
Martyrs Day clampdown: ‘Jammu and Kashmir government under detention' to prevent visits to graveyard; CM calls it a ‘shame'
SRINAGAR/JAMMU: J&K chief minister
Omar Abdullah
was barred Sunday from visiting a graveyard of 1931 martyrs in Srinagar, and most of his cabinet colleagues were detained in their homes along with scores of others to keep them away from the site, virtually putting the National Conference (NC) govt under lockdown.
Among the other key political figures J&K police confined to their homes were Omar's father and NC president Farooq Abdullah, former ex-CM
Mehbooba Mufti
and Peoples Conference chief and MLA Sajad Lone.
Omar called the restrictions a 'shame' and described '13th July massacre as our Jallianwala Bagh' as he slammed the first such clampdown since his govt took charge in Oct 2024. The Omar-led govt does not control police or security, whose reins are in the hands of the Centre-appointed lieutenant governor (LG) Manoj Sinha, an arrangement that took shape after the 2019 abrogation of J&K's special status under Article 370.
Nasir Aslam Wani, Omar's political adviser, said the CM had been outside J&K and returned to Srinagar on Sunday but was not allowed to proceed towards Naqshband Sahib, the resting place of 22 people killed during an uprising against Dogra ruler Maharaja Hari Singh on July 13, 1931. The date is significant in Kashmir's history.
According to Wani, Omar remained in his house after being stopped. Deputy CM Surinder Choudhary of NC was in Jammu but his Srinagar house was locked.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Apply for NRI Account Online
HSBC
Undo
Wani said he himself had been shut in since 3 am Sunday. 'An elected government was placed under house detention in J&K by the very people who hailed the 2024 assembly elections as a triumph of democracy. The irony is not just strange, it is tragic,' NC spokesman Tanvir Sadiq told TOI.
Omar expressed anger, calling the curbs 'blatantly undemocratic' with troops deployed as jailers and major bridges in Srinagar blocked.
'I will never understand what the law-and-order govt is so afraid of,' Omar said in a swipe at authorities under LG Sinha.
Since early Sunday, authorities shut down major routes. Security was tightened at Gupkar Road, home to top politicians including Farooq, Omar, education minister Sakina Itoo and CPM MLA MY Tarigami. I too posted that she had been 'put under house arrest since last (Saturday) night'. The NC head office was sealed with concertina wire.
PDP office was shut, too. A popular Sunday flea market in the Lal Chowk area was not allowed.
All roads leading to the graveyard at Naqshband Sahib were closed. Senior cops were at the site.
Amid the restrictions, Omar sought to counter the established narrative on the 1931 uprising by likening it to Jallianwala Bagh and claiming it was against the British. 'The people who laid down their lives did so against the British.
Kashmir was being ruled under the British Paramountcy. What a shame that true heroes who fought against British rule in all its forms are today projected as villains only because they were Muslims.
We may be denied the opportunity to visit their graves today but we will not forget their sacrifices,' the CM posted.
PDP chief Mehbooba called for 'acceptance' of the martyrs. 'The day you accept our heroes as your own just as Kashmiris have embraced yours, from Mahatma Gandhi to Bhagat Singh, that day, as Prime Minister Modi once said, the dil ki doori (distance of hearts) will truly end,' Mehbooba said.
Former PDP minister Naeem Akhtar, also locked in, posted that 'it feels like we are in 1931'.
In Jammu, the BJP leader of opposition, Sunil Sharma, sought to contest projections of the 1931 episode as martyrdom. He had sparked bedlam in the assembly this March by calling the martyrs 'traitors'. 'Communal violence was given a false narrative of martyrdom. The recent remarks by Omar, equating Islamist rioters with freedom fighters, are an insult to the nation and its true freedom struggle,' Sharma said Sunday.
Deputy CM Choudhary hit back with a veiled jab at the BJP. 'If they admire Nathuram Godse, who killed Mahatma Gandhi, what's wrong in remembering the July 13 martyrs who sacrificed their lives for the rights of people?' Choudhary asked as NC functionaries in Jammu paid tributes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Fed chair on edge: Who is Jerome Powell, leading the US Federal Reserve since 2018? Why Trump wants to fire him and end his streak
US President Donald Trump has once again taken aim at Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, signalling that he might remove him from the role if re-elected. Trump has long criticised Powell over interest rate hikes and now claims the top central banker is obstructing economic growth. Who is Jerome Powell? Why does Trump want him gone? Jerome Powell, who has led the US Federal Reserve since 2018, is a key figure in shaping the country's monetary policy. Appointed by Trump himself, Powell was initially praised by the MAGA chief. However, their relationship soured when the Fed increased interest rates during Trump's term in office. Trump argues that those rate hikes were unnecessary and blamed Powell for making it harder for Americans and businesses to borrow. Since launching his 2024 campaign, Trump has not backed down. He has floated the idea of firing Powell before his current term ends in 2026, suggesting he would replace him with someone more aligned with his economic agenda. 'If he wins, he may fire Powell before his term ends in 2026,' Trump allies say. Trump believes a new Fed chair would favour lower rates and push for what he describes as a more 'pro-growth' policy approach. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Most Unwelcoming Countries in the World, Ranked BigGlobalTravel Undo Such a move would be controversial. The Federal Reserve is meant to operate independently of the White House, ensuring that political pressure does not influence interest rate decisions. Although the president nominates the Fed Chair, the law allows removal only 'for cause,' meaning misconduct or neglect of duty, not policy disagreements. Financial experts warn that trying to dismiss Powell could shake investor confidence and disrupt financial markets. Trump, however, has insisted Powell's decisions have hurt ordinary Americans. 'We don't do crimes and that's what unites us,' Trump recently said while speaking about the broader need for national unity and law and order. Under Powell's leadership, the Federal Reserve has raised interest rates to tackle high inflation, especially in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. While this strategy has brought inflation down, it has also increased borrowing costs, affecting homebuyers, credit card holders and small businesses. Powell, for his part, maintains that the Fed's actions are driven by data, not politics. 'But that's not who we are. Rule of law unites us as Americans,' he said, defending the central bank's role in maintaining long-term economic stability. Although some Republicans side with Trump and accuse Powell of overreach, many in the financial world support keeping the central bank free from political interference.


Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Could have been 'far worse': Why Bill Gates is 'just fine' with Donald Trump's Tax Law despite huge cuts in Climate tech
AI Image Microsoft founder Bill Gates has been a strong advocate of Clean Climate Technologies. Bill Gates has been actively involved in climate technology through his company Breakthrough Energy, which invests in and supports climate solutions. Gates believes that technological advancements and innovation are crucial for achieving significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, rather than solely relying on lifestyle changes. In an interview with Cipher News, Bill Gates spoke about Donald Trump administration's recent legislation, dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' which significantly scaled back major climate incentives in the U.S. Gates expressed cautious optimism, stating, 'It wasn't quite the evisceration that a complete lack of believing in climate change might have led to.' The law, which Gates noted aligns with President Donald Trump and his Cabinet's dismissal of climate change as a pressing issue, eliminated most federal incentives for established technologies like wind, solar, and electric vehicles. Tax law could have been far more damaging However, Gates emphasized that U.S. demand is only a fraction of the global market, suggesting these technologies will continue to develop globally despite the cuts. 'They're still going to happen,' he said. Gates highlighted that the bill preserved tax credits for emerging technologies like geothermal, nuclear fission, and fusion, a move he sees as a mitigating factor. 'The fact that it retained tax credits for newer technologies, in particular geothermal and nuclear fission and fusion,' was evidence, he said, that the legislation could have been more damaging. Why Breakthrough Energy has cut lobbying efforts by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo On Breakthrough Energy's scaled-back policy efforts, Gates revealed he has reduced funding for clean energy advocacy due to his increased focus on global health and the emergence of other climate action leaders. 'I view global health as, in a certain sense, having a lot of urgency because of the dramatic reductions that have been made there,' he said. However, he affirmed Breakthrough's overall success, including its fellows program and venture investments, and indicated he would step in to support advocacy efforts, such as preserving cleantech tax credits, when necessary. 'If I see that that story is not being told well, I'll jump in,' he added. Discussing TerraPower, the advanced nuclear power company he founded, Gates noted that AI-fueled data centers are driving significant demand. 'The AI data center industry may help us fill up our order book for the first, you know, 10 to 20 units,' he said, explaining that this scale could enable more efficient manufacturing. He added that nearly all U.S. demand for TerraPower is tied to data centers, a point underscored by a recent investment round led by Nvidia's venture arm. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump is doing something no one wants
Last week, the right-wing president of the United States wrote a pointed letter to the left-wing president of Brazil . With typical brio, Donald Trump threatened to impose steep tariffs as punishment for, among other sins, the prosecution of Jair Bolsonaro, the former president who is facing criminal charges for his attempt to hold on to power after his electoral defeat in 2022. "This Trial should not be taking place," Trump wrote. "It is a Witch Hunt that should end IMMEDIATELY!" It caused quite a stir. Yet lost amid the fracas was a much quieter, potentially more consequential document signed just a few days earlier in Brazil: an agreement between Chinese and Brazilian state-backed companies to begin the first steps toward building a rail line that would connect Brazil's Atlantic coast to a Chinese-built deepwater port on Peru's Pacific coast. If built, the roughly 2,800-mile line could transform large parts of Brazil and its neighbors, speeding goods to and from Asian markets. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category Public Policy Data Science PGDM Others Degree Operations Management Artificial Intelligence Product Management CXO Data Analytics Data Science Digital Marketing Healthcare others Leadership healthcare Finance MBA Project Management Management MCA Design Thinking Technology Cybersecurity Skills you'll gain: Duration: 12 Months IIM Calcutta Executive Programme in Public Policy and Management Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Economics for Public Policy Making Quantitative Techniques Public & Project Finance Law, Health & Urban Development Policy Duration: 12 Months IIM Kozhikode Professional Certificate Programme in Public Policy Management Starts on Mar 3, 2024 Get Details It was a neat illustration of the contrasting approaches China and the United States have taken to their growing rivalry. China offers countries help building a new rail line; Trump bullies them and meddles in their politics. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like SRM Online MBA – Empowering Future Leaders SRM Online Enquire Now Undo The surreal first six months of Trump's second stint as president have offered up endless drama, danger and intrigue. By that standard his tussle with Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva , Brazil's president, seems like small beer. But it was a revealing moment, illuminating how Trump's recklessness compounds America's central foreign policy problem of the past two decades: How should the United States execute an elegant dismount from its increasingly unsustainable place atop a crumbling global order? And how can it midwife a new order that protects American interests and prestige without bearing the cost, in blood and treasure, of military and economic primacy? These are difficult, thorny questions. Yet instead of answers, Trump offers threats, tantrums and tariffs, to the profound detriment of American interests. Live Events China's astonishing economic rise, coupled with its turn toward deeper authoritarianism under Xi Jinping , has made answering these challenges more difficult. China now seems to most of the American foreign policy establishment, and even more so to Trump, too powerful to be left unconfronted by the United States. But this line of thinking risks missing America's best and most easily leveraged asset in the tussle for global dominance with China: Most countries don't want to choose sides between hegemons. They prefer a world of benign and open competition in which the United States plays an important, if less dominant, role. Nowhere is that truer, perhaps, than Brazil. A vast nation, bigger than the contiguous United States, it is a good stand-in for many of the world's middle powers. Contrary to the famous quip that Brazil is the country of the future and always will be, it has managed to become the world's 10th-largest economy, just a whisker smaller than Canada. It has a long tradition of hedging its relationships with a range of big powers -- the United States, China and the European Union -- while trying to advance its ambition to be a key player in world affairs. As the United States' position as the sole superpower has waned and Brazilian leaders have vied to shape an increasingly multipolar landscape, those efforts have picked up. That has involved, unquestionably, a deepening of its economic and diplomatic relationship with China, its biggest trading partner. Lula traveled to Beijing in May for his third bilateral meeting with Xi since returning to the presidency in 2023, declaring that "our relationship with China will be indestructible." The two countries are founding members of the BRICS group, a bloc of mostly developing middle-income countries that includes a number of American antagonists -- Russia and, more recently, Iran. American officials have long been wary of BRICS, which has sought in various, mostly marginal ways to thwart American power. But Trump has been outright antagonistic. Last week, as Lula played host to the BRICS summit, Trump blasted off a social media post threatening to slap additional tariffs on any nation "aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS." Some countries within BRICS would like the organization to be more forthrightly antagonistic to the United States, but Brazil, along with India and South Africa, has been resolutely opposed to turning it into an anti-American or anti-Western bloc. "Brazil knows that China is indispensable and the United States is irreplaceable," Hussein Kalout, a Brazilian political scientist who previously served as the country's special secretary for strategic affairs, told me. "Brazil will never make a binary choice. That is not an option." Indeed, Brazil has much to lose in alienating the United States, and its growing ties with China are as much a symptom of American vinegar as Chinese honey. It does a huge amount of business with the United States, running a trade surplus in America's favor of about $7 billion last year. America is Brazil's largest source of foreign direct investment, rising steadily over the past decade in everything from green energy to manufacturing. Lula and Trump may be ideological opposites, but if they were ever to meet, they would have plenty of pragmatic reasons to get along. Instead, Trump has chosen antagonism. Part of his calculation, clearly, is political. But if Trump thought he was helping Bolsonaro's right-wing supporters win back power by undermining Lula, his letter appears to have had the opposite effect. Lula, once one of the world's most popular and celebrated leaders, won a very narrow victory in 2023. His popularity has sagged as he struggles to deliver on his election promise to bring down prices and improve the economy. Thanks to Trump's attacks, Brazilians are rallying around their president. But the spat shows something deeper and more important. For many rising powers, China's supposedly revisionist designs on reshaping the globe pale in comparison to Trump's shocking use of tariffs, sanctions and military firepower. "From a Brazilian perspective, the country firmly seeking to change the underlying dynamics of the global order is the United States," Oliver Stuenkel, a Brazilian German political scientist who has written extensively about BRICS, told me. America, not China, is the wrecker. Even as Trump pledged to avoid foreign wars and entanglements, his vision of peace seems predicated on a form of "America first" dominance that invites the chaos he promises to avoid. This stance makes violent confrontation with China, the only real rival to American primacy, seem almost inevitable -- and the return of the grim contestation that characterized the Cold War more likely, whether China desires it or not. What is certain is that many countries -- rich and poor, declining and rising -- definitely do not want this.