Former Afghan army officer says UK data breach put his life ‘more at risk' from the Taliban
A former Afghan army officer who worked with UK military advisors and Nato during the war has told ITV News the Government data breach has made his life harder and left him "more at risk".
After working in what he described as a 'dangerous' role for the UK military, he was left behind, like many others, during Britain's chaotic evacuation from Kabul in August 2021.
To support those left behind and at serious risk from the Taliban, the government launched the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap), which offers relocation to the UK for those who qualify.
But in February 2022, a defence official accidentally released a dataset containing the personal details of nearly 19,000 Arap applicants.
The Ministry of Defence only became aware of the breach in August 2023, when parts of the dataset were anonymously posted in a Facebook group.
A superinjunction was issued by the High Court to try to stop the Taliban from discovering the leak.
That injunction was lifted on Tuesday after a review. Those affected were contacted by email and warned of the potential danger.
ITV News has spoken to a man who fled Afghanistan to protect himself and his family while on the run from the Taliban.
For security reasons, we cannot reveal his exact role. He told us that despite taking precautions since 2021, the data leak has made his life even harder.
"The UK Government's data breach has made things even harder. It exposed my personal information, making me and others even more at risk," he said.
Though he added that even with "all his suffering," he does not regret helping the UK mission.
He said that when the Taliban took over in 2021, they came to his home three times looking for him.
Fearing for his life, he said he had 'no choice' but to flee to another country.
Now on the run, he said: "I'm jobless. I do heavy jobs like truck loading and other things, just to buy food and pay rent."
He hopes, like others, that he will receive an offer to relocate to the UK under the Arap.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
Decision due on whether Palestine Action legal challenge can go ahead
The co-founder of Palestine Action will find out whether she can bring a legal challenge over the decision to ban the group as a terror organisation. Huda Ammori has made a bid to challenge Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's decision to proscribe the group under anti-terror laws, announced after the group claimed responsibility for action in which two Voyager planes were damaged at RAF Brize Norton on June 20. The ban means that membership of, or support for, the direct action group is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Earlier this month, lawyers for Ms Ammori asked a judge to allow her to bring a High Court challenge over the ban, describing it as an 'unlawful interference' with freedom of expression. Mr Justice Chamberlain will give his decision on whether the legal action can proceed on Wednesday. Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, told the court at the hearing on July 21 that the ban had made the UK 'an international outlier' and was 'repugnant'. Mr Husain added: 'The decision to proscribe Palestine Action had the hallmarks of an authoritarian and blatant abuse of power.' The Home Office is defending the legal action. Sir James Eadie KC, for the department, said in written submissions that by causing serious damage to property, Palestine Action was 'squarely' within part of the terrorism laws used in proscription. He said: 'There is no credible basis on which it can be asserted that the purpose of this activity is not designed to influence the Government, or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.' Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, saying that the vandalism of the two planes, which police said caused an estimated £7 million of damage, was 'disgraceful'. The bid for a full High Court challenge comes after Ms Ammori failed in a previous bid to temporarily block the ban coming into effect, and the Court of Appeal dismissed a challenge over that decision less than two hours before the proscription came into force on July 5.
Rhyl Journal
38 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Decision due on whether Palestine Action legal challenge can go ahead
Huda Ammori has made a bid to challenge Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's decision to proscribe the group under anti-terror laws, announced after the group claimed responsibility for action in which two Voyager planes were damaged at RAF Brize Norton on June 20. The ban means that membership of, or support for, the direct action group is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Earlier this month, lawyers for Ms Ammori asked a judge to allow her to bring a High Court challenge over the ban, describing it as an 'unlawful interference' with freedom of expression. Mr Justice Chamberlain will give his decision on whether the legal action can proceed on Wednesday. Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, told the court at the hearing on July 21 that the ban had made the UK 'an international outlier' and was 'repugnant'. Mr Husain added: 'The decision to proscribe Palestine Action had the hallmarks of an authoritarian and blatant abuse of power.' The Home Office is defending the legal action. Sir James Eadie KC, for the department, said in written submissions that by causing serious damage to property, Palestine Action was 'squarely' within part of the terrorism laws used in proscription. He said: 'There is no credible basis on which it can be asserted that the purpose of this activity is not designed to influence the Government, or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.' Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, saying that the vandalism of the two planes, which police said caused an estimated £7 million of damage, was 'disgraceful'. The bid for a full High Court challenge comes after Ms Ammori failed in a previous bid to temporarily block the ban coming into effect, and the Court of Appeal dismissed a challenge over that decision less than two hours before the proscription came into force on July 5.
North Wales Chronicle
38 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Decision due on whether Palestine Action legal challenge can go ahead
Huda Ammori has made a bid to challenge Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's decision to proscribe the group under anti-terror laws, announced after the group claimed responsibility for action in which two Voyager planes were damaged at RAF Brize Norton on June 20. The ban means that membership of, or support for, the direct action group is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Earlier this month, lawyers for Ms Ammori asked a judge to allow her to bring a High Court challenge over the ban, describing it as an 'unlawful interference' with freedom of expression. Mr Justice Chamberlain will give his decision on whether the legal action can proceed on Wednesday. Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, told the court at the hearing on July 21 that the ban had made the UK 'an international outlier' and was 'repugnant'. Mr Husain added: 'The decision to proscribe Palestine Action had the hallmarks of an authoritarian and blatant abuse of power.' The Home Office is defending the legal action. Sir James Eadie KC, for the department, said in written submissions that by causing serious damage to property, Palestine Action was 'squarely' within part of the terrorism laws used in proscription. He said: 'There is no credible basis on which it can be asserted that the purpose of this activity is not designed to influence the Government, or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.' Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, saying that the vandalism of the two planes, which police said caused an estimated £7 million of damage, was 'disgraceful'. The bid for a full High Court challenge comes after Ms Ammori failed in a previous bid to temporarily block the ban coming into effect, and the Court of Appeal dismissed a challenge over that decision less than two hours before the proscription came into force on July 5.
