logo
A New Challenge for New York Fashion

A New Challenge for New York Fashion

NEW YORK — At its midcentury peak, the streets of the Garment District — a stretch of Midtown home to New York's clothing manufacturing industry — were filled with so many rushing racks of fabric and A-line dresses it was hard to pass through.
That romantic image is far in the past.
Since the 1970s, the city's manufacturing capacity has diminished over 90 percent, according to the New York Economic Development Council. Today, former garment factories, workshops and storefronts sit abandoned. Still, it's the historic and operational centre of New York fashion, where third-generation makers and some of the industry's biggest names craft runway collections and Met Gala dresses.
A new zoning measure passed by the Department of City Planning, or DCP, in June could change that. If approved by city council and New York mayor Eric Adams, as expected later this summer, the Midtown South Mixed-Use plan, known as MSMX, will lift manufacturing zoning protections to allow the neighbourhood's buildings to be converted into housing.
The district saw manufacturing rules relaxed in both 2004 and 2018, and given the industry's shrinkage in the area, many consider the move overdue. Fashion wouldn't be pushed out, DCP said. In its environmental impact analysis, however, it found 114 fashion-related businesses, out of a total of nearly 500 still operating in the area, could be displaced, mostly due to the inevitable rent increases that would follow redevelopment.
Opponents worry that in its current state, the plan could further harm an already weak ecosystem, still feeling the aftershocks of Covid's impact. While the Garment District is far from its height, it's not yet a relic. Brands — especially young labels — rely on the area's sample and pattern-makers, sewers, finishers, button suppliers and other specialised makers, and their close proximity fosters creativity and resource sharing. The impact wouldn't be immediate, but it could force some makers to either relocate or shutter altogether, which has implications for fashion.
'This perpetual erosion of the Garment District is an active dismantling of our creative infrastructure,' said Tessa Maffucci, assistant chair of fashion at Pratt Institute and The Fashion Workforce Development Coalition lead. 'What has made New York a global capital is we have this innovative, playful, break-the-rules model that works because of this diverse ecosystem of makers that are centrally located and clustered together. When we lose that, we don't get the next Ralph Lauren.'
Of course, Ralph Lauren emerged from a different Garment District, over 50 years ago. Now, it mostly operates as an 'R&D hub' with small-batch production, said Steven Kolb, chief executive of the Council of Fashion Designers of America. He doesn't believe the rezoning represents a major threat to the district's primary uses.
But as designer Jackson Wiederhoeft, who makes his namesake ready-to-wear and bridal line in the Garment District, put it, 'It's a beautiful plant that's teetering and needs more soil … instead, we're putting it into a smaller pot and chopping off fruit. It's never going to grow into a huge tree if we keep reducing the size of the pot.'
The situation is one of many challenges New York fashion faces today. Last year, The Partnership for New York City, a business advocacy group, published a report with consulting firm McKinsey, alleging New York's status as a global fashion capital is at risk, citing lack of support for emerging talent, the closure of specialty stores, high operating costs, disintegration of manufacturing and a fragmented and increasingly negligible fashion week. There's no clear solution to these problems, with fashion businesses in the middle.
'The challenge is to work within a system that is in disruption,' said Stan Herman, designer and former CFDA president. 'We're not moving backwards.' Everything Is an Ecosystem
While much of fashion has filtered out of the Garment District for downtown or even further out to Bushwick, Long Island City and Sunset Park (which the city pushed for in 2018), it's still the symbolic center of the industry.
'It's a representation of New York itself. You had a dream, and you came to New York to make it happen,' said Wen Zhou, co-founder and chief executive of 3.1 Phillip Lim, which launched in the early 2000s.
Brands including Thom Browne, Carolina Herrera and Calvin Klein have offices, ateliers and showrooms in the area, and often work with local finishers and patternmakers on samples and special pieces. Up-and-coming designers, such as Kallmeyer, TWP, Meruert Tolegen and Grace Ling, in particular, benefit from the collaboration, speed and access it provides.
As a fashion capital, New York's evergreen advantage is its proximity to culture and American consumption. But a fashion capital needs a strong talent pool, top schools to churn it out, retailers, a fashion week that attracts international press and buyers, access to funding, media and production capabilities, all firing in tandem.
'Every piece of it needs the other piece to continue to go,' said Sergio Hudson, the LA-based designer of his namesake line, which is made entirely in New York.
Fashion 'is all about immediacy,' said Zhou, and local production creates a 'feedback loop' that fosters experimentation and efficiency. When 3.1 Phillip Lim was just getting started, 'the speed and flexibility made it feel like we were able to do anything and everything.'
But it's also crucial for vendors themselves, many of whom now share employees, depending on the unpredictable ebb and flow of work. The opportunity to learn in the district is a huge pull for New York's fashion schools, said Naika Colas, associate director of fashion management at Parsons School of Design. Working designers rely on the district's experts in construction and commerciality.
'They know exactly what needs to go in these stores. They know what Saks wants, they know what Neimans wants,' said Hudson. 'My brand wouldn't be what it was if it wasn't for those people that poured knowledge into me.'
For designers just starting out who can't meet minimums to manufacture abroad or manage importing complexity, local production is often the only option. But proponents say there are advantages for anyone, especially now, given president Donald Trump's protectionist trade policies. Brands don't have to take as big of risks on inventory and can closely react to demand without falling into a pattern of discounting, said Gigi Burris, a milliner and the founder of Closely Crafted, an organisation aimed at preserving American craftsmanship.
Though as a brand scales, producing in the Garment District gets more challenging because of capacity. Underlying the real-estate struggle is a skilled-talent crisis, which spans outside New York. Plus, technology is relatively aged. Ready-to-wear label Tanner Fletcher, for example, got its start in the Garment District in 2020, but to meet growth goals, moved half of its production to a factory in China this year.
'We're able to make a lot more and the quality is really good … [even with tariffs] it's still more cost effective to produce in China,' said designer Tanner Richie. Evening wear and wedding collections are still made in the Garment District because 'we need to be fitting it on customers really quickly.'
Changed systems reflect a changed world. While New York needs to 'preserve, subsidise and support the garment manufacturing industry,' strict centralisation around the district is not important because designers can do a lot remotely, said Gary Wassner, founder of financing and factoring company Hilldun Corp.
Something is lost, though.
'You lose the feeling of an industry working together, you lose the feeling of energy, excitement and creativity, being part of an ecosystem,' said Wassner. A Fashion or Finance Capital?
There is some optimism: Fashion stakeholders such as the NYFWDC, CFDA, Closely Crafted and Pratt Fashion want to harness the moment to secure support in a city where it's hard to come by, despite the industry contributing over $3 billion in annual tax revenue and immeasurable cultural impact.
While other cities like Paris and Milan protect fashion as a crucial cultural export with tax and trade incentives, subsidised shows and support schemes, New York has toggled between inconsistent and laissez faire approaches. It also lacks the stabilising influence of luxury giants.
'Fashion is a big economic driver,' said Kolb. 'The city knows and understands that … but sometimes we are at a disadvantage because we don't get the government support that other cities get. Everything we do we're on our own.'
The CFDA supported the 2018 rezoning, with the Economic Development Council promising $20 million in funding to aid in purchasing a fashion-specific building and tax abatements for landlords who house manufacturers, none of which materialised, said Kolb. The city also pledged funding to the Garment District Alliance (the neighbourhood's business development organisation), aimed at supporting the district, that the NYFWDC says has yet to be funneled to makers.
'You can point a lot of fingers,' said Kolb. But 'now in 2025 I want to see how you're going to make good on those promises.'
In addition to re-upping pledges made in 2018, groups have advocated for expanding local workforce programs, and establishing a displacement relief fund for those negatively impacted. The CFDA has pushed for reconsideration of its 'The Local Production Fund,' a proposal that would offset costs to make in New York with credits to factories. Kolb said he feels positive about the progression of talks with the city.
'The garment and fashion sectors are important segments of the city's economy, and we are committed to investing in these sectors,' said Joe Marvilli, DCP deputy press secretary, in an email to BoF. 'We will continue to work with our partners across City government to identify how to support the district, including through non-zoning tools and small business support, as this plan moves forward.'
Consistent business would reduce prices, said George Kalajian, a fifth-generation pleater who has worked with brands including Carolina Herrera, Khaite and Proenza Schouler. 'I have seven pleating machines. One is running almost every day. If two of my machines ran everyday, I could drop my prices by 50 percent. More work circulating here would be so much better for all of us,' Kalajian said.
In New York, everything comes down to dollars and cents. The city has an affordability problem. Rising rents have quickened the pace of closures in the Garment District. Designers, meanwhile, lament the cost of showing, working and living as compared with other fashion capitals. In turn, some talent has seeped out.
In the face of so many challenges, proactivity is important, said Herman.
'We have to be aggressive about how we feel about fashion, otherwise the world will pass us by,' Herman said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ethics panel: Pennsylvania Republican violated code of conduct with spouse's stock trades
Ethics panel: Pennsylvania Republican violated code of conduct with spouse's stock trades

The Hill

time2 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Ethics panel: Pennsylvania Republican violated code of conduct with spouse's stock trades

The House Ethics Committee 'found substantial evidence' that Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) violated the code of conduct for the lower chamber when his wife profited off stock trades for a company the congressman was focusing on in Washington. The report — which spans 28 pages and has three packets of supporting documents — cleared Kelly of intentionally causing his wife to trade based on insider information and having a conflict of interest, determining there wasn't evidence to prove those two wrongdoings. But the panel found that Kelly, a member of the powerful Ways and Means Committee, breached the House's code of conduct 'by failing to meet his duty of candor.' The committee ordered he and his wife to divest their investments in Cleveland-Cliffs, the steel manufacturer at the center of the report. 'Representative Kelly's conduct with respect to Cleveland-Cliffs and his wife's stock purchase raised significant concerns for the Committee, even if it did not rise to the level of insider trading or clearly violate conflict of interest rules,' the committee wrote, later adding Kelly 'has not demonstrated sufficient appreciation for the harm to the institution caused by the appearance of impropriety.' The panel's investigation focuses on a series of trades of Cleveland-Cliffs stock that Kelly's wife, Victoria, made in the last five years. Cleveland-Cliffs in 2020 acquired AK Steel, which is the sole producer of grain oriented electrical steel (GOES) in the U.S. GOES is produced in Butler, Pa., a town in Kelly's district. In early 2020, Cleveland-Cliffs had said it may have to close the Butler location and lay off employees if the Trump administration did not implement Section 232 tariffs, which would protect the production of GOES in the U.S. Kelly took part in actions in Washington to address the matter. On April 28 of that year, the Commerce Department told Cleveland-Cliffs — and Kelly learned — it would begin a Section 232 investigation for some GOES-based steel products, according to the report. The next day, the panel learned, Victoria Kelly bought 5,000 shares of Cleveland-Cliffs stock for $23,075. The investigation was announced on May 4. The committee said it was unable to determine if Victoria Kelly was made aware of the development before making the trade. But, the congressman was working from home at the time after testing positive for COVID-19 and told the committee 'Mrs. Kelly would've heard any of my conversations,' adding that she 'sits around for most of the time I'm on the phone,' according to the report. The panel said it could definitely determine if she heard the conversation. The Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act, enacted in 2012, prohibits members and staff from engaging in insider trading using information learned in official capacities. While Kelly was interviewed as part of the investigation, his wife 'refused to participate in a voluntary interview or to respond to written questions from the Committee, citing her prior cooperation with document requests as well as health concerns,' according to the report. The Congressman also said his wife did not want to speak to the committee because she felt the process was 'invasive.' 'The Committee did not receive full cooperation from Mrs. Kelly and was therefore unable to determine whether her stock purchase was improper,' the report reads. The panel did, however, find that the investment in Cleveland-Cliffs 'was an outlier' in her portfolio, noting that unlike other trades that were made at her firm's discretion, that transaction 'had to be instructed and confirmed directly by Mrs. Kelly in order for the transaction to be completed because it was not on PNC's investment platform.' The move marked her first purchase of individual stock in a year, according to the report, and was different from the mainly funds and bonds on her account. Kelly said he believed his wife made the transaction because 'she thought the stock was so low priced, it'd be foolish not to… I know that she thought she made a hell of a buy.' In August 2020, however, Kelly's office told a local news outlet inquiring about the purchase that it was made 'to show her support for the workers and management of this 100-year old bedrock of their hometown, where they both are life-long residents.' The second transaction examined by the committee was made in January 2021, shortly after Cleveland-Cliffs in December 2020 acquired a steel manufacturing corporation that caused its stock to skyrocket in value. Victoria Kelly that month sold all her shares in the company for $87,551.06, turning a $64,476.06 profit. 'None of the witnesses interviewed by OCC or the Committee, including Representative Kelly, provided an explanation for why Mrs. Kelly chose to sell her stock at that time. Representative Kelly told the Committee he did not speak with Mrs. Kelly about the sale at any point,' the report reads. Then in June 2024, Kelly disclosed that his wife purchased between $50,000 and $100,000 in shares of Cleveland-Cliffs back in March, as the congressman's office was involved in a matter involving the company and the Department of Energy. In March, the Energy Department made a decision on the matter that protected the facility in Butler. As a result of the findings, the panel recommended that Kelly and his wife 'divest all of Cleveland-Cliffs stock should he continue to take official actions relating to the company.' 'It is rare for the Committee to recommend divestment of stocks where there is a potential appearance of a conflict of interest. As Representative Kelly himself noted, however, he is an 'insider' when it comes to Cleveland-Cliffs, by virtue of his position as the representative for his district,' the report reads. In a statement responding to the Ethics report, Kelly said: 'This investigation has unnecessarily lasted for nearly five years.' 'In the years since this investigation began, the Cleveland Cliffs Butler Works plant faced an uncertain future due to the Biden administration's reckless energy policies. Throughout this process, I have fought for the 1,400 workers at the plant, I've spoken with these workers, and they appreciate the hard work we have done to fight for those jobs and for Butler. My family and I look forward to putting this distraction behind us,' he added.

Trump floats tariff 'rebate' for consumers. That could be a challenge, experts say
Trump floats tariff 'rebate' for consumers. That could be a challenge, experts say

CNBC

time5 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Trump floats tariff 'rebate' for consumers. That could be a challenge, experts say

President Donald Trump said the administration is considering a rebate for some consumers from revenue raised by higher tariffs on U.S. trade partners. When asked by a reporter on Friday at the White House about a possible rebate for Americans from tariff revenue, Trump said: "We're thinking about that. We have so much money coming in, we're thinking about a little rebate." "The big thing we want to do is pay down debt," Trump said. "But we're thinking about a rebate." "A little rebate for people of a certain income level might be very nice," he said. It's unclear whether a rebate could happen without Congressional approval. If enacted, it's unknown whether the rebate would come via stimulus checks or another form of tax relief, experts say. More from Personal Finance:Student loan forgiveness may soon be taxed againWhat the Fed's interest-rate decision could mean for your moneyHow to lower capital gains on your home sale as Trump eyes ending the tax "It's kind of unlikely that they would go ahead and do that," said Tax Foundation senior economist Alex Durante. "But I wouldn't put anything past this administration." The Treasury Department reported an unexpected surplus for June, with a boost from tariff revenue. Customs duties totaled roughly $27 billion for the month, compared to $23 billion in May. The duties reflect a 301% gain from June 2024. Trump's rebate idea comes as a chorus of lawmakers and policy experts voice concerns about the federal budget deficit. "I don't think [a rebate] would be particularly good policy," Durante said. "I would prefer that the revenue was used for deficit reduction rather than just cutting checks to people." Enacted in early July, Trump's "one big beautiful" tax-and-spending package could add an estimated $3.4 trillion to the deficit through 2034, according to a conventional score released by the Congressional Budget Office this week. The motivation for sending the direct payments would be different than they were during the Covid pandemic, when many households were losing income or unable to work, said Joseph Rosenberg, senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center's tax and income supports division. Now, the federal government is imposing tariffs that will cost U.S. households, and this would be a way of helping those individuals and families, Rosenberg said. Because Congress just passed the very expensive "big beautiful" budget and tax legislation, rebates to individuals could exacerbate the effects on the federal budget deficit, he said. The rebates would reinforce the inflationary effects of the tariffs that already exist, Rosenberg said. "People will go out and spend some of that money, and that would further put upward pressure on prices and probably magnify inflationary effects," Rosenberg said. Pandemic-era fiscal stimulus contributed to an increase in inflation of about 2.6 percentage points in the U.S., according to 2023 research from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

Pennsylvania Republican called out by Ethics panel for stock investments
Pennsylvania Republican called out by Ethics panel for stock investments

Politico

time2 hours ago

  • Politico

Pennsylvania Republican called out by Ethics panel for stock investments

The panel urged Kelly and his wife to divest their holdings before he takes any more official actions related to Cleveland-Cliffs. Lawmakers are barred from insider trading under the STOCK Act, which Congress passed in 2012 in direct response to concerns about lawmakers and government officials using their proprietary information to advance their own personal gain. Under this law, officials also cannot give such information to others for the purposes of stock trading. Still, the committee was concerned that Kelly's wife bought more stock during the investigation, and Kelly did not disclose the purchase in a timely manner — nor did he answer questions about it. In a statement, Kelly said, 'My family and I look forward to putting this distraction behind us.' He added: 'This investigation has unnecessarily lasted for nearly five years. In the years since this investigation began, the Cleveland Cliffs Butler Works plant faced an uncertain future due to the Biden administration's reckless energy policies. Throughout this process, I have fought for the 1,400 workers at the plant, I've spoken with these workers, and they appreciate the hard work we have done to fight for those jobs and for Butler.' Kelly is a member of the powerful Ways and Means Committee, which oversees tax policy, and sits on the GOP Steering Committee, which makes recommendations to the full Conference on House leadership assignments. The Ethics Committee published a second report Friday regarding Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), whose attendance to the 2021 Met Gala caused much consternation. The panel found that despite her attempts to comply with House rules, Ocasio-Cortez's conduct, including her partner's attendance at the event at no cost, was not entirely appropriate. Once she repaid the expenses, the Ethics Committee said, it would consider the matter closed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store