Morrisey says he'll call special session for PEIA
Gov. Patrick Morrisey held a press conference to discuss his first 100 days in office in Wheeling, W.Va. on Wednesday, April 23, 2025. (West Virginia Office of the Gov. Patrick Morrisey | Courtesy photo)
West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey said he plans to call a special legislative session to address the rising costs of state employee health insurance coverage.
Speaking during a press conference Wednesday, Morrisey said he'd bring lawmakers back to Charleston to tackle issues including the Public Employees Insurance Agency.
'That's important. I thought that would be best for a special session, to be honest,' Morrisey said. 'Because you can bring everyone. You can focus it. It's a complicated issue. We want to get it right.
'That was kicked down the road for many, many years,' the governor said. 'I don't intend to kick it down the road. We have to bring everyone together, all the stakeholders: listen, learn and then you'll be seeing some activity.'
Morrisey's news conference, which he held in Wheeling, marked his first 100 days in office.
More than 200,000 state employees and thousands of local government workers rely on PEIA for their health insurance.
Beginning in July, PEIA premiums are increasing by 14% for state employees and by 16% for local government employees. Out-of-pocket and copay costs are also increasing. The agency will also raise premiums by 12% for retirees.
PEIA leaders have said that the rising cost of health care, particularly inflation for prescription GLP-1 drugs that treat obesity and diabetes, are a major driver of the rate increases.
Following the regular session, union leaders reiterated calls that the program be stabilized.
'It's a good benefit. We need to keep it at a good benefit,' West Virginia ALF-CIO president Josh Sword told West Virginia Watch. 'We also know that public sector workers generally make less than those in the private sector, and one of the reasons that it's attractive, therefore, to work in the public sector is because you've generally had access to PEIA, which is a good health care benefit for the employee and their family.
'You take that away, or you destroy a pretty good benefit program so that it is not what it used to be, then you've lost that incentive to attract and retain qualified individuals in the public sector,' he said.
This year's state budget included $64 million more in spending for PEIA than last year's budget. The appropriation is in line with the funding Morrisey level requested for the agency, according to a spokeswoman for the Senate.
Senate president Randy Smith and House of Delegates Speaker Roger Hanshaw were not available for comment on Thursday. Senate communications director Jacque Bland said Smith would not be surprised by the governor's remarks indicating a special session, which Morrisey has talked about before.
Ann Ali, communications director and deputy chief of staff for the House of Delegates, said Hanshaw's reaction would likely depend on what specific proposals the governor has. Morrisey did not outline any specific ideas for PEIA during his press conference Wednesday.
'Extraordinary sessions for various reasons have become commonplace, but Speaker Hanshaw's response when asked for potential reaction or feedback to any general proposal from the previous governor was usually that the House would have to see the bill(s) for how that proposal would be structured,' Ali said.
House Minority Leader Sean Hornbuckle, D-Cabell, said lawmakers need to go beyond allocating money to PEIA and consider structural changes. He said finding solutions should involve bringing various stakeholders together.
'We need to look at serious, what I would call long-term structural enhancements to the program to make sure that the promise that we made state workers many, many moons ago isn't eroded, and we follow through on that,' Hornbuckle said. 'That's very important to me, from a state perspective.'
He added that he would have preferred that time during the regular session were dedicated to PEIA and not to vaccine exemption bills and legislation ending diversity, equity and inclusion programs.
'The priorities of the supermajority Republicans are not in line with everyday West Virginians,' he said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The $1.3 Billion Health-Tech IPO Everyone Missed--Until It Soared 21% on Day One
Omada Health (NASDAQ:OMDA) opened its first day of trading with a bangjumping 21% to $23 after pricing its IPO at $19. That move gives the digital chronic-care startup a market cap of roughly $1.3 billion. The $150 million raise was more than just well receivedinvestor demand came in more than 15x oversubscribed, with most allocations going to a concentrated group of institutional buyers. It's another sign that appetite for health-tech IPOs is heating up again. U.S. listings have raised nearly $25 billion year-to-date, and early-stage healthcare names are up an average of 18% since listing. Founded in 2011, Omada offers virtual care between doctor visitsfocused on diabetes, obesity, hypertension, and joint pain. What sets it apart? It's not chasing the GLP-1 gold rush. Instead, Omada supports people already on those drugs, helping them manage side effects, nutrition, and post-treatment maintenance. About 50,000 of its 679,000 members are on GLP-1s. CEO Sean Duffy told Bloomberg that while AI powers much of the back-end, real human interaction is what drives results. Our members tell us they want a personand I have yet to see anyone that feels accountable to ChatGPT, he said. Revenue for Q1 2025 came in just under $55 millionup from $35.1 million a year agowhile net losses narrowed by more than half to $9.4 million. That improving financial picture, combined with a clear niche in chronic care, could be what's drawing top-tier investors. Revelation Partners, Andreessen Horowitz, Fidelity, and USVP are all among the largest shareholders. The IPO was led by Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, and JPMorgan. OMDA now trades on the Nasdaq Global Marketand it's one more sign that digital health might be staging a real comeback. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Axios
22 minutes ago
- Axios
Musk cash becomes liability in Democratic primaries
Cash from Elon Musk 's companies has prompted finger-pointing in Democratic primaries, with candidates targeting donations their opponents received in some cases years before Musk's full embrace of the MAGA movement. Why it matters: It has turned into a de facto purity test, with Democratic candidates in New Jersey, Michigan, Illinois and Minnesota facing questions about donations from Musk's SpaceX's political arm and its lobbyists. Many of the Democrats under fire are responding by washing their hands of Musk's money, saying their campaigns gave away the contributions, which span from this year to before President Biden's election. Driving the news: The donations from Musk's company and lobbyists have spawned attack ads ahead of Tuesday's contentious New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial primary. Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D-N.J.) donated the $24,000 her campaign received from SpaceX's political action committee to a food bank in New Jersey, according to campaign finance reports. Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.), one of Sherrill's primary opponents, also donated the $2,500 he received from the PAC last year, according to his campaign. Between the lines: But Musk's company PAC has donated widely to Democrats over the years, setting up a clash over the cash elsewhere. Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Mich.), who is running for an open Senate seat, received over $73,000 from SpaceX's PAC and lobbyists starting in 2018. Stevens' campaign declined to comment for this story. In Illinois, Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.), donated Space X PAC money his campaign received to charity before launching his Senate bid, according to his campaign. Rep. Robin Kelly (D-Ill.), who is running for the same Senate seat, also received money from the company's PAC. Another Senate aspirant, Rep. Angie Craig (D-Minn.) donated money she received from SpaceX's PAC to a veterans organization. What they're saying: "These are false, desperate attacks from candidates who've spent millions and have failed to garner support," said Sean Higgins, a spokesman for Sherrill.
San Francisco Chronicle
25 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Senate Republicans revise ban on state AI regulations in bid to preserve controversial provision
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Republicans have made changes to their party's sweeping tax bill in hopes of preserving a new policy that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade. In legislative text unveiled Thursday night, Senate Republicans proposed denying states federal funding for broadband projects if they regulate AI. That's a change from a provision in the House-passed version of the tax overhaul that simply banned any current or future AI regulations by the states for 10 years. 'These provisions fulfill the mandate given to President Trump and Congressional Republicans by the voters: to unleash America's full economic potential and keep her safe from enemies,' Sen. Ted Cruz, chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, said in a statement announcing the changes. The proposed ban has angered state lawmakers in Democratic and Republican-led states and alarmed some digital safety advocates concerned about how AI will develop as the technology rapidly advances. But leading AI executives, including OpenAI's Sam Altman, have made the case to senators that a 'patchwork' of state AI regulations would cripple innovation. Some House Republicans are also uneasy with the provision. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., came out against the AI regulatory moratorium in the House bill after voting for it. She said she had not read that section of the bill. 'We should be reducing federal power and preserving state power. Not the other way around,' Greene wrote on social media. Senate Republicans made their change in an attempt to follow the special process being used to pass the tax bill with a simple majority vote. To comply with those rules, any provision needs to deal primarily with the federal budget and not government policy. Republican leaders argue, essentially, that by setting conditions for states to receive certain federal appropriations — in this instance, funding for broadband internet infrastructure — they would meet the Senate's standard for using a majority vote. Cruz told reporters Thursday that he will make his case next week to Senate parliamentarian on why the revised ban satisfies the rules. The parliamentarian is the chamber's advisor on its proper rules and procedures. While the parliamentarian's ruling are not binding, senators of both parties have adhered to their findings in the past. Senators generally argue that Congress should take the lead on regulating AI but so far the two parties have been unable to broker a deal that is acceptable to Republicans' and Democrats' divergent concerns. The GOP legislation also includes significant changes to how the federal government auctions commercial spectrum ranges. Those new provisions expand the range of spectrum available for commercial use, an issue that has divided lawmakers over how to balance questions of national security alongside providing telecommunications firms access to more frequencies for commercial wireless use. Senators are aiming to pass the tax package, which extends the 2017 rate cuts and other breaks from President Donald Trump's first term along with new tax breaks and steep cuts to social programs, later this month.
