
The Iron Dome of India
In the stillness of the Baisaran valley meadow at Pahalgam, horror came uninvited. Armed militants attacked tourists and locals – asking their religion, demanding they recite Islamic Kalima verses, forcing them to strip down so the terrorists could check for physical signs of identity. What followed, was a cold methodical execution.
Shubham Dwivedi, a 31-year-old businessman was shot point blank in the head. An Indian Navy Lieutenant, Vinay Narwal was the next victim. He had come to Pahalgam with his wife, Himanshi, just six days after their wedding. When the terrorists realised he was Hindu, they shot him three times – through the neck, chest and thigh. A photograph of Himanshi, still in her bridal bangles, sitting defeatedly beside her husband's lifeless body, went viral as a symbol of unspeakable loss and quiet rage.
Two weeks later, Operation Sindoor was launched. The name was chosen not to project might, but to mourn – marking the vermillion that had been wiped from so many foreheads. Operation Sindoor was a firm declaration that acts of terrorism would not go unanswered. Over 100 terrorists were reportedly eliminated and their terror bases in Pakistan were reduced to rubbles.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi while addressing the nation remarked, 'Every terrorist and terror organisation now understands the consequences of attempting to harm the dignity and pride of our daughters and sisters.'
The Pahalgam Attack and its aftermath
The Pahalgam incident stands as one of the most destructive civilian massacres in Jammu and Kashmir's recent history. Armed militants carrying M4 carbines and AK-47s unleashed a brutal assault on unarmed civilians, including tourists and one local pony operator. The incident of terror had 26 casualties, including a local Muslim pony operator who in a valiant effort tried to protect the tourists. Many survived non-fatal injuries. This massacre was inadvertently filmed by a tourist who was ziplining down the valley. The video captured the noise of the gunshots, the cries for help and the chaos of the sheer spectacle. In the days that followed, the locals and the gurudwaras offered shelter to victims and terrified tourists while the injured were transferred to hospitals for further treatment.
A temporary lockdown was imposed in the Pahalgam area while Indian Army helicopters and security forces were sent on a manhunt for the militants who fled to the Pir Panjal range. The Resistance Front, a front for Lashkar-e-Taiba which has been violently opposing the granting of domicile certificates to non-Kashmiri settlers through cold-blooded killing of civilians, initially claimed responsibility for the attack.
However, they retracted their statement and accused Indian cyber-intelligence operatives of planting that statement. Furthermore, the National Investigation Agency of India (NIA) conducted an investigation and uncovered that all five militants were linked to Lashkar-e-Taiba with traces connecting them to Pakistan. India, in response, suspended the Indus Waters Treaty until Pakistan discards its support for cross-border terrorism, closed the main border, cancelled all previously sanctioned Visas and imposed a travel ban of all Pakistani individuals to India under the SAARC Visa Exemption scheme. Pakistani military advisers stationed at the High Commission in Delhi were expelled while Indian military officials posted in Islamabad were called back.
The discord which ensued in physical spaces trickled into cyberspaces too. A coordinated campaign spreading rumours and misinformation emerged from Pakistani social media accounts, which used AI-generated content and deepfakes to mock victims and discredit the Pahalgam attack as an internally orchestrated event were shared rapidly. This propaganda campaign directly targeted the integrity of India's security and aimed at sowing communal discord.
However, the Indian government responded with a firm hand by implementing digital vigilance measures – the information and broadcasting ministry issued strict advisories to Indian media channels to exercise caution against unverified or sensitive information.
Operation Sindoor: A Payback
Two weeks after the Pahalgam attack, Indian security forces retaliated with unwavering resolve. On May 7, Operation Sindoor was carried out – India's first coordinated triservice military attack against Pakistan since the 1971 Bangladesh liberation war. The seamless synergy among the Indian Army, Navy and Air Force resulted in dismantling of cross-border terror infrastructure including the vital training camps at Bahawalpur and Muridke, and the elimination of over 100 terrorists affiliated with Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed and Hizbul Mujahideen, as confirmed by Lieutenant General Rajiv Ghai, Director General of Military Operations of the Indian Army.
The Director General of Air Operations, Air Marshal AK Bharti confirmed that the Air Force achieved its mission objectives. Critical targets including ones in Lahore and Gujranwala were selected through intensive analysis and neutralized using precision air-to-surface munitions. These precision attacks were in retaliation to Pakistani provocations such as UAV intrusions and recurrent airspace violations. Several Pakistani aircrafts were intercepted; some were downed in an attempt to protect and prevent intrusion into India. Despite recurring efforts of drone and aircraft intrusion, India's air defence neutralised every possible wave of aggression.
On the maritime front, the Indian Navy maintained a firm position in the Northern Arabian Sea, keeping the Karachi port and other notable coastal targets within striking range as confirmed by AN Pramod, Vice Admiral of Indian Navy. On land, the Indian Army displayed valiant efforts while executing precision artillery and small arms strikes along the Line of Control, reportedly eliminating over 35 Pakistani personnel while observing strict discipline and a firm resolve to avoid civilian casualties – a stark contrast against Pakistani strikes that targeted populated villages and religious places.
India's arsenal: Technology
Operation Sindoor, apart from being a military manoeuvre was also a representation of India's technological evolution. Especially in the air defence front, it marked the deployment of a diverse range of air defence arsenal. Proven legacy systems such as the Pechora, OSA-AK and LLAD guns were used along with cutting edge India-made platforms like Akash Surface-toAir Missile (SAM) system. Akash was used independently or in conjunction with Electronic Counter-Counter measures, all mounted on mobile platforms. These systems formed the backbone of protection for the Indian territory. They created an impenetrable shield against Pakistani air deployments.
With the help of the Integrated Air Command and Control System (IACCS), all air activity was seamlessly tracked, detected and neutralized when required. Indian security forces performed exceptionally not just on the defence front but on the attack front as well. Air strikes conducted by the air force were equally precise. Pakistani targets including air defence radars in Lahore and Gunranwala and enemy airbases at Noor Khan and Rahimyar Khan were neutralised using loitering munitions and precision-guided weapons. These strikes were completed under a record time of 23 minutes. Jamming Chinese-origin Pakistani air defence systems, India established superiority in terms of electronic warfare capabilities.
A doctrinal change in policy: Zero-tolerance for terrorism
This marks a departure from the previous restraint that India's defence strategy has observed. While past governments walked on a diplomatic tightrope, India today will not hesitate to use calibrated force when its sovereignty and security are threatened.
(Pinky Anand is a former additional solicitor general and senior advocate. Views expressed are personal.)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
India is not imposing a trade ban on Pakistan supporter Turkey due to..., even Erdogan will be unaware of this reason
India is not imposing a trade ban on Pakistan supporter Turkey due to..., even Erdogan will be unaware of this reason Even after Turkey openly supported Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, India has not taken any drastic step against the foe country. In fact, the government has adopted a very soft stance regarding trade. The reason for this is that India sells more goods to Turkey than it buys from it. In this way, India earns a profit of 2.73 billion dollars every year. When Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan not only made statements in favour of Pakistan but also sent drones, every Indian was so angry that demands started rising to stop everything from tourism to trade with Turkey. Why is India not banning trade with Turkey? According to the report of The Indian Express, an official said that the government has received many applications demanding a ban on the import of goods from Turkey. He said that apple producers of Himachal Pradesh and marble traders of Udaipur have demanded a ban on importing goods from Turkey, but India has a trade surplus with Turkey, that is, India sells more goods to Turkey than it buys from there. The official said that if trade with Turkey was banned, it would be a strong geopolitical message, but it would depend on how far you want to take it. What does India-Turkey trade in? Another reason for continuing trade with Turkey is that the trade surplus includes industrial exports. Such as engineering goods, electronics, organic-inorganic chemicals, whose export has increased significantly in the last five years. On the other hand, if we talk about Turkey, India mainly imports fruits, dry fruits, gold and marble from it. However, apple traders and marble traders of Udaipur, angry with Turkey for supporting Pakistan during Operation Sindoor , had demanded a ban on imports from Turkey. In this regard, he had also written a letter to the Prime Minister's Office. In the last few years, Turkey had also increased the import of petroleum products, but in the financial year 2025, it saw a decline. How much did India and Turkey trade last year? According to official figures, Turkey imported goods worth $2.99 billion to India last year, out of which fruits and dry fruits worth $107.12 million were purchased. At the same time, gold worth $270.83 million was purchased in the financial year 2025, which was more than in 2024. In 2024, gold worth $104.56 million came from Turkey to India. Talking about India, exports worth $5.72 billion were made to Turkey in the financial year 2025, out of which 50 percent i.e. $3 billion was engineering exports. Micro, Small Medium Enterprises (MSME) exports accounted for 35-40 percent. According to this, India has sold more goods worth $2.73 billion than Turkey.


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Is This How India Will 'Dehyphenate' Itself From Pakistan?
"The enemy is anybody who's going to get you killed, no matter which side he's on," said Yossarian, the 'hero' of Joseph Heller's 1961 cult classic Catch-22. This absurdly dark and hilarious novel, set during the Second World War, contains some of the most astute observations on war and peace, a theme for our times. Or all times. Apart from one's own commanders, like Colonel Cathcart of Catch-22, the enemy could also be suboptimal actions driven by fallacious estimations of self. While our armed forces, as commanded, demonstrated their professionalism and precision, the same has been seen as lacking from other quarters in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor. Despite India's consistent attempts at keeping the Kashmir issue out of the arena of international interference, Pakistan has doubled down on its efforts to the contrary and achieved at least some degree of success. India, regrettably, has also got 're-hyphenated' with Pakistan despite our government's forceful iterations that the victims and perpetrators of terrorism cannot be treated at par by the international community. Pak Is No Match The irony of the current situation is that India may have played some part in bringing this rehyphenation upon itself. Rather than setting the paradigm, India is seen as playing catch-up in its diplomatic oeuvre. Immediately after the high offices of the Pakistani government, including Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif, embarked on their international mission to convince the world about India's alleged aggression, seven all-party committees were dispatched by India to different parts of the world. We are yet to see what such delegations have achieved for the long run, apart from generating newsy moments. As the world's fourth-largest economy, India has a stature that Pakistan can only aspire to achieve. Sharif's statement about India being more wary of the cost of war than Pakistan because the latter is still in a struggling phase is darkly humorous and unintentionally ingenious. It doesn't behove a superpower like India to be following Pakistan's diplomatic footsteps. The soon-to-retire chief of the Florida-based United States Central Command, General Michael E. Kurilla, has recently called Pakistan a "phenomenal partner" whose value "will only increase as the Taliban continues to face security challenges within its borders". President Donald Trump, too, has been underscoring how the US values its "beautiful" relationship with both India and Pakistan, which have "great" leaders. Rather than dismissing this 'both-siding' as classic Trump balderdash, India should devise a robust plan to offset Pakistan's geopolitical arm-twisting of the West. Pak's Sneaky Ways The Afghanistan-Pakistan hyphenation is what has been driving the West's response to Islamabad's backing of the terror outfits in Kashmir and other parts of India. Pakistan has managed to convince the West, especially the US, of its indispensable status in eliminating actors that pose a direct threat to people and property in the Global North. India's renewed engagement with the Taliban, short of recognising them, has only limited potential to counter Pakistan's perceived value as a partner of the West to counter terrorist threats originating from Central and South Asia. The spectre of ISIS-K looms large on any Western attempt at holding Pakistan responsible for terror activities in India. Pakistan has utilised multilateral platforms, such as the UN, to its utmost benefit. Currently, as a non-permanent member of the UNSC, Pakistan serves as the Chair of the 1988 Taliban Sanctions Committee, Vice Chair of the 1373 Counter-Terrorism Committee, and Co-Chair of two informal working groups. It is also set to become the rotational president of the UNSC in July. While these positions do not hold any substantive powers, Pakistan can be expected to initiate meetings and debates to internationalise the Kashmir issue. The Kashmir Question India may have brushed these concerns away in the past, upholding its policy of keeping Kashmir as an internal matter, but it will appear a little hypocritical now. Once you reach out to the world with an aim to share your side of the story, you cannot accuse the other party of doing the same. There has been a spirit of tentativeness with which multilateral platforms have treated India-Pakistan tensions. A large number of nations are not even aware of Kashmir and the eight-decade-long dispute over it. All they have perhaps seen is a half-hearted inscription on UN maps showing the border between the two countries. More importantly, India can no longer claim that it does not care for the "opinion" of the international community, particularly the US, when it was a foreign commander in chief of the armed forces who "announced" - however unwarrantedly - the ceasefire or the "pause" during Operation Sindoor. Classical Greek playwright and master of comedies Aristophanes said, "Men of sense often learn from their enemies. It is from their foes, not their friends, that cities learn the lesson of building high walls and ships of war; and this lesson saves their children, their homes, and their properties". While it may be important to learn from Pakistan the art of conning everyone all the time, India must continue to act like the regional power and global arbiter that it posits itself as.


Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
Delhi University will not teach Manusmriti, says VC after text included in Sanskrit course
The Manusmriti will not be taught at Delhi University 'in any form', its vice chancellor told The Indian Express on Thursday. The statement came days after the text was reportedly included in the reading list of a new undergraduate Sanskrit course at the university. The Manusmriti is a Hindu scripture authored by a medieval ascetic named Manu. It has been widely criticised for its gender and caste-based provisions. 'We will not teach any part of Manusmriti in any form in the University of Delhi,' Yogesh Singh, the Delhi University vice chancellor, told the newspaper. 'This direction has been issued even earlier by the vice chancellor's office, and departments should adhere to it.' Singh added that the Sanskrit department should not have included the text in the reading list in the first place in view of the earlier directives. The department had listed the Manusmriti as one of the primary texts in the syllabus for a four-credit discipline-specific core course titled 'Dharmashastra Studies', according to The Indian Express. A discipline-specific core course refers to a mandatory subject within a particular academic field that provides foundational knowledge and skills. The reading list for the course also included Hindu religious texts such as the Ramayana, the Mahabharata, the Puranas and the Arthashastra, the newspaper reported. In July 2024, Delhi University had rejected a proposal to include the Manusmriti in its Bachelor of Laws syllabus. The Faculty of Law had proposed to introduce the literary works Manusmriti with the Manubhasya of Medhatithi by GN Jha and Commentary of Manu Smriti – Smritichandrika by T Kristnasawmi Iyer as suggested readings for undergraduate law students. The proposal had triggered an uproar, with the Social Democratic Teachers Front, a collective of university teachers, writing to Singh. They told the vice chancellor that the introduction of any section or part of the Manusmriti is against the basic structure and principles of the Constitution. Singh had later said that a committee headed by him did not find the proposal 'appropriate' and rejected it. 'There are many other texts to teach [the] Indian knowledge tradition and we should not rely on any one text,' the vice chancellor had said.