New Jersey Democrats vow to fight Trump in final gubernatorial debate
Five of the six Democratic contenders — Reps. Mikie Sherrill and Josh Gottheimer, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop, and former state Senate President Steve Sweeney — faced off Sunday night in a debate hosted by On New Jersey, the New Jersey Globe, and Rider University. A sixth candidate, Montclair Mayor Sean Spiller, did not meet the fundraising threshold to participate in the debate.
The candidates sparred for over two-and-a-half hours on a range of state-specific issues, from transit and education funding to taxes and state budgets. But they were united in resolving to take on Trump.
New Jersey is one of two states, along with Virginia, with gubernatorial races this year, which could provide an early look at how voters are responding to Trump's second term. While the Virginia matchup is set, the New Jersey candidates first have to compete in the June 10 primary.
There are contested primaries on both sides, but former Assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli has led the GOP primary field, and he secured Trump's endorsement last week. The Democratic race has been more unpredictable, with a crowded field splitting voters.
When asked how schools and universities should navigate threats to federal funding if they do not comply with Trump's executive orders on DEI or transgender issues, all five said institutions should resist the administration.
Fulop said, "We should absolutely be pushing back,' while Sweeney called Trump 'a criminal.' Gottheimer, referring to the president as 'this guy,' said, 'The job of the governor is to fight him.'
Baraka — who was arrested on trespassing charges at a federal immigration detention facility earlier this month — also said, 'We have to fight back.' He has denied any wrongdoing and argued the charges were politically motivated. Former Trump lawyer Alina Habba, now the interim U.S. attorney for New Jersey, wrote in an X post after Baraka was arrested, 'NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.'
Sherrill, who some consider the frontrunner in the crowded race, called Trump 'the most corrupt president this nation has ever had' and likened him to a playground bully.
'This is not a federal government you can work with,' Sherrill said.
Sherrill and Gottheimer faced some criticism, particularly from Sweeney, for not doing enough to combat Trump and Republicans in D.C.
'We need to start winning some fights in Washington,' Sweeney said a few times throughout the debate.
The candidates also laid out their paths to victory in November, with the race expected to be competitive. Trump lost New Jersey by 6 points last year, a 10-point improvement on his performance in the 2020 election.
Sherrill previewed a potential case against Ciattarelli, saying that the former assemblyman 'has promised to DOGE New Jersey' and will not stand up to Trump (Ciattarelli has called for establishing a Department of Government Efficiency at the state level).
Both Sherrill and Gottheimer touted their victories in competitive House districts, and Gottheimer stressed his focus on reducing taxes and lowering costs.
Baraka pitched himself as the true progressive in the race, adding that progressive groups have endorsed him because 'they know I'm gonna fight Donald Trump, not just in words but in action.'
Sweeney, meanwhile, said he would be best equipped to run state government and that other candidates pitching themselves as Trenton outsiders would face a steep learning curve.
Fulop noted in his opening statement that Ciattarelli 'will be tough to beat,' and later said that a candidate tied to the party establishment, and particularly to Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy, will be 'dead on arrival in November.' (Murphy cannot run for re-election due to term limits.)
'It is not gonna be only a referendum on Donald Trump because independent voters in the state of New Jersey, a lot of them voted for Donald Trump,' Fulop said, later adding, 'You need to move independent voters, you need to move Republican voters, with a clear vision of what New Jersey looks like.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
39 minutes ago
- Spectator
Trump may regret investing in Intel microchips
When President Trump unveils a massive investment in the microchip manufacturer Intel on behalf of the American people it will no doubt be accompanied by all the usual hyperbole. No doubt we will hear all about how it will be the 'deal of the century', delivered personally by the 'investor in chief'. But hold on. Sure, we can understand why the President wants to help one of the US's most strategic companies. But the blunt truth is that Intel is well past its peak – and it will prove to be a terrible deal. It will be one of the largest industrial investments the White House has ever made. According to reports today, the government is discussing taking a 10 per cent stake in Intel, making it the largest shareholder. In total, the government might pump around $10 billion (£7.4 billion) into the company, although a big chunk of that will come from converting the billions in grants and subsidies it received from President Biden's Chips Act into equity. Either way, Intel will get a big chunk of extra cash. In fairness, there is a case to be made for state support. Microchips are a key strategic industry, and, just like Joe Biden, President Trump wants to make sure that the United States has enough manufacturing capacity on its home soil. He wants to ensure the country is not completely reliant on imports from South Korea, Japan, or, most worryingly of all, Taiwan, given that it could be invaded by China one day. It is probably significant that one of Intel's biggest projects is a new plant in Ohio, which also happens to be the home state of vice president J.D. Vance. The trouble is, the company also faces huge challenges. The days when laptops proudly boasted 'Intel Inside' are long in the past. The company's share price has halved over the last five years. It has been overtaken in chip technology by Nvidia, now the largest company in the world measured by market value, as well as Taiwan's TSMC. It has abandoned its plans to invest in Germany, despite receiving billions of euros from the government in Berlin to build a plant in the country because it couldn't work out how to make it pay. In the mass market, Samsung has overtaken it, and Chinese manufacturers are snapping at its heels. It may have been one of the pioneers of the computer age, but it is now looking well past its prime. In reality, Intel has become hooked on subsidies and grants. The company has become very good at hustling cash out of governments. It has not been so good at making chips or serving customers. It is very hard to see how a few more billions from the White House is going to turn that around now. President Trump will no doubt boast that he has secured 'the best deal ever'. But it is likely to prove a terrible investment.
Scottish Sun
39 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Why does Putin want the Donbas? How ‘fortress belt' region scarred by 11yrs of war is tyrant's top prize in peace talks
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) PUTIN laid his cards on the table when he declared that he wants the whole of Ukraine's Donbas region in exchange for peace. The eastern zone, home to Ukraine's "fortress belt", would be a valuable prize for Putin with murderous potential - and one he has sought for over a decade. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 8 A member of the Ukrainian Volunteer Army patrol around the town of Velyka Novosilk Credit: Getty 8 Putin said he would freeze the entire frontline if Ukraine handed over the last remaining section of the Donbas Credit: Reuters 8 Fighting in raging on the frontline in Donetsk - which has seen unrest now for 11 years Credit: Getty 8 Since invading in 2022, Russia has overrun almost the entire Donbas - comprised of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts. But one corner of the Donetsk region remains clinging on. The frontline there accounts for just a fraction of the whole conflict, but suddenly the last remaining sliver of land has been thrust to the heart of the peace conversation. At last week's Alaska summit, Putin declared he would freeze the frontline if Ukraine handed over the last remaining enclave of the Donbas. read more on the ukraine war SUITED… NOT BOOTED Trump pledges to protect Ukraine's security as Zelensky wins concessions But Kyiv has consistently rejected the idea of releasing any territory it currently holds - creating a major sticking point in the negotiations. But why is Putin so obsessed by this particular patch? The Donbas is Ukraine's industrial powerhouse and holds rich reserves of coal and metal underground. By taking it all Russia would totally suffocate the vital supply of those fossil fuels to Ukraine. The Donbas is also a crucial strategic location in the conflict. It is a gateway guarding the central heartland of Ukraine - built around Ukraine "fortress belt". Moment warped Russian soldiers taunt Ukraine by flying an AMERICAN flag into battle ahead of crunch Zelensky-Trump talks This refers to a run of fiercely-defenced towns and cities which Russia has so far failed to undo. The valley around the Kazenyi Torets river, which runs through the unconquered region, has been fortified into a defensive stronghold. Over more than a decade, defensive lines have been embedded into the terrain and the slopes measured up for artillery ranges. Ukraine's army knows every inch of the land - hence the Russians have been unable to penetrate it. 8 Zelensky, who met Trump in the White House on Monday, has vowed not to give over any more land to Russia Credit: AFP 8 In last week's Alaska summit, Putin made the Donbas region a key bargaining chip Credit: Getty With the Donbas out of the way, Putin's ranks would find it much easier to storm through and take large swathes of central Ukraine in any future attacks. The region also holds a very particular history which means Russia feels a particular claim to it. It has long been one of the most Russian speaking parts of Ukraine, and political loyalties there have sometimes landed in favour of Russia. Donetsk was the home and main power base of Viktor Yanukovych - Ukraine's former president loyal to the Kremlin. Yanukovych was toppled in 2014 and it was in the aftermath of this when Russia seized Crimea. Unrest raged for the next eight years, with a separatist movement fuelled by Russian guns. 8 Strikes on Ukraine continued even as Zelensky and EU leaders sat down with Trump in Washington Credit: Getty 8 A school in the Donbas destroyed school after a strike in the city of Bakhmut Credit: AFP Even though the people of the Donbas firmly backed Zelensky in 2019 votes, Putin used the protection of its residents as a key justification for his so-called special military operation. He recognized two breakaway territories — the self-declared 'Donetsk People's Republic' and 'Luhansk People's Republic' — before launching his full-scale invasion of Ukraine. This thin excuse was debunked within hours when the marauding Russians advanced far beyond its boundaries. While the remaining piece of land demanded by Putin may be small, the future of a vast area would be destabilised if it falls into Russian hands. A former high-ranking Kremlin official previously warned: 'Putin has acted opportunistically; when he launched the invasion he had no fixed territorial limits in mind. 'His appetite grows once he's tasted success.'
Daily Mirror
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
How Donald Trump was charmed by Volodymyr Zelensky after embarrassing JD Vance row
In February, Volodymyr Zelensky met with Donald Trump and JD Vance in a disastrous summit in which he was chastised for failing to properly thank the US president and not wearing a suit Volodymyr Zelensky appears to have wooed America's ego-driven president with a simple wardrobe swap. Yesterday marked Zelensky 's second ever visit to the White House after the disastrous February meeting saw him being hounded out of the building. He was asked to leave following a heated exchange with Donald Trump and his sidekick Vice President JD Vance. However, yesterday's meeting was worlds apart, with a much more upbeat tone and feel as Trump and Zelensky were joined by seven European leaders to hash a route out of the ongoing war in Ukraine. Trump is believed to have contacted Russian tyrant Vladimir Putin in the hours after the meeting to discuss its outcomes. One of the key takeaways was plans for Putin and Zelensky to sit down for an unprecedented bilateral meeting in the coming weeks. But how did Zelensky manage to turn a former antagonist into a friend? The suit maketh the man February's fiasco was caused by a number of things, including accusations that Zelensky was being stubborn in refusing to engage in peace talks with Russia. As a point of defiance in the face of Russian aggression, the wartime premier had always refused to engage with the idea of peace with tyrannical Putin. However, the meeting also started on bad terms due to the Ukrainian president's choice of attire. Zelensky usually wears camo military-style shirts and has been seen doing so in countless public appearances. It's thought he chooses the attire to show solidarity with the Ukrainian men and women serving in his army, and to reassure the public he is the man leading them through the conflict. However, Trump was less than impressed with his outfit. At the time, Trump quipped, "Oh, you're all dressed up" as he welcomed Zelensky into the Oval Office. Yesterday things were markedly different after Zelensky showed up wearing a sharp black field jacket, black shirt and black trousers. Outside the White House, a pro-Trump reporter told the Ukrainian president, "you look fabulous in that suit", before Trump chimed in: "I said the same thing." 'I can't believe it, I love it,' he added as he shook his hand vigorously. He turned to Zelensky and said, "isn't that nice? That's the one who attacked you last time", referring to the previous meeting when the reporter asked why he wasn't wearing a suit at the White House. Zelensky's endless gratitude Vice President JD Vance said the costume error showed Zelensky was disrespectful and ungrateful for Trump's work trying to end the war. Vance, who was silent through yesterday's meeting, asked him: 'Have you said thank you once? 'Offer some words of appreciation for the United States of America and the president who is trying to save your country.' According to reports, the disastrous meeting led European leaders to step in to coach the Ukrainian premier on how to deal with the volatile and ego-driven US leader. While cameras were rolling in the Oval Office, Zelensky thanked his host seven times during a minute of speech. He also thanked the president's wife, Melania Trump after she sent a letter to Putin detailing human rights abuses involving the abduction of Ukrainian children. 'Thanks so much, Mr President,' he said. 'If I can, first of all, thank you for the invitation, and thank you very much for your efforts, personal efforts, to stop killings and stop this war. Thank you.'
