Faith Salie offers her two cents on the end of the penny
What makes us stop in the street to transcend our pride and stoop to pick it up?
It's the humble, shiny, tiny penny.
The Treasury announced it will cease making new pennies by early next year. Will they disappear immediately? No. But like so many things in our lives – reliably snowy winters, face-to-face conversations, books whose pages we can turn – pennies are fading away.
Before you shrug me off as a sentimental fool old enough to remember visiting the penny candy store on Cape Cod, I do understand that pennies are "outdated" and "inefficient." The government spends about 3.7 cents to make 1 penny. That's a loss of $85 million last year alone. And around half of us don't even carry cash anymore. I don't think the Tooth Fairy believes in pennies nowadays. So, canceling them makes "cents."
But in a world where it seems like everyone's looking down, a penny can remind us things might be looking up ... you know, pennies from heaven?
You know who was on the first penny in 1792? A woman! It was deemed un-American back then to depict a ruler on a coin, so pennies featured Lady Liberty.
It wasn't until 1909 that President Lincoln's face graced the coin. His iconic profile was designed by a Lithuanian-born Jewish immigrant, Victor David Brenner, who created what's thought to be the most reproduced piece of art in history.
1943 pennies were made of zinc-coated steel, because copper was needed for World War II.
Should we just throw that history away? Well, yes! As long as we imbue each toss with our wishes.
"A penny for your thoughts" was coined nearly 500 years ago by Sir Thomas More, back when offering someone a penny meant their musings were really worth something.
These are just my two cents, but ... nobody throws a bitcoin into a fountain.
Call me a numismatic nostalgic, but in a world full of crypto and virtuality, I'll keep my eyes peeled for the tarnished, tangible, inefficient promise of luck.
For more info:
faithsalie.com
Story produced by Liza Monasebian. Editor: Ed Givnish.
See also:
Face value: Portraits on money ("Sunday Morning")Moneymakers: Artists at the U.S. Mint ("Sunday Morning") Almanac: "In God We Trust" ("Sunday Morning") The history of the penny ("Sunday Morning")
The wonderfully weird world of artist Luigi Serafini
Fans turn out for estate sale at home of Tom Petty
Trump says Musk is "not really leaving" as DOGE savings lag behind projections
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Engadget
2 hours ago
- Engadget
Intel's CEO has successfully wooed President Trump
It sounds like President Trump no longer thinks Intel's CEO should resign. Trump has revealed on Truth Social that he met with Lip-Bu Tan, Howard Lutnick, the Secretary of Commerce, and Howard Lutnick, the Secretary of the Treasury. He didn't discuss the details of their meeting, but he described it as "a very interesting one." Trump added: "His success and rise is an amazing story." If you'll recall, Trump alleged that Tan was "highly conflicted" due to his investments in hundreds of Chinese firms and should resign. Reuters had previously reported that some of those companies had links to the Chinese military. "Mr. Tan and my Cabinet members are going to spend time together, and bring suggestions to me during the next week," Trump said in his post. According to a report by the Financial Times , Tan wrote a letter to Intel employees about the issue, telling that there had been a lot of misinformation about the roles he'd held. "I wanted to be absolutely clear... I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards," he reportedly wrote in the letter. He also said that Intel was communicating with the White House "to address the matters that have been raised and ensure they have the facts." Trump's call for Tan to resign reportedly came about due a letter from Tom Cotton, the Republican head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, to the Intel CEO. Cotton apparently expressed concerns aout the "security and integrity of Intel's operations" due to Tan's ties with China. Tan was named the CEO of Intel in March, taking over a company that was losing money due to its foundry business being unable to secure big customers and lagging behind rivals like Taiwan Semiconductor. Since taking over, Tan has enforced several cost-cutting measures, including cutting jobs with the goal of reducing its workforce by 22 percent by the end of the year. He also recently told investors that Intel could abandon the development of its next-gen manufacturing technology if it fails to secure a large client.
Politico
5 hours ago
- Politico
Trump extends US-China trade truce for another 90 days
Earlier in the day, Trump remained coy about a possible extension at a White House press conference, saying, 'We'll see what happens.' The administration is increasingly seeking to fold non-tariff-related trade disputes into trade negotiations. Trump earlier on Monday defended a deal he struck with chip-makers Nvidia and AMD that allows them to continue to sell certain chips to China despite concerns over national security, in exchange for the companies giving the U.S. government a portion of the revenue from the sales. Trump also did not follow through last week on a threat to impose secondary tariffs of up to 100 percent on China because of its continued purchases of Russian oil, even though he punished India for the same thing by doubling U.S. tariffs to 50 percent. Top officials from the two countries met in Stockholm late last month, the third in a series of meetings between Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Chinese negotiators led by Vice Premier He Lifeng. 'This action is necessary to facilitate ongoing and productive discussion with China about remedying trade imbalances, unfair trade practices, expanding market access for American exports, and aligning with the United States on national security and economic matters,' the White House said in a fact sheet. Those talks — in Geneva in May and London in June — have focused on stabilizing the trade relationship after tit-for-tat tariff increases, easing Beijing's blockade on critical minerals exports and eliminating U.S. curbs on sales of ethane to Chinese manufacturers. With existing duties remaining in place, the U.S. agreed in May to temporarily lower tariffs on Chinese imports from 145 percent to 30 percent, while China dropped levies on U.S. goods from 125 percent to 10 percent. Trade between the countries has been strained over the past year, as Trump has targeted Chinese goods in his effort to upend the global economy. That has put businesses that are heavily reliant on Chinese goods — like the toy industry and the apparel industry — in a difficult situation as they try to navigate changing tariff levels. The 90-day pause will supply those businesses with a sense of certainty, helping with inventory through the Christmas season — even if it comes at a higher cost. Jeff Moon, a former assistant USTR for China, said Trump appears to be hoping to reach a deal with China in time for a regional summit in South Korea in late October. 'You can see the choreography of what's happening,' Moon said Friday during a discussion hosted by the Washington International Trade Association, referring to a series of 'confidence-building steps' between the two countries in recent months.
USA Today
5 hours ago
- USA Today
Trump signs order extending US-China tariff truce by another 90 days
The executive order staves off triple-digit duties on Chinese goods as U.S. retailers prepared for the critical end-of-year holiday season. WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump extended a tariff truce with China by another 90 days on Aug. 11, a White House official said, staving off triple-digit duties on Chinese goods as U.S. retailers prepared for the critical end-of-year holiday season. Trump signed an executive order delaying the start of higher tariffs until mid-November, shortly after giving reporters a noncommittal answer when asked at a news conference if he planned to keep the lower tariff rates in place. On Aug. 10, Trump demanded China quadruple its purchases of U.S. soybeans, but it remained unclear whether Beijing had agreed. The tariff truce between Beijing and Washington had been due to expire on Aug. 12 at 12:01 a.m. ET. The timing of the extension until early November buys crucial time for the seasonal autumn surge of imports for the Christmas season, including electronics, apparel, and toys at lower tariff rates. The new order prevents U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods from shooting up to 145%, while Chinese tariffs on U.S. goods were set to hit 125% - rates that would have resulted in a virtual trade embargo between the two countries. It locks in place, at least for now, a 30% tariff on Chinese imports, with Chinese duties on U.S. imports at 10%. "We'll see what happens," Trump told a news conference earlier on Aug. 10, highlighting what he called his good relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping. "It's positive news. Combined with some of the de-escalatory steps both the United States and China have taken in recent weeks, it demonstrated that both sides are trying to see if they can reach some kind of a deal that would lay the groundwork for a Xi-Trump meeting this fall," said Wendy Cutler, a former senior U.S. trade official who is now a vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute. Trump told CNBC last week that the U.S. and China were getting very close to a trade agreement and he would meet with Xi before the end of the year if a deal was struck. Trade 'detente' continued The two sides in May announced a truce in their trade dispute after talks in Geneva, Switzerland, agreeing to a 90-day period to allow further talks. They met again in Stockholm, Sweden, in late July, and U.S. negotiators returned to Washington with a recommendation that Trump extend the deadline. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said repeatedly that the triple-digit import duties both sides slapped on each other's goods in the spring were untenable and had essentially imposed a trade embargo between the world's two largest economies. "It wouldn't be a Trump-style negotiation if it didn't go right down to the wire," said Kelly Ann Shaw, a senior White House trade official during Trump's first term and now with law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld. She said Trump had likely pressed China for further concessions before agreeing to the extension. Trump pushed for additional concessions on Aug. 10, urging China to quadruple its soybean purchases, although analysts questioned the feasibility of any such deal. Trump did not repeat the demand on Aug. 11. "The whole reason for the 90-day pause in the first place was to lay the groundwork for broader negotiations and there's been a lot of noise about everything from soybeans to export controls to excess capacity over the weekend," Shaw said. Ryan Majerus, a former U.S. trade official now with the King & Spalding law firm, said the news would give both sides more time to work through longstanding trade concerns. "This will undoubtedly lower anxiety on both sides as talks continue, and as the U.S. and China work toward a framework deal in the fall," he said. Imports from China early this year had surged to beat Trump's tariffs, but dropped steeply in June, Commerce Department data showed last week. The U.S. trade deficit with China tumbled by roughly a third in June to $9.5 billion, its narrowest since February 2004. Over five consecutive months of declines, the U.S. trade gap with China has narrowed by $22.2 billion - a 70% reduction from a year earlier. No formal announcement was immediately released. The Treasury Department and the U.S. Trade Representative's Office did not respond to requests for comment. Washington has also been pressing Beijing to stop buying Russian oil, with Trump threatening to impose secondary tariffs on China. (Reporting by Trevor Hunniccutt and Andrea Shalal; Editing by Bernadette Baum, Rod Nickel and Nia Williams)
