 112,000 scam posts removed – predators are still finding their way in. For victims, the losses go beyond money. They carry paranoia, sleepless nights and a shaken trust in the systems meant to protect them – and in a world where a phone call can erase years of savings in hours, that trust is a currency they may never get back. In July, Digital Minister Gobind Singh Deo announced that his ministry would present a cybersecurity enforcement strategy to the Cabinet, prepared by CyberSecurity Malaysia, with a proposal for a dedicated enforcement agency to better implement existing laws. The plan involves cooperation between the Home Ministry, the Communications Ministry and the Law and Institutional Reform Ministry. But until that strategy moves from paper to practice, victims like Lawrence and Nisa remain stranded between the moment their money vanished and the day justice finally arrives.
New Straits Times
9 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Civil servant among seven remanded over RM139k false claims
MELAKA: Seven people comprising a civil servant and six contractors were remanded for five days starting today to assist in investigations into allegations of submitting false claims totalling RM139,000 last year. The remand order until Monday against the suspects, aged 32 to 52, was issued by magistrate N. Sivashangari after receiving an application from the Melaka Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC). According to a source, all the suspects were detained between 11.24am and 12.05pm yesterday when they appeared to give statements at the Melaka MACC office. "They are being investigated for the offence of submitting supply work documents involving six different companies to obtain claims for the supply of food and beverage services totalling RM139,100 when the supply was never carried out," said the source. The case is being investigated under Section 18 of the MACC Act 2009 which, if convicted, carries a fine not less than five times the value of the false items or RM10,000, whichever is higher, and imprisonment not exceeding 20 years.
Daily Express
9 hours ago
- Daily Express
Business couple pleads not guilty to RM3.6 million false claim charges
Published on: Thursday, August 14, 2025 Published on: Thu, Aug 14, 2025 By: Cynthia D Baga Text Size: Anita and Ang, both wearing face masks, leaving the court. KOTA KINABALU: A husband-and-wife business duo have claimed trial to charges of abetting a company director in submitting false claims amounting to more than RM3.6 million to the Department of Industrial Development and Research (DIDR). Anita Mohamed, 54, and Ang Ka Fat @ Kenny, 57, pleaded not guilty to their respective charges when brought before Sessions Court Judge Jason Juga on Thursday. Both face two separate charges each, as well as one joint charge, over the alleged offences. The charges were framed under Section 28(1)(c) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009, read together with Section 18 of the same Act, and punishable under Section 24(2). Upon conviction, the provision carries a maximum 20-year prison sentence and a fine of at least five times the value of the false particulars, or RM10,000, whichever is higher. The documents were allegedly submitted to an administrative assistant at the DIDR office between 2022 and 2023. The court set Sept 23 for pre-trial case management and released both on bail, with counsel Azhier Farhan Arisin representing them. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
