logo
Key questions answered on Sizewell C after Reeves confirms nuclear investment

Key questions answered on Sizewell C after Reeves confirms nuclear investment

Rhyl Journala day ago

It comes ahead of the spending review on Wednesday, where Ms Reeves will outline departmental budgets for the next three years.
Here we answer key questions about Sizewell C and the Government's wider nuclear power plans.
– What is the Sizewell C nuclear plant?
Sizewell C was first proposed 15 years ago on a site by the hamlet Sizewell, which sits on the Suffolk coast between Aldeburgh and Southwold.
The area is already home to two separate power stations, the decommissioned Sizewell A nuclear plant and pressurised water reactor Sizewell B.
Nuclear power plants use a process called nuclear fission, where atoms split, releasing heat which is then used to generate electricity.
– How much funding has the Government announced?
The Chancellor said £14.2 billion will be invested to build the Sizewell C plant, marking the end of a long journey to secure funding for the project since it was first earmarked in 2010.
At the peak of construction, Sizewell C is expected to provide 10,000 jobs.
The company behind the project has already signed £330 million worth of contracts with local businesses.
Elsewhere, the Government confirmed one of Europe's first small modular reactor (SMR) programmes, backed by £2.5 billion in taxpayers' money over five years.
Ministers announced Rolls-Royce as the winners of a long-running competition on Tuesday for the bid to build the SMR programme.
– How could Sizewell C contribute to the UK's future energy system?
Sizewell C will power the equivalent of six million homes and is planned to be operation in the 2030s, the Government said.
It is also understood that the plant will generate electricity for 60 years.
The Treasury said that, combined with the ambition to build SMRs, it would deliver more new nuclear energy to the grid than over the previous half century by the 2030s.
It comes as nuclear plants are seen as increasingly important electricity sources as the Government tries to decarbonise Britain's grid by 2030, replacing fossil fuels with green power.
The last time Britain completed one was in 1987, which was the Sizewell B plant.
Hinkley Point C, in Somerset, is under construction and is expected to produce enough power for about six million homes when it opens, but that may not be until 2031.
Sizewell C is part of the Government's wider ambitions to support clean power, such as wind and solar, and decarbonise the country's power grid to tackle the climate crisis and ensure future energy security.
– What are small modular reactors?
SMRs are a nuclear fission reactor that are a fraction of the size of a traditional nuclear plant.
This means they can be built on smaller sites across the country, closer to where the electricity is needed.
Still an emerging technology, only China and Russia have successfully built operational SMRs.
The Government says the newly-announced UK project could support up to 3,000 new skilled jobs and power the equivalent of around three million homes, with a first site expected to be allocated later this year by state-owned Great British Energy – Nuclear.
The hope is eventually attract private investment, especially from tech companies, which might build SMRs to power data centres.– Who has welcomed the Government funding?
Trade unions welcomed the move, which the Treasury said would go towards creating 10,000 jobs, including 1,500 apprenticeships.
The GMB union said giving Sizewell C the go-ahead was 'momentous'.
Regional secretary Warren Kenny said: 'Nuclear power is essential for clean, affordable, and reliable energy – without new nuclear, there can be no net zero.
'Sizewell C will provide thousands of good, skilled, unionised jobs and we look forward to working closely with the Government and Sizewell C to help secure a greener future for this country's energy sector.'
Mike Clancy, general secretary of Prospect, said: 'Delivering this funding for Sizewell C is a vital step forward, this project is critical to securing the future of the nuclear industry in the UK.
'New nuclear is essential to achieving net zero, providing a baseload of clean and secure energy, as well as supporting good, unionised jobs.
'Further investment in SMRs and fusion research shows we are finally serious about developing a 21st-century nuclear industry.
'All funding must be backed up by a whole-industry plan to ensure we have the workforce and skills we need for these plans to succeed.'
– Who has criticised the plans?
Various campaigners oppose the plant and have criticised the decision to commit the funding, saying it is still not clear what the total cost will be.
Alison Downes of Stop Sizewell C said ministers had not 'come clean' about the full cost of the project, which the group has previously estimated could be some £40 billion.
'There still appears to be no final investment decision for Sizewell C, but £14.2 billion in taxpayers' funding, a decision we condemn and firmly believe the Government will come to regret.
'Where is the benefit for voters in ploughing more money into Sizewell C that could be spent on other priorities, and when the project will add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent just like Hinkley C?
'Ministers have still not come clean about Sizewell C's cost and, given negotiations with private investors are incomplete, they have signed away all leverage and will be forced to offer generous deals that undermine value for money. Starmer and Reeves have just signed up to HS2 mark 2.'
Environmental campaigners have also warned of the impact the plant could have on local wildlife, given Sizewell is surrounded by protected areas.
The whole coast is an area of outstanding natural beauty (AONB), the shingle beach is a site of special scientific interest (SSSI) while the nearby Sizewell Marshes and Leiston Sandlings are special protected areas (SPAs) for birds.
Many argue that ministers should focus on investing in renewable energy, such as wind farms, instead.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NI to receive £1.2bn more after spending review – but economist warns that alone won't fix challenges
NI to receive £1.2bn more after spending review – but economist warns that alone won't fix challenges

Belfast Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Belfast Telegraph

NI to receive £1.2bn more after spending review – but economist warns that alone won't fix challenges

Announcing the outcome of Labour's spending review, the Chancellor Rachel Reeves declared: 'The devolved administrations will receive their largest real terms settlements since devolution began in 1998.' Budgets across Westminster departments will grow by 2.3% per year in real terms until 2028-29. Northern Ireland will see an increase in the amount of money it receives through the Barnett formula, the mechanism the Treasury uses to calculate how much money it gives to Stormont. Speaking about the average increase of £1.2bn, the Treasury said: 'The Northern Ireland Executive will receive an average extra £1.2 billion through the Barnett formula, 24% more to spend per person than the comparable UK Government spending in the rest of the UK, reflecting Northern Ireland's unique circumstances." Westminster has committed to maintaining some already-announced spending over the course of the review, for example allocating: '£137 million over three years in continued support for tackling paramilitarism and organised crime, and the Police Service of Northern Ireland's Additional Security Fund." Some of the Chancellor's headline nation-wide policies will have a direct impact on Northern Ireland, including changes to asylum policy. The government intends to end the use of hotels to provide accommodation to asylum seekers within the life of the current parliament. The Home Office currently contracts private firm Mears Group to source accommodation – including in hotels – for people seeking asylum in GB and NI. As of last September, there were over 300 such people in Northern Ireland living in hotels, in conditions which have been criticised by refugee rights' groups. News Catch Up - Thursday 12th June The Chancellor said she will speed up the asylum process and cut the backlog in the system which is costing the government billions of pounds. Other parts of wider UK policies will impact Northern Ireland, including the government's plans to increase defence spending annually by between 3.6-3.8%. The precise location of defence spending increases will be announced later in the year in the defence investment plan, but it will include Northern Ireland, where the government spent £240m in 2023-24 on an industry that employs 600 people. Speaking to the Belfast Telegraph, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones said that 'both' new and existing defence facilities here would receive investment 'because there is just so much extra money going into defence spending.' Mr Jones added that Northern Ireland would also see investment in the advanced manufacturing sector, including aerospace businesses. Northern Ireland will also have access to an additional £350m from the British Business Bank, the governmental body that offers financing and investment to private firms across the UK. It was through the bank that the Covid-relief loans were provided to companies. It has supported 6,000 businesses in NI since 2014 and its NI investments include Reform RX, a Pilates reformer company which was recently sold on to a major US firm. Northern Ireland will also be part of other pieces of investment, including the government's plan to aggressively grow AI capabilities in NI. An AI unit will be set up within the Executive, part of what Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly called 'a huge agenda.' 'We are determined to try and ensure Northern Ireland can do transformation in efficiency and productivity improvements through all of the tools that are there. That includes the advances in AI,' she said. 'This has been underway for a number of months, as referenced in our programme for government. We believe that digitisation and AI agenda can really improve public services and the way that we deliver those public services.' Responding to the spending review, Andrew Webb, the chief economist of Grant Thornton NI, said reform was necessary to ensure increased public spending was effective. 'Our public services face accumulated pressure - financial, structural, and societal. 'The Spending Review acknowledges this by calling for reform, but when we look around and see infrastructure deficits in areas such as waste water that are in the billions of pounds, we know we have a massive task on our hands. 'Our challenges aren't just money-related. New money helps, but money alone won't fix planning bottlenecks, staff shortages, or fragmented governance. "Northern Ireland needs a structured, long-range recovery plan with investment in the right places, powers aligned with purpose, and a relentless focus on outcomes. 'Otherwise, we risk repeating the cycle of pouring more money in and improving little.' Meanwhile, Stormont Finance Minister John O'Dowd said that agreements secured with the Treasury by his department will 'deliver an additional £600m of funding provided for vital public services here.' Mr O'Dowd was referring to the Treasury's willingness to exclude over £300m of agriculture funding from funding calculations, saving the Executive £600m over the period of the spending review. An independent review of Northern Ireland's Level of Need by Professor Gerald Holtham was also published yesterday, recommending an increase in the Barnett adjustment factor.

Spending war of words will only heat up as Holyrood election looms
Spending war of words will only heat up as Holyrood election looms

Scotsman

timean hour ago

  • Scotsman

Spending war of words will only heat up as Holyrood election looms

The battle lines have been well and truly drawn ahead of 2026 Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It didn't take long for the traditional war of words to kick off between ministers north and south of the Border. The Chancellor's spending review was a blizzard of big numbers. Rachel Reeves said it would deliver an average block grant for Scotland of £50.9 billion per year over the next three years. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This is the largest settlement in real terms since devolution was introduced, she said. UK ministers said it amounted to an extra £9.1 billion for the Scottish Government over the review period. Chancellor Rachel Reeves | PA 'That's more money than ever before for them to invest in Scottish public services like our NHS, police, housing and schools,' said Scottish Secretary Ian Murray. Keen Holyrood watchers will not be surprised to hear that Shona Robison, the SNP's Finance Secretary, took a different view. She insisted Scotland was yet again being treated 'as an afterthought'. 'Today's settlement for Scotland is particularly disappointing, with real terms growth of 0.8 per cent a year for our overall block grant, which is lower than the average for UK departments,' she said. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Had our resource funding for day-to-day priorities grown in line with the UK Government's overall spending, we would have £1.1 billion more to spend on our priorities over the next three years. 'In effect, Scotland has been short-changed by more than a billion pounds.' Analysis by experts such as those at the Fraser Of Allander Institute (FAI), attached to Strathclyde University, helps cut through some of the noise. The wider UK picture, it said, is one of 'largesse in the short-run' followed by cuts in future years. On the day-to-day spending side, the Scottish Government's funding does indeed grow at an average of 0.8 per cent a year after accounting for inflation. This is lower than forecast by the independent Scottish Fiscal Commission last month. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We have seen some Labour MPs and MSPs describing this event as increasing the block grant by £9.1 billion over the spending review period,' experts at the FAI wrote in a blog post. 'While it is true that Barnett consequentials add up to this figure (across different periods for resource and capital), this doesn't seem like a particularly transparent or helpful way of describing the changes. 'It essentially assumes that no additional funding would have been made available for the Scottish Government in cash terms relative to that in 2025/26 – which is not a credible baseline. 'A much more insightful – though perhaps less cheery – conclusion from looking at the SFC's forecast is that by 2028/29, funding will be £0.7 billion lower than their central estimate published on 29 May.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad David Phillips, from the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said the increase in the Scottish Government's day-to-day funding was frontloaded, at 1.2 per cent in 2026/27, then 0.6 per cent and 0.7 per cent in subsequent years. 'With devolved elections looming, this poses a risk: it will be easier to fund any pledges/giveaways around the time of the election than later years,' he wrote on social media. 'Parties need to avoid the temptation to promise unfunded 'goodies'; their pledges will need to be carefully scrutinised. 'While the Scottish Government's budget will increase overall, the NHS could easily absorb all of the increase - necessitating cuts to other spending. 'That's particularly likely from 2027/28 onwards, due to combo of smaller increases in UK funding and devolved tax and benefit forecasts. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'It's perfectly legitimate for the Scottish Government to prioritise benefits and public sector pay rises - but without further tax rises that will squeeze many services even more than in the rest of the UK.' Of course, there were other big announcements for Scotland in the spending review, not least money for a long-awaited carbon capture project in Aberdeenshire. The Acorn facility, which had previously been overlooked in favour of schemes down south, is in line for 'development funding' from the UK Government, although it is not clear how much money is actually on the table. Ms Robison said the Scottish Government had been provided with no figures and no timeframe. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Elsewhere, the Chancellor confirmed up to £750 million in funding for the creation of a supercomputer at Edinburgh University, which could be one of the most powerful in the world. The plan had previously been scrapped by Ms Reeves in the early weeks of her Government taking office. There was also an initial investment of £250 million over the next three years in the Faslane naval base, the home of the UK's nuclear deterrent, while Glasgow will benefit from wider munitions funding. Increased cash for the NHS and housing in England will see more money flow north to Scotland, and SNP ministers will be under pressure to pass this on. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "What we have done previously is we have passed on health resource consequentials and [then] some, going back years and years,' Ms Robison told journalists in Holyrood. "We haven't just matched health resource consequentials, but we've given more than that. So that has been our pattern of investment in the health service previously." But as the Holyrood election looms next year, it is clear the war of words over spending - and who is to blame for the state of public services - will only heat up. In a briefing for Scottish journalists, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones said the spending review will mean £2.9 billion extra for Scotland each year.

Acorn project funding uncertainty as 'final decision' still to be made by Chancellor Rachel Reeves
Acorn project funding uncertainty as 'final decision' still to be made by Chancellor Rachel Reeves

Scotsman

timean hour ago

  • Scotsman

Acorn project funding uncertainty as 'final decision' still to be made by Chancellor Rachel Reeves

Concerns have emerged over how much funding the Chancellor will hand over for the Acorn project. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... North Sea bosses have welcomed the UK government finally pledging to back Scotland's carbon capture project after years of delay - but concerns have been raised after it emerged a final investment decision is still to be made. Chancellor Rachel Reeves confirmed in her spending review that the Acorn carbon capture and storage project, based at St Fergus near Peterhead, will receive funding from the Treasury. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Keir Starmer's government has finally pledged funding for the Acorn project at the St Fergus gas terminal hear Peterhead (Photo by Jeff) | Getty Images But buried in the detail, the Treasury has confirmed that 'a final investment decision will be taken later this parliament, subject to project readiness and affordability'. This has led to a warning over 'investor uncertainty' if a final decision for the Acorn project is not taken 'urgently'. The Acorn project, made up of several firms including Shell, Harbour Energy and Storegga, will, in theory, take harmful carbon emissions and prevent them from being released into the atmosphere and instead buried under the seabed off the Aberdeenshire coast. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There are also plans to repurpose an existing oil and gas pipeline to potential transport carbon from Grangemouth to the offshore storage sites. The Scottish Government has commissioned a report into whether this is possible, but has not yet published that work. The previous Conservative UK government had only granted the Acorn project 'reserved' status and favoured projects south of the Border for full early funding. But the Chancellor told the House of Commons she was announcing 'support for the Acorn project', adding that it will 'support Scotland's transition from oil and gas to low-carbon technology". Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Pressed over how much investment will be allocated by the UK government, Ms Reeves simply said that 'we are putting money into Acorn'. As well as indicating support for the Acorn project, the Chancellor also pledged to back the Viking project south of the Border. David Whitehouse, Offshore Energies UK (OEUK) CEO, said: 'The support for the next phase of carbon storage projects in Scotland and Humberside is welcome, and an important step towards final investment decisions later in this parliament. OEUK's chief executive, David Whitehouse | OEUK 'Together Viking and Acorn have the potential to unlock over £25 billion of investment by 2035, creating over 30,000 jobs at peak construction.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He added: 'These projects will provide the pathway to support the decarbonisation of UK industries and are critical to the government's clean power objectives. We will continue to work with government to detail the long-term support required to deliver these projects and unlock the UK's wider CCS ambitions.' Trade unions have also welcomed the vow to back the Acorn project. STUC general secretary, Roz Foyer, said: 'Following years of Tory failure to invest in carbon capture and storage, this funding is welcome. STUC general secretary Roz Foyer | Andrew Milligan/PA Wire 'The UK and Scottish governments must now work with the relevant unions to ensure that the project maximises the opportunity to create and retain high quality, unionised jobs.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Sara Thiam, chief executive of development body, Prosper, said that 'advancing development' in the Acorn project was 'a welcome step', but she warned that 'final confirmation for the project is urgently required to reduce investor uncertainty'. Environmental campaigners have repeatedly raised concerns about the reliance on carbon capture to meet emissions goals, despite independent watchdogs, the Climate Change Committee, suggesting net zero targets cannot be hit without the technology. There are concerns about the reliability of carbon capture technology which is yet to be proven at commercial scale. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Friends of the Earth Scotland's climate campaigner, Alex Lee, branded the project 'a fossil fuel polluters pipe dream' that 'will never live up to the hype'. They added: 'Carbon capture has received billions in funding around the world and it has never worked properly.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store