
This Top VC Wants To Use Main Street America As An AI Lab
Sitting in the offices of General Catalyst, overlooking Oracle Park—where the San Francisco Giants play—and the sweeping bay stretching beyond it, CEO Hemant Taneja explains how his venture capital firm is going to transform how Americans access health care: by buying and running a hospital.
Last year, the firm announced its $485 million purchase of Summa Health, an 8,000-employee hospital system based in Akron, Ohio, with the aim of plugging it into Silicon Valley's innovation engine. That means injecting tech and artificial intelligence into almost every step of the health care process, from checkups to insurance. No hospital system was going to do this on its own, so the thinking was simple: 'We have to go buy one and do it ourselves,' Taneja says. 'And live it.'
That ballpark view is fitting because Taneja, No. 8 on this year's Midas List, Forbes' annual ranking of America's top venture capitalists, is no stranger to proverbial big swings (even if the India-born Taneja prefers cricket). Buying a hospital is jaw-dropping for a VC. Tech investors preach disruption, but they are deeply conservative when it comes to running their own funds. Little has changed since venture's grandfather, Arthur Rock, started cutting funding checks to the likes of Intel and Apple. Entrepreneurs such as Gordon Moore and Steve Jobs might 'think different,' but Rock himself was a buttoned-down Harvard MBA who started his career on 1950s Wall Street.
General Catalyst wants to break that mold. Since 2018, it has morphed from a typical VC partnership to a multi-hyphenate investment house: There's the firm's 'creation' fund, which spins up new AI companies aimed at remaking dusty industries like accounting or customer service. Then there's the General Catalyst Institute, a think tank looking to shape technology policy around the world, and GC Wealth, a white-glove broker meant to woo well-heeled founders away from private banks.
That makes Taneja, 50, one of the champions of a new class of venture capitalist. 'Mega funds' are the sometimes-sniffy label for General Catalyst and peers like Andreessen Horowitz, Lightspeed and Thrive Capital, Josh Kushner's outfit. Mana-ging tens of billions of dollars, they are still minnows compared to Blackstone ($1 trillion in assets) and KKR ($660 billion), but Taneja's ambition isn't to be the biggest investor. Instead, he wants General Catalyst to be a 'strategic conglomerate.' Says Neil Sequeira, a former General Catalyst managing director: 'It's an exciting new animal.'
Taneja has his critics, too. General Catalyst's industrial-scale investing barely resembles venture capital, some say. Others snipe, discreetly, about General Catalyst's focus shifting from generating returns from financing startups to 'farming fees' from ever-multiplying funds.
Taneja's supporters are willing to back his bold vision thanks to a near-15-year winning streak. Since moving to Silicon Valley from Boston in 2011, Taneja has backed payment giant Stripe (last valued at $91 billion), defense startup Anduril (in funding talks at a $28 billion valuation) and a string of health care unicorns like Commure (valued at $6 billion).
General Catalyst tapped its backers for $8 billion last year—more than some Midas List veterans have raised in a lifetime, cementing its status as a venture powerhouse. Assets have ballooned to over $36 billion from $3.8 billion just 10 years ago. And the scaling is accelerating: General Catalyst, along with archrival Andreessen Horowitz, claimed around 20 cents of every dollar invested with U.S. VCs last year, according to Pitchbook data.
Silicon Valley gossip normally focuses on which startup will go public next, but recently chatter has circulated that General Catalyst itself will have an IPO. Taneja flatly denies the rumors. 'It's not even on the agenda,' he says. 'We've never discussed it.' For a VC firm, Taneja has loads of money on tap, but his grand strategy may require even larger amounts. Blackstone, KKR and Apollo grew more than tenfold after going public as they used their freshly minted shares to fuel growth, fund takeovers and cash out old partners. But there's still a taboo around venture funds going public: Valley graybeards still remember dot-com bomb Internet Capital Group listing on Nasdaq in 1999. The VC shop's valuation ballooned to nearly $60 billion before plunging 99.5% in less than two years.
Taneja now rubs shoulders with business leaders, prime ministers and royalty (he cohosts an annual ball at new hire Jeannette zu Fürstenberg's family castle in Germany). It's a long way from the aisles of the suburban Massachusetts CVS where he worked in high school to help his parents make ends meet. When he was 15, his parents moved to Boston from New Delhi. During the recession of the early 1990s, his father wound up managing a KFC. 'I probably ate that almost every day,' he says. 'I can't look at a KFC anymore.'
After high school, he landed at MIT. He cofounded and sold a mobile software startup after graduating, landing him on the radar of General Catalyst cofounders Joel Cutler and David Fialkow in 2001. The pair were looking for a founder to kickstart new business ideas. 'He was the full package. We knew early on that Hemant could be a tremendous leader,' Fialkow says.
General Catalyst had a handful of early wins like travel booking site Kayak (which went public for $1 billion in 2012), but its East Coast base was away from the entrepreneurial center of Silicon Valley. So in 2011, the firm's founders tapped Taneja, along with a handful of other partners, to build a beachhead in Palo Alto.
He had his work cut out for him. Taneja's outsider status was apparent when he was elbowed out of an early Snap investment by Valley vets. His fortunes changed after an early Stripe hire sat in on a guest lecture Taneja gave at MIT and connected him with the startup's cofounder brothers, Patrick and John Collison. He first invested in 2010, then led the startup's Series B two years later. While Stripe's cofounders initially saw the company as a 'little developer-oriented credit card payment thing,' Taneja saw the bigger opportunity in simplifying digital transactions more generally, CEO Patrick Collison says. 'He perceived more in Stripe than we did.' (Taneja got into one of Snap's later rounds, too.)
Taneja's new path was set over a bottle of Brunello during a 2017 dinner at Vicolina, a now-shuttered Manhattan trattoria, with Ken Chenault. The former Amex CEO had just been hired as General Catalyst's chairman, partly to help manage the handover from the fund's cofounders to heir apparent Taneja. As they dined, Chenault, who was one of the first Black executives to run an S&P 500 company, leaned across the table and pressed Taneja on what he wanted his impact to be. 'I want to be a leader, not just in business,' Chenault recalls Taneja telling him.
To some, General Catalyst's strategy looks like private equity with a coat of shiny AI paint.
Taneja took over as CEO in 2021 and began transforming General Catalyst from a clubby partnership into a firm that could address social problems. Goodbye to Mark Zuckerberg's motto of 'move fast and break things.' Hello 'responsible innovation.' It's not as catchy, and it hasn't always earned Taneja a warm reception from some of the Valley's loudest voices and deepest pockets. General Catalyst's advocating for guardrails on new AI systems was met with hoots of disapproval, notably from Andreessen Horowitz billionaire cofounder Marc Andreessen.
'They're very smart, they're very opinionated. All that is positive in my book,' Taneja says of the rival firm. 'They're playing a different game than us.' (Behind closed doors, Andreessen and Taneja played nice when they both sat on the board of now-public freight tracking company Samsara, says CEO Sanjit Biswas.)
Guardrails or not, AI is central to the firm's strategy of doing rollup mergers in sectors long considered too stodgy for Silicon Valley, like IT services and human resources. Buyout funds have been doing this for decades, cutting costs by moving jobs offshore. Taneja wants to use AI.
Last year, a General Catalyst startup called Crescendo bought PartnerHero, a $80-million-a-year call center company, and automated calls with bots, handing over only tricky cases to human workers. The result is as much as 30% savings for customers, says Crescendo CEO Matt Price. Dwelly, a London-based real estate startup cofounded by General Catalyst, bought a handful of property management companies and added AI tools for managing open houses and maintenance requests. Not only is AI cheaper, but the wait for fixes for leaky taps and other repairs is down 40% to 30 days, says Dwelly CEO Ilia Drozdov.
To some, the strategy looks like private equity with a coat of shiny AI paint. Taneja shrugs off the notion, saying that while private equity is more focused on cost-cutting, General Catalyst's rollups are about instilling a culture of 'innovation,' albeit the type that also happens to cut costs.
Taneja is the driving force behind these rollups, and he wants General Catalyst to cofound the firms executing them. The lodestar is Livongo, the diabetes management startup he cofounded in 2014. It went public in 2019 for $3.6 billion. That would be a home run for most investors, but Taneja was just warming up. A year later, Livongo was acquired for $18.5 billion by Teladoc, resulting in a paper gain of $3.4 billion for the fund. The outsize return was almost entirely thanks to General Catalyst's large ownership stake (18.3%) as a cofounder.
Still, Taneja is treading a difficult path. He needs to overcome local protests against his yet-to-close hospital takeover before turning around the $2 billion (2024 revenue) operation. And while Taneja is a savvy investor, he's by no means infallible. A series of bets on climate startups resulted in a $100 million wipeout, and health insurance claim specialist Olive, once valued at $4 billion, is a total bust. And General Catalyst ended up banking only an estimated $1.8 billion from Livongo, with Teladoc's share price crashing 97% from its peak.
But perhaps the biggest risk is that General Catalyst is doing too much. 'I get that question a lot,' Taneja says. He says it's a matter of having 'leadership bandwidth' and a good operating model, comparing the company to Amazon, which expanded from books to data centers to grocery stores to moviemaking.
Taneja has stretched himself to the brink in the past. At MIT, his counselor warned the triple major (computer science, biology and math) that he might not finish with such a demanding courseload. He not only graduated but went on to earn master's degrees in engineering and operations research a few years later. It's a pattern he has carried with him throughout life, Taneja says, laughing. 'I'm always trying to do too many things at the same time,' he says. 'I push myself to the max.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
17 minutes ago
- Forbes
How CPAs Should Speak To Clients As Crypto Adoption Accelerates
CPAs need to be educated on crypto to better advise clients CPAs have been discussing crypto for years, but given the rapidly (and positively) changing regulatory and policy environment it seems a good time to revisit what might sound like a straight-forward question; how should CPAs approach clients about cryptoassets? While in the past CPAs could have reasonably advised clients to minimize exposure to crypto since the regulatory environment was so uncertain, bankruptcies such as FTX dominated the headlines, and price volatility seemed ingrained into the asset class. Over the last 12-18 months, however, those narratives have changed significantly, with several developments making the crypto conversation between advisors and clients much more nuanced. Positive momentum on the legislative front at the federal and numerous state levels, the proliferation of spot crypto ETFs, the relaxation of previous strict language around including crypto into 401 (k) plans, the comprehensive repayment plans announced by the FTX estate, and the successful IPO of major stablecoin issuer Circle have all contributed to a more optimistic for crypto as 2025 continues to roll forward. Despite these developments, including the actions taken by the OCC and FDIC to allow more institutions to engage with crypto operations, the tax and accounting outlook for crypto has yet to significantly shift. Let's take a look at a few things CPAs need to keep in mind when discussing crypto with clients as positive momentum continues to accelerate. Given the nearly continuous flow of positive headlines around cryptoassets and the increased frequency with which investors of all sizes are allocating funds to said assets CPAs might very well be speaking with clients who fear missing out on these returns. That said, the investing adage that past success does not indicate future performance holds equally as true for crypto as any other asset class. For example, bitcoin has traded as low as $70,000 in 2025 prior to rebounding back about $100,000 beginning in May 2025; volatility remains an embedded part of the crypto ecosystem. For CPA clients seeking to integrate cryptoassets as part of a treasury allocation, accepting cryptoassets for payment purposes, or seeking to advise external clients whether crypto is a good fit for operations the pressure to invest in crypto can be significant. A responsibility of CPAs across the board is to make sure that any and all clients interested in crypto are only investing in these assets if the assets are well understood, and are a good fit for the business model of the firm. Despite the positive changes that have permeated into the cryptoasset sector the tax ramifications of these the fact remains that taxes are an obstacle to wider utilization of crypto for business purposes. Virtually every single transaction, transformation, or exchange that involves cryptoassets will create a tax reporting and potential tax payment obligation, and this has not changed even as the usage and adoption of crypto continues to accelerate. This is especially true for individuals that engage in higher volume trading or business activities, as several changes in particular will impact businesses using crypto. Specifically, changes that are related to IRS code section 6045 and 6050I, including the pivot to a universal wallet tracking methodology, are set to complicate the accounting for crypto transactions and gains. With further changes coming to the marketplace beginning January 2026, and while DeFi broker regulations (with an effective date in 2027) have been sidelined for now, the tax conversation around crypto is far from over. CPAs are already trusted as business and tax advisors, and especially as it is connected to crypto the value that can be added to a client via improved tax information is difficult to overstate. An often repeated issue and statement that can arise with the onboarding of cryptoassets is the perception that internal controls are less important since underlying blockchains are usually perceived as immutable and unhackable. Even if the blockchain itself has proven itself resilient and impervious to hacking attempts the multitude of hacks and data breaches that have occurred in the cryptoasset sector should serve as a reminder that internal controls are always important. Specifically the recent data breach at Coinbase should be illustrative to potential users and investors in crypto; even one of the most highlight regulated and well regarded institutions in the crypto sector suffered a data breach due to social engineering attacks on certain employees. For smaller institutions or entrepreneurs looking to gain exposure to crypto the importance of establishing and improving internal controls around cryptoassets and crypto policies should be an imperative. CPAs are well versed in assisting clients in the establishment and improvement of controls and control frameworks, and the importance of controls around crypto is no different. Crypto continues to make inroads across the economic board, and CPAs need to be well-prepared to discuss these issues with clients now and going forward.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says Elon Musk could face ‘serious consequences' if he backs Democrats
US President Donald Trump said he has no desire to repair his relationship with Elon Musk, and warned that his former ally and campaign benefactor could face 'serious consequences' if he tries to help Democrats in upcoming elections. Mr Trump told NBC's Kristen Welker in a phone interview that he has no plans to make up with tech entrepreneur Mr Musk. Asked specifically if he thought his relationship with the mega-billionaire chief executive of Tesla and SpaceX was over, Mr Trump responded: 'I would assume so, yeah.' 'I'm too busy doing other things,' Mr Trump continued. Alarming — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 7, 2025 'You know, I won an election in a landslide. I gave him (Mr Musk) a lot of breaks, long before this happened, I gave him breaks in my first administration, and saved his life in my first administration, I have no intention of speaking to him.' The US President also issued a warning amid speculation that Mr Musk could back Democratic legislators and candidates in the 2026 mid-term elections. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Mr Trump told NBC, though he declined to share what those consequences would be. Mr Musk's businesses have many lucrative federal contracts. The US President's latest comments suggest Mr Musk is moving from close ally to a potential new target for Mr Trump, who has aggressively wielded the powers of his office to crack down on critics and punish perceived enemies. As a major government contractor, Mr Musk's businesses could be particularly vulnerable to retribution. Mr Trump has already threatened to cut Mr Musk's contracts, calling it an easy way to save money. The dramatic rupture between the President and the world's richest man began this week with Mr Musk's public criticism of Mr Trump's 'big beautiful bill' pending on Capitol Hill. Mr Musk has warned that the bill will increase the federal deficit and called it a 'disgusting abomination'. Mr Trump criticised Mr Musk in the Oval Office, and before long, he and Mr Musk began trading bitterly personal attacks on social media, sending the White House and Republican congressional leaders scrambling to assess the fallout. As the back-and-forth intensified, Mr Musk suggested Mr Trump should be impeached and claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about the President's association with infamous paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Mr Musk appeared by Saturday morning to have deleted his posts about Epstein. In an interview, US vice president JD Vance tried to downplay the feud. He said Mr Musk was making a 'huge mistake' going after Mr Trump, but called him an 'emotional guy' who was becoming frustrated. 'I hope that eventually Elon comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear,' Mr Vance said. Mr Vance called Mr Musk an 'incredible entrepreneur,' and said that Mr Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which sought to cut US government spending and laid off or pushed out thousands of workers, was 'really good'. Mr Vance made the comments in an interview with 'manosphere' comedian Theo Von, who last month joked about snorting drugs off a mixed-race baby and the sexuality of men in the US Navy when he opened for Mr Trump at a military base in Qatar. The Vance interview was taped on Thursday as Musk's posts were unfurling on X, the social media network the billionaire owns. During the interview, Mr Von showed the vice president Mr Musk's claim that Mr Trump's administration has not released all the records related to Epstein because Mr Trump is mentioned in them. Vice President Vance on what it's like to be Trump's VP: 'It is my job, obviously, to provide the President honest counsel…he talks to everybody. I think it's why he's in touch with normal people.' — Vice President JD Vance (@VP) June 7, 2025 Mr Vance responded to that, saying: 'Absolutely not. Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein.' 'This stuff is just not helpful,' Mr Vance said in response to another post shared by Mr Musk calling for Mr Trump to be impeached and replaced with Mr Vance. 'It's totally insane. The President is doing a good job.' Vance also defended the bill that has drawn Mr Musk's ire, and said its central goal was not to cut spending but to extend the 2017 tax cuts approved in Mr Trump's first term. The bill would slash spending and taxes but also leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance and spike deficits by 2.4 trillion dollars (£1.77 trillion) over the decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. 'It's a good bill,' Mr Vance said. 'It's not a perfect bill.'
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he has no desire to fix his relationship with Musk, even after the former 'first buddy' deletes his X posts
President Donald Trump says he has no desire to repair his relationship with Elon Musk. He also said Musk would face "serious consequences" if he funds Democrats. Meanwhile, Musk deleted some of his most incendiary X posts on Saturday. It seems Elon Musk won't be President Donald Trump's "first buddy" again anytime soon. Trump told NBC News on Saturday that he has no plans to repair his relationship with Musk after it imploded this week. When asked if their relationship is done, Trump said, simply, "I would assume so, yeah." Trump said he doesn't intend to speak with Musk and said the tech billionaire was "disrespectful to the office of the President." "I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful. You could not disrespect the office of the President," Trump said. The epic and very public fallout began after Musk criticized Trump's tax bill, which the president calls his "One Big Beautiful Bill." During Thursday's dramatic exchange, which took place mostly on the social media networks each billionaire owns, Trump threatened to terminate Musk's government contracts and subsidies. Musk shot back that Trump was in the so-called "Epstein files" in a now-deleted post. In the NBC interview on Saturday, Trump warned Musk against funding Democratic candidates running against GOP members voting in favor of the bill, saying there will be "serious consequences." "If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that," Trump said. "He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that." Last month, Musk said he would spend "a lot less" on political campaigns in the future. He spent hundreds of millions in support of Trump in 2024. "If I see a reason to do political spending in the future, I will do it," Musk said at the Qatar Economic Forum last month. "I do not currently see a reason." Trump's remarks on Saturday came after Musk deleted some X posts from his account. He deleted the post referencing the Epstein files and a video he re-posted that appeared to show Trump partying with Epstein in the 1990s. Musk also deleted an X post in which he called a Trump comment an "obvious lie" and another post saying SpaceX would decommission its Dragon spacecraft "immediately." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Business Insider that passing the tax bill is the president's priority. "President Trump and the entire Administration will continue the important mission of cutting waste, fraud, and abuse from our federal government on behalf of taxpayers, and the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill is critical to helping accomplish that mission," Leavitt said in a statement. Representatives for Musk did not respond to a request for comment from BI. The repercussions from Musk and Trump's dispute were swift, affecting the price of Tesla stock and Dogecoin. A senior White House official told BI that Trump is now considering selling his Tesla. On Saturday, Vice President JD Vance said it was a "huge mistake" for Musk to "go after the president" during the newest episode of "This Past Weekend w/ Theo Von." "I'm not saying he has to agree with the bill or agree with everything that I'm saying," Vance said. "I just think it's a huge mistake for the world's wealthiest man, I think one of the most transformational entrepreneurs ever — that's Elon — to be at this war with the world's most powerful man." During the interview, Vance said he thinks everything will be fine between the pair if Musk "chills out a little bit." "Hopefully Elon figures it out and comes back into the fold," Vance said, adding that Trump had been a "little frustrated" with Musk's recent criticisms. "But I think he's been very restrained because the president doesn't think that he needs to be in a blood feud with Elon Musk, and I actually think if Elon chilled out a little bit, everything would be fine," Vance said. Musk responded to Vance's comment on X on Saturday, writing, simply, "Cool." Read the original article on Business Insider