Special Tribunal interdicts payment of pension fund to former NLC manager
The interdict, granted by the Special Tribunal on June 10, bars Sanele Dlamini from accessing his pension benefits until the SIU's main case, a civil recovery action tied to the misallocation of R6m in NLC grant funds, is concluded.
The tribunal directed Liberty's Corporate Selection Umbrella Retirement Fund to assess and disclose the value of Dlamini's pension within 60 days.
'This preservation is intended to ensure that funds remain available for potential recovery should the SIU succeed in its claim', SIU spokesperson Kaizer Kganyago said.
Dlamini, who held several senior positions at the NLC, including provincial manager for KwaZulu-Natal, senior manager: grant operations and acting COO, was found guilty on four of six disciplinary charges related to misconduct during his tenure.
'The charges included approving falsified progress reports, as well as gross negligence and dereliction of duty. His dismissal was finalised on October 4 2024 after the disciplinary process.'
Kganyago said the SIU's investigation revealed that the NLC-funded project — a sports complex — was never initiated, and supporting documents, including progress reports and financial statements, were falsified.
Dlamini, who facilitated the irregular disbursement of R3m to the Motheo Sports and Entertainment Foundation, cosigned the fraudulent progress report without verifying the site or documentation, enabling the unlawful payout.
Kganyago said the SIU pursued a preservation order to limit the risk of a 'hollow judgment' if funds were released, noting concerns that Dlamini might lack sufficient assets to satisfy future claims.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
11 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Former NLC board member Advocate Huma ordered to pay back R21-million received in unlawful grants
JOHANNESBURG - Former National Lotteries Commission (NLC) board member Advocate William Elias Huma has been ordered to pay back R21-million he received in unlawful grants. Between August and September 2020, the NLC awarded two grants to non-profit organisations linked to the family members of Huma. The grants were for the empowerment of women, youth and disabled people living in the villages of the Bojanala District in the northwest. In its judgment, the special tribunal, which presides over matters brought by the special investigating unit, found that the grant money was not used for its intended purposes. "The tribunal further found former NLC board member, advocate William Elias Huma, his affiliated entities, and the beneficiary organisations caused the NLC to suffer damages in the amount of R21,158,118.00, citing egregious misconduct, negligence, dishonesty, and violations of fiduciary duties," said Special Investigating Unit (SIU) spokesperson, Kaizer Kganyago. The respondents are ordered to repay in full R 21,158.118.00. The SIU has already commenced the process to execute the order and recover the full amount from the respondents. The process is ongoing."
TimesLIVE
15 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
SIU ready to recover R21m in lottery grant funding
The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) says it has already started the process of executing an order of the Special Tribunal which set aside grant funding of R21m made by the National Lotteries Commission (NLC). The tribunal reviewed and set aside two NLC grant funding applications and ordered a former board member, advocate William Huma, to pay back the amount in full. The SIU said on Monday this was the first judgment that set aside grant funding in its NLC investigation. 'The SIU has now filed 18 NLC review applications to set aside grants. The total value of the funds involved in these review and preservation applications amounts to R320m. More review applications can be expected.' In the judgment in June, the Special Tribunal reviewed and set aside the 2019 NLC decision to award R16.5m to the Samaritan Initiative NPO, a hijacked entity allegedly controlled by Huma's relatives. The funds were allocated for community upliftment projects, including a chicken farming initiative for the residents of Marikana, North West. 'The SIU investigation found that the funds were misappropriated by Silverlite Trading (Pty) Ltd, which Huma later took control as the sole director. The farm is now in a dilapidated state and has never benefited the community of Marikana,' the SIU said. The tribunal also set aside a 2020 grant of R4.6m to Reagile NPC, directed by Huma's wife and nephew. The SIU said no tangible community benefits were delivered. It said the tribunal found that Huma abused his position to funnel funds to entities linked to his family. 'His conduct was deemed 'egregious, negligent, and dishonest', causing the NLC to suffer losses of R21,158,118.' The tribunal said Huma failed to disclose conflicts of interest, contravening the Lotteries Act and his fiduciary duties. 'To ensure there is cash available to recover the full amount lost by the NLC, the SIU, through the tribunal, preserved R10m, which are the proceeds of a sale of Huma's Waterkloof property, which amount is now executable.' As part of the ongoing NLC investigations, the SIU preserved a number of assets belonging to Huma and linked to NLC funds. These include a farm and a boutique hotel, both in North West. This preservation is linked to another NLC investigation. 'As part of implementing the order, the SIU will conduct auctions for the properties in question. The proceeds generated from these auctions will be directed back to the NLC to support projects aimed at uplifting communities, rather than benefiting individuals or their close associates.' The SIU was authorised in terms of a proclamation issued by President Cyril Ramaphosa in 2020 to investigate allegations of corruption and maladministration in the affairs of the NLC and recover any financial losses suffered by the state.
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Fixed electricity charge suspension fails to ease financial strain
Residents say they remain under financial strain despite the CoE's decision to suspend a controversial fixed electricity charge. Following protests in Tembisa, Mayor Nkosindiphile Xhakaza announced the suspension of the R126 fixed tariff fee (including VAT) that came into effect on July 1. But some residents believe the suspension offers little relief. Resident Pontsho Ramatsoma said, 'It feels like a tactic to calm the community. Once we've forgotten, they might bring it back. If they wanted to help, they would scrap the increases completely.' Ramatsoma said his monthly electricity bill has more than doubled from R500 to over R1 000, forcing him to cut expenses and change his usage habits. He also criticised the city's communication efforts. He also touched on the CoE's (CoE) communication rollout before the tariff increases came into effect. 'There are elderly people who are not on social media or don't have the comprehension skills to understand the language used to communicate the tariff increases. The city should prioritise sending their employees to engage with the community in a manner that allows them to enquire if they need clarity,' he said. Another resident, Dimakatso Motsoenening, added that the cost of electricity had made it difficult to get by daily. 'Life is unaffordable. We're already struggling to put butter on expensive bread. Add these increases, and we might as well starve. What we need is relief, not increases. Electricity has become a luxury,' she said. This issue has not only affected the working class but also the unemployed. Unemployed resident James Lombard wrote to the Springs Advertiser, explaining that his R350 monthly electricity budget now buys 75kWh instead of 131kWh, an effective hike of 75%. 'If I still wanted 131kWh, it would cost me around R612. How can they justify this?' Responding to enquiries, CoE spokesperson Zweli Dlamini said the sharp increases for low-use households were primarily due to a new fixed R109.78 monthly charge for Tariff A2 prepaid users. Tariff A1 has no fixed charge and is aimed at indigent households. 'Tariff A1 does not have fixed charges and is suitable for indigent consumers. This charge applies regardless of how little electricity is used, thus pushing up the effective price per unit cost for small consumers. This structure was introduced to ensure fair recovery of infrastructure maintenance costs, which are independent of use levels,' Dlamini said. He addressed Lombard's concerns over the unit prices by explaining that an increase of 11.32% was implemented for prepaid users (tariffs A1 and A2) with an additional fixed charge of R109.78 for Tariff A2 customers. Therefore, 131kWh will now cost R240.90 for Tariff A1 and R515.8 for Tariff A2 customers. Dlamini added there are measures in place to protect the vulnerable households, such as the provision of Free Basic Electricity 50kWh to customers on Tariff A1 (registered indigent households), the Indigent Policy, which provides relief on municipal services including electricity, for which households must be registered, and lastly, the phased implementation of fixed charges that was used to ease the transition. The city acknowledged the concerns raised about the recent tariff adjustments. 'Formal notices were published through official channels, including the city's website, newspapers and council presentations. Going forward, the city is committed to improving the clarity of tariff announcements, using relatable examples that reflect real household scenarios, enhancing engagement through ward councillor briefings, public meetings, digital platforms and issuing simplified tariff guides, showing the total monthly cost under different consumption levels,' Dlamini concluded.
