Apple in talks to secure US Formula 1 streaming rights following success of Brad Pitt ‘F1' film
The iPhone maker's move follows the strong box office performance of its original movie F1, starring Brad Pitt, which has become Apple's highest-grossing film to date. The film, alongside Netflix's Drive to Survive documentary series, has boosted interest in the sport among younger, female and American audiences.
Apple eyes F1 broadcast rights
Formula 1's US rights are currently held by ESPN, which pays around $85 million annually for the broadcasts. However, ESPN's exclusive negotiation period ended last year without a deal, opening the bidding process to other interested parties including Apple.
Analysts at Citi estimate the next US broadcast deal could be worth approximately $121 million per year, a figure likely to rise following the film's success. Formula 1's global media rights revenue grew by almost 8 per cent to about $1.1 billion in 2024.
Liberty Media, the owner of Formula 1, has prioritised the US market, adding Miami and Las Vegas to the race calendar in recent years. Cadillac, backed by billionaire financier Mark Walter and General Motors, is set to join the grid as the 11 th team in 2026.
Viewership of Formula 1 races on ESPN has doubled since Liberty Media took control in 2017, from 554,000 average viewers per race in 2018 to around 1.1 million in 2024. The first 10 events this year averaged 1.3 million viewers, with record audiences for races in Australia, China, Monaco, Spain, Canada and Austria.
Apple has also made moves in live sports streaming, with deals to broadcast Major League Baseball Friday night games and Major League Soccer matches in North America.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Crypto Insight
an hour ago
- Crypto Insight
Strategy launches Bitcoin stock pegged at $100 to increase treasury
Strategy, the world's largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, is launching a new type of stock offering to raise additional funds for further investment in the cryptocurrency. Michael Saylor's Strategy announced plans to conduct an initial public offering of 5 million shares of Strategy's Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock (STRC). Strategy will use the net proceeds for 'general corporate purposes, including the acquisition of Bitcoin and for working capital,' it announced on Monday. Unlike previous offerings, the STRC Stock will accumulate cumulative dividends at a variable rate on the stated amount of $100 per share. The initial monthly regular dividend will be 9% annually. The announcement comes two weeks after Strategy announced a $4.2 billion at-the-market (ATM) offering on July 7, which functions as an equity-raising mechanism designed to enable the firm to sell newly issued shares to buy more Bitcoin. . The new offering will be available through an initial public offering (IPO) to 'select investors,' Saylor said in a Monday X post. STRC dividend stock to trade akin to a synthetic stablecoin? Strategy's new offering aims to 'adjust the monthly regular dividend rate per annum in such manner as Strategy believes is designed to cause the STRC Stock to trade at prices at or close to its stated amount of $100 per share,' the announcement said. This mechanism makes the STRC stock akin to a 'new financial lifeform' optimized to 'convert fiat into Bitcoin at velocity,' according to Bitcoin author Adam Livingston. 'Strategy can tweak the rate each month to keep $STRC trading near $100 par like a synthetic stablecoin with yield,' wrote Livingston in a Monday X post, adding: 'You're not buying stock. You're buying a yield-targeted Bitcoin conduit.' This mechanism will enable Strategy to 'attract fiat via yield' and 'dollar-cost average into Bitcoin,' added the author. The new stock offering was announced shortly after Strategy bought $740 million worth of Bitcoin on Monday, at an average price $118,940 per coin, signaling more confidence in Bitcoin's price trajectory. Bitcoin-focused treasury companies like Strategy and Metaplanet may drive Bitcoin to become a $100 trillion market opportunity, according to Adam Back, co-founder and CEO of Blockstream and the inventor of Hashcash. 'A sustainable and scalable $100-$200 trillion trade front-running hyperbitcoinization. Scalable enough for most big listed companies to move to BTC treasury,' wrote Back in an April 26 X post. Source:
Zawya
3 hours ago
- Zawya
Fed reform may move markets more than Powell ouster: Mike Dolan
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.) LONDON - Changing the way the Federal Reserve operates or assesses the economy may have a more durable impact on policy and markets than firing the Fed boss. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent added another twist to President Donald Trump's ongoing criticism of Fed Chair Jerome Powell on Monday by claiming he wanted to review the entire Fed institution and its performance. In an interview with CNBC, Bessent claimed the Fed's "fear-mongering over tariffs" without significant signs of inflation was justification for considering a root-and-branch review of the central bank's functioning. "What we need to do is examine the entire Federal Reserve institution and whether they have been successful," he said. "All these PhDs over there, I don't know what they do." It's not yet clear whether Bessent was merely heaping more pressure on the Fed to speed up interest rate cuts, as Trump has been demanding almost daily, or whether the administration is actually planning to conduct a formal review of Fed operations, analysis and execution. While recent weeks have been filled with anxious noise about Trump attempting to fire Powell, this latest development - possible changes to the way the Fed ticks - could be much more far-reaching and impactful than simply truncating the tenure of one Chair. Of course, the Fed Chair is an important role, and a politically motivated ouster would be a serious challenge to Fed independence. Yet the Fed boss ultimately remains just one vote on the rate-setting board, and the Fed's policymaking structure is partly designed to insulate the central bank from any undue political influence. The Federal Open Market Committee that sets policy is made up of seven Fed board members and five regional Fed bosses, but the FOMC chair and vice chair are voted in by the committee at the start of each year. The Fed Chair typically takes the helm by convention, but not necessity. If a majority of the FOMC members balked at a politically partisan appointee to the top job, they could theoretically vote for a different Chair of the FOMC in an act of defiance. But, regardless, the Chair is still only one vote. PRICE TOO HIGH Changing the Fed's institutional structure would require Congressional approval, a process likely to be protracted as many Republicans, including strong Trump supporters, may be wary of tampering with the Fed. Moreover, a recent Supreme Court ruling also suggested Fed structures should be left in place due to "a special historical status". But influencing the way the Fed thinks, forecasts and operates is a different matter. To complicate matters further, the Wall Street Journal on Monday claimed Bessent counseled Trump against firing Powell, arguing that the current Fed Chair might sue, or Congress could drag its feet on approving a replacement. Both scenarios could result in a leadership hiatus that would see Joe Biden appointee Vice Fed Chair Philip Jefferson assume the role. Bessent argued the price of removing Powell now was potential market disruption and economic uncertainty for no real gain in influence compared with waiting for Powell's term to just expire in May, the WSJ said. Trump, already battling with the WSJ on another story, dismissed the report as 'fake'. Bessent said the decision was ultimately up to Trump. But the messiness of Powell's removal may be why the administration sees other pressure on the Fed to buckle on rates soon as more fruitful. After all, two Trump appointees to the board - Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman - already arguing for immediate cuts and two more board positions, including Powell's, are likely to come up by this time next year. That would leave a majority on the board being Trump appointees - even though not the FOMC. SGH Macro Advisors' Tim Duy reckons that to reshape the Fed, the White House needs even more seats to shift the board - building a block of Trump nominees sufficient to out-vote the five regional Presidents that make up the rest of the FOMC. Without that, it leaves the Trump team trying to change the DNA of Fed thinking and a major review that shifts standing assumptions, forecasting patterns and public presentations may be significant longer-term. Current favorite to be Trump's pick for the Chair, former Fed policymaker Kevin Warsh, who is a known critic of orthodox Fed analysis, doubts there's a trade-off between jobs and inflation the way it's currently presented and claims rates can move lower if balance sheet policies were tighter. If markets think it's inappropriate to ease now, of course, then inflation expectations may just build on fears of undue political influence and long-term borrowing rates should rise. But it may not be that clean. "The goal appears to be to keep policy rates low while shifting U.S. Treasury issuance to the front end of the curve," wrote SGH Macro's Duy. "While excessively loose policy would be expected to raise long term rates, there is the possibility that Fed and Treasury manage the debt with an eye toward yield curve control." That's a delicate balance that might come off - but guaranteeing the Fed comes on board will not be easy. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters -- Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn. Plus, sign up for my weekday newsletter Morning Bid U.S. (by Mike Dolan; editing by Nia Williams)
Economy ME
4 hours ago
- Economy ME
Crude oil prices rise to $68.75 as U.S.-Japan trade deal boosts market optimism
Oil prices increased slightly during Asian trading on Wednesday after experiencing three consecutive days of decline. This uptick follows a recent U.S. trade deal with Japan that indicates progress on tariffs, although the overall gains were limited by diminished expectations for a significant outcome at an upcoming EU-China summit. Brent crude futures climbed by 21 cents, or 0.31 percent, reaching $68.80 a barrel by 03:51 GMT (currently trading above $68.75). Meanwhile, U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures rose by 17 cents, or 0.26 percent, to $65.48 per barrel (currently trading above $65.45). Both benchmarks had dropped approximately 1 percent in the previous session after the EU announced it was contemplating countermeasures against U.S. tariffs, leading to waning optimism for a resolution ahead of the August 1 deadline. President Donald Trump stated on Tuesday that the U.S. and Japan had finalized a trade deal that includes a 15 percent tariff on U.S. imports from Japan. He also noted that Japan had committed to investing $550 billion in the U.S. Low expectations for EU-China Summit Traders are expressing concerns that Trump's tariff policies may result in a slowdown of global economic growth and diminished energy demand, potentially putting downward pressure on WTI prices. Trump mentioned that reciprocal tariffs would increase on August 1 for trade partners that have not reached an agreement with the U.S. Earlier this week, he threatened a 30 percent tariff on imports from the European Union (EU) if no deal was finalized. In the meantime, industry expectations remain low for Thursday's EU-China summit, which will test the bloc's unity and resolve amid escalating trade tensions with both Beijing and Washington. According to the Chinese ministry, China's commerce minister and the European Union's trade chief had a 'candid and in-depth' discussion regarding economic and trade cooperation, along with other issues that both sides face leading up to the summit. Separately, market sources reported that U.S. crude and gasoline stocks saw a decline last week, as cited by the American Petroleum Institute figures released on Tuesday. Distillate stocks, however, increased by 3.48 million barrels. Global supply glut concerns In another encouraging sign for the crude market, the U.S. energy secretary indicated on Tuesday that the U.S. is considering sanctioning Russian oil to expedite the resolution of the war in Ukraine. Additionally, worries about an expanding global oil supply glut may contribute to downward pressure on WTI. The Iraqi government has officially resumed crude oil exports from the Kurdistan Region after a halt of over two years. This move is expected to alleviate tensions between Baghdad and Erbil while boosting national export volumes. Kurdistan anticipates supplying Iraq's crude market with 230,000 barrels per day (bpd) once exports resume. The potential for increased crude exports from Iraq may enhance global oil supplies and undermine WTI prices in the near term. U.S. crude oil inventories decreased last week, which could offer some support to WTI prices. The American Petroleum Institute 's weekly crude oil stock report revealed that crude oil stockpiles in the U.S. declined by 577,000 barrels for the week ending July 18, in contrast to a rise of 19.1 million barrels the previous week. So far this year, crude oil inventories have increased by 11 million barrels, according to calculations from Oilprice based on API data.
