Andhra Pradesh-Telangana Water Row: Nara Lokesh's Remarks Stirs Fresh Tensions Over Godavari Dispute
A fresh round of war of words has erupted between Telangana and Andhra Pradesh over sharing of river waters after Andhra Pradesh Minister Nara Lokesh defended the controversial Godavari-Banakacherla Link Project and declared that the government is determined to take Centre's approval for the same.
Two weeks after the Telugu states agreed to form a committee to address river water issues, Lokesh's comments have triggered new tension between the two neighbours.
The remarks by Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu's son not only drew strong reaction from the Congress government in Telangana but also provided more ammunition to Telangana's opposition Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS), which has been accusing Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy of mortgaging Telangana's interests to his "political guru", CM Naidu, by agreeing to a committee.
Lokesh, who is minister for Human Resources Development and Information Technology, not only questioned Telangana's objections to the project but also asked the neighbouring state if it had the approvals to build the Kaleshwaram project on the Godavari River.
Maintaining that Andhra Pradesh will be diverting Godavari water flowing into the sea to the Rayalaseema region through the Banakacherla project, Lokesh remarked, "Why should anyone have an objection to it?"
"We will be diverting the river water, which is coming to Andhra Pradesh after flowing through Telangana, and going into the sea. I am surprised why they should have an objection to it. Why did you build the Kaleshwaram project? Do you have regulatory committee approval?" he asked.
He alleged that some leaders were deliberately inciting regional animosities in the name of Banakacherla for political mileage.
Lokesh did not name any party, but BRS was quick to hit back at him. Claiming itself to be the only party which can protect the water rights of Telangana, BRS vowed to fight legally to stop the Banakacherla project.
"Speaking about our water rights is not inciting regional animosities. How is it wrong to speak about the future of our people? As the party that achieved Telangana, we will speak about our rightful share of water," said BRS leader and former irrigation minister T. Harish Rao.
On Lokesh's claim that Andhra Pradesh did not obstruct the Kaleshwaram project of Telangana, Harish Rao advised him to ask his father if he did not write seven letters to the Centre to stop the project.
Referring to Lokesh's remark that they have the "required power" to get the Centre's approval for Banakacherla, Harish Rao alleged that CM Naidu was acting as per his wish, as Revanth Reddy was maintaining silence.
"Revanth Reddy is busy paying 'guru dakshina' to Chandrababu Naidu," Harish Rao said, referring to the past relationship between the two chief ministers.
Lokesh's remarks also drew the ire of Telangana ministers and Congress leaders. They warned that his comments could harm the harmony between the two states.
Telangana Deputy Chief Minister Mallu Bhatti Vikramarka termed as "misleading" the statement by Lokesh that the Banakacherla project will divert water which is flowing into the sea. He argued that river basin states have a share in flood waters.
Vikramarka blamed the "incompetence" of BRS for the water going to the downstream. "The BRS during its 10-year rule failed to take up projects to utilise the state's share," he said.
He also made it clear that Telangana would not entertain further discussions about Banakacherla until its rights and needs were met.
Dismissing the BRS allegations of a secret understanding with the TDP-led coalition government in Andhra Pradesh, Vikramarka said that Chief Minister Revanth Reddy and Irrigation Minister Uttam Kumar Reddy went to Delhi to stop the Banakacherla project.
The Congress leaders also alleged that BRS, during its rule, mortgaged Telangana's water rights to Andhra Pradesh and claimed that their government is now trying to reclaim those rights.
The Union Government told Parliament last week that construction on Banakacherla has not begun as the Telangana government continues to raise serious objections to it.
Minister of State for Environment, Forest and Climate Change Kirti Vardhan Singh said in reply to a question that the ministry received a proposal seeking a grant of Terms of Reference for undertaking an environmental impact assessment study for the proposed project.
The proposal was appraised by the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) for River Valley and Hydro-Electric projects in its meeting held on June 17.
The EAC recommended that the project proponent should approach the Central Water Commission for examining the inter-state issues and grant of necessary clearance/permission/NOC before submitting the proposal for framing the TOR for conducting the EIA study. Accordingly, the EAC recommended the return of the proposal.
The Rajya Sabha was told that the project is being assessed by the Central Water Commission (CWC) in consultation with all concerned authorities and co-basin states.
Giving a new twist to the row, Lokesh said that the Andhra Pradesh government will ensure that the CWC gives its clearance for the Banakachelra project.
As the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) is a key partner in the BJP-led NDA government at the Centre, Congress and BRS leaders in Telangana have the apprehension that Chandrababu Naidu may influence the Centre to approve the project.
The Banakcherla project aims to divert 200 TMC (thousand million cubic feet) of Godavari floodwater to irrigate 7.41 lakh acres, stabilise 22.58 lakh acres in drought-prone Rayalaseema and south coastal districts, and supply industrial water.
During his meetings with Union Home Minister Amit Shah, Jal Shakti Minister C.R. Paatil and Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman recently, CM Naidu sought the Centre's help to complete the project, which is estimated to cost Rs 80,000 crore.
He explained that the project proposes to divert 200 TMC of floodwater from Polavaram to the Banakacherla regulator in Kurnool district. He stressed that, as the last state on the river's course, Andhra Pradesh has the rightful claim to fully utilise this surplus water from the Godavari.
CM Naidu maintained that the proposed project poses no harm to Telangana's interests. He has been stating that 2,000 TMC of Godavari water is flowing into the sea, and that if this water is utilised, it will benefit both the states.
Telangana is opposing the Banakacherla project as it fears that it will impact water availability and violate inter-state water sharing agreements.
At a meeting in Delhi on July 16 in the presence of the Jal Shakti Minister, the chief ministers of the two states agreed to constitute a committee to address all issues concerning Godavari and Krishna river waters.
It was announced that the committee will comprise senior officials, engineers and experts from both the Telugu states. It was to be formed in 3-4 days and come out with a way forward on all issues in 30 days. The committee has not yet been constituted.
While Telangana Chief Minister stated after the meeting that Banakacherla was not discussed in the meeting, Andhra Pradesh's Irrigation Minister Nimmala Rama Naidu claimed that it was the first item on the agenda and that the proposed committee will look into all issues, including Banakacherla.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
20 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Have To Act Accordingly": Shashi Tharoor Slams US For Additional 25% Tariffs
New Delhi: Slamming the United States for "double standard" for imposing an additional 25% tariff on India for buying Russian oil, Congress leader Shashi Tharoor on Wednesday said US President Donald Trump's move will make "our goods unaffordable to a lot of people in America." He pointed out that while China imports various materials, including more Russian oil than India, the country has received a "90-day break" from the US tariffs. "Uranium, Palladium, there are various things they (US) are importing from Russia. There is, unfortunately, a certain double standard involved. They have given the Chinese a 90-day break, but the Chinese are importing far more Russian oil than we are. So clearly this has not been a particularly friendly gesture from a country we thought was well disposed towards us, an administration that we thought was well disposed," Mr Tharoor told reporters. Suggesting that tariffs also might signal how the friendly relations between India and the US have been affected, the Congress leader mentioned the possibility of "pressures within India" for imposing reciprocal tariffs on American exports to India. "Very clearly, we have to act accordingly, and we will have to learn our lessons from this experience. I think there is certainly a likelihood that there will be some pressure within India now to impose comparable reciprocal tariffs on American exports to India. So I think we're going to have to really start looking at other trading partners much more in these circumstances," Mr Tharoor mentioned. "I don't think that's particularly good news for us and that takes our total tariffs to 50 per cent then that's going to make our goods unaffordable to a lot of people in America and in particularly when you're looking at these percentages you have to compare them with the tariffs being levied on some of our competitors," Mr Tharoor told ANI. Comparing the tariffs on other countries like Pakistan (19 pc), Bangladesh (20 pc), Philippines (19 pc), Indonesia (19), or even Vietnam (20 pc), the Congress leader said that this will effect Indian goods being bought in US, as people will look for the cheapest option. "This means we need to very seriously diversify to other countries and other markets that may be interested in what we have to offer. We now have an FTA with the UK. We are talking to the EU. There are many countries in which hopefully we would be able to, but in the short term, it is definitely a blow," Mr Tharoor told ANI. US President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order on August 6 imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on imports from India. Trump cited matters of national security and foreign policy concerns, as well as other relevant trade laws, for the increase, claiming that India's imports of Russian oil, directly or indirectly, pose an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to the United States. Terming the United States' move to impose additional tariffs on India over its oil imports from Russia as "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable," the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) declared that New Delhi will take "all actions necessary to protect its national interests. "In an official statement, the MEA said, "The United States has in recent days targeted India's oil imports from Russia. We have already made clear our position on these issues, including the fact that our imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India." "It is therefore extremely unfortunate that the US should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest," the statement added.
NDTV
30 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Will Raise J&K Statehood Issue InINDIA Bloc Meet In Delhi": Farooq Abdullah
Srinagar: Ruling National Conference (NC) president Farooq Abdullah Wednesday said he would raise the restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir issue in the meeting of INDIA bloc parties in Delhi the following day. Farooq Abdullah was responding to a question about Chief Minister Omar Abdullah's letter on Tuesday to the presidents of 42 political parties, including Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge, urging them to press the Centre to bring legislation in the ongoing Parliament session to restore statehood to J-K. "I am going there myself tomorrow. A Congress leader has called all opposition leaders. I will raise this issue there and hope that they have stood with us before as well, and will stand with us in future also," Abdullah told reporters in Anantnag district in south Kashmir. The NC chief also said the plea for the restoration of statehood to J-K is likely to be heard by the Supreme Court on Friday. "The statehood case is being heard by the Supreme Court on (August) 8. So, let us wait and see what happens there," he added. To a question about Mehbooba Mufti-led People's Democratic Party's (PDP's) criticism of the ruling party, the senior Abdullah said it is the PDP that brought "misfortune on us". "They joined hands with the BJP. What will they tell us? Unfortunately, they are fooling the people. Article 370 and 35A would not have been abrogated had (former CM) Mufti (Mohammad Sayeed) accepted the support from the National Conference and the Congress. "We had told him to take our support and we did not want any ministries. But they brought the BJP here and they are responsible. God has drowned them before and will drown them in the future as well," he added.
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
US Department of Education to reform special needs programs with more access, choice, and new learning models
The US Department of Education is moving toward a significant overhaul of its special needs programs, aiming to offer students with disabilities more personalized options, greater access, and innovative approaches to learning. This shift signals a new era in how special education is delivered across the country, with a focus on flexibility and family empowerment. Shifting the system to fit the student The department's new direction prioritizes student-centered learning models over traditional, one-size-fits-all structures. The reform aims to allow families to choose schools and programs that align better with the unique needs of their children, rather than forcing students to conform to rigid institutional norms. The approach calls for school systems to adopt more customized learning strategies, expand specialized services, and integrate modern educational tools. By broadening access to different types of schools—including charter, private, and online programs—students with disabilities are expected to gain more opportunities for success. Adapting a decades-old law to a modern world At the core of this transformation is the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), a federal law passed in 1975 to guarantee educational rights for children with disabilities. Nearly 8 million students aged 3 to 21 are currently eligible under IDEA, along with hundreds of thousands of younger children. While the law remains foundational, the Department of Education is emphasizing the need to modernize its implementation. This includes incorporating 21st-century learning tools, allowing for more flexibility in service delivery, and encouraging schools to think beyond compliance and toward innovation. Growing focus on school choice The reforms align with the current administration's broader education agenda, which includes expanding school choice options through federal tax incentives. A new provision passed by Congress enables funding for private school tuition, homeschooling, tutoring, transportation, and technology—if states opt in. However, this expansion into private and alternative schooling has raised concerns about equity and oversight. Critics point out that private institutions are not bound by the same legal obligations as public schools, particularly when it comes to accommodating students with disabilities. Balancing innovation and civil rights Despite ongoing staffing cuts at the Education Department, the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) remains intact—indicating that special education remains a key area of focus. The Department is encouraging state and district leaders to rethink how special needs services are designed and delivered, urging them to adopt new models while staying grounded in civil rights protections. The reform effort also includes plans to give states and districts more decision-making power, allowing local leaders to tailor their programs according to community needs and student diversity. The road ahead Implementation of these reforms will vary by state, depending on whether local governments choose to adopt the new federal programs and funding structures. In the coming years, the Department hopes to see a broader mix of school models, including public, private, charter, and specialized schools designed to support different learning needs. This marks a major shift in how special education is viewed—not just as a service, but as a system that should evolve with the needs of modern learners and their families. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
