Ex gratia I got at the time of layoff was taxed. Can I get refund?
If the ex gratia is paid voluntarily by the employer, say in appreciation of any personal qualities of the employee, such payment would not be taxable as salary. While various courts have held that such voluntary payment of ex gratia without any legal obligation and not in lieu of services rendered by the employee would be considered as a capital receipt and, therefore, not taxable, most of these decisions were before the introduction of section 56(2)(x). In my view, if such ex gratia is received voluntarily from a former employer, such amount would likely be taxable as income from other sources under section 56(2)(x) as it is received without any consideration.
If you wish to claim that the amount received is not taxable, you can claim a refund of the TDS deducted by your employer in your return of income. You would need to ensure that the amount of ex gratia received by you has been disclosed in the return as exempt income, and such a disclosure is also made in the schedule for TDS. However, as discussed above, such a view is unlikely to succeed as it may be taxable as income from other sources.
It is assumed that the entire amount of ex gratia received by you is voluntary and is not towards gratuity or under any voluntary retirement scheme as the taxability under each of these is different and may be exempt, subject to certain conditions as well as a threshold.
Mahesh Nayak, chartered accountant, CNK & Associates.
If you have a personal finance query, write to us at mintmoney@livemint.com to get it answered from experts
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Gensol employees face threat of double tax liability
Mumbai: Gensol Group companies deducted tax from employee salaries before going belly-up, but didn't deposit the tax deducted at source (TDS) with authorities for a year, four former executives who are aware of the matter said. That leaves about 2,200 former employees of the group in a situation where they might have to pay the taxes again, this time to the Income Tax department, as Indian law holds the employee liable for paying tax even where the employer is at fault, despite multiple court orders to the contrary. The group companies have not paid any salaries since March 2025, the former executives said on the condition of anonymity as they did not want to be publicly associated with the beleaguered group. Gensol Engineering and BluSmart Mobility went bankrupt amidst charges of promoters siphoning crores of rupees and misleading investors, and are separately undergoing corporate insolvency under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. 'They have not paid TDS since April 2024. I haven't filed my tax return yet. I don't know what to do," said one of the executives who quit months before the company went down. This executive added that employees have not received their Form 16 for the previous fiscal, which puts them in a spot over filing returns even as the 15 September deadline approaches. Form 16 is a certificate of TDS provided by the employer that helps employees reconcile tax deductions, and is an essential document for filing tax returns. A second former executive who is directly aware of the company's HR practices said that Gensol habitually deposited TDS lumpsum at the end of the year rather than making monthly deposits. 'They would always pay TDS late with penalties. Anmol (promoter Anmol Singh Jaggi) said that this was the company's usual practice," this person said. 'In a meeting with CXOs in March, he said he will pay TDS by 15 April. That never happened." The second executive added that there was no employee dashboard and 'the payrolls were made by hand". Queries sent to the promoters Anmol Singh Jaggi and Puneet Singh Jaggi on Monday remained unanswered as of press time Tuesday. Meanwhile, Keshav Khaneja, Gensol Engineering's interim resolution professional, said that he does not have access to employee salaries or TDS data as everyone has left the firm. He is trying to piece together the information on pending employee dues, he said. Law vs courts Legal experts say that under the Income Tax Act, 1961, the liability lies on the employee even if the employer fails to deposit TDS with the tax department. This is despite the Delhi, Karnataka and Gujarat High Courts ruling separately that the employee was not liable. The case brings flashbacks of the infamous bankruptcy of Kingfisher Airlines from over a decade ago when thousands of employees were left without pay and their TDS was similarly not deposited with the tax department. The employees subsequently received tax notices, prompting many to move court. Eventually, the Delhi, Karnataka and Gujarat High Courts separately ruled that employees were not liable and authorities must recover the dues from the airline. More recently, several thousand employees of beleaguered edtech platform Byju's also found themselves in a similar conundrum. The Bombay High Court provided relief last September with a ruling that employees were not liable for unpaid TDS when the employer is undergoing corporate insolvency. 'Unfortunately, this relief is flowing from judicial pronouncements and not from the statute itself," said Amit Singhania, founder of Areete Law Offices. 'Therefore, again the employees may have to knock the door of the Court, to get relief from tax demand arising from non-payment of TDS." The background The Gensol Group employed about 2,200 people across its various companies including flagship Gensol Engineering, ride-sharing platform BluSmart Mobility and several other unlisted subsidiaries including Gensol Electric Vehicles, Gensol EV Leasing, and Matrix Gas and Renewables. When the company went kaput overnight earlier this year, many jumped at the first offer that came their way, the former executives said, while most hung on to the hope of a resolution and the recovery of their unpaid dues. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) filed its interim order against Gensol Engineering Ltd and its promoters on 15 April. The regulator accused the promoters of siphoning crores of rupees from the company for personal expenses, and said that there was a complete breakdown of internal controls and corporate governance norms at the Mumbai-listed company. 'The promoters were running a listed public company as if it were a proprietary firm. The Company's funds were routed to related parties and used for unconnected expenses, as if the Company's funds were promoters' piggybank," Sebi wrote in its interim order. The diverted funds would ultimately have to be written off from the company's books, resulting in losses to the investors, Sebi said. Sebi's final order in the case is still pending.
Time of India
12 hours ago
- Time of India
Parliament passes new Income Tax Bill: Rajya Sabha clears it by voice vote; to replace Income Tax Act 1961
. NEW DELHI: Parliament on Tuesday passed the New Income Tax Bill, 2025, with the Rajya Sabha clearing it by a voice vote and returning it to the Lok Sabha. The legislation, which replaces the six-decade-old Income Tax Act, 1961, aims to simplify tax procedures, cut compliance burdens, and modernise outdated provisions. Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman said the bill's language has been made simpler without introducing any new tax rates. She further explained that some parts of the Income Tax Act, 1961, have become outdated and a new law was necessary. The bill was passed in the Lok Sabha on Monday. It also incorporates recommendations from the Parliamentary Select Committee. Sitharaman thanked the committee for its scrutiny, noting that over 75,000 person-hours went into drafting the legislation. She also criticised the opposition for skipping debates on key bills like the Income Tax law. "I am shocked that the opposition doesn't want to participate," Sitharaman remarked after the opposition parties staged a walkout in both Houses despite earlier agreeing to a 16-hour debate in each. Key features of the New I-T Bill, 2025: The proposed legislation reduces text volume and sections by approximately 50%, presenting provisions in a more straightforward and comprehensible manner. It simplifies the taxation timeline by eliminating the complex distinction between assessment year and previous year, introducing a unified "tax year" concept. Allows taxpayers to claim refunds even when returns are submitted after deadlines, which should provide significant relief to individuals filing their taxes. Retains provisions for carrying forward losses and grants tax relief on anonymous donations to religious trusts. Cuts the TDS correction window from six years to two years, aiming to reduce disputes. Clarifies deductions applicable to commuted pension and gratuity payments received by family members. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays , public holidays , current gold rate and silver price .
Mint
13 hours ago
- Mint
Parliament approves new Income Tax Bill 2025, set to replace 1961 Act after six decades
Parliament passes new Income Tax Bill to replace IT Act, 1961. The Income Tax Bill, once enacted, will replace the archaic 6-decade-old income tax law. The legislation will make tax law simple by reducing the number of chapters and wordage. Lok Sabha passes new Income Tax Bill in just 3 minutes The Income Tax Bill (No.2) 2025 - a major legislative move to replace the 63-year-old law governing income taxation for individuals and corporations - was passed in the Lok Sabha on Monday in just three minutes, without any debate. The Bill, which streamlines TDS, exemptions and other compliance-heavy provisions as also allows individuals to claim refunds without penalty on delayed filings, was passed as the opposition parties continued to disrupt proceedings over allegations of irregularities in the special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, who had on August 8 withdrawn the Income Tax Bill, 2025 she had introduced in February, on Monday introduced an updated version incorporating recommendations made by a Parliamentary panel that scrutinised the legislation. Amid slogan shouting by the opposition, the bill was put to vote and passed by voice vote. The Bill will now go to the Rajya Sabha for approval and thereafter to the President for assent. It will become law once the Presidential assent is provided. The new bill reduces the size and complexity of the current Income Tax Act, drastically cutting the number of effective sections and chapters and nearly halving the word count. "Almost all of the recommendations of the Select Committee have been accepted by the Government. In addition, suggestions have been received from stakeholders about changes that would convey the proposed legal meaning more accurately," said the statement of Objects and Reasons of the Income Tax (No.2) Bill. It does away with the confusing concepts of assessment year and previous year, replacing them with easier to understand 'tax year'. According to the revised Bill, individuals will be allowed to claim TDS refund even if their return of income is filed beyond the statutory timeline provided for filing of the original income-tax return. Thus, the Finance Ministry has incorporated the provision of the existing Income Tax Act, 1961. The Income Tax (No.2) Bill provides for 'nil' TCS on Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS) remittances for education purposes financed by any financial institutions. Nangia Andersen LLP Partner Sandeep Jhunjhunwala said deductions in respect of certain inter-corporate dividends for companies opting for concessional rate of taxes have been re-introduced in line with the provisions of the existing Income-tax Act, 1961 The provisions relating to the carry forward and set-off of losses have been appropriately amended and the reference to the beneficial owner has been omitted to align with Section 79 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. "By enabling refunds for belated returns and harmonising definitions of Micro and Small enterprise with allied statutes, the Bill reflects a balanced, pragmatic, and taxpayer-oriented approach," Jhunjhunwala said. While the Bill has welcome changes for enhancing clarity and reducing litigations, there seems to be no significant changes made to contentious provisions surrounding search and seizure in the virtual digital space. The present act provides authorised officers to conduct search and seize assets and books of accounts of individuals who may be suspected to have any undisclosed income or documents in order to evade paying tax. This allowed the authority to break the lock on any door, box, or locker if they couldn't find their keys or had cause to believe that any books of accounts or undeclared valuables were being stored there. In the bill introduced in February, Clause 247 allows tax officers to bypass passwords and access digital platforms like emails and social media during searches if taxpayers refuse cooperation. It stipulates that an authorised officer, in consequence of information in his possession, has reason to believe, can "break open the lock of any door, box, locker, safe, almirah, or other receptacle for exercising the powers conferred by clause to enter and search any building, place, etc., where the keys thereof or the access to such building, place, etc., is not available, or gain access by overriding the access code to any said computer system, or virtual digital space, where the access code thereof is not available". This provision had sparked concerns around privacy. The updated bill states that tax authorities can "break open the lock of any door, box, locker, safe, almirah, or other receptacle or override the access code to any computer system ... where the keys thereof are, or the access to such building, place, etc., or the access code to such computer system ... is not available". While the 'digital space' is missing from the clause, it is included in the definition of computer systems. Tax experts believe that starting April 1, 2026, when the new income tax law comes into force, income tax officials could get the authority to access individuals' digital accounts, such as emails, social media, bank accounts, trading platforms, and online investments, if they suspect tax evasion.
