We can't even see: Iran's president confirms severe damage to nuclear sites by US
The three facilities -- Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan -- were hit by US B-52 bombers deploying bunker-buster munitions aimed at crippling Iran's nuclear infrastructure. The strikes, ordered by President Donald Trump, were part of a broader effort to deter Iran's alleged development of nuclear weapons.His remarks validate Trump's claims that the strikes dealt a devastating blow. "It was obliteration, and you'll see that," Trump had said during the NATO summit in the Netherlands. Pezeshkian's admission that Iran cannot access its own underground nuclear sites has further fuelled debate about the true scale of the US operation's impact.Earlier, a US Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) report painted a more cautious picture. First reported by CNN, the assessment concluded that while the strikes did cause "significant damage," Iran's nuclear programme had only been set back by a few months and was not "completely and fully obliterated."Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth dismissed the leak as "preliminary" and "low confidence," while Secretary of State Marco Rubio condemned the leakers as "professional stabbers."- EndsWith inputs from APMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's peace offer to Putin on Ukraine war leaked while threatening deadly consequences if there's no peace
U.S. President Donald Trump plans to host Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on August 15, 2025, negotiations aiming at securing peace in the Ukraine war. But according to leaked reports, the peace proposal could involve crucial territorial concessions — and Trump has privately cautioned of 'serious consequences' if the talks fail. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Alaska as Host: A Symbolic and Strategic Choice Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A Peace Deal or a Concession? Global Reactions: Unease in Europe, Silence in Asia Will It Lead to Peace or Provoke More Conflict? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs: U.S. President Donald Trump is all set to host Russian President Vladimir Putin at a controversial summit in Alaska on August 15, 2025, focusing on negotiating an ending to the ongoing war in Ukraine. Leaked Reports show that Trump has privately cautioned Putin to accept the peace terms or face 'serious and immediate consequences.' Although no information has been revealed, the statement is regarded as a high-stakes strategy to force Moscow into accepting the to insiders, the proposal suggests that Russia would retain control over four occupied Ukrainian regions: Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson. In return, Moscow would commit to halting all offensive operations and demilitarizing certain contested zones. While the arrangement has been framed as a practical step toward ending the bloodshed, critics warn it could embolden future territorial upcoming summit will take place remotely in a military base near Anchorage, far from Washington, D.C. According to insiders, Alaska was chosen due to its geographical proximity to Russia and a degree of neutrality in international affairs. It also allows the U.S. to avoid potential complications tied to international legal mechanisms such as the International Criminal Court, which has issued an arrest warrant for measures have been significantly tightened, and the event is being said as one of the most sensitive diplomatic meetings in recent years. While the Biden administration has remained in public silence, it has reportedly raised internal concerns about the legitimacy and legality of the summit, especially if it includes territorial concessions without Ukraine's indicate that Trump is considering the idea of a territorial trade to bring an end to the conflict . Under this rumored deal, Russia would maintain control over several occupied territories in eastern Ukraine, including Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson in return for a full ceasefire and possible demilitarization of specific a recent Fox News appearance, Trump described the arrangement as a 'win-win' stating 'Everyone gets something. Most importantly, the dying stops,' he Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has sharply criticized, calling any agreement that excludes Ukraine 'illegitimate.' He stressed that no foreign power can decide Ukraine's future and cautioned that appeasing aggression would set a dangerous global Europe leaders have expressed strong reservations. NATO officials have cautioned that any agreement rewarding territorial aggression could undermine the entire continent. Germany, France, and the U.K. have jointly highlighted that Ukraine must be directly involved in any peace contrast, China and India have remained mostly silent, signaling their characteristically guarded approach when it comes to high-profile geopolitical disputes involving Western powers and the high-stakes summit approaches,uncertainty hangs in the air. The central question remains: will Trump and Putin reach an agreement that halts the bloodshed or will the event further rift the international community?It is evident that the summit is not just about Ukraine. At its core, It's about the role of American leadership in global conflict resolution and whether diplomacy can still thrive in an era defined by nationalism, military strategies, and competing eyes will be on Alaska—not just for peace, but for precedent that this meeting could set for future geopolitics..A1. It's a planned meeting to discuss a possible peace deal to end the war in Ukraine.A2. The summit is scheduled for August 15, 2025
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
22 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump's big boost to nuclear power, US launches pilot project to deploy 11 microreactors
In line with the agenda to expand nuclear power, the Trump administration has finalised 11 companies to build microreactors as part of a pilot programme. In line with US President Donald Trump's agenda of expanding nuclear power, the Department of Energy on Tuesday announced the finalisation of 11 projects for a pilot programme that would develop microreactors and small modular reactors. Trump signed four executive orders in May to accelerate the construction of these types of advanced nuclear reactors, primarily to address the increased power requirement of industries like data centres driving the artificial intelligence (AI) boom. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Advanced reactors —including microreactors, small modular reactors, and Generation IV and Generation III+ reactors— have revolutionary potential. They will open a range of new applications to support data centers, microchip manufacturing, petrochemical production, healthcare, desalination, hydrogen production, and other industries,' the executive order read. The DoE on Tuesday said that at least three of the eleven nuclear reactors part of the pilot programme will need to go critical July 2026 — a nuclear reactor going critical, in a layman's terms, means achieving demonstrable operationability. 'President Trump's Reactor Pilot Program is a call to action. These companies aim to all safely achieve criticality by Independence Day, and DOE will do everything we can to support their efforts,' said Deputy Energy Secretary James Danly. The 11 companies selected by the DoE are Aalo Atomics, Antares Nuclear, Atomic Alchemy, Deep Fission Inc, Last Energy, Oklo, Natura Resources LLC, Radiant Energy, Terrestrial Energy, and Valar Atomics. The DoE said that they will be responsible for all costs involved in the designing, manufacturing, constructing, and decommissioning their test reactors. Unlike regular nuclear power plants that take up a huge space and produce huge power, small modular reactors (SMRs) are advanced nuclear fission reactors that generally produce a third of a regular reactor's power. They are made in factories like a regular product and can be installed at the site where power is needed, such as in an industrial facility or a defence installation, making that facility or installation self-sufficient in energy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Currently, such reactors are in use in limited numbers in China and Russia. The United States now wants to install such reactors as well.
Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘A mirage': Iranian President takes a swipe at Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu over offer to help with water crisis
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian took a swipe at Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday (Aug 13) after the Israeli Prime Minister offered to help with Iran's water crisis. Taking to his X account, Pezeshkian declined Israel's offer and labelled the country a 'regime' that 'deprives' Gaza of food and water. 'A regime that deprives people of Gaza from water and food says it will bring water to Iran? A MIRAGE, NOTHING MORE,' he said in a sharp rebuke. A regime that deprives #Gaza of water and food now says it will bring water to Iran? A MIRAGE, NOTHING MORE. — Masoud Pezeshkian (@drpezeshkian) August 13, 2025 During a Cabinet meeting in Tehran, the Iranian president also said that 'those with a deceptive appearance are falsely claiming compassion for the people of Iran.' 'First look at the difficult situation of Gaza and (their) defenceless people, especially children who are struggling … because of hunger, lack of access to potable water and medicine, because of a siege by the brutal regime.' Netanyahu, in a video message, called on Iranians to 'take risks for freedom,' 'take to the streets' and demand accountability from the country's government. He vowed to bring Israeli water experts to provide 'cutting-edge technology and know-how' to Tehran, once the country is 'free' from its current regime, according to Israeli media. 'We do not have water' Pezeshkian, on Sunday (Aug 10), told a group of officials that 'we do not have water, we do not have water under our feet, and we do not have water behind our dams, so you tell me what do we do? Someone comes and tells me what do I have to do?' He said that 'we are in a serious and unimaginable crisis,' adding that his administration was in touch with experts who were working to find a solution to the problem. In June, Israel launched a missile salvo targeting Iran, killing 1,100 people, including several military commanders. Iran retaliated and carried out a wave of airstrikes, killing 28 people in Israel. (With inputs from AP)
