₹7,425 crore special development funds will be released to 196 MLAs, says Rayaraddi
Addressing presspersons in Hubballi on Monday, Mr. Rayaraddi, who is Economic Advisor to Chief Minister, rubbished the Opposition allegation that the State government does not have enough funds for development works.
'I am part of the budget preparation team which held elaborate discussions. In the budget for 2025-26, ₹83,000 crore has been earmarked for capital expenditure which is more than what the previous BJP government set aside for the purpose,' he said.
Mr. Rayaraddi said that in the special grant scheme, MLAs under BBMP limits have been excluded as the government has already announced special grants to constituencies in the BBMP limits and they are already getting more funds.
'Of the 224 MLAs, 28 MLAs (12 Congress, 16 Opposition) are under the BBMP limits and they have been excluded. It has been decided to release ₹50 crore for Congress MLAs and ₹25 crore to Opposition MLAs. It has also been decided to give ₹25 crore to Congress MLAs in Kalyana Karnataka as under KKRDB (Kalyana Karnataka Region Development Board) too special grants have been allocated. It all comes to ₹7,425 crore,' he said.
'However, keeping in mind the likely demand of MLAs from Kalyana Karnataka region for grant of ₹50 crore instead of ₹25 crore, we have set aside ₹8,000 crore,' he said.
Mr. Rayaraddi also clarified that in continuation of the decision taken on special grants, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah will be personally having one-on-one meetings with MLAs which will be held for three days.
'In fact, the proforma has already been given to MLAs to indicate their priorities for special grants and they have been asked to submit them indicating their choice. Subsequently, the Chief Minister will have one-on-one meetings with them. We have also suggested to the Chief Minister to have similar meetings with Opposition MLAs too which may happen subsequently,' he said.
To a query, he clarified that the issue of special grants has nothing to do with the visit of AICC general secretary Randeep Singh Surjewala, as it was decided earlier. On the reduced grants for Opposition MLAs, he said that the BJP started it during its regime.
21.6% collection
Mr. Rayaraddi said that out of the total tax collection for the current fiscal (2025-26), the State government has already received ₹43,935 crore in the first quarter (June-end), which is 21.6% of the targeted collection (₹2,03,000 crore). 'Our economic condition is strong. Our expectation is that we may reduce the budget deficit to zero in the next fiscal,' he said.
Mr. Rayaraddi said that Karnataka is No 2 in the country in GST collection and No 1 in GSDP (Gross State Domestic Product) which indicates that the State is a prosperous one. 'The required assistance from the Centre will help it further grow. However, the State is yet to receive ₹11,000 crore recommended in the 15th Finance Commission and ₹5,000 for the Bhadra Irrigation Project which has been declared a national project,' he said.
On Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman's statement that recommendation is only in the interim report and not in the final one, Mr. Rayaraddi sought to know why Kerala has received funds according to what they termed as interim report, while Karnataka has not.
Mr. Rayaraddi said that the State government has already approached the 16th Finance Commission with details of the injustice meted out to it in devolution of funds. The reduction in Karnataka's share under the 15th Finance Commission to 3.647% from 4.713% has resulted in a cumulative loss of over ₹80,000 crore during the award period and this has been brought to the notice of the commission. 'The commission has assured us of studying it further and making amends,' he said.
Petty issues
The senior Congress leader said that instead of assisting the ruling party in getting issues concerning funds and development resolved, the BJP leaders are doing politics over petty issues and making comments.
'Ideally, as a responsible Opposition, it should have helped the ruling party in addressing the issues of development concerning the State,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
8 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Congress flags 'serious questions' over impact of India-UK FTA on domestic industry
NEW DELHI: With an India-UK free trade agreement likely to be signed during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Britain, the Congress on Wednesday claimed that serious questions have emerged on its impact on India's domestic industry. The opposition party's attack came after Prime Minister Modi on Wednesday left on a four-day visit to the UK and the Maldives, expressing confidence that this would boost India's ties with the two countries. Congress general secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh said, "The Super Premium Frequent Flier jets out of India again today -- this time to the UK and the Maldives. The London trip is for the signing of the India-UK Free Trade Agreement (FTA), which will in fact have pernicious consequences for numerous stakeholders." The FTA's significant consequences would be on the micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), which are the backbone of India's economy, the largest employers of India's workers, the object of neglect and the subject of distress in the last 11 years of the Modi government's policy of favouring a couple of big business groups, Ramesh claimed in a post on X.
Indian Express
8 minutes ago
- Indian Express
How Dhankhar's exit has landed Oppn in Catch-22, put unity to fresh test
At the start of the Monsoon Session of Parliament, a united Opposition had a clear idea of its floor strategy: It wanted to force the government for a discussion on the Pahalgam terror attack and the alleged US role in cessation of military action between India and Pakistan besides the Election Commission (EC)'s special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar. But the resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar as the Vice-President came out of the blue. While the government has agreed for a discussion on Operation Sindoor next week and will not concede on the Bihar SIR exercise, the Opposition now is faced with two new challenges. Most of the Opposition leaders believe Dhankhar's sudden resignation is shrouded in mystery – there is far more to his 'totally unexpected' resignation than meets the eye, as Congress leader Jairam Ramesh put it – but there seems to be lack of clarity in the Opposition camp about how to capitalise on it to score points over the government, especially since he stepped down citing health concerns. Adding to it is the fact that there had been acrimonious relations between Dhankhar and the Opposition ever since he first presided over the Rajya Sabha in the 2022 Winter Session. The second challenge is to find and field a joint candidate for the Vice-Presidential election, for which the EC has set the ball rolling Wednesday. The Trinamool Congress (TMC), for instance, had abstained in the previous V-P election poll, claiming that the Opposition parties had decided on their nominee, Margaret Alva, without consulting it. Much water has flown down the bridge since then. With West Bengal headed to the Assembly elections next year, the TMC would weigh its options carefully – it may not like to be seen as siding with any camp. The AAP, on the other hand, has already declared that it was not part of the Opposition INDIA bloc. Interestingly, the TMC has so far refrained from commenting on Dhankhar's resignation. As regards the principal Opposition Congress, the initial response articulated by Ramesh surprised his own party. While arguing that Dhankhar's resignation was 'inexplicable' and 'clearly there is far more to his totally unexpected resignation than meets the eye', Ramesh went on to say that 'Dhankhar took both the Government and the Opposition to task in equal measure' and even requested him to reconsider his decision. 'This will be in the nation's interest. The farming community particularly will be greatly relieved,' he said. 'Sometimes he (Ramesh) is on his own. Dhankhar clearly was the most partisan Chairman the Rajya Sabha has seen,' a senior Congress functionary said. Shiv Sena (UBT)'s Priyanka Chaturvedi publicly disagreed with Ramesh. ''Mr Dhankar took both the Government and the Opposition to task in equal measure.' Fact check: Incorrect. Reminder: Opposition was forced to file a no-confidence motion against the Chair because of the partisan manner of conduct. Let's at least not forget that, just because the moment has come as a surprise,' she said. And it was not just Ramesh. Samajwadi Party (SP) chief Akhilesh Yadav Tuesday said, 'Our very popular Vice-President expressed concern about his health and resigned but nobody inquired about his health. Nobody went to ask about his well-being. Lots of BJP members would have been waiting for a message to go and ask about health and well-being. I don't think that any of the BJP members would have reached to ask about his well-being… Today a person occupying top position has to resign by showing concern for his health and nobody from the BJP is going to inquire (about his health), then that means 'kuch daal me kaala hai' which we are not able to guess.' Such reactions marked an interesting change of stance since the Congress and the SP were part of the Opposition group, which has had several run-ins with Dhankhar in the past. They had in December last year even made the unprecedented move of bringing a no-confidence motion against the V-P, accusing him of 'partisan conduct' as the Rajya Sabha Chairman. In their impeachment notice which was later rejected by Deputy Chairman Harivansh, the Opposition had alleged that Dhankhar had taken it upon himself to be an 'impassioned spokesperson' of the government's policies in public forums. They had alleged that he was 'explicitly partisan' and conducted the proceedings of the Upper House in an 'extremely biased manner.' And therein lies the Opposition's dilemma. Most of the Opposition leaders believe that Dhankhar's exit was allegedly 'forced' by the government – which aligns with their larger allegation that the BJP-led government has been undermining the Constitution and institutions – but are wary of going full-throttle over the issue. 'What if we turn it into a big political issue and he then makes a statement tomorrow, saying he was pained by the politicisation of his resignation. So far he has been quiet. We hope he will speak out one day,' a senior Opposition leader said, signalling the Opposition's belief that Dhankhar would follow the Satyapal Malik route. 'To protect the dignity of the second-highest constitutional office and address growing speculation, the government must clarify the circumstances surrounding the resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar. Information from certain quarters suggests a senior minister sought his resignation on behalf of the government. The contrast between the Prime Minister's enthusiastic endorsement of Dhankhar ji as 'Kisan Putra' during his candidacy and the cryptic, delayed statement following his resignation heightens intrigue,' said the CPM's Rajya Sabha MP John Brittas. 'If the government continues to evade questions, it would be fitting for Dhankhar ji to break his silence to uphold the dignity of the the Opposition disagreed with the former Vice-President on many issues, the BJP government's handling of this constitutional position is deeply troubling and warrants concern,' said Brittas. On the other hand, the virtual silences of the TMC and the DMK on the issue show that all the Opposition parties are not on the same page. On its part, the BJP believes that the issue would die down in a few days and the attention would shift to the election of the new Vice-President. And then, the Opposition would face its next challenge. It is not just the TMC and the AAP which do not want to be seen with the Congress, the CPM is also upset with the grand old party, particularly Rahul Gandhi, for having attacked it during his last Kerala visit.
The Hindu
8 minutes ago
- The Hindu
U.S. House ending session early as Republicans clash over Epstein vote
U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson is rebuffing pressure to act on the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, instead sending members home early for a month-long break from Washington after the week's legislative agenda was upended by Republican members who are clamouring for a vote. Mr. Johnson, a Republican from Louisiana, said Tuesday (July 22, 2025) morning that he wants to give the White House 'space' to release the Epstein information on its own, despite the bipartisan push for legislation that aims to force the release of more documents. Editorial | Republican rumblings: on Trump and the Epstein files 'There's no purpose for the Congress to push an administration to do something they're already doing,' Johnson said at his weekly press conference, his last before lawmakers depart Washington on Wednesday for their traditional August recess. The Speaker's stance did little to alleviate the intra-party turmoil unfolding on Capitol Hill as many of President Donald Trump's supporters demand that the administration meet its promises to publicly release a full accounting of the sex trafficking investigation into Epstein, who killed himself in his New York jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial. Under pressure from right-wing online influencers, as well as voters back home, rank-and-file Republicans are demanding that the House intervene in the matter. 'The public's not going to let this die, and rightfully so,' said Rep Ralph Norman, a South Carolina Republican. Johnson's control of the House is under threat The dynamic left Johnson with slipping control of his Republican conference and several crucial committees. Even before Mr. Johnson spoke Tuesday morning, a Republican-controlled subcommittee of the House Committee on Oversight was advancing a resolution to subpoena Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, for a deposition. Mr. Johnson decided to end the House's legislative business early this week after he essentially lost control of the powerful House Rules Committee, which sends bills to the floor for debates and votes. Late Monday evening, business on that panel ground to a halt when the Republicans on the committee abruptly recessed proceedings rather than risk more proposals from Democrats pushing them to release Epstein files. Republicans had teed up votes on legislation to increase penalties for migrants who enter the country illegally, to ease permitting for water infrastructure and to rollback several Biden-era regulations. But all of those bills were put on hold at least until after the August recess. Frustration in the House has been running high since last week, when Republican leaders signaled possible support for a vote on the Epstein files as they raced to pass a $9 billion package of spending cuts. GOP leader unveiled a resolution that has no legal weight but would urge the Justice Department to produce more documentation. Mr. Trump, meanwhile, has asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek the release of testimony from secret grand jury proceedings in the case, though that effort is unlikely to produce new revelations. Echoing Mr. Trump's position, Mr. Johnson insisted he, too, wants the files released, but only those that are 'credible'. Mr. Johnson, who has relied heavily on Mr. Trump to hold onto leadership in the House, cast the President's reticence to release information as out of concern for the victims of Epstein. 'We have a moral responsibility to expose the evil of Epstein and everybody who was involved in that — absolutely — and we're resolved to do it,' Mr. Johnson said. 'But we also have an equal moral responsibility to protect the innocent, and that is a fine needle to thread.' A political wedge Even with the month-long break, the pressure on Mr. Johnson is unlikely to end. Rep. Thomas Massie, a Republican whose contrarian stances are often a thorn in the side to leadership, is gathering support for a legislative maneuver to force the bipartisan bill to a House vote, even without leadership's consent. 'Now, there are a lot of people here in the swamp who think that, Oh, well, if we spend five weeks on vacation, the pressure for this will dissipate. I don't think it's going to dissipate',' Mr. Massie told reporters Monday evening. Democrats have watched it all unfold with glee and worked to inflame the conflict among Republicans by making their own calls for transparency on the Epstein investigation. They have repeatedly tried to force votes on the matter, casting it as an issue of trust in the government. 'It's about transparency in government. It's about whose side are you on? Are you on the side of the rich and powerful, protecting men? Or are you on the side of young girls and America's children?' said Rep Ro Khanna, the California Democrat who put forward the legislation alongside Massie. Epstein sexually abused children hundreds of times over more than a decade, exploiting vulnerable girls as young as 14, authorities say. He couldn't have done so without the help of Maxwell, his longtime companion, prosecutors contend. Mr. Massie said the case is palpable enough to carry significant political consequences. 'This will be an issue that does follow Republicans through the midterms, and it will follow each individual Republican through the midterms. It will follow people into their primaries. Did you support transparency and justice, or did you come up here, get elected and fall into the swamp?' he told reporters. He added, 'I think it is a watershed moment for the speaker of the House and the president."
