Morrisey says he'll call special session for PEIA
West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey said he plans to call a special legislative session to address the rising costs of state employee health insurance coverage.
Speaking during a press conference Wednesday, Morrisey said he'd bring lawmakers back to Charleston to tackle issues including the Public Employees Insurance Agency.
'That's important. I thought that would be best for a special session, to be honest,' Morrisey said. 'Because you can bring everyone. You can focus it. It's a complicated issue. We want to get it right.
'That was kicked down the road for many, many years,' the governor said. 'I don't intend to kick it down the road. We have to bring everyone together, all the stakeholders: listen, learn and then you'll be seeing some activity.'
Morrisey's news conference, which he held in Wheeling, marked his first 100 days in office.
More than 200,000 state employees and thousands of local government workers rely on PEIA for their health insurance.
Beginning in July, PEIA premiums are increasing by 14% for state employees and by 16% for local government employees. Out-of-pocket and copay costs are also increasing. The agency will also raise premiums by 12% for retirees.
PEIA leaders have said that the rising cost of health care, particularly inflation for prescription GLP-1 drugs that treat obesity and diabetes, are a major driver of the rate increases.
Following the regular session, union leaders reiterated calls that the program be stabilized.
'It's a good benefit. We need to keep it at a good benefit,' West Virginia ALF-CIO president Josh Sword told West Virginia Watch. 'We also know that public sector workers generally make less than those in the private sector, and one of the reasons that it's attractive, therefore, to work in the public sector is because you've generally had access to PEIA, which is a good health care benefit for the employee and their family.
'You take that away, or you destroy a pretty good benefit program so that it is not what it used to be, then you've lost that incentive to attract and retain qualified individuals in the public sector,' he said.
This year's state budget included $64 million more in spending for PEIA than last year's budget. The appropriation is in line with the funding Morrisey level requested for the agency, according to a spokeswoman for the Senate.
Senate president Randy Smith and House of Delegates Speaker Roger Hanshaw were not available for comment on Thursday. Senate communications director Jacque Bland said Smith would not be surprised by the governor's remarks indicating a special session, which Morrisey has talked about before.
Ann Ali, communications director and deputy chief of staff for the House of Delegates, said Hanshaw's reaction would likely depend on what specific proposals the governor has. Morrisey did not outline any specific ideas for PEIA during his press conference Wednesday.
'Extraordinary sessions for various reasons have become commonplace, but Speaker Hanshaw's response when asked for potential reaction or feedback to any general proposal from the previous governor was usually that the House would have to see the bill(s) for how that proposal would be structured,' Ali said.
House Minority Leader Sean Hornbuckle, D-Cabell, said lawmakers need to go beyond allocating money to PEIA and consider structural changes. He said finding solutions should involve bringing various stakeholders together.
'We need to look at serious, what I would call long-term structural enhancements to the program to make sure that the promise that we made state workers many, many moons ago isn't eroded, and we follow through on that,' Hornbuckle said. 'That's very important to me, from a state perspective.'
He added that he would have preferred that time during the regular session were dedicated to PEIA and not to vaccine exemption bills and legislation ending diversity, equity and inclusion programs.
'The priorities of the supermajority Republicans are not in line with everyday West Virginians,' he said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
19 minutes ago
- Axios
U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett of Texas says he'll bow out if redistricting stands
Longtime Austin Democratic congressman Lloyd Doggett said Thursday that he won't seek reelection if new congressional maps are not overturned by courts. Why it matters: Doggett's move prevents a potentially nasty Democratic primary in the wake of a Republican redistricting effort, allowing U.S. Rep. Greg Casar, D-Austin, a rising progressive, to remain in power. State of play: Casar and Doggett would have battled for a single Austin-based district under the new congressional map that the Texas House approved on Wednesday and which the Senate is expected to pass soon. Gov. Greg Abbott has said he'll sign the legislation. Doggett, who has been repeatedly targeted by Republicans in redistricting during his over 30 years in Congress, currently represents much of Austin and its suburbs. Casar, a former Austin city council member first elected to Congress in 2022, represents parts of southern and eastern Austin in a district that snakes down to San Antonio. Flashback: In a campaign email nearly two weeks ago, Doggett wrote that "seniority is an asset, not a liability." He urged Casar to "not abandon" his reconfigured district, arguing that Casar could "use his organizing skills and populist message to win over the disaffected, particularly disaffected Hispanic voters." What they're saying: Unless the new maps are overturned by courts, "I will not seek reelection," Doggett said in a statement Thursday. "I had hoped that my commitment to reelection under any circumstances would encourage Congressman Casar to not surrender his winnable district to Trump." "While his apparent decision is most unfortunate, I prefer to devote the coming months to fighting Trump tyranny and serving Austin rather than waging a struggle with fellow Democrats." On X, Casar wrote: "Lloyd Doggett is an Austin institution. I've learned so much from him. I'm grateful to him. The fight for democracy continues." The big picture: The new map could give Republicans an additional five seats in Congress. Democrats say the map disenfranchises Black and Latino voters.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
California Democrats pass Newsom's redistricting plan
California's Democrat-controlled legislature on Thursday formally approved a plan to redraw the state's congressional lines, teeing up a special election this fall that will let Californians weigh in on mid-decade redistricting in response to a plan pushed by Texas Republicans. Both the state Assembly and Senate approved three pieces of the 'Election Rigging Response Act' legislative package, which include a proposed constitutional amendment and two separate bills that lay out the logistics for the special election and map proposal. Those bills now head to Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) desk for approval. Democrats in the Golden State have been racing against the clock to get the package through by Friday in order to set up a Nov. 4 special election. Unlike in Texas, where the GOP-controlled legislature and the governor's approval will be enough to make the Lone Star State maps official, California ultimately has to put the question before voters. Californians will be asked to greenlight plan that could give Democrats five additional House seats, effectively cancelling out the five would-be Republican gains in Texas, by going around the state's independent redistricting commission until the end of the decade. 'This proposal would give Californians a choice to fight back — and bring much needed accountability and oversight to the Trump Administration,' Newsom said in a statement this week. Newsom has pitched the plan as a way to 'fight fire with fire' after President Trump pushed Texas to find five new GOP seats. He's also underscored that the plan would be temporary, reverting back to the independent commission's regular post-census redistricting schedule after the 2030 cycle. Republicans, on the other hand, argue that the plan goes against the will of the voters, who approved the commission in 2008 and 2010. During hours of proceedings on Thursday, they also raised questions about who drew the maps and concerns about the cost of a special election. California GOP legislators earlier this week filed suit with a petition asking the state Supreme Court to block action on the legislation, arguing that the sprint to vote on the legislation package violated the state constitution. The state court rejected that petition on Wednesday, allowing the efforts to move forward in the Legislature. California's plan comes after talk of new maps in Texas kicked off a national redistricting tit-for-tat in the run-up to next year's high-stakes midterms. Republicans hold a slim 219-212 majority in the House, and control of Congress could come down to just a few seats. The GOP currently controls just nine of California's 52 House slots. The Republican incumbents affected by the new map are Reps. Kevin Kiley (R), Doug LaMalfa (R), Darrell Issa (R), Ken Calvert (R) and David Valadao (R). Redistricting has also been floated in the red states of Ohio, Florida, Indiana and Missouri — and in Democratic strongholds such as Maryland and Illinois. Meanwhile, the Texas House advanced its redistricting plan on Wednesday. Now, both Houses have to reconcile the legislation before it kicks over to Gov. Greg Abbott (R) for approval.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
California Legislature moves forward with gerrymander to counter Texas
'This bill gives voters a choice — a choice to keep the current districts or adopt maps to counter the actions of MAGA extremists in Texas who are obediently working to tip the scales for President Trump,' California Senate Majority Leader Lena Gonzalez said. Texas' House approved a Republican-favoring gerrymander Wednesday, and its state Senate is expected to send the new map to Gov. Greg Abbott on Thursday evening for his promised signature. Unlike in California, Texas legislators can redraw maps mid-decade without voter approval. California Democrats previously planned to pass a map that would take effect only if Texas acts. But on Thursday morning, they removed that contingency, arguing it was nearly inevitable that Texas would move forward and that voters could be confused by the trigger. The new maps for both states are the first blows in what could amount to a nationwide redistricting war between the two parties, whose leaders are pushing to reshuffle the national congressional map to boost their odds of winning control of the House in 2026. Republicans are hoping Indiana, Missouri and Florida draw new Republican-majority seats, while Ohio's legally mandated redraw will likely create new GOP-leaning congressional districts. Democrats have few opportunities to match Republican efforts beyond Newsom's ballot measure. California Republicans have promised state and federal lawsuits aimed at preventing the measure from going before voters in November. But their first attempt to blunt Democrats' efforts was tossed out by the California Supreme Court on Wednesday. Famous figures from the state party's past including former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy and former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger are gearing up for an intense campaign this fall. 'We're going to do everything we can to stop this Gavinmander from moving forward,' California Assembly Republican leader James Gallagher told reporters. Aaron Pellish contributed to this report.
