After housing and job crisis, Canadian MP launches petition to end temporary foreign worker program
Temporary Foreign Worker program
. He said the TFW program is a big reason immigration is too high, and it's taking jobs from Canadians and lowering wages, as per reports.
In a social media video, Jivani blamed high immigration for doctor shortages, crowded hospitals, housing problems, and fewer
jobs for Canadians
. He said people can see these problems everywhere like not enough hospital beds, hard to find a doctor, houses are too few, and jobs are scarce. Jivani said in Parliament it's hard to have a 'sensible conversation' about immigration now. He said his petition doesn't include farm workers. He wants a different program for seasonal farm jobs.
One reason for this petition is high youth unemployment. In April, unemployment for 15 to 24-year-olds was 14%, as per the Statistics Canada's May 2025 jobs report. Last year, the federal government already said they will cut back the number of TFWs. They said they won't process TFW applications in cities with more than 6% unemployment, according to a Canadian Press report.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Dental Implant Bagong Silang Cost Might Be More Affordable Than Ever!
Dental implant | Search Ads
Learn More
Undo
From 2025 to 2027, the plan is to allow 82,000 temporary workers into Canada each year. Employment Minister Patty Hajdu responded by pointing out that Jivani is not in the Conservative shadow cabinet. She said if Jivani had been briefed by his party, he'd know they already reduced the TFW program. Hajdu also said the government is talking to labour and industry groups for more changes. She said the TFW program does NOT replace Canadian workers and is important for farms and tourism, as per reports.
Jivani seems to be doing this petition on his own. He doesn't have an official role as an immigration or jobs critic in the party. The actual Conservative critics for immigration and employment are Michelle Rempel Garner and Garnett Genuis. The Conservative Party has not commented yet, as mentioned in The Canadian Press report.
Live Events
FAQs
Q1. What is Jamil Jivani's petition about?
He wants to end the Temporary Foreign Worker program in most sectors.
Q2. Is the foreign worker program still being run by the Canadian government?
Yes, but they are limiting it in cities with high unemployment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Who is May Mailman, the Harvard-educated lawyer at the center of Trump's campaign against America's top universities?
May Mailman's role in challenging elite US universities during Trump's term. (Photo courtesy: Facebook) May Mailman, a Harvard-trained lawyer, has been the key figure behind President Trump's aggressive campaign targeting America's top universities, according to reporting by The New York Times. Through executive orders, the strategic use of federal funding, and civil rights investigations, Mailman helped design a broad approach aimed at pressuring elite institutions to alter their policies on admissions, diversity, and gender. Although Mailman departed the White House in August 2025, as reported by CBS News, she continues to serve as a special government employee, overseeing ongoing negotiations with universities such as Harvard, according to The New York Times. Driving policy to reshape higher education Mailman was instrumental in drafting executive orders early in Trump's second term that redefined the federal government's stance on sex, limiting recognition to only two genders and rolling back policies that promoted diversity, equity, and inclusion, as reported by The New York Times. These changes forced universities like the University of Pennsylvania to ban transgender girls and women from participating in women's sports. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like If You Find These Bugs in Bauru, Do Something Immediately Undo The New York Times further notes that Mailman was 'credited as an animating force behind a strategy that has intimidated independent institutions and undercut years of medical and scientific research.' She helped lead an effort to challenge what the administration viewed as liberal bias in admissions practices, particularly focusing on the role of race in college admissions. Using federal funding and civil rights investigations as leverage According to The New York Times, a key element of Mailman's strategy involved leveraging federal funding to pressure universities. Institutions faced the risk of losing significant research grants or student visa approvals if they did not align with the administration's demands. In addition, the administration opened civil rights investigations into admissions policies at several leading universities. The Times reports that Mailman personally closed a $221 million settlement with Columbia University—the largest settlement the administration has secured to date—after such investigations. Negotiations with elite universities While many universities chose to quietly comply, Harvard has been a rare holdout, willing to fight back in court, The New York Times reports. Mailman led the White House's negotiations with Harvard, which included contentious issues such as how race factored into admissions and disputes over patent investigations. The Times quotes Harvard officials describing these investigations as 'yet another retaliatory effort targeting Harvard for defending its rights and freedom. ' Talks with Harvard appeared to be progressing, with the university signalling openness to spending $500 million to reach a resolution, though new investigations and pressures continued, as noted by The New York Times. Impact on academic freedom and campus culture The New York Times highlights concerns from faculty and student groups that the administration's approach threatens academic freedom and free speech on campuses. Mailman's policies, which have included attempts to dictate hiring practices, admissions, and curriculum content, have been described by some as trampling on First Amendment rights. Adam Goldstein, vice president of strategic initiatives at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, was quoted by The New York Times saying, 'If you normalize the use of federal power like this, then academic freedom is just a memory and universities become political footballs and no longer useful instruments in the search for truth.' Mailman's pragmatism amid controversy Despite her aggressive tactics, The New York Times reports that Mailman is respected within government circles for her efficiency and ability to balance competing interests. University officials who have negotiated with her privately have praised her pragmatic approach, noting her skill in navigating complex discussions between the administration and academic institutions. Stephen Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff, praised Mailman as 'one of the most indispensable, gifted and dedicated staffers and lawyers in the Trump administration since Day 1,' according to The New York Times. Continuing influence after White House departure Though Mailman officially left her White House post in August 2025, The New York Times reports that she remains involved as a special government employee to 'tie up loose ends' on policy matters. CBS News also reported that Mailman plans to start a government affairs firm but will not represent clients related to her administration projects, including ongoing negotiations with Harvard. Mailman herself said, as quoted by The New York Times, 'We don't want to run these universities. We want some sweeping changes that set things in the right trajectory.' TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Lok Sabha approves updated I-T bill, to ease compliance burden
Lok Sabha NEW DELHI: Lok Sabha on Monday approved the Income Tax Bill 2025 - a key reform aimed at revamping the decades old income tax law for individuals and companies, making it simple for taxpayers and easing the compliance burden. Earlier, FM Nirmala Sitharaman introduced the revised and updated version of the I-T bill in Parliament, incorporating recommendations of the Select committee of Parliament. On Aug 8, FM had withdrawn the earlier bill, which was introduced in the house on Feb 13. The Select committee of the Lok Sabha headed by BJP's Baijayant Panda had examined the I-T Bill 2025 and adopted the report on the draft legislation last month. The parliamentary panel had suggested 285 recommendations on the draft legislation, aimed at simplifying and modernising the country's tax laws. "Almost all of the recommendations of the Select Committee have been accepted by govt. In addition, suggestions have been received from stakeholders about changes that would convey the proposed legal meaning more accurately," according to the statement of Objects and Reasons of the Income Tax (No.2) Bill. " For TDS correction statements, the time period for filing statements has been reduced to two years from six years in the Income-tax Act, 1961. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like listen now on spotify samy Listen Now Undo I-T department sources said this is expected to reduce the grievances of deductees significantly. Flexibility has been provided in the new I-T bill for allowing refund claims in cases where the return is not filed on time, a move which is expected to come as a major relief for taxpayers. Tax experts said the reforms are expected to ease compliance for individuals, companies, MSMEs and promote a stable, predictable and transparent tax system, key for sustaining domestic consumption, attracting foreign investment and supporting growth. "The withdrawal of the earlier I-T bill and the introduction of a revised version demonstrates govt's responsiveness to stakeholder feedback and the Select Parliamentary committee's recommendations," said Gouri Puri, partner, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas and Co. Puri said the original draft raised concerns about ambiguities, particularly regarding house property taxation, pension deductions, and the refund process for delayed filings. "The revised bill addresses these gaps to simplify interpretation, reduce disputes and promote fairness," said Puri. The new I-T Bill also aims to eliminate redundant and repetitive provisions for better navigation, reorganising sections logically to facilitate case of reference. It has opted for simplified language to make the law more accessible and has removed obsolete and redundant provisions for greater clarity. Mandatory investment and deposit of deemed accumulated income of 15% of regular income in specified modes has been done away with. The word "profession" has been added after "business" in clause 187 to enable professionals with total receipts exceeding Rs 50 crore in a year the facility of prescribed electronic modes of payment. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays , public holidays , current gold rate and silver price .
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Pot Stocks Soar on Report Trump Mulling Drug Reclassification
Shares of cannabis-linked companies rallied on Monday after a report that President Donald Trump was considering reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug — giving the sector a much needed boost. The stock of greenhouse production firm Village Farms International Inc. surged as much as 42% on Monday, its biggest intraday jump since June 2017. Tilray Brands Inc., Canopy Growth Corp., Aurora Cannabis Inc., SNDL Inc. and Cronos Group Inc. all climbed by double digits after the Wall Street Journal reported that the US president was interested in making the change. The report highlighted Trump's remarks made during a fundraising event, citing people familiar with the matter. Hints of a new scheduling push from the administration may have also reignited hope for a broader federal legislation push that is key to unlocking value in the sector. Cannabis is currently labeled as a Schedule 1 drug — putting it into a category that also includes substances like heroin and LSD. Former Florida Republican representative Matt Gaetz said in a March op-ed that the Trump administration would bring 'meaningful change' in reclassifying cannabis to a Schedule III drug, which puts it on the same level as anabolic steroids and the medication Adderall. 'Over the long-term, a rescheduling of cannabis would likely lift the entire sector by bolstering research, reducing stigma, improving access to capital, and opening up a large addressable market,' TD Cowen analyst Derek Lessard wrote in a Monday note. He rates Canadian cannabis producer Aurora Cannabis a buy, but reminded investors the company has no known plans to enter the US market. Even if the US approved a rescheduling of marijuana's status, it wouldn't likely have near-term effects on companies without US operations, he warned. Rescheduling is also a separate issue than federal legislation. The US operates as a state patchwork system as far as legalization goes and progress on legalizing marijuana on a federal level has been slow. The sector trades well below its 2021 heyday, when rates were lower and investor enthusiasm was at its peak. The Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF, an exchange-traded fund tracking cannabis companies, rose by as much as 20% to its highest level on Monday. It's still down more than 90% from its 2021 peak. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
