Volunteers on 'right side of history' fight Trump data purge
Scores of activists are working to safeguard and then make public data they had archived for safe-keeping after President Donald Trump's administration targeted "gender ideology extremism" and environmental policies with deletion.
"We're moving past the initial phase and approaching the next: ensuring that there's public access to everything that we have preserved," data scientist Jonathan Gilmour said via video call.
Gilmour belongs to Public Environmental Data Partners, a coalition of environmental, justice and policy organizations committed to "public access to federal environmental data".
They are working with other volunteers — environmental coders at Earth Hacks, archivists such as the Internet Archive, data consultants Fulton Ring — to build new public access tools from the purged data.
The Trump administration has gutted several federal agencies, fired tens of thousands of employees and altered or deleted thousands of government webpages since taking office in January.
First in Trump's firing line were health, climate and LGBTQ+ datasets that fell foul of his ideology.
These include stats gathered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, such as the social vulnerability index and environmental justice index — measures used to quantify the health risks faced by different Americans.
Among those working to restore the deleted data are former government workers and staff who were put on leave by Trump.
An Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) employee placed on leave helped make a new map that shows improvements in air pollution monitoring systems and upgrades of aging sewer systems made under environmental justice grants.
"It's miraculous what (we've) been able to do — take these tools ... and protect them from this act of official vandalism," the employee, who requested anonymity to speak more freely, said.
Those who are leading efforts to restore access to the missing data say they are understaffed, underfunded and persisting in their work despite risking retaliation from the Trump government, which has targeted lawyers it considered hostile.
"There's certainly a concern of retribution from the administration, but we feel strongly we're on the right side of history here," Gilmour said.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment before time of publication.
Data for all
Rajan Desai and Jeremy Herzog, founders of Fulton Ring, were motivated to volunteer by reports of government censorship.
"This is like (George Orwell's dystopian novel) '1984.' It made it very real for us," Desai said in a video call from New York.
The duo built a new version of the government's Future Risk Index, showing the cost of climate change to U.S. communities.
The administration removed the original, managed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in January. FEMA did not respond to a request for comment before time of publication.
The new version resurrects the dead data — and also processes it faster and better on smartphones, even fixing some of its old bugs.
The aim is to arm ordinary Americans with the sort of valuable information that is currently held in private hands.
"A lot of this disaster data, flooding data (is used by) insurance and financial institutions in some capacity. The only person that seems not to have any visibility into this is the average consumer who might use it to buy a house," Desai said.
He hopes that by turning these obscure datasets into new and open tools, citizens can make more informed decisions.
Preserving data
Getting the data back online is only the first step. It must then be protected from further takedowns, Gilmour said.
The coalition is backing up its tools over an array of platforms, including the research site Figshare, Canadian repository Borealis and Harvard University's Dataverse, an indefinite storage network across 216 locations over 36 countries.
A diverse network bolsters protection against a government that might aim to restrict information within its borders.
The repository hosts data from research institutes, academics and more, ranging from small Excel spreadsheets to astronomical or biomedical data that can be thousands of terabytes bigger, such as a file that can fill four iPhone 16 Pro smartphones.
Another challenge is keeping the records up to date since stagnant data loses relevance every day.
"(Gathering new data) is incredibly labor-intensive when you don't have the power of an agency or the resources of the U.S. government to request data from the states," Gilmour said.
His volunteer network is fundraising to pay workers, but they know some information will be lost.
There are "tools that include geospatial data from NASA satellites. If NASA stops providing that information, we're not going to go launch our own satellites," Gilmour said.
Work in progress or internal tools that were not public-facing could be irretrievable if the Trump administration defies federal laws on record retention, the EPA employee said.
An EPA spokesperson said that it was working to implement Trump's executive orders.
"President Trump advanced conservation and environmental stewardship in his first term, and the EPA will continue to uphold its mission to protect human health and the environment in his second term," the spokesperson said via email.
Despite the challenges, Gilmour said the volunteers would keep at their mission to save the people's data.
"We're preserving these tools and datasets that have been paid for by the American people and developed for all of us."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NHK
7 hours ago
- NHK
Trump administration in talks to take Intel stake, Bloomberg reports
The US media outlet Bloomberg says the administration of President Donald Trump is in talks with Intel Corp. to have the government take a stake in the struggling chipmaker. Bloomberg published the report on Thursday, quoting people familiar with the plan. The Trump administration apparently aims to boost domestic chip production by supporting the delayed construction of Intel's planned factory hub in the Midwest state of Ohio. Bloomberg said the size of the potential stake is not clear. It also said the details are still being worked out and the plans remain fluid. Intel has fallen behind in the development of chips for artificial intelligence. It posted a large operating loss last year and faces the challenge of turning its business around. Chip giants Nvidia and AMD have reportedly agreed to pay the US government 15 percent of their revenues from chip sales in China as part of an arrangement to secure export licenses. Bloomberg describes the talks with Intel as "the latest direct intervention by Trump into a key industry."


Yomiuri Shimbun
11 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump Told Norwegian Minister He Wants Nobel Prize, Newspaper Says
OSLO (Reuters) — When U.S. President Donald Trump called Norway's finance minister last month to discuss tariffs, he also told him he wanted the Nobel Peace Prize, Norwegian business daily Dagens Naeringsliv reported on Thursday. Several countries including Israel, Pakistan and Cambodia have nominated Trump for brokering peace agreements or ceasefires, and he has said he deserves the Norwegian-bestowed accolade that four White House predecessors received. Out of the blue, while Finance Minister Jens Stoltenberg was walking down the street in Oslo, Donald Trump called, Dagens Naeringsliv reported, citing unnamed sources. He wanted the Nobel Prize — and to discuss tariffs.

Japan Times
13 hours ago
- Japan Times
Which Donald Trump will negotiate with Putin in Alaska?
When U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin met in Helsinki in 2018, the pair alarmed allies with a friendly encounter where Trump sided with the Russian leader over his own intelligence agencies on election interference. Trump flies to a meeting in Alaska with Putin on Friday in a different public mood — impatient with the Russian's unwillingness to negotiate an end to his war in Ukraine and angry over missile strikes on Ukrainian cities. The world is waiting to see if it will be this tougher version of Trump who shows up in Anchorage or if it will be the former real estate tycoon who has sought to ingratiate himself with the wily former KGB agent in the past. The answer could have deep implications for European leaders concerned that Russia, if allowed to absorb parts of Ukraine, will be more aggressive toward NATO allies near Russia like Poland, Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia. It matters even more for Ukraine, which has been losing ground to Russian forces after three-and-a-half years of grinding combat. Despite his harsher tone toward Putin over the past months, Trump has a more extensive history of trying to placate the Russian leader. When Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, Trump declined to directly criticize Putin. The Russian president, shunned by multiple presidents, praised Trump for working to improve Russian-U.S. relations. Kremlin watchers are looking to see whether Trump will be enchanted by Putin again and swayed by his argument that Russia has a right to dominate Ukraine. "It's a reasonable concern to think that Trump will be bamboozled by Putin and cut a terrible deal at Ukraine's expense," said Dan Fried, a diplomat for several U.S. presidents who is now at the Atlantic Council. But a different outcome is also possible, added Fried. "There's a reasonable prospect that the administration will wake up to the fact that Putin is still playing them." The Trump administration has sought to temper expectations, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt telling reporters on Tuesday the meeting would be a "listening exercise." Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska | REUTERS Trump told reporters on Wednesday that he might broker a second meeting that includes both Putin and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy if the Alaska session goes well. Russia has given no indication it is prepared to make concessions amid Ukrainian worries that Trump might make a deal without their input. Zelenskyy says he would like to see a ceasefire first followed by security guarantees. Sweeteners and complaints When Trump assumed office again in January, the Republican president tried to revive the warmth between the two leaders from his first term, expressing sympathy for Putin's isolated position in the world and vowing to end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours. As the administration eased pressure on Russia, some Trump aides parroted Russian talking points to the dismay of Ukraine's backers. In March, U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff implied in a podcast interview with conservative commentator Tucker Carlson that Russia had a right to capture four mainland regions of Ukraine — Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson — because "they're Russian speaking." And in a dramatic White House meeting in February, Trump and Vice President JD Vance berated Zelenskyy for his handling of the war, to the delight of hardliners in Russia. Despite all the sweeteners, the Russian leader has refused to play along with Trump's efforts to steer the two sides into a peace deal. Putin has talked to Trump regularly but has kept up deadly bombing raids against Ukraine. The ongoing bloodshed prompted Trump to shift to a tougher stance in July and complain that Putin was stalling him. Trump has agreed to send new weapons to Ukraine — that Europe will pay for — and has threatened new financial penalties for Moscow. Trump last week imposed an additional 25% tariff on India for buying Russian oil — indirect pressure on Moscow — but has held back from following through on his threats to impose stiffer sanctions. On Wednesday, he threatened "severe consequences" if Russia will not make a deal. "While the tone coming out of the White House has shifted, it has not yet been followed up with an expansion of U.S. sanctions — Trump's deadlines for additional sanctions keep getting pushed back — or new financial commitments from Washington to strengthen Ukrainian security," said Nicholas Fenton, of the Europe, Russia, and Eurasia Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. On Monday, Trump said he should know within two minutes whether Putin is willing to make concessions. "I may say, lots of luck. Keep fighting. Or I may say, we can make a deal," he said. The lure of the deal For Trump, who is drawn to the spectacle of a high-profile summit with the world watching, the lure of making a deal is strong. He has engaged in an open campaign for a Nobel Peace Prize this year, pointing to what he has claimed as his diplomatic victories, and has unnerved U.S. allies with his eagerness for a Ukraine peace deal that they fret could embolden Putin. In recent days, Ukrainian and European leaders have protested Trump's assertion that Russia and Ukraine will have to engage in land swaps in order to reach a peace deal. While Russia occupies Crimea and large swaths of eastern Ukraine, the Ukrainians no longer hold any Russian territory, raising the question of what, exactly, could be exchanged. Trump insists that, given his personal relationship with Putin, he is the only one who can bring the war to an end. John Bolton, who was one of Trump's national security advisers in his first term and is now a sharp critic, said he was concerned that Putin was "beginning to work his magic" on Trump. "Personal relations obviously have a place in foreign affairs, just like they do in everything else. But when you're one of the world's hard men like Vladimir Putin, this is not a matter of emotion, this is a matter of cold calculation. Trump doesn't get that point," Bolton said. In a social media post on Wednesday, Trump complained that "very unfair media is at work on my meeting with Putin," citing the use of quotes from "fired losers" like Bolton.