The Diageo share price leaps 6% despite profits drop. Is the recovery back on?
That hasn't happened much lately. The stock is still down 25% over 12 months and more than 50% over three years. That's a dreadful run for what used to be one of the UK's most solid and reliable blue-chips.
Diageo has been on the ropes for a while, battered by a string of profit warnings, cost pressures, shifting drinking habits and worries about the impact of weight loss drugs. Even the Guinness craze couldn't stop the slide. But now we've had some long-awaited good news.
Sales growth holds firm
Today (5 August), Diageo released its full-year results and the shares jumped 6% in early trading. That's a much-needed morale boost, especially for me as a long-term shareholder. I'm still sitting on a 30% paper loss though.
Reported operating profit slumped 27.8% to $4.33bn, hit by impairments and currency shifts. Yet stripping those out, underlying profits dipped just 0.7% to $5.7bn. That's not exactly a barnstorming result, but it could have been worse.
Reported net sales fell 0.1% to $20.2bn. Organic net sales growth came in at 1.7% with both volume and price contributing. The group said it held or gained market share across 65% of measured markets, including the US, which has been a problem area lately.
Free cash flow hit an impressive $2.7bn. Diageo held its full-year dividend steady at 103.48 cents. I'd have liked to see an increase. The trailing dividend yield is 4.16%.
Management also raised the target for its cost-cutting programme from $500m to $625m over the next three years. It knows the business needs to change.
Cost savings lifeline
Hargreaves Lansdown equity analyst Aarin Chiekrie said Diageo just about beat analysts' cautious expectations, helped by some customers stocking up ahead of looming tariffs. He praised Guinness for another year of double-digit revenue growth and said the group's brand stable remained world class.
Tariffs could add around $200m of extra annual costs, so Diageo is rightly getting on with trimming spending elsewhere. It still carries $21.9bn of net debt and may need to sell some smaller brands to shrink that. Chiekrie thinks any disposals would focus on slower-growth, lower-margin assets.
The recent exit of CEO Debra Crew shows the pressure is on. A permanent replacement has yet to be named, but whoever steps in will have a tough task to steady the ship.
FTSE 100 recovery play?
There's still a long way to go. Younger drinkers may never embrace alcohol like older generations did. The impact of weight loss drugs on booze consumption is also unclear. And as I've learned the hard way, even the best brands can underperform if management misreads the market.
Yet after such a dire run, Diageo is edging in the right direction. The shares now trade at a price-to-earnings ratio of a lowly 13.93, down from around 24 or 25 in better days. That looks fair value for a global brand owner with decent free cash flow.
This could be a long haul. We need a brighter set of results before Diageo gets its old fizz back and is worth considering. Patience required.
The post The Diageo share price leaps 6% despite profits drop. Is the recovery back on? appeared first on The Motley Fool UK.
More reading
5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50
One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool
Harvey Jones has positions in Diageo Plc. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Diageo Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.
Motley Fool UK 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Morning Bid: Split Bank of England set to cut rates
A look at the day ahead in European and global markets from Kevin Buckland There's little doubt in the market's mind that the Bank of England will cut interest rates later today by another quarter point, making it five cuts in the past year. But a tricky balance between a slowing jobs market and nagging inflation worries could see the board split three ways, with two of the nine members potentially pushing for no change, while two others may lobby for a half-point reduction. The board's language will also be key, with a focus on whether the message of "gradual and careful" policy easing remains in place. Any signs of an extended pause would be a blow for Finance Minister Rachel Reeves and Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who have promised to speed up Britain's slow economic growth. Away from the UK, the market's broad focus falls squarely on another central bank with some similar problems. The U.S. Federal Reserve has seen the macroeconomic data take a distinct downward turn over the past week - particularly the labour market - just days after the board opted to forgo a rate cut. But with worries about simmering inflationary forces as a result of President Donald Trump's bellicose tariff campaign also showing up in the data, Fed Chair Jerome Powell's wait-and-see stance also finds some support. Hanging over the Fed's debate - which saw two Trump-chosen Fed governors dissent in last week's decision - are the president's persistent and aggressive calls to cut rates, often framed with name-calling and threats to fire Powell before his chairmanship expires in May. The market's eyes are on Trump's short list of four possible replacements, and more immediately, his pick to fill a governor role abruptly vacated by Adriana Kugler. Meanwhile, Trump's barrage of tariff threats continues unabated, with a 100% duty on semiconductor imports and additional levies on India for importing Russian oil among the latest. Trump plans to talk to Russian President Vladimir Putin next week about ending the war in Ukraine, which is buoying the euro while injecting uncertainty into the outlook for crude oil. Overall though, the market has become more inured to the constant tariff sabre-rattling and Japan's Topix index marched to a record peak while tech-heavy Taiwan shares leapt more than 2% to the highest in over a year. Pan-European STOXX 50 futures are pointing 0.2% higher, with Wall Street futures also up by about the same amount. A strong U.S. earnings season is one reason for that. Coming up are Eli Lilly, ConocoPhillips and Warner Bros Discovery, among many others. Europe has a busy day of earnings reports as well, with Allianz, Siemens and Merck among them. On the data front, Germany has trade figures and industrial production numbers, while Britain gets a reading on house prices. Key developments that could influence markets on Thursday: -BoE policy decision -UK Halifax house prices (July) -German exports, imports, industrial production (all June) Trying to keep up with the latest tariff news? Our new daily news digest offers a rundown of the top market-moving headlines impacting global trade. Sign up for Tariff Watch here. 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Wary of sticker shock, retailers clash with brands on price hikes
By Helen Reid LONDON (Reuters) -Caught between rising costs from tariffs and belt-tightening consumers, big retailers are clashing with the producers of consumer brands such as Nivea-maker Beiersdorf and brewer Heineken, as they look to avoid sticker shock that could hurt sales. The disputes - which have dented some brands' sales - underscore the challenge for consumer goods makers and sellers, with inflation and tariffs pushing up input costs and price spikes in commodities such as coffee. While pricing talks have never been easy, tariffs are escalating already high food inflation since the pandemic, making grocery bills more contentious and political as consumers grapple with a cost-of-living crisis. "We all should be very well aware of consumer budgets," Frans Muller, CEO of supermarket company Ahold Delhaize, which owns U.S. chains Food Lion, Hannaford, and Stop & Shop, told Reuters on Wednesday. He said conversations with consumer goods companies over pricing were "tight," adding that the industry's focus was on increasing sales volumes rather than increasing revenue by hiking prices. "That is the wrong way of supporting customers and the wrong way of growing the business itself." Ahold has in-house teams that track commodity, energy, and labour costs, and own-brand products it can compare with to establish whether price increases demanded by consumer brands are justified or not, Muller said. On the other side of the equation are the brands, facing higher costs that are squeezing margins. Beiersdorf CEO Vincent Warnery said on Wednesday that retailers in key markets, including Germany and France, had pushed back strongly in price talks last quarter, not only refusing price increases but asking for price reductions, and pulling products from shelves. Beiersdorf eventually agreed to a 2.6% rise, Warnery said, but delistings of some products by retailers knocked two percentage points off its sales growth in Europe in the second quarter. "There will be a lot of price changes pushed forward by consumer brands, some will be accepted by retailers and some will not," said Bobby Gibbs, a Dallas-based partner at Oliver Wyman who advises retailers and consumer goods firms. Manufacturers will find it easier to push higher prices through on products where there is brand loyalty and fewer strong private label alternatives, Gibbs said. Reuters' global tariff tracker shows at least 102 out of nearly 300 companies monitored by the tracker have announced price hikes in response to the trade war, with about 41 of them in the consumer sector. As well as tariffs, other factors like the cost of capital and labour, and commodity prices in the case of coffee and chocolate, are pushing prices up on certain products, Gibbs said. Trump has said the tariffs counter persistent U.S. trade imbalances and declining U.S. manufacturing power, and that the moves will bring jobs and investment to the nation. MORE PRICE HIKES AHEAD More price hikes are planned, particularly in the U.S. Tide detergent maker Procter & Gamble last week said it was raising prices on about a quarter of its products in the U.S. by a mid-single-digit percentage as part of efforts to mitigate the cost of higher tariffs on imported goods. That will affect pricing at Walmart, Target, and other stores. As talks heat up, more retailers could pull branded products temporarily as a negotiating tactic, as Ahold's Albert Heijn chain did this year in a dispute over price hikes by coffee roaster JDE Peet's. Dutch brewer Heineken last week said its beer sales were dented by a price dispute with European retailers. "Many retailers are getting more sophisticated in how they can measure product switching ... so they're willing to be bolder on delistings because they're able to protect sales and margin more than they would have in the past," said Gibbs. In Europe, retailers are joining forces to increase their clout in pricing talks. Carrefour said last month it had created a new European buying alliance called Concordis, along with rival group Coopérative U, and is in advanced discussions with other European retailers to expand the alliance. Supermarkets are developing more own-brand alternatives to big-name brands. Ahold has introduced 300 new own-brand products this year in its U.S. chains, and sales growth in those has outpaced the rest of the store, it said. Big brands have taken note, with P&G's Chief Financial Officer Andre Schulten saying last week that retailers have been implementing "more aggressive pricing" on own-brand products. "We see some level of pressure to drive trade down because of price promotional behaviour," he said, referring to consumers swapping to lower-priced products, adding the market would remain "volatile and challenging". Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
With A 1.1% Return On Equity, Is Vonovia SE (ETR:VNA) A Quality Stock?
Explore Vonovia's Fair Values from the Community and select yours Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand Vonovia SE (ETR:VNA). Shop Top Mortgage Rates A quicker path to financial freedom Personalized rates in minutes Your Path to Homeownership ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. In short, ROE shows the profit each dollar generates with respect to its shareholder investments. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. How Is ROE Calculated? Return on equity can be calculated by using the formula: Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Vonovia is: 1.1% = €314m ÷ €28b (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2025). The 'return' is the income the business earned over the last year. So, this means that for every €1 of its shareholder's investments, the company generates a profit of €0.01. Check out our latest analysis for Vonovia Does Vonovia Have A Good Return On Equity? Arguably the easiest way to assess company's ROE is to compare it with the average in its industry. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. If you look at the image below, you can see Vonovia has a lower ROE than the average (4.9%) in the Real Estate industry classification. That certainly isn't ideal. That being said, a low ROE is not always a bad thing, especially if the company has low leverage as this still leaves room for improvement if the company were to take on more debt. When a company has low ROE but high debt levels, we would be cautious as the risk involved is too high. To know the 3 risks we have identified for Vonovia visit our risks dashboard for free. Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE Companies usually need to invest money to grow their profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the first and second cases, the ROE will reflect this use of cash for investment in the business. In the latter case, the use of debt will improve the returns, but will not change the equity. Thus the use of debt can improve ROE, albeit along with extra risk in the case of stormy weather, metaphorically speaking. Vonovia's Debt And Its 1.1% ROE It's worth noting the high use of debt by Vonovia, leading to its debt to equity ratio of 1.49. The combination of a rather low ROE and significant use of debt is not particularly appealing. Debt does bring extra risk, so it's only really worthwhile when a company generates some decent returns from it. Summary Return on equity is a useful indicator of the ability of a business to generate profits and return them to shareholders. Companies that can achieve high returns on equity without too much debt are generally of good quality. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE. But ROE is just one piece of a bigger puzzle, since high quality businesses often trade on high multiples of earnings. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth -- and how much investment is required going forward. So you might want to take a peek at this data-rich interactive graph of forecasts for the company. Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
