Safaricom sees earnings surge as Ethiopia startup losses fall
By Hereward Holland
NAIROBI: Kenyan telecoms firm
Safaricom
said on Friday that its earnings could surge as much as 50% this financial year as it projected that losses in key expansion market Ethiopia would fall steeply.
Safaricom, partly owned by South Africa's Vodacom and Britain's Vodafone, launched in Ethiopia in 2022 as the government there opened up the tightly-controlled economy to foreign competition.
The company has had a bumpy ride in Ethiopia due to security, inflation and currency challenges, but it remains bullish that Africa's second most-populous nation will power future growth.
Chief Executive Officer Peter Ndegwa told a results presentation that the company was expecting group earnings before interest and taxes of 144 billion to 150 billion Kenyan shillings ($1.12 billion-$1.16 billion) in the year to the end of March 2026, excluding the hyper-inflationary impact from its Ethiopian business.
That compares with EBIT of 97.1 billion shillings in the year to end-March 2025 without the hyper-inflationary impact.
"We are pleased with our performance in FY25 despite the various challenges that faced the operating environment including economic disruptions, slowdown in GDP growth and impact of foreign exchange regime reforms in Ethiopia," Safaricom said in a statement.
Group service revenue grew more than 10% year-on-year to 371.4 billion shillings last financial year, while customer numbers increased 16% to 57.1 million.
Safaricom's
Kenya
business continued to be the main profit driver last year, while the company invested in rolling out operations in Ethiopia.
This year, the company expects negative EBIT of between 23 billion and 26 billion shillings in Ethiopia, compared to negative EBIT of about 61 billion last year.
"The exceptional performance in our Kenya business... offset the foreign exchange corrections in Ethiopia," Ndegwa said.
Safaricom's board has proposed a final dividend of 0.65 shillings per ordinary share, making the total dividend for 2024-2025 similar to the previous year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
11 hours ago
- Mint
Bitcoin is introduced into Africas largest slum, with risks and rewards
KIBERA, Kenya (AP) — Dotting the roadside in what is widely considered Africa's largest urban slum are typical stands selling vegetables. What isn't typical is their acceptance of bitcoin as a form of payment. Around 200 people use bitcoin in Soweto West, a neighborhood of the Kibera slum in Kenya 's capital. It's part of an initiative to extend financial services to one of the country's poorest and most under-banked areas. Its promoters say the adoption of crypto fits with the ideals of bitcoin as an accessible, democratic technology — but experts say it also has major risks. Bitcoin came to Soweto West via AfriBit Africa, a Kenyan fintech company, through its nonprofit initiative to improve financial inclusion. 'In many cases, people in Kibera do not have an opportunity to secure their lives with normal savings,' said AfriBit Africa co-founder Ronnie Mdawida, a former community worker. With bitcoin, "they do not need documentation to have a bank account … that gives them the foundation for financial freedom.' Bitcoin, the first and largest crypto, was created in 2009 in the wake of the global financial crisis as a decentralized digital asset that could act as an alternative method of payment. The asset has found more popular use as a store of value, like a digital form of gold. Bitcoin has attracted enthusiastic supporters as prices have climbed almost 1,000% in the last five years. But its volatility and lack of regulation are concerns. AfriBit Africa introduced bitcoin into Soweto West in early 2022 through crypto-denominated grants to local garbage collectors, who are often funded by nonprofits. The groups are made up of dozens of young people, who Mdawida says are more likely to be open to new tech. After gathering on a Sunday to collect trash, garbage collectors are paid a few dollars' worth of bitcoin. AfriBit Africa estimates that it has put some $10,000 into the community, with garbage collectors acting as the main agents of spreading bitcoin in Soweto West. In Kibera, many people earn about a dollar a day. Now a small number of other residents hold bitcoin, and some merchants and motorcycle taxis accept payments in crypto. Damiano Magak, 23, a garbage collector and food seller, said he prefers bitcoin to M-PESA, the ubiquitous mobile money platform in Kenya, because M-PESA transaction costs are higher and the network can be slower. There are no fees for M-PESA transactions between individuals or businesses up to 100 Kenyan shillings (78 cents), but after that the fees increase with transaction size. Fees for the Lightning bitcoin network where transactions take place are free if people use a platform that AfriBit Africa introduced into the community. Onesmus Many, 30, another garbage collector, said he feels safer with his money in a bitcoin wallet instead of in cash because of crime. Some merchants have found benefits to accepting crypto, including Dotea Anyim. She said around 10% of customers at her vegetable stand pay in bitcoin. 'I like it because it is cheap and fast and doesn't have any transaction costs,' she says. 'When people pay using bitcoin, I save that money and use cash to restock vegetables.' The possibility that crypto prices could keep rising also appeals to residents of Soweto West. Magak and Many said they now have around 70% to 80% of their net worth in bitcoin, a far higher level of exposure than most people. 'It is my worth and I'm risking it in bitcoin,' Magak said. That concerns Ali Hussein Kassim, a fintech entrepreneur and chair of the FinTech Alliance in Kenya. 'In an extremely volatile asset like bitcoin, it's overexposure. I can't afford to lose 80% of my wealth. How about a guy in Kibera?' Kassim said. 'You are exposing a vulnerable community to an ecosystem and to financial services that they can't necessarily afford to play in.' Kassim acknowledged the potential benefits that digital assets could bring, particularly in facilitating cheaper cross-border payments like remittances, but failed to see the benefit in Kibera. Bitcoin's volatility could negate the benefits of cheaper transaction fees, Kassim said, and bitcoin does not have the same protections as other financial services due to a lack of regulation. Mdawida disagreed, calling bitcoin's unregulated nature a benefit. 'We don't shy away from the risks involved,' the AfriBit Africa co-founder said, noting the group's investments in bitcoin education in Kibera, including financial literacy training and crypto courses in the community. Efforts to introduce bitcoin into developing countries have faced challenges. Bitcoin was adopted as legal tender in El Salvador and Central African Republic but both countries have reversed their decision. In Kenya, the digital asset sector has faced legal and regulatory challenges, including crackdowns on cryptocurrency giveaways. This small project, focusing only on Soweto West, has been allowed. 'On my phone I put notifications on when bitcoin rises … and it's all smiles," Magak said. "Whenever it fluctuates up and down, I know at the end of the day it will just rise.' For more on Africa and development: The Associated Press receives financial support for global health and development coverage in Africa from the Gates Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
Mint
a day ago
- Mint
Mint Explainer: What the World Bank's new poverty line means for India
Last week, the World Bank announced a new poverty line to decide how many people worldwide live in 'extreme poverty". The new threshold is higher than the previous one even in inflation-adjusted terms. That means many more people globally will suddenly find themselves below that benchmark and now be counted as 'poor". However, for India, the estimate has been revised downwards. That's because it's not all about the poverty line itself – other factors are at play, too. Also, 5.3% of Indians are poor by one measure, and 23.9% by another. Let's unpack all this. First, what is the poverty line? The poverty line is a minimum level of spending needed to meet one's basic nutrition, clothing and shelter needs. The number of people who cannot afford even that are classified as poor. One can adopt several standards to set the poverty line, and countries are free to decide those for themselves. But doing so at a global level is complex. A simple exchange-rate adjustment of India's poverty line in rupees per month wouldn't make it comparable with an American spending in dollars or a Kenyan spending in shillings, given the vastly different pricing levels in those countries. Also read | Himanshu: India needs official poverty data for effective policymaking To allow international comparisons, researchers created an international poverty line in 1990 that was adjusted for 'purchasing power parity' (PPP) across economies. PPP is an economic concept that compares the cost of a fixed basket of goods and services in different countries to determine the relative value and purchasing power of their currencies. That gave the World Bank its first global standard for a poverty line – $1 a day (at 1985 PPP). But PPP factors don't stay the same, since inflation is different everywhere, so the World Bank's International Comparison Program (ICP) keeps updating the PPP factors. This necessitates updates to the international poverty line as well. That's what has happened now. Because of such updates, it's possible that without any remarkable change in standards of living, one can cross the global line or slip under it merely through a methodology update. So, what did the World Bank say? Last week, the World Bank applied the 2021 PPP updates (which the ICP released last year) to determine a new poverty line. It also took into account improved data collection methods by several poor countries, which led to new poverty lines for them. Earlier, anyone who spent less than $2.15 a day on basic needs (at 2017 PPPs) was said to be poor. Adjusted to inflation, it would have been around $2.60 a day in 2021, but the new benchmark (which isn't merely due to PPP changes but also because of improved consumption surveys) is $3 a day at 2021 PPPs. Also read: India must redraw its poverty line to reflect economic progress When the World Bank issued its last estimate in September 2024, it counted 9% of people in the world as poor in 2022 based on the $2.15-a-day threshold. Now it reckons the figure was 10.5% (again, in 2022) by the new yardstick. This means 125 million more people were poor in 2022 (the latest reference year for which data is known reliably) than what last year's estimate had said. But there are two caveats to this. One, this increase doesn't necessarily mean more people are now poor; it means more people will now be classified as poor. Two, this number would have been much higher had the World Bank not applied a new method to come up with India's data (which was an outlier, seeing a decline in poverty rate). How has India's data helped in the revision of the estimates? Multiple factors, not just the application of 2021 PPP factors, have come together to influence poverty rates within the space of a few months. A major one is that the World Bank has now taken into account India's first official household consumption expenditure survey (CES) in 11 years, which took place in 2022-23 (and has since also taken place in 2023-24). When the data was still awaited for long, the World Bank was forced to use alternative sources to issue the best possible estimate of 12.9% for 2021 based on the $2.15-a-day poverty line. But now, the estimate stands revised to 5.3%. The change is based on both the new poverty line and the new official data that's now available. If we applied the old benchmark ($2.15 a day), around 2.4% of Indians were poor in 2022, as per the World Bank's calculations on that year's CES. The CES data for the 2023-24 survey is also available, but that doesn't yet reflect in the World Bank data. Let's apply a like-to-like comparison to summarise this: at the $2.15-a-day poverty line, the poverty rate for 2022 has been revised from 12.9% to 2.4%, thanks to the new official data. Meanwhile, the poverty rate for 2022 has gone up from 2.4% to 5.3% thanks to the changed poverty line. How has India's poverty rate changed over time? Any comparison with old data is ill-advised. The two poverty lines retrospectively applied to the CES of 2011-12 puts the somewhat comparable figures at 16.2% ($2.15 a day) and 27.1% ($3 a day). That means in both cases, poverty has shrunk drastically; by the new threshold, an estimated net 269 million Indians exited poverty in these 11 years. But this comparison isn't that straightforward. The 2011-12 CES is hardly comparable with the new surveys held in 2022-23 and 2023-24. The new ones tend to record higher consumption by Indians due to fundamentally improved data collection practices, and also because they ask them to lay out their spending on 405 items instead of 347 earlier. Also read: Don't deceive the poor world with an expensive green illusion The new surveys also assign consumption values to subsidised goods and services obtained from state-run schemes. This, too, raises the value of consumption spending for households. In summary, the methodology now records Indians as spending more in general, so it's harder to fall below a particular poverty line. But while a direct comparison isn't advisable, it is evident that poverty rates may indeed have fallen by a lot in the past decade. By how much, it's difficult to say. What more should one know about this? One, this is not the only poverty line the World Bank uses globally. This is actually the median of the national poverty lines of only low-income countries. It is applied to all countries under the name 'extreme poverty", meaning that one who is 'poor" even by the standards of low-income countries can be said to be living in 'extreme poverty". There are two other poverty lines: one for lower-middle-income countries, which has been revised from $3.65 to $4.20 a day, and for middle-income countries, which has been revised from $6.85 to $8.30. India is a lower-middle income country, so the $4.20-a-day poverty line would be a more relevant one. By that benchmark, 23.9% Indians were poor in 2022, as compared to 28.1% estimated by the old poverty line. The retrospective figure for 2011-12 (not strictly comparable) is nearly 58%. Also read | Mint Primer: How to read SBI's latest poverty estimates Secondly, the World Bank report also said there were 'growing concerns" about the CES's inability to capture households at the top of the consumption pyramid, and also observed its own need to exclude certain data captured in the CES—both factors, it said, would underestimate inequality in India. That said, the new CES methodology is more robust than the earlier one, and could provide more frequent poverty estimates hereon. Comparisons with the past data are impossible, and should ideally not be used to quantify progress over time.
Hindustan Times
6 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Killer gangs are inches from ruling all of Haiti
The collapse of Haiti's government in April last year was a challenge but also an opportunity. An interim government called the Transitional Presidential Council was installed. A UN-brokered, Kenyan-led security mission arrived soon after. But a year later things are worse than ever. 'We are approaching a point of no return,' María Isabel Salvador, the UN's top official in Haiti, told its Security Council at a meeting on April 21st. Tasked with preparing for elections that in theory will be held in November, the council is now mired in allegations of corruption. The security force of around 1,000 people (less than half the number originally planned) has not been able to stem the chaos. Its funding runs out in September. The council is a 'transitional authority that controls nothing', says Claude Joseph, a former prime minister. 'It's an unsustainable catastrophe. We could lose Port-au-Prince at any time.' Port-au-Prince, the capital, now sees daily gun battles in which police and civilian vigilantes face off against a gang coalition called Viv Ansanm ('Living Together'). It has seized control of much of the city. The international airport has been all but shut down; the only way in or out is by helicopter, or by a barge that skirts the coast to bypass gang territory to the south. On May 2nd the United States designated Viv Ansanm and a sister organisation as terrorist groups, opening the door to tougher criminal penalties for those who provide them with money and weapons. The collapse of public life is accelerating. Most schools are shut. Cholera is spreading. The Marriott, one of the last functioning hotels, has closed its doors. Gangs have surrounded the offices of Digicel, Haiti's main cellular network, through which most people connect to the internet. 'If Digicel goes down, the country goes dark,' warns a security expert. The gangs don't need it. Increasingly sophisticated, they use Elon Musk's Starlink satellite system to communicate, organising themselves to the extent that they have been able to keep control over access to Haiti's ports. They also extort lorry drivers and bus operators moving along many of the country's main roads. The UN reports that in February and March more than 1,000 people were killed and 60,000 displaced, adding to the 1m, nearly 10% of the population, who have fled their homes in the past two years. Circulating videos show gang members playing football with severed heads, bragging: 'We got the dogs.' Central Haiti, once relatively peaceful, is fragmenting into fiefs. Mirebalais, a city which lies between Port-au-Prince and the border with the Dominican Republic, is now controlled by gangs. 'The country has become a criminal enterprise. It's the wild, wild West,' says a foreign official. Patience is running thin at the UN Security Council. The United States has already committed $600m to the security mission, but is unlikely to offer more. 'America cannot continue shouldering such a significant financial burden,' said Dorothy Shea, the US ambassador to the UN. Few other countries want to donate. The Transitional Presidential Council is so desperate that it is exploring deals with private military contractors. It has been talking to Osprey Global Solutions, a firm based in North Carolina. The founder of Blackwater, Erik Prince, visited Haiti in April to negotiate contracts to provide attack drones and training for an anti-gang task force. The council declined to comment. The Haitian police are overwhelmed; an estimated 12,000 officers police a population that approaches 12m, barely half the UN-recommended ratio. Weak leadership, poor co-ordination with the Kenyan-led force, and calls for the ousting of the police chief point to deep institutional rot. In Canapé-Vert, one of Port-au-Prince's last gang-free pockets, a former policeman known as 'Commander Samuel' leads a vigilante group called Du Sang 9 ('New Blood' in Creole). Gangs have thinned its numbers. It is all that stands between them and the prime minister's office. Clarification (June 3rd 2025): Paragraph eight of this article has been amended to make clear that the council exploring deals is the Transitional Presidential Council. Sign up to El Boletín, our subscriber-only newsletter on Latin America, to understand the forces shaping a fascinating and complex region. Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.
