US tariffs will test South Africa's economic resilience
Image: Doctor Ngcobo / Independent Newspapers
On August 1, 2025, the United States will impose a 30% tariff on select South African exports, a move the Trump administration frames as a corrective to "trade imbalances" but which South Africa decries as a unilateral overreach.
President Cyril Ramaphosa has rejected the US justification, noting that 77% of U.S. goods enter South Africa duty-free, with an average tariff of just 7.6%.
Yet, the policy threatens to derail South Africa's fragile economic recovery, destabilise global supply chains, and escalate protectionist tensions worldwide. This article examines the tariff's sectoral impacts, systemic risks to multilateral trade, and strategic responses to mitigate the fallout.
Sectoral impacts:
Automative sector
South Africa's automotive sector, a beneficiary of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), faces existential risk.
Reuters reported that the US absorbed 6.5% of South Africa's vehicle exports (worth $1.8 billion in 2024) and is a critical market for manufacturers like BMW and Ford. The 30% tariff could force plant closures and mass layoffs, eroding a sector contributing 5.2% to GDP.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
Agriculture Citrus: The U.S. accounts for 5–6% of South Africa's citrus exports ($100 million annually), supporting 35 000 jobs. Tariffs may cede market share to Chile and Peru.
Wine: Producers are scrambling to redirect stock or absorb price shocks, but the U.S. market's premium margins are irreplaceable.
Macadamia Nuts and Grapes: High-value perishables face logistical hurdles in pivoting to new markets swiftly.
Textile
The textile sector may lose competitiveness in the U.S., while aluminium exports face a $534.5 million risk, with 24.6% going to the U.S. Furthermore, the South African Reserve Bank warns of 0.3% GDP contraction and 100,000 job losses. Fiscal strain from reduced export revenues and a weaker rand.
The tariffs will disrupt global logistics: Freight bottlenecks: A pre-tariff rush to ship goods to the U.S. has already caused 6–10-week delays on routes like China and South Africa.
Cost inflation: U.S. consumers will pay more for South African goods, while businesses face redundant inventory and working capital crunches.
BRICS Retaliation: The U.S. has threatened an additional 10% tariff on BRICS-aligned nations, politicising trade.WTO Erosion: Unilateral tariffs bypass dispute mechanisms, undermining multilateralism.
South Africa may expand its exports by increasing trade with markets in the EU and Asia. AfCFTA: Boosting intra-African trade as a buffer.
The Latest developments:
The trade deal reached today (27 July 2025) between the United States and the European Union will ease tariff barriers and improve market access between the two economies. For South Africa, this development could have significant ramifications. First, EU exporters may displace South African goods in U.S. markets, particularly in competitive sectors like wine, citrus, and manufactured components.
Second, the EU may divert more of its exports to the U.S., limiting the space for South African exports to expand into Europe. Unless offset by diplomatic interventions and aggressive trade diversification, this deal risks marginalising South Africa in both the U.S. and EU markets simultaneously.
To navigate the crisis, South Africa must leverage trade finance tools:
Export Credit Facilities: Bridge cash flow gaps for exporters facing margin compression.
Risk Mitigation: Insurance products to hedge against payment delays and demand shocks.
Market Diversification: Enter new markets (e.g., EU, ASEAN).
Local Substitution: Support domestic production to replace costly U.S. imports.
Conclusion:
The U.S. tariffs are a stress test for South Africa's economic resilience. While the short-term pain is inevitable, strategic diplomacy, trade finance innovation, and market diversification could transform this threat into an opportunity for long-term resilience. The world will watch whether South Africa and the global trading system can adapt without fracturing further.
About the Author :
Nyaniso Qwesha, MBA, is a trade finance consultant with expertise in global commerce and risk management. He advises clients on trade policy, market access, and financial solutions in emerging economies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
29 minutes ago
- IOL News
Anger mounts as Trump's tariffs set to bite
Demonstrators burn a US flag and a picture of US President Donald Trump during a protest in defence of national sovereignty following the US government trade taxes and sanctions on Brazil, near the US consulate, in Sao Paulo, Brazil, on August 1, 2025. Thabo Makwakwa Analysts warn that the path ahead is fraught with challenges, including potential irreversible damage to sectors already under pressure following the recent imposition of a 30% tariff by the United States on key South African exports. They raised concerns about long-term economic stability, job security, and export revenue. Effective August 1, 2025, the new tariffs target key industries, including citrus, macadamia nuts, automotive components, steel, and aluminum. South Africa's citrus industry, which supports over 35,000 jobs and contributes more than R38 billion annually, faces disproportionate risk. Speaking to Sunday Independent on Friday, Dr. Iraj Abedian, Chief Economist at Pan-African Investments Research Services, highlighted the severity of the situation. "The tariffs will have a dire impact on our automotive and citrus industries. We're looking at an initial loss of around 100,000 jobs, especially in motor manufacturing, which feeds into a broader supply chain of tire, component, and leather producers." Abedian further explained that the Western Cape's citrus sector is uniquely vulnerable due to its climatic resilience against certain citrus diseases like black spot, which restricts exports to the US. Other regions lacking this advantage could see prices plummet, affecting the entire supply chain. "When the Western Cape exports are constrained, it affects prices and volumes in other markets like the Middle East, Europe, China, and Russia, creating a ripple effect across the industry." Beyond immediate impacts, industry experts warn of potentially permanent damage. Wandile Sihlobo, Chief Economist, emphasized that the tariffs threaten the fabric of South Africa's manufacturing sector, particularly those producing vehicles tailored for the US market. "When factories close due to these tariffs, they don't reopen easily, even years later. The investment required to establish a foothold in the US market is extensive, and once lost, it's nearly impossible to regain." He pointed out that industries such as automotive manufacturing, which produce both right- and left-hand drive vehicles for export, face the risk of shuttering facilities entirely. The consequences extend beyond jobs, impacting revenue streams and the country's long-term industrial capacity. Sihlobo also highlighted the broader implications for South Africa's trade relations. The US's move increases the vulnerability of South African agricultural exports, such as ostrich products, table grapes, nuts, and wines, to competitors from nations like Peru and Chile, which face lower tariffs. "South Africa now faces a significant disadvantage, as our exports are taxed at around 30%, while Peru and Chile enjoy tariffs closer to 10%. This disparity undermines our competitiveness." He noted ongoing negotiations between South Africa and US officials, with the government actively seeking more favorable terms. However, Sihlobo cautioned that such talks are complex and protracted, especially given the US's recent trade tensions with other major partners like the European Union and Japan. "The negotiations are challenging, and the current environment of global uncertainty makes it difficult to predict outcomes. Still, we continue to support our government's efforts to advocate for our industries," he said. With the US accounting for approximately 8% of South Africa's total exports, particularly in vehicles (17%) and agriculture (5%), the impact of these tariffs could be profound. Higher costs for US buyers are expected to reduce demand, threaten supply chains, and diminish South Africa's export earnings. Economic analysts warn that the tariffs could accelerate job losses, depress public revenues, and deepen existing economic vulnerabilities. "This is not just a short-term setback. The damage could be long-lasting, and reversing it will require years of concerted effort and strategic investment, said Abedien. The experts warned that South Africa's industries must brace for a challenging period ahead. The Federation of Unions of South Africa (Fedusa) said that while it did not subscribe to alarmist projections of a 'jobs bloodbath,' it was mindful that implementing such measures could profoundly impact South Africa's export-led industries, particularly the automotive sector. 'The proposed tariff would render South African automotive and manufactured goods significantly more expensive and less competitive in a vital export market. 'A contraction in demand would almost certainly force firms to scale down production, with downstream effects that include shift reductions, deferred investments, and potential job losses over time,' Fedusa said. The president of the General Industries Workers Union of South Africa, Mametlwe Sebei, said the country risks losing access to the US market due to unmet requirements influenced by shifting global politics and policies. 'When you look at AGOA, the US Congress has specific requirements for Africa, and many US Congress members have pointed out that South Africa is not meeting these. This has been an ongoing issue, even in the past. 'Secondly, given policies on Israel-Palestine, and the current focus on China and Russia as a bloc, the global economy is shifting, and it's unlikely that South Africa will maintain the privileged access it currently enjoys to the US market,' said Sebei. He argued that if South Africa wants to transition toward manufacturing vehicles, it must mobilize resources and industry capacity to meet the country's transport and manufacturing needs. However, he expressed skepticism about current ambitions and the capacity to achieve these goals. Meanwhile, President Cyril Ramaphosa has announced that negotiations with the United States will continue over the next week. Ramaphosa said that ongoing communications between South Africa and US officials continued on Friday, adding that the government has submitted a Framework Deal to enhance mutually beneficial trade and investment relations.
The Citizen
33 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Oh crack! Will your windscreen pass a roadworthy?
The chairperson of the Tyre, Equipment, Parts Association (TEPA), Johann van de Merwe, says a windscreen is no longer just a pane of glass; it's an essential structural component that plays a critical role in passenger safety. Beyond providing visibility, a windscreen also ensures correct airbag deployment, protects occupants from ejection during an accident and supports the roof during rollovers. 'Laminated glass, which came to the fore in the 1990s, was a turning point for windscreen quality because it doesn't shatter upon impact. Instead, the inner layer holds the fragments in place, dramatically improving crash safety,' van de Merwe said. 'With the influx of affordable imported vehicles, we can expect to see an increase in ADAS, augmented reality HUDs (head-up displays), biometric sensors and even electrochromic glass that adjusts tint automatically. Some manufacturers are also exploring windscreen-integrated solar panels.' ALSO READ: Repair those pesky windscreen chips Van de Merwe warned that even a small chip can weaken the structural integrity of a windscreen. 'It may seem cosmetic, but under pressure, like from a pothole or speed bump, that chip can suddenly spread and shatter the windscreen.' He added that South African law prohibits driving with a windscreen that impairs visibility. 'You can be fined or even fail a roadworthy test. Cracks larger than 150mm or within the driver's vision won't pass a roadworthy.' TEPA'S top eight windscreen tips: • Don't blow hot air on a cold windscreen. • Avoid slamming doors with windows closed. • Use gentle wipers and top-up washer fluid. • If a chip is smaller than a 10c coin and not in the driver's line of sight, a repair may be possible. Cracks or damage near the screen's edge almost always require full replacement. • Always use an accredited glass fitment centre where SABS-approved glass is used and there are trained technicians doing the work. • ADAS cameras rely on precise angles. When the windscreen is replaced, the system must be recalibrated; otherwise, it can misread distances or lane markings, leading to increased crash risk for drivers and possible liability claims for insurers. 'What's important is that a lot rides on the integrity of your windscreen. Incorrect fitment, poor-quality glass and a lack of calibration could render all the safety tech in your vehicle useless.' ALSO READ: How road-ready is your 'mom's taxi'?
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
‘Women should not only be present in science – they must shape its direction'
This year marks 30 years since the adoption of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, a global agenda for advancing women's rights which includes their access to education, technology and leadership. Image: Supplied More than 30 years ago, South Africa took its bold first steps into democracy. It was a moment of unprecedented hope, not just for political freedom, but for the transformation of society in all its dimensions. As the country reflects on passing its three-decade milestone, it's an opportune time to assess the progress made by women in science, technology and innovation (STI). While the road has been uneven, the strides that have been made are undeniable. This year marks 30 years since the adoption of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, a global agenda for advancing women's rights which includes their access to education, technology and leadership. As we mark just over 30 years of freedom and reflect on 30 years of global gender advocacy since the Beijing resolution, we must shift our efforts from a focus on participation to a demand for leadership. Women should not only be present in science – they must shape its direction. That means ensuring that women lead laboratories, policy development, global scientific collaborations, and research and training institutions. It also means rethinking how we define innovation – more value needs to be placed on community-based knowledge, indigenous science and interdisciplinary approaches that centre on people, not just products. To understand how far we've come, we must begin with a pivotal moment in our country's history: the Women's March to the Union Buildings on 9 August 1956. On that day, more than 20 000 women of all races and backgrounds marched peacefully against apartheid's pass laws. They stood united in defiance of an oppressive system, carrying petitions and chanting, 'Wathint' Abafazi, Wathint' Imbokodo!' ('You strike a woman, you strike a rock'). That historic act of resistance was not just about civil liberties – it was a declaration of women's power to shape South Africa's future. Fast-forward to today, and that same spirit continues to drive South African women, not just in politics or activism, but in laboratories, tech hubs, industry and innovation spaces. In many ways, the progress of women in STI is one of the quiet revolutions of our democratic era, largely influenced by our policy frameworks that support women in this sector. The National Development Plan 2030, the Department of Science and Innovation's White Paper on Science, Technology and Innovation, and the more recent Decadal Plan all advocate for gender transformation and gender-responsive planning as national priorities. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Dr Rakeshnie Ramoutar-Prieschl, Head of Research Capacity Development at the University of Pretoria Image: Supplied Yet structural inequalities persist. Women – especially women of colour – remain under-represented in STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) leadership roles, with a national representation of a mere 30% of the workforce. Barriers such as unequal access to quality education, limited mentorship opportunities, and gender bias in academia and industry continue to constrain progress. So, how can these systemic challenges be tackled? One of the most effective ways to empower women in STI is through mentorship. Access to mentors helps young women navigate the complex terrain of academia, research and industry, especially in male-dominated environments, such as mining- and engineering-related fields. It builds confidence, opens doors and fosters a sense of belonging. Science outreach efforts in rural and township schools, particularly those that bring in female scientists from similar backgrounds as role models, can have a transformative impact. When girls see someone who looks like them succeeding in science, it fundamentally shifts what they believe is possible. Embedding targeted programmes that focus on raising awareness of women's and girls' rights into school or university curricula can help address some of the societal ills that disproportionately affect girls and women. These include cyberbullying (especially on social media platforms), gender-based violence, exploitative relationships (such as those that involve 'sugar daddies'), and reproductive health and teenage pregnancies, among others. This calls for politicians, governments, higher education leaders, schools and communities to work together to co-create and co-develop inclusive innovation strategies for accelerated change. As we commemorate almost 70 years since the 1956 Women's March, we must remember and honour this defining act of resistance and unity. The women who marched to the Union Buildings were not just resisting oppression; they were demanding a future in which their daughters and granddaughters could be free to learn, lead and innovate. That dream is still being realised, in university labs, coding bootcamps, data science hubs and tech start-ups. But our work is far from done. We must shift from symbolic inclusion to structural transformation: more women in leadership, more equitable funding, more inclusive curricula and sustained support from childhood through to the career stage. The rocks that built this nation must now become the architects of its innovative future. Let us honour their legacy not just with words, but with policies, platforms and partnerships that ensure every girl, from the village to varsity, can rise, lead and transform the world. Dr Rakeshnie Ramoutar-Prieschl, Head of Research Capacity Development at the University of Pretoria
