
Matt Eberflus denies neglecting Caleb Williams' development during his rookie season
Matt Eberflus denies neglecting Caleb Williams' development during his rookie season
By now, saying Caleb Williams' rookie season with the Chicago Bears was a disaster is the professional football equivalent of beating a dead horse. So much so that discussing how the Bears put their best prospect at the quarterback position in decades in a position to fail right away is like talking in circles. From this point forward, no one, Williams included, will gain anything productive from excavating the depths of this conversation any further. I assure you.
Enter disgraced former Bears head coach Matt Eberflus, who really has to learn the concept of "digging up, stupid."
In a recent conversation with Ed Werder on The Doomsday Podcast, Eberflus gave his side of the story on the infamous "scandal" regarding how the Bears' offensive coaches left Williams to his own devices when he had to watch film. According to Eberflus, Williams mischaracterized the Bears' apparent (but still quite plausible with all context at hand) atmosphere of development neglect with their rookie quarterback.
Uh, sure, pal. Everyone totally believes this perspective, which notably came a month later (and without taking any accountability for leaving Williams high and dry), even though Eberflus has been employed as the Dallas Cowboys' defensive coordinator since late January:
"In the development of the quarterback position and really all positions in my time at the Bears, we always had daily coached film sessions," Eberflus said. "That was through the entire year. That was what I observed and that's where it was.
That's really all I have to say about it. That's where it is."
What's rich about Eberflus' characterization of the situation is how it reveals he's still not listening to his now-former quarterback. Because, as Williams explained last month, he technically never said that coaches didn't watch film with him. In context, he meant Eberflus's staff's guidance with this all-important football teaching tool was lacking, leaving Williams to try and fill in the blanks without any markers to watch for. This is something you never want to do with a young quarterback still learning the ropes.
That's an important distinction, and one Eberflus conveniently didn't address:
"That was a funny one [the film excerpt quote] that came out," Williams clarified during Bears organized team activities. "It wasn't that I didn't know how to watch film, it was more or less the sense of learning ways to watch film and be more efficient, learning ways to pick up things better. That was a funny one that came out, in context, and how I was trying to portray it, it didn't get portrayed that way. It wasn't that I didn't know how to watch film, it was trying to figure out the best ways and more efficient ways so that I can watch more film."
In essence, Eberflus's late response once again shows why he should've never been the steward for Williams' initial development. He's still refusing to take accountability for his mistakes. He's still hearing Williams say one thing, then letting it go right out the other ear. If I didn't know any better, Eberflus still sounds like the same self-absorbed lackey hellbent on prioritizing his self-preservation at all costs, which should usually be a career death sentence for anyone trying to coach anything professionally. With all things considered, I guess that's why Ben Johnson seems like such a perfect fit for the Bears.
Well, if Eberflus wants to say anything to Williams' face, his Cowboys will visit Chicago in Week 3 of this upcoming season. Here's hoping that the bitter reunion is as awkward as this whole film saga has been.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
35 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
NBA Finals: Jalen Williams scores 40 as Thunder move to edge of first title
OKLAHOMA CITY — Jalen Williams scored a career playoff-high 40 points, MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander added 31 and the Oklahoma City Thunder moved one win from a title by beating the Indiana Pacers 120-109 in Game 5 of the NBA Finals on Monday night. It was the 10th — and by far, the biggest — time the Thunder stars combined for more than 70 points in a game. Williams was 14 of 24 from the field, and Gilgeous-Alexander added 10 assists. Pascal Siakam had 28 points for Indiana, which now trails the series 3-2 and will host Game 6 on Thursday night. TJ McConnell added 18 for the Pacers, who whittled an 18-point deficit down to two in the fourth — then watched the Thunder pull away again, and for good. 'That's a really good team over there,' Williams said. 'You just don't trip into the finals.' True. But now, everything favors the Thunder. Teams that win Game 5 of an NBA Finals that was tied at 2-2 have gone on to win the series 23 times in 31 previous opportunities, or 74%. And teams with a 3-2 lead in the finals have won 40 times in 49 previous opportunities, or 82%. But Game 5 was not easy. Far from it. Down by 18 late in the second quarter, the Pacers — the comeback kings of these playoffs, with as many wins in this postseason from 15 points down or more (five) than the rest of the league has combined, including in Game 1 of this series — did what they do, chipping away. And they did it with Tyrese Haliburton reduced to basically playing decoy on offense because of a leg issue that he aggravated in the first quarter. Led by McConnell, who scored 13 points in just under seven minutes of the third, the Pacers got within five late in that quarter. Then, Siakam went to work — a pair of free throws with 9:19 left got Indiana within four, then a 3-pointer about a minute later made it 95-93. In the play-by-play era of the NBA, starting with the 1997 playoffs, teams with leads of 15 points or more in the finals were 80-9. Make that 81-9 now, and the Thunder are one win away. 'That was honestly the same exact game as Game 1,' Williams said. 'Learning through these finals, that's what makes a team good.' One more win, and his team will be certified as great.


Hamilton Spectator
38 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Game 5: Williams scores 40 points and Thunder win 120-109 for a 3-2 NBA Finals lead over Pacers
OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — Jalen Williams scored a career playoff-high 40 points, MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander added 31 and the Oklahoma City Thunder moved one win from a title by beating the Indiana Pacers 120-109 in Game 5 of the NBA Finals on Monday night. It was the 10th — and by far, the biggest — time the Thunder stars combined for more than 70 points in a game. Williams was 14 of 24 from the field, and Gilgeous-Alexander added 10 assists. Pascal Siakam had 28 points for Indiana, which now trails the series 3-2 and will host Game 6 on Thursday night. TJ McConnell added 18 for the Pacers, who whittled an 18-point deficit down to two in the fourth — then watched the Thunder pull away again, and for good. 'That's a really good team over there,' Williams said. 'You just don't trip into the finals.' True. But now, everything favors the Thunder. Teams that win Game 5 of an NBA Finals that was tied at 2-2 have gone on to win the series 23 times in 31 previous opportunities, or 74%. And teams with a 3-2 lead in the finals have won 40 times in 49 previous opportunities, or 82%. But Game 5 was not easy. Far from it. Down by 18 late in the second quarter, the Pacers — the comeback kings of these playoffs, with as many wins in this postseason from 15 points down or more (five) than the rest of the league has combined, including in Game 1 of this series — did what they do, chipping away. And they did it with Tyrese Haliburton reduced to basically playing decoy on offense because of a leg issue that he aggravated in the first quarter. Led by McConnell, who scored 13 points in just under seven minutes of the third, the Pacers got within five late in that quarter. Then, Siakam went to work — a pair of free throws with 9:19 left got Indiana within four, then a 3-pointer about a minute later made it 95-93. In the play-by-play era of the NBA, starting with the 1997 playoffs, teams with leads of 15 points or more in the finals were 80-9. Make that 81-9 now, and the Thunder are one win away. 'That was honestly the same exact game as Game 1,' Williams said. 'Learning through these finals, that's what makes a team good.' One more win, and his team will be certified as great. ___ AP NBA:
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
2025 NFL Schedule Preview: NFC North
2025 NFL Schedule Preview: NFC North originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Our schedule breakdown continues with four teams in a wide-open NFC South, who will play against the AFC North and NFC East, as well as six games in division. Chicago Bears: Schedule By Week vs MIN @ DET vs DAL @ LV BYE @ WSH vs NO @BAL @ CIN vs NYG @ MIN vs PIT @ PHI @ GB vs CLE vs GB @ SF vs DET Detroit Lions: Schedule By Week @ GB vs CHI @ BAL vs CLE @ CIN @ KC vs TB BYE vs MIN @ WSH @ PHI vs NYG vs GB vs DAL @LAR vs PIT @ MIN @ CHI Green Bay Packers: Schedule By Week vs DET vs WSH @ CLE @ DAL BYE vs CIN @ ARI @PIT vs CAR vs PHI @ NYG vs MIN @ DET vs CHI @ DEN @ CHI vs BAL @ MIN Minnesota Vikings: Schedule By Week @ CHI vs ATL vs CIN @ PIT @ CLE BYE vs PHI @ LAC @ DET vs BAL vs CHI @ GB @ SEA vs WSH @ DAL @ NYG vs DET vs GB ODDS TO WIN NFC NORTH: BEARS : (+425) LIONS : (+140) PACKERS : (+320) VIKINGS: (+400) Advertisement LAGHEZZA'S LEAN: The NFC East may get all the attention for being the league's most competitive division, but I'd push back with its counterpart right here in the north. Remember, three of these teams won at least 11 games in 2024 — and the only one that didn't in Chicago is widely regarded as the most largely improved unit this offseason. Can anyone remember the last time a team won 14 games in the regular season only to get listed as a (+400) underdog to win their division just six months later? Obviously, changing QBs matters — but there's a contradiction somewhere in the narratives surrounding Sam Darnold. If Darnold's success was system-based, and purely a factor of operating Kevin O'Connell's scheme, why is betting the Vikings so cheap? And if Darnold's the reason the Vikings are a four-to-one dog, why is Seattle also (+475) in the NFC West? I'm not saying I know the answers here, but it's pretty clear no one else does either. Advertisement Given the pretty neutral scheduling layout overall, the Lions feel like the rightful favorite, However, it's still a mystery what losing Ben Johnson will mean and personally, I'm turned off by the price. My pick would be the Packers purely for the combination of cost plus track record — but as of now, I'm still up in the air. Thanks so much for reading — it's been so exciting getting to interact with all my new friends here at Athlon Sports. If you're interested in upping your analytical game, come find out what all the hubbub's about regarding my best-selling MLB/NFL Substack page. Don't be shy — reach out to me via DM anytime on X @JohnLaghezza and I'll hook you up with a free trial. This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 7, 2025, where it first appeared.