Influencer faces charges after abused dog is rescued
The influencer at the centre of the storm is now facing charges under the Animals Protection Act.
The video, which surfaced last week, showed a social media influencer dancing for the camera while a severely malnourished dog sat in the background.
Bobby appeared weak and neglected, sparking widespread outrage online.
'She is the most lovable dog, handing out kisses to everyone since the moment she arrived,' the NSPCA said in a statement.
'Bobby was found severely malnourished, suffering from fly strike, and covered in ticks and fleas. She had even been forced to eat plastic to survive.'
The NSPCA's Special Projects Unit immediately launched an investigation and successfully tracked down both Bobby's owner and the influencer.
Bobby was taken into custody and is now receiving veterinary care and proper nutrition.
While she remains in poor condition, the NSPCA says she is on a 'long road to recovery.'
Once she has regained her strength and health, she will be sterilised and made available for adoption into 'the loving and caring home she deserves.'
The influencer reportedly sarcastically mocked the NSPCA online after learning that the organisation was looking for her. But the tone has since changed.
'Now, she will be facing charges in terms of the Animals Protection Act, while Bobby walked out victorious against her cruelty,' the NSPCA confirmed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald
a day ago
- The Herald
NSPCA dismayed over NPA declining to prosecute Julius Malema for cruelty
The National Council of SPCAs (NSPCA) on Wednesday expressed disappointment at the National Prosecuting Authority's (NPA) decision not to prosecute EFF leader Julius Malema for cruelty regarding an incident in 2023. 'The case stems from a widely circulated video depicting Malema attempting to slaughter a cow in a manner the NSPCA believes violated the Animals Protection Act and inflicted unnecessary suffering,' said the NSPCA which opened a formal case in September 2023. The organisation said it had supplied supplementary video evidence, affidavits and secured a key eyewitness who captured further footage at the scene. 'Yet, in a letter to the NSPCA, the NPA stated 'the prosecution will not be in a position to adduce sufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt' that a contravention of the act occurred. The letter further cited the 'authenticity' of the video footage as a concern.' The case faced numerous challenges and was escalated by the NSPCA. 'While we acknowledge and respect the independence of the prosecutorial process, we are disheartened by this outcome. We believed the available evidence merited judicial consideration. This decision will no doubt be dismaying to many South Africans who care deeply about the humane treatment of animals. 'This matter also underscores a broader issue: the continued struggle for animals to achieve visibility and protection in the justice system. The law must be applied consistently,' said the NSPCA. TimesLIVE
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
NPA declines to prosecute Julius Malema in animal cruelty case
The National Prosecuting Authority has declined to prosecute EFF leader Julius Malema for animal cruelty. Image: Ayanda Ndamane / Independent Newspapers The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has declined to pursue criminal charges in an animal cruelty case involving EFF leader Julius Malema. The case relates to a widely circulated 2023 video in which Malema was seen attempting to slaughter a cow. The National Council of SPCAs (NSPCA). alleges that the act contravened the Animals Protection Act, citing 'unnecessary suffering' inflicted on the animal. The NSPCA confirmed it opened a formal case in September 2023, submitting video evidence, affidavits, and the testimony of a key eyewitness who had captured additional footage of the incident. The NSPCA said the NPA informed them that 'the prosecution would not be able to adduce sufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt' that the law had been broken. The NPA also cited concerns regarding the 'authenticity' of the video evidence. The NSPCA described the outcome as a serious setback for animal welfare. 'While we acknowledge and respect the independence of the prosecutorial process, we are deeply disheartened by this outcome,' the organisation said. 'We believed the available evidence merited judicial consideration.' According to the NSPCA, the matter was escalated through several tiers of the prosecutorial hierarchy, from the Public Prosecutor to the Chief Public Prosecutor, Director of Public Prosecutions, and ultimately the National Director of Public Prosecutions, but all declined to proceed with a prosecution. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ 'This decision will no doubt be dismaying to many South Africans who care deeply about the humane treatment of animals,' the NSPCA stated. The organisation also said the case highlighted systemic issues in the legal protection of animals. 'This matter also underscores a broader issue: the continued struggle for animals to achieve visibility and protection within the justice system. The law must be applied consistently.' THE MERCURY
TimesLIVE
a day ago
- TimesLIVE
NSPCA dismayed over NPA declining to prosecute Julius Malema for cruelty
The National Council of SPCAs (NSPCA) on Wednesday expressed disappointment at the National Prosecuting Authority's (NPA) decision not to prosecute EFF leader Julius Malema for cruelty regarding an incident in 2023. 'The case stems from a widely circulated video depicting Malema attempting to slaughter a cow in a manner the NSPCA believes violated the Animals Protection Act and inflicted unnecessary suffering,' said the NSPCA which opened a formal case in September 2023. The organisation said it had supplied supplementary video evidence, affidavits and secured a key eyewitness who captured further footage at the scene. 'Yet, in a letter to the NSPCA, the NPA stated 'the prosecution will not be in a position to adduce sufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt' that a contravention of the act occurred. The letter further cited the 'authenticity' of the video footage as a concern.' The case faced numerous challenges and was escalated by the NSPCA. 'While we acknowledge and respect the independence of the prosecutorial process, we are disheartened by this outcome. We believed the available evidence merited judicial consideration. This decision will no doubt be dismaying to many South Africans who care deeply about the humane treatment of animals. 'This matter also underscores a broader issue: the continued struggle for animals to achieve visibility and protection in the justice system. The law must be applied consistently,' said the NSPCA.
