Putin Briefs Kim Jong Un In Phone Call Before Alaska Summit With Trump
During the call on Tuesday, Putin thanked Kim for supporting his war on Ukraine as the two leaders "exchanged views on the issues of mutual concern," North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency said. The Kremlin had earlier said Putin shared information with Kim "in the context of the upcoming talks" with Trump.
"Kim Jong Un expressed firm conviction that the DPRK would always remain faithful to the spirit of the DPRK-Russia treaty and fully support all measures to be taken by the Russian leadership in the future," KCNA said, referring to a mutual defense pact the two leaders signed last year. DPRK stands for the North's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
The phone conversation, which was held in a "warm comradely atmosphere," according to North Korea, took place just three days before Putin and Trump are set to meet in Alaska as part of the latest US effort to negotiate a ceasefire in the Ukraine conflict, now in its fourth year.
Putin has demanded that Ukraine cede the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, territory that Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has said is non-negotiable. Trump has suggested he's on board with the idea of Russia and Ukraine swapping some territory.
The latest call follows Putin's phone conversation with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Friday during which Xi said he was glad to see the US and Russia talking. Putin also spoke with India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi last week.
Kim has emerged as a key ally of Putin and his war in Ukraine, helping boost Moscow's fighting presence on the ground while raising concerns about North Korea's ability to strengthen its military and sustain its regime with Russian backing.
When Putin visited Pyongyang in June 2024 - his first trip to North Korea in 24 years - the two leaders revived a Cold War-era agreement to provide immediate military assistance if either country is attacked. Putin also invited Kim to visit Moscow.
Kim and Putin agreed to further enhance their partnership and "make closer contact in the future," KCNA said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
5 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Daily Briefing: Tariffs, talks and tightropes
Good morning, Let me take you back to 2004 for a moment. You're in the theatre, watching Shah Rukh Khan's Main Hoon Na, and just when you thought the movie was over, it cuts to another song and dance sequence. One by one, not just the cast but even the usually behind-the-scenes crew appear on screen, dancing to 'Ye Fizaein'. Three years later, Farah Khan would do it again with Om Shanti Om, asking crew members to walk down the red carpet. It's all a bit silly, but wildly entertaining. These end-credit sequences also serve a bigger purpose of interrogating the way films — and capitalism itself — are structured. Contributing writer Aamatullah Rajkotwala writes in the latest 'Fresh Take' that these end-credit scenes challenge the capitalistic tendency of 'commodity fetishism', when a product is valued more than the labour which produced it. Do we then dare call Farah Khan an accidental Marxist? On that note, let's get to today's edition. In the next two weeks, India will engage key partners Russia and China. On August 21, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar will visit Moscow to meet his Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov, paving the way for President Vladimir Putin's potential visit to India. Crucially, Putin is set to meet US President Donald Trump in Alaska tomorrow. New Delhi will watch their talks closely. If Putin and Trump reach a framework for ending the war in Ukraine, India could avoid the additional 25 per cent US tariff linked to its Russian oil purchases. On August 18, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi will visit India for talks with National Security Advisor Ajit Doval ahead of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit in China later this month, which Prime Minister Narendra Modi is slated to attend. Tightrope: These engagements are part of New Delhi's multi-alignment foreign policy, but it will be careful not to be seen as part of an 'anti-Western' grouping. India has often portrayed itself as non-Western, and not anti-Western. Beijing has been seeking an India-Russia-China trilateral meeting, but New Delhi has so far refused to participate. Trumponomics: These geopolitical churnings gained urgency in the face of Trump's steep tariffs. Trump has raised duties on all trading partners, pushing the average import tariff to 15–20 per cent from 3 per cent in January. While the broader economic impact is yet to show, inflationary signs are emerging. How has the US avoided the worst of Trumponomics? Read my colleague Anil Sasi's report. Pak hand: Amid New Delhi's strained ties with Washington DC, Pakistan has improved its relationship with the US under Trump. Army Chief Syed Asim Munir has visited the US twice on high-level trips in less than two months. While Pakistan's army has long exercised de facto control over the country's governance, Munir's emergence as Pakistan's numero uno figure on the international stage is unprecedented. The first batch of Agniveers, part of the new Agnipath recruitment scheme, is set to complete their four-year term by 2026-end. Sources have told The Indian Express that discussions are underway to increase the retention of Agniveers after their performance in Operation Sindoor was found to be 'excellent'. Why does the Army want more manpower, and what could be the potential changes for Agniveers? Read our report. Drug bust: Mephedrone, a synthetic drug, has emerged as a key challenge for enforcement agencies in recent years. In the last five years alone, investigators have seized mephedrone worth Rs 9,522 crore from Maharashtra. At the heart of the drug network, which stretches to the UAE and Turkey, is believed to be mastermind Salim Dola, a wanted figure in the narcotics trade and linked to the Dawood Ibrahim gang. The Mumbai Crime Branch says it is closer than ever to apprehending Dola. Here's how they connected the dots to reach the drug lord. Balancing act: The Ajit Pawar-led Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) finds itself in an uneasy position in its alliance with the BJP and Shiv Sena in Maharashtra. Recent moves by the Deputy Chief Minister, Pawar, including support of the Qureshi community against self-styled cow vigilantes and questioning orders to shut meat shops on Independence Day, are seen as efforts to project the NCP as unwaveringly secular. Zeeshan Shaikh explains what necessitates Pawar's balancing act, and whether it has worked. 🎧 For more on the cow vigilante issue in Maharashtra, tune in to today's '3 Things' podcast episode. Mounting troubles: Can a mountain of coal go missing? Authorities in Meghalaya are faced with a bizarre problem. Almost 4,000 metric tonnes — that's 40 lakh kilograms — of illegally mined coal in the South West Khasi Hills district has gone missing. Was it 'swept away by heavy rain' as excise minister Kyrmen Shylla suggested? The issue, at the centre of a political firestorm, even reached the Meghalaya High Court, which formed a one-member panel to monitor coal mining in the state. Imagine the Indian government, the American CIA and the British MI5 working together. No, this isn't the plot of a Netflix thriller. In the late 1950s, the trio teamed up to carry out a clandestine operation to spy on the communists in Kerala. I leave you with this column by Paul McGarr, author and lecturer, that has fascinating details on the operation. That's all for today, folks! Until tomorrow, Sonal Gupta
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
5 minutes ago
- First Post
Why Trump rated his call with Zelenskyy, European leaders a ‘10 out of 10'
Praise, positivity and punishment… these three words sum up Donald Trump's conference call with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders. This phone call came a day ahead of the American president's high-stakes summit with Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Here's what came out of it After his call with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders, Donald Trump said there will likely be a second meeting with Putin that includes Zelenskyy. File image/AFP In the next 24 hours, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin will come face-to-face in Alaska to discuss the Ukraine war and steps to stop the fighting. This will be the first time the Russian leader has been permitted on Western soil since his February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, which has killed tens of thousands of people. Ahead of this high-stakes meeting, Trump held a con-call with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders on August 13, which he described as a 'very good one', saying it 'was a 10'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But what took place in that call? What was the message that the European leaders along with Zelenskyy conveyed to Trump? Here's what we learnt from the call. Conference call with the biggest names The call between Trump and European leaders, perhaps, had the biggest names in the world. There was US President Donald Trump along with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, UK's Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, France's Emmanuel Macron, Italy's Giorgia Meloni, Poland's Donald Tusk, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, EU leader Ursula von der Leyen and Nato's Mark Rutte. Notably, the host of this call was the German leader. Zelenskyy travelled to Berlin for the meeting and briefed reporters afterwards with Merz. 'We had a truly exceptionally constructive and good conversation' with the president, Merz told reporters in brief remarks. 'There is hope for movement, there is hope for peace in Ukraine,' he added. The phone call was followed by another larger meeting of the 'Coalition of the Willing' that US Vice President JD Vance attended. US President Donald Trump speaks during a visit to the Kennedy Centre in Washington. He warned that Russia would face very severe consequences if it didn't adhere to a ceasefire after Friday's meeting. Reuters Trump praises Europe — a shift in tone After the digital gaggle, Trump described the call as 'very good', rating it as 'a 10'. Speaking at the Kennedy Centre, the US president sounded pleased with his allies. 'We had a very good call,' he told reporters. 'I would rate it a 10. Very friendly.' Even earlier, Trump was appreciative of his European counterparts; before the call, Trump wrote on Truth Social, 'Will be speaking to European leaders in a short while. They are great people who want to see a deal done.' This is in stark contrast to the American leader's previous stance on Europe and Ukraine when it comes to the war. Trump has been famously mercurial on the issue of Ukraine; he has frozen out Europe in the past when it comes to the war. Also, he has praised Putin in the past, calling him a genius. However, in the recent past, Trump has issued many verbal diatribes towards Putin — even calling him 'crazy'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump won't discuss land divisions with Putin In the call, US President Trump agreed that any territorial issues had to be decided with Volodymyr Zelenskyy's involvement. According to two European officials and three other people briefed on the call, Trump told European leaders during a call on Wednesday that he does not intend to discuss any possible divisions of territory when he meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on August 15. He also told his European counterparts and Zelenskyy that the meeting with Putin had one goal — securing a ceasefire in Ukraine. Trump and European leaders agreed that a ceasefire in Ukraine has to be implemented before peace negotiations can begin, the European officials and two other people briefed on the call said. Some of the European leaders were left with the impression from the call that Trump is not optimistic about the results of his meeting with Putin, they added. Earlier, there had been concerns that Trump and Putin might agree to the parameters of a peace deal, including territorial divisions, and then try to pressure Ukraine to agree to it. Trump's comments last week that there would 'be some land swapping' between Russia and Ukraine, in particular, put Zelenskyy and European leaders on edge. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy walks next to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz upon arrival in the garden of the chancellery in Berlin to join a video conference of European leaders with the US President on the Ukraine war ahead of the summit between the US and Russian leaders. AFP But the two European officials and three other people briefed on Wednesday's call said all the leaders agreed that Ukraine must be included in negotiations and should be the one to decide what territorial concessions it might be willing to make. They also said the leaders were united in their belief that if Putin does not agree to a ceasefire, Trump will likely levy new sanctions on Russia. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It is learnt that European leaders left feeling positive about Trump's plans for his meeting with Putin. One of them said achieving a ceasefire is expected to be the priority for Trump in the meeting. The other person expressed confidence that Ukrainian territory would not be negotiated without Ukraine. The Politico also reported that Trump was willing to contribute security guarantees for Ukraine — with some conditions. Sources told the news outlet that America was willing to play some sort of role in providing Kyiv with the means to deter future Russian aggression if a ceasefire is reached. However, it's not clear what Trump meant by security guarantees and only discussed the broader concept. When asked about the call, the White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement: 'The White House does not discuss details of the president's private diplomatic conversations. However, President Trump has been clear that he wants to end this war and stop the killing, and Friday's meeting with President Putin will serve as an important moment in this process.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Later on, Trump also signalled that he would get tough with Russia if it didn't agree to a ceasefire in Friday's meeting. After the call, when asked if Russia would face consequences if Putin did not agree to stop the war after the Alaska meeting, Trump said: 'Yes, they will… very severe consequences.' Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer co-chairs the Coalition of the Willing videoconference call with European leaders on Ukraine, ahead of the expected meeting of US President Donald Trump and Russia's President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Reuters Trump eyes trilateral with Putin and Zelenskyy Following his one-hour call, Trump also said he was planning a second meeting with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin soon after Friday's Alaska summit — this time with Ukraine leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy included. 'If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one,' he told reporters. 'I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelensky and myself, if they'd like to have me there.' Even France's Macron spoke on the possible future trilateral, saying that he hoped that such a meeting could be held in Europe 'in a neutral country that is acceptable to all parties,' AFP noted. France's President Emmanuel Macron, European Council President Antonio Costa, France's Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot and France's Minister of Armed Forces Sebastien Lecornu attend a video conference on Ukraine with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz from the Fort de Bregancon presidential holidays residence in Bormes-les-Mimosas, southern France. AFP Trump gets angry with Macron during call It is learnt that during the video-conference call, Trump 'did not like' being called out by France's Emmanuel Macron. Axios reported that the French president 'took very tough positions' and told Trump that a meeting was 'a very big thing' to give Putin. Sources told Axios that 'Trump didn't like that'. An overall sense of positivity It seems that the call, did indeed, go very well as everyone involved came out with a sense of positivity with the European leaders seeming upbeat. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskky himself said afterwards, 'Our mood now is that we are united, and it was very positive [as] all the partners spoke in one voice, one desire, the same principles and the same vision and this is an important step forward.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Even Germany's Merz said that Trump had agreed to five principles for the talks with Putin. They include keeping Ukraine 'at the table' for follow-up meetings on the war and refusing to discuss peace terms, like swaps of land between Russia and Ukraine, before a ceasefire is put in place. With inputs from agencies
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
5 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Should Intel's treatment worry Silicon Valley's powerful Indian diaspora
According to President Donald Trump, the rise of Intel Corp.'s CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, is 'an amazing story.' That's as much payoff as Tan can expect from his emergency meeting with Trump, who last week had demanded he 'resign, immediately' because he was 'highly CONFLICTED.' We don't know if Intel will be able to convince the administration to view its CEO with less disfavor. Some in Washington are concerned about Malaysian-born Tan's long history supporting and investing in the Chinese tech sector. And questions about how Intel intends to live up to government controls on the export of high-end technology under his leadership are, given this history, not unreasonable. Take a step back and ask yourself: Is there anything inherently questionable about a tech firm appointing a CEO with an eye for innovative and effective startups? At his venture capital firm Walden International, Tan invested in more than 100 Chinese companies, including an early bet on Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. Normally, this would be a count in his favor. The problem is a fear, both in Washington and in Silicon Valley, that the US and Chinese tech ecosystems are not complements but rivals. This wasn't the case in 2001, when Walden put money in SMIC. But it's certainly the general feeling today. Indian tech leaders have managed to escape similar scrutiny precisely because the tech scene here is seen as providing low-end support to US industry, not high-value competition. But how long will that be true? And what happens if it changes? New Delhi is not happy being a supporting player in the AI revolution. The country has begun to stockpile chips — compute capacity has passed 34,000 GPUs in May, according to government officials — and has already selected national champions it intends to support. Given the relative dynamism of India's startups, its tech sector will at some point produce a few success stories that challenge the dominance of US companies. That's good news for Indians. But it might make things more difficult for Indian-Americans in Silicon Valley. Across corporate America, but particularly in Big Tech, people of Indian descent have been disproportionately successful as leaders, more so perhaps than their colleagues of Chinese heritage. Think of Alphabet Inc.'s CEO Sundar Pichai, Microsoft Corp.'s Satya Nadella, Adobe Inc.'s Shantanu Narayen and IBM Corp.'s Arvind Krishna, for example. As Intel's troubles following its choice of Tan demonstrate, this might partly be because their home nation is not considered a strategic competitor to the US. That image is slowly changing in the Trump era. Indians in Silicon Valley have already discovered that things are bit harder now. H1-B visas, for example, are a political hot-button issue, and provided the first wedge in the relationship between Trump and Elon Musk. Trump has already made it clear that he doesn't want his backing of Big Tech to mean any jobs for Indians: 'Many of our largest tech companies have reaped the blessings of American freedom while building their factories in China, hiring workers in India and stashing profits in Ireland,' he said at a tech summit last month, adding: 'Under President Trump, those days are over.' So far, corporate leaders have not had to answer any questions about their distance from the sector back home. But the political environment will get more difficult to navigate as India's tech companies achieve greater autonomy and efficiency, and the Trump administration reworks policy. The 50 per cent tariff rate that New Delhi has been threatened with reveals how the president's mind works: He may not see India's trajectory as fundamentally different from China's, and his mercantilist soul rebels at the thought of collaborating with a future rival. An age of economic nationalism and competitive industrial policy will always be tough on cosmopolitan minorities. 'Dual loyalty' accusations gain no traction in an age of prosperous globalization, but have a long and dark history when populists seize power and turn back the clocks. The diaspora should not look at Tan's attempts to win over Trump with satisfaction or superiority. They might be next. Nor should they assume that they'll always be able to avoid similar accusations. The only reason they haven't faced them so far is that nobody thought their connections back home could ever be a problem. Here's the hard truth: India's success will mean the end of Silicon Valley's Indian-American golden age.
