logo
Kids watching TV at childcare raises parents' ire

Kids watching TV at childcare raises parents' ire

The Age03-05-2025

Another mother in Melbourne's eastern suburbs with a two-and-a-half-year-old, who spoke with The Age, said an educator would often just be holding an iPad showing YouTube for kids to watch, without engaging.
'It was at the end of the day during pick-up, so I just thought she was over it by then. But it happened often,' the mother said.
An Albert Park mother of two said she was 'a bit disturbed' after visiting a family daycare centre to find a row of children listlessly watching ABC Kids.
Another said when her children were sometimes watching Bluey on an iPad when she arrived to collect them from their Montessori centre, which prompted her to wonder why she paid for childcare when her children could be watching TV at home.
'I don't want to blame educators who do it, it's not the educator's fault, they are operating in a system that's not supporting them,' the mother said.
Early Childhood Australia (ECA) chief executive Samantha Page said her organisation had no data on how widely screens were used passively, but said there were many active, creative ways to use digital technology in early childhood that complemented the curriculum.
The ECA has developed guidelines for the use of digital technology in childcare settings, and calls for a 'contextual approach' to using screens.
Paediatrician Nitin Kapur said that educators actively engaging alongside screens in an educational context would not be regarded as passive screen time.
'What we don't want is that [the child] is given one hour of screen time at the kindy or the daycare, and then they go home and have more exposure,' he said.
'[It] should be clearly told to the parents that the child had half an hour on the screen or one hour, so that then parents make an informed decision of should they be giving any more time.'
Kapur referred to a 2023 Japanese study that shows children who spend more than the recommended amount of time watching a screen have reduced cognition.
Australian Childcare Alliance president Paul Mondo said that in his experience, TV was not used in early learning services.
'It would be very uncommon for regular TV or movies to be shown to children during their time in early learning settings. However, there may be circumstances where TV programs are used in the context of the classroom's educational programs,' Mondo said.
He said screens and technology could be valuable tools for learning purposes, to spark conversation or illustrate lessons in the curriculum.
Professor Hayley Christian from the Kids Research Institute Australia said young children should only engage with screens with an educator or parent.
'Young children need many bursts of energetic play throughout the day, so dancing along to The Wiggles or copying the movements of animals on a large screen can help support learning activities while also enabling them to be active and develop their fundamental skills,' Christian said.
South Melbourne mother Rosie Cuppaidge, who has a 14-month-old daughter Ione, said she would prefer no television at early learning centres and that screen use should be discouraged among children.
'There's enough going on at childcare that screens shouldn't be needed,' she said.
'But on occasion it doesn't hurt, and I trust the educators know what they are doing as professionals.'
Loading
Associate Professor Catherine Hamm from the University of Melbourne said digital technologies were like any other learning resource in the classroom.
'You would consider the ways in which you used it like you would any other piece of equipment,' Hamm said.
'Are you just putting the children in front of a digital device and doing something else, or are you collaborating with them? … You're using it as you would read a book or some other piece of equipment in your classroom.'
Hamm believed there were other ways children could have downtime, rather than watching a screen.
'If it is a long day – some children are there for 10 hours – you know there's beautiful yoga and lots of different ways that I think downtime can be offered,' she said.
'I don't think that there's a place for ... consuming digital stuff in a passive way.'
Hamm said there were no guidelines around telling parents if their children had been watching screens.
'Different centres might have policies about that. I think that's becoming more common for centres to have a digital technology policy,' she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Phew, it's a girl! The stunning decline of the preference for having boys
Phew, it's a girl! The stunning decline of the preference for having boys

The Age

timea day ago

  • The Age

Phew, it's a girl! The stunning decline of the preference for having boys

Without fanfare, something remarkable has happened. The noxious practice of aborting girls simply for being girls has become dramatically less common. It first became widespread in the late 1980s, as cheap ultrasound machines made it easy to determine the sex of a fetus. Parents who were desperate for a boy but did not want a large family – or, in China, were not allowed one – started routinely terminating females. Globally, among babies born in 2000, a staggering 1.6 million girls were missing from the number you would expect, given the natural sex ratio at birth. This year that number is likely to be 200,000 – and it is still falling. The fading of boy preference in regions where it was strongest has been astonishingly rapid. The natural ratio is about 105 boy babies for every 100 girls; because boys are slightly more likely to die young, this leads to rough parity at reproductive age. The sex ratio at birth, once wildly skewed across Asia, has become more even. In China, it fell from a peak of 117.8 boys per 100 girls in 2006 to 109.8 last year, and in India from 109.6 in 2010 to 106.8. In South Korea it is now completely back to normal, having been a shocking 115.7 in 1990. In 2010 an Economist cover called the mass abortion of girls ' gendercide '. The global decline of this scourge is a blessing. First, it implies an ebbing of the traditions that underpinned it: the stark belief that men matter more and the expectation in some cultures that a daughter will grow up to serve her husband's family, so parents need a son to look after them in old age. Such sexist ideas have not vanished, but evidence that they are fading is welcome. Second, it heralds an easing of the harms caused by surplus men. Sex-selective abortion doomed millions of males to lifelong bachelorhood. Many of these 'bare branches', as they are known in China, resented it intensely. And their fury was socially destabilising, since young, frustrated bachelors are more prone to violence. One study of six Asian countries found that warped sex ratios led to an increase of rape in all of them. Others linked the imbalance to a rise in violent crime in China, along with authoritarian policing to quell it, and to a heightened risk of civil strife or even war in other countries. The fading of boy preference will make much of the world safer. In some regions, meanwhile, a new preference is emerging: for girls. It is far milder. Parents are not aborting boys for being boys. No big country yet has a noticeable surplus of girls. Rather, girl preference can be seen in other measures, such as polls and fertility patterns. Loading Among Japanese couples who want only one child, girls are strongly preferred. Across the world, parents typically want a mix. But in America and Scandinavia, couples are likelier to have more children if their early ones are male, suggesting that more keep trying for a girl than do so for a boy. When seeking to adopt, couples pay extra for a girl. When undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and other sex-selection methods in countries where it is legal to choose the sex of the embryo, women increasingly opt for daughters. People prefer girls for all sorts of reasons. Some think they will be easier to bring up, or cherish what they see as feminine traits. In some countries, they may assume that looking after elderly parents is a daughter's job.

Phew, it's a girl! The stunning decline of the preference for having boys
Phew, it's a girl! The stunning decline of the preference for having boys

Sydney Morning Herald

timea day ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Phew, it's a girl! The stunning decline of the preference for having boys

Without fanfare, something remarkable has happened. The noxious practice of aborting girls simply for being girls has become dramatically less common. It first became widespread in the late 1980s, as cheap ultrasound machines made it easy to determine the sex of a fetus. Parents who were desperate for a boy but did not want a large family – or, in China, were not allowed one – started routinely terminating females. Globally, among babies born in 2000, a staggering 1.6 million girls were missing from the number you would expect, given the natural sex ratio at birth. This year that number is likely to be 200,000 – and it is still falling. The fading of boy preference in regions where it was strongest has been astonishingly rapid. The natural ratio is about 105 boy babies for every 100 girls; because boys are slightly more likely to die young, this leads to rough parity at reproductive age. The sex ratio at birth, once wildly skewed across Asia, has become more even. In China, it fell from a peak of 117.8 boys per 100 girls in 2006 to 109.8 last year, and in India from 109.6 in 2010 to 106.8. In South Korea it is now completely back to normal, having been a shocking 115.7 in 1990. In 2010 an Economist cover called the mass abortion of girls ' gendercide '. The global decline of this scourge is a blessing. First, it implies an ebbing of the traditions that underpinned it: the stark belief that men matter more and the expectation in some cultures that a daughter will grow up to serve her husband's family, so parents need a son to look after them in old age. Such sexist ideas have not vanished, but evidence that they are fading is welcome. Second, it heralds an easing of the harms caused by surplus men. Sex-selective abortion doomed millions of males to lifelong bachelorhood. Many of these 'bare branches', as they are known in China, resented it intensely. And their fury was socially destabilising, since young, frustrated bachelors are more prone to violence. One study of six Asian countries found that warped sex ratios led to an increase of rape in all of them. Others linked the imbalance to a rise in violent crime in China, along with authoritarian policing to quell it, and to a heightened risk of civil strife or even war in other countries. The fading of boy preference will make much of the world safer. In some regions, meanwhile, a new preference is emerging: for girls. It is far milder. Parents are not aborting boys for being boys. No big country yet has a noticeable surplus of girls. Rather, girl preference can be seen in other measures, such as polls and fertility patterns. Loading Among Japanese couples who want only one child, girls are strongly preferred. Across the world, parents typically want a mix. But in America and Scandinavia, couples are likelier to have more children if their early ones are male, suggesting that more keep trying for a girl than do so for a boy. When seeking to adopt, couples pay extra for a girl. When undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and other sex-selection methods in countries where it is legal to choose the sex of the embryo, women increasingly opt for daughters. People prefer girls for all sorts of reasons. Some think they will be easier to bring up, or cherish what they see as feminine traits. In some countries, they may assume that looking after elderly parents is a daughter's job.

A school published an obituary for a beloved teacher. It turns out he's very much alive
A school published an obituary for a beloved teacher. It turns out he's very much alive

The Age

time2 days ago

  • The Age

A school published an obituary for a beloved teacher. It turns out he's very much alive

And so to Victoria's Central Highlands, and the (not so) hallowed halls of Ballarat Grammar. Regular readers will recall The Age has published a series of disturbing stories about the prestigious private institution over recent months. The school, which traces its forebears back to 1877, has storied alumni who include one-time premier Henry Bolte, ABC presenter James Valentine, opera singer David Hobson and AFL star Tony Lockett. The private school's war cry and school song is Boomalacka, which is also the name of school magazine, which has lately been generating interest for all the wrong reasons. The autumn 2025 edition of the biannual community magazine Boomalacka features an obituary for former staff member Chris Gardner, who was geography teacher from 2002 until 2007. There's even a photo. Aw. What a heartfelt way to commemorate the passing of an ex-teacher. Except there's one teeny problem … Gardner isn't dead. And was rather taken aback by the news of his unfortunate demise. 'Unfortunately, without any communication or consultation with my family, Ballarat Grammar School has announced my death to the school community,' says a Facebook post written by a very much alive Gardner. 'As you can imagine, I am quite upset about this!' The erroneous obituary and photograph were quickly wiped from the online version of Boomalacka. At this point, we feel duty bound to point out that: (a) CBD has, ahem, form in this regard, and (b) in the best traditions of mainstream media – our own sins would never stop us pointing out the misdemeanours of others.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store