UK Overhauls Regulation Of 'Broken' Water System
The move comes after years of angry complaints about the privately-run system and its much-maligned regulator Ofwat, including constant leaks and raw sewage being discharged into waterways and oceans.
"Our water industry is broken," Environment Secretary Steve Reed said in a statement.
The government will abolish Ofwat in response to failures identified by the Independent Water Commission, dubbed the most comprehensive review of the sector since its privatisation in the late 1980s.
"A single, powerful regulator responsible for the entire water sector will stand firmly on the side of customers, investors and the environment and prevent the abuses of the past," Reed said.
Spiralling bills and high executive pay at the water companies, alongside decades of dividends paid to their shareholders and underinvestment in crumbling infrastructure, have stoked public anger.
On Sunday, it emerged the number of serious contamination incidents in England had risen by 60 percent in a year, prompting the government to vow to halve sewage pollution caused by water companies by 2030.
"The water industry, the system of regulation that we have and actually our system for managing our rivers and waterways generally ... is failing," Jon Cunliffe, head of the Independent Water Commission, told Times Radio.
Published alongside a 67-page summary detailing the 88 recommendations, the commission's report concluded the "complex and unintelligible" framework to upgrade infrastructure is "clearly not working".
It urged the UK and Welsh governments to give themselves more powers to "direct" failing water firms, while also demanding an overhaul of their regulation.
Britain's publicly-owned water and sewage industry was privatised in 1989 under the Conservative government of then-prime minister Margaret Thatcher.
Then the sector had no debt, but that has now ballooned to tens of billions of pounds, which critics say has been partly used to pay generous dividends.
Water campaigner Feargal Sharkey said Monday that successive governments had "lost control of this industry" and he had little faith the suggested reforms would succeed.
"The beating heart of this debacle is ... corporate greed, the financial engineering, the exorbitant salaries," he told BBC News.
"We were promised a proper root and branch wide-ranging review, including ownership and structure. We were promised champagne. All we've actually got is sour milk."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
21-07-2025
- Int'l Business Times
UK Overhauls Regulation Of 'Broken' Water System
The UK government announced Monday it will overhaul the management and regulation of the water system, following a landmark report that slammed systematic failings in the heavily-criticised industry. The move comes after years of angry complaints about the privately-run system and its much-maligned regulator Ofwat, including constant leaks and raw sewage being discharged into waterways and oceans. "Our water industry is broken," Environment Secretary Steve Reed said in a statement. The government will abolish Ofwat in response to failures identified by the Independent Water Commission, dubbed the most comprehensive review of the sector since its privatisation in the late 1980s. "A single, powerful regulator responsible for the entire water sector will stand firmly on the side of customers, investors and the environment and prevent the abuses of the past," Reed said. Spiralling bills and high executive pay at the water companies, alongside decades of dividends paid to their shareholders and underinvestment in crumbling infrastructure, have stoked public anger. On Sunday, it emerged the number of serious contamination incidents in England had risen by 60 percent in a year, prompting the government to vow to halve sewage pollution caused by water companies by 2030. "The water industry, the system of regulation that we have and actually our system for managing our rivers and waterways generally ... is failing," Jon Cunliffe, head of the Independent Water Commission, told Times Radio. Published alongside a 67-page summary detailing the 88 recommendations, the commission's report concluded the "complex and unintelligible" framework to upgrade infrastructure is "clearly not working". It urged the UK and Welsh governments to give themselves more powers to "direct" failing water firms, while also demanding an overhaul of their regulation. Britain's publicly-owned water and sewage industry was privatised in 1989 under the Conservative government of then-prime minister Margaret Thatcher. Then the sector had no debt, but that has now ballooned to tens of billions of pounds, which critics say has been partly used to pay generous dividends. Water campaigner Feargal Sharkey said Monday that successive governments had "lost control of this industry" and he had little faith the suggested reforms would succeed. "The beating heart of this debacle is ... corporate greed, the financial engineering, the exorbitant salaries," he told BBC News. "We were promised a proper root and branch wide-ranging review, including ownership and structure. We were promised champagne. All we've actually got is sour milk."
Int'l Business Times
17-07-2025
- Int'l Business Times
Afghan Data Breach Unmasked UK Spies, Special Forces: Reports
The details of more than 100 Britons, including spies and special forces personnel, were included in a massive data breach involving thousands of Afghans, UK media reported on Thursday. The information was included in the mistakenly released spreadsheet, British newspapers reported, citing unnamed defence sources. The leak was only revealed to the public earlier this week after a news blackout imposed by the previous Conservative government was finally lifted. "It's longstanding policy of successive governments to not comment on Special Forces," a ministry of defence spokesperson said in a statement. "We take the security of our personnel very seriously and personnel, particularly those in sensitive positions, always have appropriate measures in place to protect their security." But reports in the British media, including the Guardian newspaper and the BBC, said members of Britain's intelligence service and special forces were among those listed on the spreadsheet. Britain's government disclosed on Tuesday that a UK official had accidentally leaked a document containing the names and details of almost 19,000 Afghans who had asked to be relocated to the UK. It happened in February 2022, just six months after Taliban fighters seized Kabul, Labour's Defence Secretary John Healey told parliament. The breach and the resettlement plan to protect those involved from potential repercussions only came to light after a court-issued super-gag was lifted. The nearly two-year-long court ban secured by the previous Conservative government prevented any media reporting of the leak. In addition, parliament was not briefed and there was no public knowledge of the resettlement plan and the costs involved. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has said that Tory ministers have "serious questions to answer" over the secret resettlement plan while parliamentary Speaker Lindsay Hoyle said that the affair raised "significant constitutional issues". Some 900 Afghans and 3,600 family members have since been brought to Britain or are in transit under the programme known as the Afghan Response Route, at a cost of around GBP400 million ($535 million), Healey said. Applications from 600 more people have also been accepted, bringing the estimated total cost of the scheme to GBP850 million. They are among some 36,000 Afghans who have been accepted by Britain under different schemes since the August 2021 fall of Kabul.
Int'l Business Times
17-07-2025
- Int'l Business Times
UK To Lower Voting Age To 16 In General Elections
The British government said Thursday it would allow 16 year-olds to vote in general elections, a landmark change giving the UK one of the lowest voting ages worldwide. The ruling Labour Party pledged to lower the age from 18 ahead of winning power last year. It is among several planned changes to the democratic system. Some argue Britain's democracy is "in crisis", in particular due to low turnout. The voting age change is contentious, however, with critics previously arguing it is self-serving as newly-enfranchised teenagers are seen as more likely to support centre-left Labour. "I think it's really important that 16- and 17-year-olds have the vote, because they are old enough to go out to work, they are old enough to pay taxes, so (they) pay in," Prime Minister Keir Starmer said. "And I think if you pay in, you should have the opportunity to say what you want your money spent on, which way the government should go," Starmer added. The government will have to bring legislation before parliament, where it has a comfortable majority, to make the changes. Only a small number of countries allow 16-year-olds to vote in national elections, according to online databases. They include Austria -- the first EU country to lower the voting age to 16 in 2007 -- as well as Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador and Cuba. Labour ministers insist the change is intended to "modernise our democracy", while aligning general elections with the existing voting age for elections for the devolved regional parliaments in Scotland and Wales. Other planned changes include introducing automated voter registration -- which is already used in Australia and Canada -- and making UK-issued bank cards an accepted form of ID at polling stations. It follows changes to the electoral law introduced by the previous Conservative government which required voters to show a photo ID. The Electoral Commission found that rule led to around 750,000 people not voting in last year's election. Harry Quilter-Pinner, executive director of the Institute For Public Policy Research think tank, called the changes "the biggest reform to our electoral system since 1969", when the voting age was lowered to 18. He noted lowering the voting age and introducing automated voter registration could add 9.5 million more people to the voter rolls. "Our democracy is in crisis, and we risk reaching a tipping point where politics loses its legitimacy," he added, backing the changes. The main Conservative opposition however accused Labour of inconsistency as 16- and 17-year-olds will still not be able to stand as election candidates, buy lottery tickets or alcohol or get married. "This is a brazen attempt by the Labour Party whose unpopularity is scaring them into making major constitutional changes without consultation," the party's communities spokesman Paul Holmes said.
