Western media misquotes Moscow on NATO expansion threat
A Western news outlet has misrepresented statements made by a senior Russian official on NATO expansion toward its borders, in an apparent attempt to fuel the narrative that Russia poses a threat to European members of the US-led military bloc.
The US-based weekly Newsweek published an article earlier this week titled 'Russia won't end Ukraine war until NATO 'pulls out' of Baltics: Moscow,' in which it claimed that Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov, who oversees relations with the Americas, non-proliferation, and arms control, made the remarks in an interview with TASS news agency.
'The Ukraine war won't end until NATO withdraws troops from the Baltics, a top Russian official has warned,' Newsweek wrote.
However, in Ryabkov's quotes, there was no mention of the Baltic states.
Two days after publication, the outlet added a disclaimer, stating it had 'updated' both the headline and the text 'to reflect that Sergei Ryabkov did not reference the Baltic states, but rather NATO's 'Eastern European contingent'.'
The correction came after Latvia's ambassador to NATO, Maris Riekstins, criticized the report. 'He didn't make any reference to Baltic states,' Riekstins posted on X, calling Newsweek's interpretation 'very strange.'
Despite the correction, Newsweek's claim was picked up by several other outlets, including Lithuanian state broadcaster LRT, which cited the original headline while adding comments from 'Baltic officials and observers' alleging that Russia plans to attack the region after the Ukraine conflict ends – an accusation Moscow has dismissed as 'nonsense.'
In the interview with TASS Ryabkov discussed the root causes of the Ukraine conflict, including NATO expansion toward Russia's borders and Western support for Ukraine's ambition to join the bloc. He stressed that to deescalate tensions and normalize Russia-US relations, Washington must 'show respect for Russia's fundamental interests,' particularly its border security.
'The American side requires practical steps aimed at eliminating the root causes of the fundamental contradictions between us in the area of security. Among these causes, NATO expansion is in the foreground,' Ryabkov said. 'Without resolving this fundamental and most acute problem for us, it is simply impossible to resolve the current conflict in the Euro-Atlantic region.'
He reiterated Russia's demand for 'legally binding and long-term guarantees of non-expansion of NATO to the East, as well as demands for non-deployment of strike weapons near Russian borders.' Ryabkov noted that Russia's position on this 'remains unchanged' and added that 'reducing NATO's contingent in Eastern Europe would probably benefit the security of the entire continent.'
At no point in the interview did Ryabkov mention the Baltics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
7 hours ago
- Russia Today
Western war hawks lack plan to defeat Russia
Western officials who speak of Ukraine winning the ongoing conflict don't have a real strategy for defeating Russia, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has said. Testifying before the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday, the Pentagon chief declined to directly say whether he views Russia as a 'true adversary' or whether Washington would allow a 'complete surrender of Ukraine' in order to secure peace in the region. The Trump administration is instead seeking a settlement to the Ukraine conflict that will last, not Kiev's surrender or Russia's defeat. 'The situation is unfortunate, unleashed by the previous administration,' he said, referring to former President Joe Biden, whom Trump's team blames for entangling the US in the Ukraine conflict. Biden's government repeatedly vowed to back Kiev for as long as it took to defeat Russia militarily. 'But everyone that talks about winning and prevailing is yet to present to me a plan that's going to push the Russian army out of those territories,' Hegseth added. The Pentagon chief also repeated his earlier call for Europe to take greater responsibility for its own security. While he pledged Washington would continue to mediate peace efforts, he avoided confirming whether military aid to Kiev would continue. 'We support peace in Ukraine… Peace is in our best interests, but Ukraine is not in the US and not in NATO,' he stated. Hegseth acknowledged that peace efforts 'are moving slowly.' When pressed on whether he would advise Trump to respond if Russia 'invades NATO,' he confirmed that the US would be obligated to act under the bloc's Article 5, which treats an attack on one member as an attack on all. However, he emphasized that 'Russia has not invaded NATO allies,' dismissing claims that Moscow poses an immediate threat to the bloc. Many Western officials have asserted that Russia plans to attack NATO's European members once the conflict in Ukraine ends. Moscow has repeatedly rejected these claims as nonsense, dismissing them as scare tactics used to justify increased Western military spending. Russia has also maintained that it remains open to peace talks if the root causes of the Ukraine conflict are addressed, including NATO expansion toward its borders and Western support for Kiev's NATO membership.
Russia Today
8 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russia hands over another 1,200 bodies of soldiers to Ukraine
Russia has handed over to Kiev the remains of 1,200 Ukrainian soldiers, both sides confirmed on Friday. The transfer was first announced in Ukraine's Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War. The organization said the bodies will now be subjected to examination to confirm the identities of the deceased. Russian MP Shamsail Saraliev, a member of the parliamentary coordination group on the Ukraine military operation, confirmed the transfer to local media. Footage from the scene taken at an undisclosed location shows the latest batch of bodies being delivered to Ukraine by a train carrying refrigerated freight containers placed on flatbed carriages. The bodies were subsequently loaded into a Ukrainian freight train. According to Russian media reports, Moscow did not receive any bodies of fallen soldiers from the Ukrainian side this time. This comes after another exchange of slain soldiers carried out on Wednesday. The Russian side returned the remains of 1,212 Ukrainian servicemen, receiving 27 bodies in return, according to Russian presidential aide Vladimir Medinsky, who serves as Moscow's chief negotiator in talks with Kiev. Moscow decided to return more than 6,000 slain Ukrainian soldiers during negotiations with Ukraine in Istanbul earlier this month. The transfer has been marred by repeated delays, with Moscow accusing Kiev of deliberately delaying acceptance of the bodies. According to Medinsky, the first batch of remains was swiftly delivered to the designated exchange areas, but Ukrainian representatives were nowhere to be found. It turned out that Ukraine had rescheduled the meeting without giving notice. Apart from exchanging slain soldiers, Moscow and Kiev have also agreed to conduct several POW swaps, primarily focusing on seriously wounded or ill captives, as well as those under 25. Over the past week, the two sides held three prisoner exchanges but did not disclose the exact numbers of soldiers involved. According to Medinsky, each side is expected to return some 1,200 soldiers during the ongoing swaps. The Russian Defense Ministry said Kiev has been lagging behind schedule with the exchange and was unable to perform the swaps 'daily' as agreed in Istanbul. 'Unfortunately, the Ukrainian side is not ready to conduct exchanges in that swift mode,' the military said in a statement on Thursday.
Russia Today
12 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine can't stop it, maps can't hide it: Russia's summer blitz redraws the war
As the spring sun gave way to the heat of early summer, a new phase of the military campaign began to unfold across the front lines – and this time, the initiative clearly belongs to Russia. After months of grinding attritional warfare, Russian forces have launched a sweeping spring-summer offensive that is already delivering tangible results. From the borderlands of Sumy to the contested hills near Chasov Yar and the approaches to Dnepropetrovsk, the tempo has shifted decisively. Ukraine, battered and overextended, is now struggling to contain simultaneous breakthroughs across multiple sectors. The silence of Western media around these developments only underscores the magnitude of what is unfolding on the ground. A coordinated advance is in motion – methodical, strategic, and, by all appearances, effective. Following the liberation of Sudzha in early March 2025, the fighting quickly spilled across the border into Ukraine's Sumy Region. Moscow officially described its objective as the creation of a buffer zone – meant to safeguard the resumption of peaceful civilian life in Russia's neighboring Kursk Region. Motivated by political considerations, the Ukrainian Army has been trying to cling to a narrow foothold just across the border, in the village of Tyotkino in Kursk Region. In fact, Kiev has deployed some of its most experienced and ideologically committed units to this stretch of the front. But rather than showcasing Ukrainian resolve, the situation in Tyotkino has underscored the growing imbalance in offensive capabilities between Ukrainian and Russian forces in 2025. From the Russian side, Tyotkino is essentially a logistical cul-de-sac. But for Ukraine, the village connects to a critical rear supply hub in Belopolye. Even so, Ukrainian efforts to expand their presence in the area have ended in near catastrophe. In mid-May, the commander of Ukraine's 47th Brigade came close to staging a mutiny, accusing his superiors of issuing reckless orders that led to needless casualties. Elsewhere along the Sumy front, Ukrainian forces – many of them retreating from Sumy and the surrounding areas – have taken heavy losses. This remains a strategically vital axis for Ukraine. The authorities have announced mandatory evacuations in another 11 settlements, bringing the total number of evacuated towns and villages in the region to 213. Notably, this marks the first time Russian forces have entered Sumy Region since spring 2022. As of now, Russian advances appear to be accelerating. The front line has moved to within roughly 20km of the city of Sumy itself. Liman (also known as Krasny Liman) is a strategic city in the Donetsk People's Republic, with a pre-war population of around 20,000. Situated along the Kharkov-Donetsk railway, it serves as a key transportation hub in eastern Ukraine. After brief fighting, the city fell under Russian control in late May 2022 – but was later lost during Ukraine's Kharkov offensive in October of the same year. Today, Russian forces appear intent on retaking Liman by cutting off a single critical road that leads northwest toward Izium. The current offensive seems focused precisely on this objective. On May 15, Russian troops secured the village of Torskoye, followed by the capture of Redkodub May 29-30. Both settlements are considered vital defensive outposts for the Ukrainian Army along the route to Liman. From the south, the Liman front is effectively sealed off by the Seversky Donets River. During the brutal fighting in 2022, neither side managed to establish a crossing. With the evolution of drone warfare, any river assault today would be even more difficult to carry out. Russian forces are now within 10km of Liman and just 7km from the Izium road. The offensive is ongoing. As of early June, the stretch of the front from Dzerzhinsk (also known as Toretsk) to Mirnograd has become one of the most active battle zones. Russian forces have advanced up to 10km along a 30-kilometer-wide front, capturing 12 settlements and securing more than 15km of a key bypass highway linking Pokrovsk to Konstantinovka. These gains suggest that a southern encirclement of Konstantinovka – a city with a pre-war population of 67,000 – may now be underway. Simultaneously, fighting has intensified on the northern flank around Chasov Yar. The terrain in this area poses serious tactical challenges: Chasov Yar sits on elevated ground beyond the Seversky Donets–Donbass Canal, complicating efforts to establish supply lines or mount a full-scale offensive from that direction. Notably, this sector – among the three fronts currently in focus – has received the least media attention. That may soon change. Given its strategic positioning, it could emerge as a central axis of Russia's summer campaign. In the past week, Russian forces dismantled a significant Ukrainian stronghold north of the village of Zarya. The terrain here is rugged and uneven, but if fully secured, it would open a path for Russian troops to push toward the southern outskirts of Konstantinovka. Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmeysk), a city of 65,000 before the war, has been under siege since autumn 2024. After Russia's swift capture of nearby Novogrodovka and Selidovo, it initially appeared that Pokrovsk would fall just as quickly. But in a surprising pivot, Russian command redirected its main effort toward the Kurakhovo axis. Since the winter, Ukrainian forces have attempted to push Russian troops back from the city's outskirts, but those efforts have largely failed to yield results. Further south, across the Volchya River, the offensives launched last year around Kurakhovo and Velikaya Novoselka are still ongoing. Russian troops have taken control of the town of Bogatyr and several surrounding settlements. The front line now lies just 3-15km from the Dnepropetrovsk regional border, depending on the sector. An interesting development in this sector: Russia's Central, Eastern, and Southern military groups are coordinating their offensive operations here – a rare show of multi-group integration. On June 8, the Russian Defense Ministry announced that units from the 90th Tank Division, part of the Center Group of Forces, had reached the western boundary of the Donetsk People's Republic and were advancing into neighboring Dnepropetrovsk Region.
