National Guard in DC: How many troops were sent to Washington? Can they arrest locals? All FAQs
How many National Guard troops have been deployed to DC?
The guard members entered the DC National Guard's headquarters, just next to the Capitol, earlier this week. On Monday, the Army activated about 800 soldiers to be mobilized in Washington, DC. According to officials, they will assist law enforcement.
Read More: Is Jimmy Kimmel planning to leave US after Trump's warning? Late-night host confirms Italian citizenship
'Currently, the National Guard is being deployed to protect federal assets, provide a safe environment for law enforcement officers to make arrests, and deter violent crime with a visible law enforcement presence," a White House official said Monday, as per NBC News.
Can the National Guard arrest locals?
No, under the District's Home Rule Act, DC National Guard troops are prohibited from making arrests. Their role is limited to administrative, logistical support, and providing a visible presence to deter crime, with any detentions handed over to local or federal law enforcement.
Read More: Why did Donald Trump deploy the National Guard in Washington?
Other FAQs
Why were troops deployed? Trump cited rising crime and disorder to assert federal control over the Democrat-led city.
Is this legal? Yes, the DC National Guard operates under presidential control, bypassing restrictions on state guards.
How long will they stay? The deployment runs from August 11 to September 25, 2025, unless extended by Congress or terminated earlier if conditions stabilize.
What will they do? Tasks include supporting police with physical presence, guarding federal assets, and aiding logistical efforts, mirroring border security roles.
Has this happened before? Yes, Trump deployed troops in 2020 to manage protests after George Floyd's murder.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump hoping to achieve halt to Ukraine fighting in Putin talks, Rubio says
US President Donald Trump will go into talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday hoping to achieve a halt to the fighting in Ukraine, but a comprehensive solution to the war will take longer, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said. 'To achieve a peace, I think we all recognize that there'll have to be some conversation about security guarantees. There'll have to be some conversation about … territorial disputes and claims, and what they're fighting over,' Rubio told reporters at the State Department on Thursday. 'All these things will be part of a comprehensive thing. But I think the President's hope is to achieve some stoppage of fighting so that those conversations can happen.' Rubio said that the longer wars go on, the harder they are to end. 'And even as I speak … there are changes happening in the battlefield which have an impact on what one side views as leverage or the other. So that's the reality of ongoing fighting, which is why a ceasefire is so critical,' he said. 'But we'll see what's possible tomorrow. Let's see how the talks go. And we're hopeful. We want there to be a peace. We're going to do everything we can to achieve one, but ultimately it'll be up to Ukraine and Russia to agree to one.' Rubio said preparations for the meeting were going 'very fast,' as it had been put together very quickly. He said he believed Trump had spoken by phone to Putin four times and 'felt it was important to now speak to him in person and look him in the eye and figure out what was possible and what isn't.' 'He sees an opportunity to talk about achieving peace. He's going to pursue it, and we'll know tomorrow at some point, as the President said, probably very early in that meeting, whether something is possible or not. We hope it is.'
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Democracy is dying at SC's doorstep, says Uddhav, urges CJI to take care of it
Democracy is dying at the doorstep of Supreme Court, said Shiv Sena (UBT) president and former Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray on Thursday, and requested the Chief Justice of India to take care of it. He was speaking at a conclave held by the Opposition parties and civil society organisations against the state government's recently passed Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill. 'Yesterday (Wednesday), the Chief Justice agreed to refer the case of stray dogs to a bigger bench and give it a hearing. The dogs of Delhi are getting a hearing… You all know that cases regarding Shiv Sena and NCP are pending at the Supreme Court. What we are getting is date after date. I have said this earlier and am saying it again. Democracy is dying at your (SC) doorstep and I request you to please take care of it. If democracy is saved, people are saved and then dogs too would be saved,' said Thackeray. Questioning the meaning of 'Left extremism' as mentioned in the bill, Thackeray said had it been against terrorists and traitors, he would have supported it. 'Hang them (terrorist and traitors) irrespective of their caste, creed or religion. Is there a mention of terrorists or traitors in this bill? Had it been against them, we would have supported it,' said Thackeray. He mentioned that the existing laws are being used selectively, giving the example of arrest of Vasai-Virar municipal Corporation official for possession of cash and letting go of Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena minister Sanjay Shirsat who was seen with bag of cash in a video that went viral on social media a month ago. Maharashtra Congress Chief Harshvardhan Sapkal said, 'This bill is a brainchild of a power hungry Chief Minister who wants to implement the ideology presented in Bunch of Thoughts (a book written by former RSS head MS Golawalkar). This is nothing but an attempt by the CM to impress his party leadership to overpower the possible power battle against the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister.' Earlier, Nationalist Congress Party (SP) president Sharad Pawar said that the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill will trample on people's freedom of expression. Pawar conceded that the bill was not opposed effectively when it was introduced in the legislative Assembly last month by the BJP-led government, but added that the necessary course correction was done in the legislative council. Maharashtra state secretary of CPM Ajit Navale said that all political parties across ideologies have come together with one aim. 'The aim is to ensure withdrawal of this bill. And I am confident that we will achieve it unitedly,' said Navale. Social activist Ulka Mahajan said that a three-step agitation path will be followed against the bill. She said that agitation will be held on September 10 across Maharashtra against the bill. 'At least one public rally will be held in each constituency of Opposition legislators and we will also take the bill to the court,' said Mahajan.
The Hindu
16 minutes ago
- The Hindu
India ‘fully engaged' with U.S. on trade deal, says Commerce Secretary
India continues to be 'fully engaged' with the U.S. on a Bilateral Trade Agreement, Commerce Secretary Sunil Barthwal said on Thursday, however adding that the date for the next round of negotiations has not yet been decided. He reiterated the deadline for the deal as fall 2025, or September-October 2025, as announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and U.S. President Donald Trump. Official sources have also confirmed that India was working with both the U.K. and the EU to fast-track the implementation of the respective trade deals India was concluding with them. During the Indian team's visit to Washington in July to continue negotiations on the deal, it had been decided that the next round would take place in New Delhi during the last week of August. However, a lot has changed since then. US President Donald Trump on July 31 approved a 25% tariff on imports from India, and then on August 6 approved an additional 25% tariffs as a 'penalty' for India's imports of Russian oil. Mr. Trump has also indicated that further negotiations would not take place until the Russia oil issue was resolved. Against this backdrop of uncertainty, Mr. Barthwal said that negotiations on the BTA were still progressing. Negotiations progressing 'We are fully engaged with the U.S. on the trade negotiations,' Mr. Barthwal said at a press briefing. 'There was a joint statement that was given by the U.S. President and our Prime Minister where it was said India and the U.S. would engage in a bilateral trade agreement and simultaneously we would also aim to more than double our trade to $500 billion.' 'Those talks are going on,' he added. 'The BTA talks are going on. We are engaged.' However, Mr. Barthwal added that the final date for the next round of negotiations would be decided closer to the last week of August. According to official sources who declined to be named, the negotiations and engagement between India and the U.S. was taking place at different levels. 'One level is at the negotiating team' level, another one happens at the Ministers' level, the third happens at the diplomatic levels, and we also engage the different industries of the U.S. to look into their issues,' the official explained. Other deals being fast-tracked The India-United Kingdom Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), signed in July, is now in the final stage where the UK is concluding its due processes in its Parliament. 'We have requested the UK to fast-track this process so it comes into force as early as possible,' another government source said. They added that the Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement (TEPA) between India and the EFTA countries — Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland — would come into force on October 1. 'With the EU, we are fast-tracking the negotiations,' they explained. 'But a lot of work has progressed and it was decided that the FTA would be concluded by the end of December. It has made good progress and there are further meetings that are going to happen, at the negotiators' level, the Secretary level, and at the Ministerial level.' With Oman, the talks on a trade agreement have concluded and the deal will be signed 'very soon', when the dates are decided by both countries. Good progress with ASEAN countries The negotiating team representing the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries was in India between August 10-14 to review the Trade in Goods Agreement between the two. 'We are telling them that we need to increase trade between India and ASEAN,' the official said. 'Everybody is concerned about the uncertain global policy environment. They have realised that both ASEAN and India move forward and improve trade between the two blocks.' They added that India and the ASEAN countries were not only looking at tariff issues but also non-tariff issues, such as Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) measures and Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) and regulatory compliances. 'Since these are issues that require deep analysis, that analysis is going on,' the official said. 'This round has been quite fruitful. There is a lot of clarity on how we should move forward.'
