Scientists discover oldest rocks on Earth, over 4.16 billion years old
The story of
Earth's origins
lies hidden in ancient stones, forged in a time of intense formation and
volcanic activity
. Recently, a groundbreaking discovery in northern Quebec has shed new light on the planet's earliest days.
Scientists have confirmed the presence of the oldest known rocks on Earth in a region near the village of Inukjuak, Nunavik. This remarkable find provides a rare glimpse into the Hadean eon, a mysterious and largely unknown chapter in
Earth
's history. The discovery has sparked intense scientific interest, offering new insights into the planet's formation and evolution. It brings us closer to understanding the Earth's unstable beginnings.
Oldest rocks found in Northern Quebec
According to earth.com, a groundbreaking study published in the journal
Science
has revealed the discovery of the oldest known rocks on Earth in northern Quebec, offering a rare glimpse into the planet's earliest history. Collected in 2017 near the village of Inukjuak, Nunavik, these ancient rocks have sparked intense scientific interest due to their unusual properties and old composition.
The research team employed advanced methods to determine the rocks' age, settling a long-standing debate that had dated the rocks to anywhere between 3.75 and 4.3 billion years old. The team's breakthrough came when they confirmed that intrusive rocks cutting through the volcanic layers were 4.16 billion years old, implying that the volcanic rocks themselves are even older.
This remarkable find offers a rare glimpse into the Hadean eon, a period of Earth's history marked by intense volcanic activity and a hostile environment.
How scientists accurately dated 4.16 billion-year-old rocks
To determine the age of the rocks, scientists employed
radiometric dating
, a precise technique that measures time based on the natural decay of elements within the rocks. They focused on samarium and neodymium, elements that undergo a slow and predictable transformation, with samarium decaying into neodymium at a known rate.
By analysing the current ratio of these elements, scientists can calculate when the rock originally formed. The team used two independent isotope systems, both of which yielded the same result: the rocks solidified approximately 4.16 billion years ago. This method provides an accurate and reliable way to date ancient rocks, allowing scientists to reconstruct the Earth's history.
Hadean Eon made Earth a planet, but it wasn't ready for life yet
The Hadean eon marked the violent and chaotic birth of Earth, around 4.6 billion years ago, with intense heat and volcanic activity. The planet was a molten rock, pummeled by space debris, and massive impacts likely shaped its formation, including the creation of the Moon. The surface was a scorching lava ocean with extreme volcanic activity, and the atmosphere consisted of toxic gases and steam.
Despite these hostile conditions, Earth was setting the stage for life. As the Hadean eon came to a close around 4 billion years ago, the planet began to cool, forming a solid crust and oceans from volcanic steam and comet impacts. Ancient zircon crystals even suggest that water may have existed earlier than previously thought, slowly making the planet habitable, though devoid of life and fossils at this stage.
Also read |
Mice with two fathers? Scientists create fertile mice using DNA from two fathers
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
What it means to send humans to space in age of AI
. Aloke Kumar Duvvuri Subrahmanyam In folktales and films, the 'village elder' stands as a symbol of accumulated wisdom — a living archive of generations past. In today's digital village, that role is played by artificial intelligence. Think of ChatGPT, trained on terabytes of human knowledge. That a terabyte hard drive can hold around a million books means AI knows more than its human creators. Many now treat AI as a modern oracle, consulted not just for homework and business decisions, but for matters of life and death. A McKinsey report warns that AI could displace 400 million to 800 million jobs by 2030. But can AI take the place of humans in space? Human spaceflight is complex and expensive. Crewed missions require human-rated spacecraft, radiation protection, psychological support systems, life-sustaining habitats, and a return strategy. Unlike robotic missions, where a failed landing is often a footnote, failure of a human mission makes global headlines and stirs public anguish. Why not leave it to the machines? We've not gone beyond the Moon's orbit, and a human voyage to even the nearest star system remains a dream. The lack of human experience in deep space means there's little real-world data for AI systems to learn from. AI thrives on data — millions of examples, patterns, and past outcomes. How do you train AI to handle the unknowns of Mars when no human has been there? This is where astronauts come in. Human beings possess an unrivalled ability to interact with unfamiliar environments, improvise, and ask the right questions. Onboard the International Space Station , astronauts have run intricate experiments, pushed the frontiers of material science, and pioneered 3D printing of human organs. These discoveries were the result of human intuition, curiosity, and working in a strange environment. Ideas once considered science fiction — like space factories — are entering the realm of practical planning. ISS has proven that when we engage directly with the cosmos, we not only gather data, but also get insights the smartest algorithms cannot predict. Human presence in space is not a quaint throwback — it's a necessary step forward. For AI to assist us beyond Earth, it will first need a training set rich in human experiences among the stars. That database doesn't yet exist. Until it does, the job of the astronaut remains safe. So, Group Captain Shubhanshu Shukla's mission to the International Space Station is a small, but important, start for a grander exciting road that lies ahead for the Indian human space programme. (Kumar is associate professor of mechanical engineering at IISc, Bengaluru; Subrahmanyam is associate professor of aerospace engineering at IISc)
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Why gorillas might be spending more time in trees than on land, new study reveals
Researchers have discovered that gorillas spend more time in trees than previously assumed. Western and Bwindi mountain gorillas in Gabon and Uganda found that even large males, weighing up to 170kg, used trees substantially. Female gorillas spent significant time in trees, with Loango females spending 34% of their time and Bwindi females spending 21% in trees. This challenges long-held ideas about gorilla behavior and evolution. The findings suggest that gorillas are more agile and adaptable than previously believed, and their tree-climbing habits play a crucial role in their daily lives. New insights into gorilla behavior. The surprising tree habitats of gorillas According to a study published in Current Biology , encompassing data from five groups in Bwindi and one in Loango, totaling nearly 5,200 observation days, presents a different picture. The Virunga population has significantly influenced our initial understanding of gorilla habitats, but these highland gorillas inhabit areas with limited fruit availability and tend to climb infrequently. The findings indicate that tree use varies substantially between different gorilla populations. Notably, even juveniles and subadults in Bwindi and Loango spent between 32% to 43% of their time in trees, which is double the rate observed in younger gorillas in Virunga. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Bookings open at 7 Mahalaxmi starting 6.76 Cr* (All Inc.) 7 Mahalaxmi, Runwal Group Book Now Furthermore, the researchers discovered that while body size plays a role in tree climbing, it does not necessarily prevent it. Gorilla tree climbing is more than just about fruit The researchers initially thought that fruit would be the primary reason for gorillas to climb trees. While they did find that gorillas climbed more when eating fruit, the reality was more complicated. In Loango, adult females spent more time in trees eating leaves than fruit, whereas in Bwindi, the opposite was true. Even large silverbacks climbed trees to eat fruit, with those in Bwindi spending 82% of their time in trees when consuming fruit. However, fruit made up only 14% of their diet, indicating that most of their time was spent eating leaves. In contrast, western gorillas in Loango often ate fallen fruit from the ground, showing that fruit consumption doesn't always require climbing. Additionally, western gorillas ate a significant amount of tree leaves (about 30% of their diet), driving their tree use for folivorous purposes, similar to some monkey species. Female gorillas climb trees primarily to feed Gorillas mostly climbed trees to feed. Adult females were more likely to climb while eating than when resting or traveling. The frequency of climbing varied between Loango and Bwindi females, likely due to differences in diet and foraging strategies. Even when not eating fruit, Loango females climbed more than Bwindi females, suggesting that leaf-eating gorillas also spend significant time in trees. The energy gained from food seems to outweigh the effort of climbing, even for large silverbacks. What gorilla tree climbing reveals about the evolution These findings have significant implications for how we understand ape evolution. The idea that gorillas lived mostly on the ground from evolutionary historical roots with a herbivorous diet is no longer applicable. The study reveals that gorillas of all ages, from infants to adults, engage in frequent tree climbing. It shows that being big and eating plants doesn't mean gorillas can't climb trees often. This new perspective may require adjustments to our models of ancient human relatives, as gorilla-like features may not necessarily imply a solely ground-based lifestyle. Also read | Chimpanzees vs Bonobos: What's the difference?
Economic Times
a day ago
- Economic Times
24 hours days to end? Expert warns accelartion in earth's speed can give history's shortest day soon
Earth's variable speed, and how is it measured? Live Events Earth gathers speed after 2020 Why is this happening? (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Earth has been rotating faster than usual on its axis since 2020, leading to shorter days. It's not that our planet's speed is going to make a significant difference, but the concern revolves around the unidentified reasons leading to this began changing five years ago in 2020 when the days started to get shorter. Now in 2025, a point has come when the record for the shortest day is knocking at our doors. The phenomenon is being studied by astrophysicist Graham Jones, and he has predicted the next shortest day on three possible dates: July 9, July 22, or August 5, it is important to understand that when we speak of days getting shorter, it doesn't mean by minutes or hours but by a few milliseconds. The length by which the days are going to get shorter is insignificant, but what holds the key is the unexplained reasons. What fuels the curiosity further is that until recently, the planet was spinning slower and rotates on its axis and completes a full rotation in exactly 86,400 seconds; in other words, its length is 24 hours. A change of a millisecond (ms) is 0.001 seconds less than a blink of an eye, which lasts around 100 the 1950s, atomic clocks came into existence, measuring tiny day-to-day variations in Earth's spin speed. The number of milliseconds above or below 86,400 seconds is known as length of day (LOD).Until 2020, when our planet was rotating slower and slower. The shortest LOD ever recorded by atomic clocks was -1.05 ms, which signified that Earth completed one rotation with respect to the Sun in 1.05 milliseconds less than 86,400 that point there was no looking back, as the Earth kept on gaining speed and broke this old record every year by approximately half a millisecond. The shortest day of all was -1.66 ms on July 5, 2024. Earth is likely to get close to this again in 2025 around July 9, July 22, and August 5 with predicted LOD on these three days is predicted to be -1.30 ms, -1.38 ms and -1.51 ms still struggle to give a concrete explanation for this, but the predicted dates for 2025 do coincide with the times when the Moon's orbit places it at its furthest point from Earth's equator, and this has an impact on our studies have suggested that the Moon has been slowing Earth's rotation for billions of years. The gravitational pull of the Moon impacts the Earth's angular momentum, hence controlling the variations in the LOD. Notably, long-term variations in the spin speed of our planet are also likely affected by other factors, including the complex motion of Earth's core, oceans, and atmosphere.
