Fed chair on edge: Who is Jerome Powell, leading the US Federal Reserve since 2018? Why Trump wants to fire him and end his streak
Trump has long criticised Powell over interest rate hikes and now claims the top central banker is obstructing economic growth.
Who is Jerome Powell? Why does Trump want him gone?
Jerome Powell, who has led the US Federal Reserve since 2018, is a key figure in shaping the country's monetary policy. Appointed by Trump himself, Powell was initially praised by the MAGA chief. However, their relationship soured when the Fed increased interest rates during Trump's term in office.
Trump argues that those rate hikes were unnecessary and blamed Powell for making it harder for Americans and businesses to borrow.
Since launching his 2024 campaign, Trump has not backed down. He has floated the idea of firing Powell before his current term ends in 2026, suggesting he would replace him with someone more aligned with his economic agenda.
'If he wins, he may fire Powell before his term ends in 2026,' Trump allies say. Trump believes a new Fed chair would favour lower rates and push for what he describes as a more 'pro-growth' policy approach.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
The Most Unwelcoming Countries in the World, Ranked
BigGlobalTravel
Undo
Such a move would be controversial. The Federal Reserve is meant to operate independently of the White House, ensuring that political pressure does not influence interest rate decisions. Although the president nominates the Fed Chair, the law allows removal only 'for cause,' meaning misconduct or neglect of duty, not policy disagreements.
Financial experts warn that trying to dismiss Powell could shake investor confidence and disrupt financial markets.
Trump, however, has insisted Powell's decisions have hurt ordinary Americans. 'We don't do crimes and that's what unites us,' Trump recently said while speaking about the broader need for national unity and law and order.
Under Powell's leadership, the Federal Reserve has raised interest rates to tackle high inflation, especially in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. While this strategy has brought inflation down, it has also increased borrowing costs, affecting homebuyers, credit card holders and small businesses.
Powell, for his part, maintains that the Fed's actions are driven by data, not politics. 'But that's not who we are. Rule of law unites us as Americans,' he said, defending the central bank's role in maintaining long-term economic stability.
Although some Republicans side with Trump and accuse Powell of overreach, many in the financial world support keeping the central bank free from political interference.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
16 minutes ago
- Mint
Greed and Fear Report: ‘TACO' Trade in trouble? Jefferies' Chris Wood warns of looming macro risks
Christopher Wood, Global Head of Equity Strategy at Jefferies, has raised a fresh red flag for global equity investors. In his latest Greed & Fear note, Wood questioned the durability of the so-called 'TACO trade'—a long-standing investor belief that U.S. President Donald Trump, though often aggressive in trade rhetoric, will ultimately step back from imposing tariffs. With global markets riding high on artificial intelligence (AI)-driven capital expenditure optimism, Wood warned that investors may be dangerously underestimating the macroeconomic damage tariff wars could bring. The 'TACO trade'—short for 'Trump Always Chickens Out'—is a strategy that gained traction among investors during earlier phases of Trump's presidency. It hinges on the assumption that Trump will frequently threaten tariffs to gain leverage but ultimately refrain from enforcing them due to political or market pressures. Since May 2025, this logic has underpinned a major equity market rally, as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq have scaled record highs despite repeated threats of new trade barriers. Wood, however, suggests this narrative may be losing credibility. The belief that Trump will always retreat before causing real damage may no longer hold water, especially as the former president signals readiness to double down on protectionist policies in his re-election campaign. In the meantime, the market has grown over-reliant on AI-driven optimism and is discounting the threat posed by trade frictions. According to Wood, the most dangerous development is not necessarily Trump's tariff threats themselves—but the market's willful ignorance of their long-term implications. Investors, he wrote, are effectively treating tariff threats like tradable events: they sell on the threat, buy on the pullback, and assume status quo will prevail. This has created a false sense of security. 'It's only a matter of time before macro data begins to reflect the damage,' he warned. Wood pointed to persistent trade tensions with countries like Brazil and Canada as examples of policy instability that investors have brushed off too easily. Even if these threats are eventually rolled back, the uncertainty they introduce could weigh heavily on corporate earnings, global supply chains, and consumer confidence. Supporting this view, macro research firm TS Lombard recently echoed similar concerns, noting that the volatility introduced by these policy announcements creates 'perceived but unacknowledged' fragility in global markets. A key risk, Wood noted, is that markets have become so numb to tariff rhetoric that any future implementation of aggressive trade policy may have an outsized negative impact. Ben Inker of GMO added that this market complacency could actually embolden Trump to carry through with his tariff plans—since he no longer fears triggering market meltdowns. The result: a vicious cycle where underreaction begets overreach. The numbers are already concerning. As per The Wall Street Journal, U.S. tariff rates have reached an average of 13.4 percent—levels not seen since the 1940s. These effectively function as a tax on imports and can erode consumer purchasing power, compress margins for U.S. companies, and spark retaliatory moves from trade partners. Combined with historically high equity valuations and the dominance of passive investing strategies, this macro exposure could leave markets particularly vulnerable to a correction if sentiment suddenly sours. Wood's analysis goes beyond the U.S. and touches on broader trade policy trends. Tensions with Brazil, Canada, and the EU, coupled with Trump's penchant for invoking emergency powers, create a geopolitical backdrop that's anything but stable. He also warned of currency volatility, particularly the potential weakening of the U.S. dollar, which has historically served as a barometer of risk sentiment. In response, Wood recommended that investors begin recalibrating their strategies. One suggestion is to reduce reliance on U.S. equities and explore opportunities in international markets—particularly Europe, China, and select emerging economies that stand to benefit from supply chain rebalancing and reduced exposure to U.S. policy volatility. Christopher Wood's latest commentary signals that the era of the 'TACO trade' may be coming to an end. While it served as a psychological and tactical cushion for investors navigating trade uncertainty, the assumption that threats never translate into lasting damage may no longer be viable. With tariff levels rising, global policy becoming more erratic, and market valuations stretched, Wood believes the risks are now too significant to ignore. If his warning proves accurate, the global equity landscape could be on the cusp of a reset—one where investor psychology must adjust to a world in which political shocks are not always cushioned by last-minute reversals. Instead, preparation, diversification, and a sharper focus on macro fundamentals may be the best path forward. Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
Economic Times
16 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Rupee falls for 2nd straight week as dollar perks up, outflows weigh
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Popular in Markets 1. Rupee dips past key support, exporter activity and inflows help limit losses The Indian rupee weakened slightly on Friday, falling for a second consecutive week, as the dollar recovered from a more than two-year low and outflows pressured local rupee closed at 86.1475, down from its previous close of 86.0750, and 0.4% lower from a week benchmark equity index the Nifty 50, fell 0.7% this week, even as MSCI's gauge of regional stocks excluding Japan was 0.8% the near-term, the rupee is "likely to hover closer to 86.50 than 85.50," a trader at a large private bank dollar demand and equity outflows weighed on the Indian currency on the day, the trader investors have net sold about $300 million of Indian equities over July so far after infusing $1.7 billion in the previous dollar index was on course for its second consecutive weekly rise, boosted by strong U.S. economic data which diminished wagers on rate cuts by the Federal Reserve. Interest rate futures markets are currently pricing in about 45 basis points of Fed rate cuts for the remainder of the year, down from closer to 50 basis points at the start of the week."We expect the residual 14bp priced in for September to be gradually reduced," ING said in a "hawkish rethink" in Fed rate cut expectations could hurt the euro while an election in Japan over the weekend runs the risk of driving the yen below 150, ING Fed is scheduled to hold a total of four meetings over the rest of 2025, including one on July euro and the yen were on course for weekly declines of 0.5% and 0.8%, in U.S.-India trade negotiations will be in focus ahead of the August 1 deadline for country-specific tariffs on exports to the United States.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
19 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Gold heads for weekly dip as platinum surges to near 11-year high
Gold prices gained on Friday, but were on track for a weekly decline on easing concerns about the US Federal Reserve's independence and strong US data, while platinum rose to a near 11-year high. Spot gold was up 0.3 per cent at $3,349.49 per ounce, as of 0834 GMT, after falling 1.1 per cent in the previous session. The bullion has declined 0.2 per cent so far this week. US gold futures eased 0.3 per cent to $3,354.70. The dollar is down 0.4 per cent for the day, but is headed for a second straight weekly rise. A stronger dollar tends to make gold expensive for buyers holding other currencies. Earlier in the week, a source told Reuters US President Donald Trump was open to firing Fed Chair Powell, but Trump later said he doesn't plan to sack him even as he renewed his criticism over interest rate policy. Meanwhile, US data showed that retail sales rose more than expected in June, while initial jobless claims were better than expected. "Market participants remain concerned about the independence of the Fed. For now, those risks have declined, and US economic data has remained solid, capping the upside for gold," said UBS commodity analyst Giovanni Staunovo. "But at the same time, Trump wants to see the Fed cutting rates aggressively... This is putting a floor under the market." Bullion is viewed as a safe-haven asset during times of uncertainty and performs well in a low-interest rate environment. "While gold might struggle near-term without a new, specific policy shock, its underlying uptrend remains firmly in place, supported by central bank buying and, increasingly, real money demand for allocated bullion," said Adrian Ash, head of research at online marketplace BullionVault. "In precious metals, the carnival has moved on from safe-haven gold to silver, platinum and palladium as pro-growth, industrial alternatives."Spot platinum rose 1 per cent to $1,472.20 per ounce, its highest since August 2014. Palladium climbed 1.4 per cent to $1,297.78, its highest since August 2023. Silver was flat at $38.12.
