Unofficial results: Voters say ‘no' to South Sioux City school bond
The proposed bond was for $127-million and would go toward new construction and upgrades to school facilities.
According to the unofficial results, 2,435 votes were cast with 1,445 of the votes against the bond, while 990 were for it. This means the bond has failed.
Story continues below
Top Story: Iowa Congressman Randy Feenstra confirms bid for Iowa governor
Lights & Sirens: Sioux City firefighter taken to hospital following Mayday call during Morningside fire
Sports: Hawarden native Hunter Dekkers signs with New Orleans Saints
'Based on today's unofficial results, the South Sioux City Community School District's $127 million bond referendum was not approved by voters. While this outcome is disappointing, we remain committed to our students, staff, and community. The needs identified in our facilities plan remain, and we will take time to listen, reflect, and determine next steps together. We are grateful to everyone who engaged in this process and will continue working to ensure safe, accessible, and future-ready learning environments for all,' said Lance Swanson, the director of communication with the South Sioux City Community School District.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
26-07-2025
- UPI
Judge throws out federal suit on Illinois, Chicago sanctuary policies
Chicago police officers watch as activists take to the streets for a May Day protest on May 1 to voice concerns on Trump administration's policies, including immigration. May 1 is also known as International Workers Day. File photo by Tannen Maury/UPI | License Photo July 26 (UPI) -- A federal judge threw out a lawsuit filed by the Trump administration against Illinois, Cook County and Chicago sanctuary policies that ban assisting in immigration-related matters. On Friday, District Judge Lindsay Jenkins in Chicago dismissed the entire lawsuit, writing the U.S. Department of Justice lacked standing, though she allowed lawyers to amend their lawsuit by Aug. 22. Jenkins, who serves the Northern District of Illinois, was appointed by President Joe Biden. Illinois is a blue state with a Democratic governor, Chicago mayor and Cook County state's attorney. Chicago is located in Cook County. In the lawsuit filed in February, the DOJ accused the governments of blocking federal immigration law based on the 10th Amendment, which deals with state and federal powers. DOJ hasn't yet publicly said whether there would be an appeal. The Department of Homeland Security has increased deportation raids, particularly in big cities with sanctuary laws. "The Sanctuary Policies reflect Defendants' decision to not participate in enforcing civil immigration law - a decision protected by the Tenth Amendment and not preempted by [the federal Immigration and Nationality Act]," Jenkins wrote in the 64-page ruling. "Finding that these same Policy provisions constitute discrimination or impermissible regulation would provide an end-run around the Tenth Amendment. It would allow the federal government to commandeer States under the guise of intergovernmental immunity - the exact type of direct regulation of states barred by the Tenth Amendment." In their lawsuit, DOJ lawyers said sanctuary cities violate the U.S. Constitution's supremacy clause. In 2017, then Gov. Bruce Rauner, a Republican, signed the 2017 Trust Act, which prohibits state and local law enforcement from involvement in separation efforts with U.S. Customs and Border Enforcement, as well as other federal agencies. The law allows coordination among agencies. A state law in 2021 prohibits local and state officialsgiving a person's custody status, release date or contact information with federal immigration officials. Raunere was succeeded by J.B. Pritzker, who testified last month to a U.S. House committee about sanctuary policies. He was also named in the suit. "Illinois ensures law enforcement time and energy is spent fighting crime - not carrying out the Trump administration's unlawful policies or troubling tactics," Pritzker spokesman Matt Hill said in a statement. "As the grandchild of Ukrainian refugees, the Governor's personal story shows how immigration is central to America's story, economy and culture. He told it to Congress when he laid out how Illinois follows the law and would like the feds to follow suit." Pritzker posted on X that "Illinois just beat the Trump Administration in federal court. Their case challenging the bipartisan TRUST Act was dismissed -- unlike the President, we follow the law and listen to the courts." Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul noted in 1997 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that federal officials may not "impress into its service - and at no cost to itself -- the police officers of the 50 States." In 1985, then-Chicago Mayor Harold Washington signed an executive order declaring it a sanctuary city. In 2006, Chicago enacted the Welcoming City ordinance, which allows all residents to obtain city services, including police protection and medical care. "We will continue to fight for the dignity of our immigrant, migrant, and refugee communities and stand up for the rights of all Chicagoans against any federal overreach," Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, who was named in the suit, said in a statement to WLS-TV. The federal lawsuit also targeted Cook County, which bans ICE agents from the county jail or other places unless they have a criminal warrant not relayed to immigration. "The Trump administration's continued attempts to bully local communities into adopting their preferred policies are not only unlawful, but counter to our values and ability to fight crime effectively," Cook County State's Attorney Eileen O'Neill Burke said in a statement. "We need victims and witnesses of crime to feel comfortable coming forward, just as we are compelled to hold those who commit crimes accountable." The American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois said in the statement that the court "was correct to reject the Trump Administration's lawsuit and to allow public officials in Illinois and Chicago to follow our policies that prioritize local public safety and welfare over federal civil immigration enforcement." Trump in an executive order on Jan. 25 stripped sanctuary cities of all federal funding. In February, Attorney General Pam Bondi announced her agency was filing a civil lawsuit against state of New York over immigration enforcement. "This is a new DOJ. We are taking steps to protect American citizens," she said with federal agents behind her. "As you know, we sued Illinois, and New York didn't listen ... you're next." Lawsuits also have been filed against California and New Jersey. There are 13 sanctuary states, including New York and Illinois. In addition, there are sanctuary cities outside them, including Atlanta; Louisville, Ky.; Baltimore; and New Orleans as well as several designated counties. None are in Texas or Arizona, which border Mexico. The other two border states, New Mexico and California, have sanctuary laws.
Yahoo
24-07-2025
- Yahoo
Iowa Democrat Stephanie Steiner to run Iowa's 4th Congressional District seat in 2026
Democrat Stephanie Steiner has launched a campaign for Congress in Iowa's 4th District, saying she was spurred to act after the passage of Republicans' "One Big Beautiful Bill Act." She noted that thousands of Iowans are expected to lose their access to Medicaid as a result of the law, and experts say they expect the changes to have a disproportionately negative effect on rural hospitals. "It is going to devastate our state," Steiner said. 'Broadly, that was what pushed me into saying, 'OK, well if somebody needs to do it, I will.'" More: 8 ways Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' will affect Iowans, from rural hospitals to biofuels Current 4th District U.S. Rep. Randy Feenstra, a Republican, is expected to vacate the seat as he eyes a run for governor in 2026. A trio of Republicans have announced campaigns to try to replace him: farmer Kyle Larsen, Siouxland Chamber of Commerce President Chris McGowan and state Rep. Matt Windschitl. And another Democrat, Ashley WolfTornabane, has also announced a campaign. Democrat Ryan Melton previously said he would seek his party's nomination, but he ended his campaign for personal reasons earlier this year. Steiner, 43, lives on an acreage outside of Sutherland with her husband and three youngest children. She said she worked as a labor and delivery nurse and as a traveling nurse before becoming a stay-at-home mom. Steiner said her younger children's father passed away suddenly in 2019 after losing access to medications. That, paired with her experience in the health care field, drives her passion for protecting access to health care, she said. 'I never want another mother or another father, another set of children to go through that because it's awful," she said. "It's awful.' Steiner said she also wants to focus on protecting civil rights for LGBTQ+ Iowans and other marginalized communities. The 4th District is the most conservative of Iowa's four congressional districts, spanning much of northwest Iowa and the full western edge of the state. Nonpartisan analysts at Cook Political Report rate it as a "solid Republican" district. Steiner said she understands the odds are stacked against Democrats, but she felt compelled to run anyway. 'We will lose 100% of the races we never run," she said. "So, if I don't do it, somebody else doesn't do it, then I can tell you this, we won't win it. But what I hope is to connect with the people in our district." Brianne Pfannenstiel is the chief politics reporter for the Des Moines Register. Reach her at bpfann@ or 515-284-8244. Follow her on X at @brianneDMR. This article originally appeared on Des Moines Register: Democrat Stephanie Steiner to run for Congress in Iowa's 4th District


Newsweek
16-07-2025
- Newsweek
Good Trouble: The Latest Anti-Trump Protest Is on July 17. Here's Why.
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. National anti-Trump demonstrations will take place across the United States on July 17 under the moniker "Good Trouble Lives On," honoring the late civil rights icon Congressman John Lewis, and continuing a spate of national demonstrations that have been well-attended by Trump detractors in nearly every pocket of the country. Why It Matters "We hope to build off the incredible momentum anti-authoritarian protests including No Kings Day, Hands Off and May Day and bring in communities already engaged in organizing into the fold of Good Trouble Lives On," group spokesperson Katie Garcia told Newsweek on Wednesday. Good Trouble Lives On National Day of Action has been an annual event for the past five years in memoriam of Lewis, and was already scheduled for July 17—the day of his death. Other protests like "No Kings" have been successful. That took place in countless cities on June 14, as part of a rebuke of Trump on his 79th birthday, which also saw the president attend a military parade in Washington, D.C., to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. An estimated 4 to 6 million people made their voices heard. In April, Hands Off! protests also galvanized opponents of Trump and billionaire Elon Musk during the throes of his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) work in the federal government. The group described itself as a pro-democracy, pro-worker movement taking place "in defiance of the Trump-Musk billionaire takeover and the Republican assault on our freedoms and our communities." Good Trouble Lives On is described as "a national day of action to respond to the attacks on our civil and human rights by the Trump administration." Good Trouble Lives On is described as "a national day of action to respond to the attacks on our civil and human rights by the Trump administration." Photo-illustration by Newsweek/AP Who is Organizing the 'Good Trouble' Protests? Good Trouble Lives On is led by Transformative Justice Coalition, Black Voters Matter, The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, League of Women Voters, Public Citizens, the Declaration for American Democracy Coalition, National Urban League, American Constitution Society, Indivisible, 50501, Third Act, Mi Familia En Acción and many more organizations. Who was John Lewis? Lewis, a Georgia Democrat and advocate of peaceful protests, who famously called for "good trouble" during the civil rights era. He rose to political infamy even before stepping into office. In March 1965, he led more than 600 peaceful protesters across the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama, as a public outcry for voting rights ultimately transformed into violence between protesters and police, now known as "Bloody Sunday." Lewis was elected to the U.S. House in 1986, representing constituents largely based in Atlanta. The 2017 Trump inauguration was the first that Lewis ever skipped. Lewis died in 2020. Protest locations across the U.S. As of the early afternoon of July 16, event organizers told Newsweek that they had confirmed more than 1,600 events and 162,000 RSVPs, adding that they "expect at least several hundred thousand people will attend across the country with a few international events also confirmed." A map on the organization's website shows events planned nationwide in every state, including Alaska and Hawaii. Locations include major cities such as New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Washington, D.C., Houston, Phoenix, Philadelphia, Dallas, Austin, Columbus and Charlotte. Palm Beach, Florida, the home city of Trump family's home, will also host events. Bigger Turnout Than Ever Public Citizen Co-President Robert Weissman told Newsweek on Wednesday that although this event has drawn interest in past years, he and organizers felt this year would be different. "We're thrilled," Wiessman said. "It's vastly greater than what we had anticipated. We actually shut off the registration a few days ago. ... This is a very different kind of thing than we've done in the past. We've done it in partnership with the Transformative Justice Coalition. And in the past it's been 75 relatively small events around the country. "We obviously knew this one is going to be bigger, but at this point 1,600 is vastly more than we had anticipated." This event differs from other aforementioned protests in terms of format and scheduling. Thursday's events will include protests, marches and vigils, in addition to panel discussions and even some barbecues. It's also unique in that it's taking place on a weekday, rather than weekends where millions came out for other protests within the past few months. Weissman said Lewis' "courage, commitment and persistence" acts as a backdrop for this particular day, acknowledging how the former congressman endured physical threats and life-altering challenges. "[Lewis] literally marched ahead and inspired others with his words, and even more with his example to be courageous," he said. "We saw his commitment to push and demand what was that victories aren't permanent, but that fighting for justice is permanent and lifelong." What People Are Saying Speaking to Newsweek, Lorella Praeli, co-president of Community Change Action, which has backed anti-Trump demonstrations, said: "Look around—Trump and his allies are deploying the tools of authoritarianism: silencing dissent, targeting immigrants, punishing oversight, and even staging military displays for personal glorification. These aren't isolated incidents; they're part of a broader effort to delegitimize democratic norms." In a statement sent to Newsweek Declaration for American Democracy, a campaign group backing the protest, said: "This isn't the government our founders envisioned, nor the democracy generations of Americans have fought to realize. As the Trump administration continues violating civil liberties and attacking fundamental freedoms, pro-democracy groups are staying vigilant. The power lies with the American people to unify and 'Make Good Trouble.'" What Happens Next It remains to be seen what organizers plan next in terms of protests and anti-Trump sentiment.