logo
Which Donald Trump will negotiate with Putin in Alaska?

Which Donald Trump will negotiate with Putin in Alaska?

Japan Timesa day ago
When U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin met in Helsinki in 2018, the pair alarmed allies with a friendly encounter where Trump sided with the Russian leader over his own intelligence agencies on election interference.
Trump flies to a meeting in Alaska with Putin on Friday in a different public mood — impatient with the Russian's unwillingness to negotiate an end to his war in Ukraine and angry over missile strikes on Ukrainian cities.
The world is waiting to see if it will be this tougher version of Trump who shows up in Anchorage or if it will be the former real estate tycoon who has sought to ingratiate himself with the wily former KGB agent in the past.
The answer could have deep implications for European leaders concerned that Russia, if allowed to absorb parts of Ukraine, will be more aggressive toward NATO allies near Russia like Poland, Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia.
It matters even more for Ukraine, which has been losing ground to Russian forces after three-and-a-half years of grinding combat. Despite his harsher tone toward Putin over the past months, Trump has a more extensive history of trying to placate the Russian leader.
When Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, Trump declined to directly criticize Putin. The Russian president, shunned by multiple presidents, praised Trump for working to improve Russian-U.S. relations.
Kremlin watchers are looking to see whether Trump will be enchanted by Putin again and swayed by his argument that Russia has a right to dominate Ukraine.
"It's a reasonable concern to think that Trump will be bamboozled by Putin and cut a terrible deal at Ukraine's expense," said Dan Fried, a diplomat for several U.S. presidents who is now at the Atlantic Council.
But a different outcome is also possible, added Fried. "There's a reasonable prospect that the administration will wake up to the fact that Putin is still playing them."
The Trump administration has sought to temper expectations, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt telling reporters on Tuesday the meeting would be a "listening exercise."
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska |
REUTERS
Trump told reporters on Wednesday that he might broker a second meeting that includes both Putin and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy if the Alaska session goes well.
Russia has given no indication it is prepared to make concessions amid Ukrainian worries that Trump might make a deal without their input. Zelenskyy says he would like to see a ceasefire first followed by security guarantees.
Sweeteners and complaints
When Trump assumed office again in January, the Republican president tried to revive the warmth between the two leaders from his first term, expressing sympathy for Putin's isolated position in the world and vowing to end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours.
As the administration eased pressure on Russia, some Trump aides parroted Russian talking points to the dismay of Ukraine's backers. In March, U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff implied in a podcast interview with conservative commentator Tucker Carlson that Russia had a right to capture four mainland regions of Ukraine — Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson — because "they're Russian speaking."
And in a dramatic White House meeting in February, Trump and Vice President JD Vance berated Zelenskyy for his handling of the war, to the delight of hardliners in Russia.
Despite all the sweeteners, the Russian leader has refused to play along with Trump's efforts to steer the two sides into a peace deal. Putin has talked to Trump regularly but has kept up deadly bombing raids against Ukraine.
The ongoing bloodshed prompted Trump to shift to a tougher stance in July and complain that Putin was stalling him. Trump has agreed to send new weapons to Ukraine — that Europe will pay for — and has threatened new financial penalties for Moscow.
Trump last week imposed an additional 25% tariff on India for buying Russian oil — indirect pressure on Moscow — but has held back from following through on his threats to impose stiffer sanctions. On Wednesday, he threatened "severe consequences" if Russia will not make a deal.
"While the tone coming out of the White House has shifted, it has not yet been followed up with an expansion of U.S. sanctions — Trump's deadlines for additional sanctions keep getting pushed back — or new financial commitments from Washington to strengthen Ukrainian security," said Nicholas Fenton, of the Europe, Russia, and Eurasia Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
On Monday, Trump said he should know within two minutes whether Putin is willing to make concessions. "I may say, lots of luck. Keep fighting. Or I may say, we can make a deal," he said.
The lure of the deal
For Trump, who is drawn to the spectacle of a high-profile summit with the world watching, the lure of making a deal is strong.
He has engaged in an open campaign for a Nobel Peace Prize this year, pointing to what he has claimed as his diplomatic victories, and has unnerved U.S. allies with his eagerness for a Ukraine peace deal that they fret could embolden Putin.
In recent days, Ukrainian and European leaders have protested Trump's assertion that Russia and Ukraine will have to engage in land swaps in order to reach a peace deal.
While Russia occupies Crimea and large swaths of eastern Ukraine, the Ukrainians no longer hold any Russian territory, raising the question of what, exactly, could be exchanged.
Trump insists that, given his personal relationship with Putin, he is the only one who can bring the war to an end.
John Bolton, who was one of Trump's national security advisers in his first term and is now a sharp critic, said he was concerned that Putin was "beginning to work his magic" on Trump.
"Personal relations obviously have a place in foreign affairs, just like they do in everything else. But when you're one of the world's hard men like Vladimir Putin, this is not a matter of emotion, this is a matter of cold calculation. Trump doesn't get that point," Bolton said.
In a social media post on Wednesday, Trump complained that "very unfair media is at work on my meeting with Putin," citing the use of quotes from "fired losers" like Bolton.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Dear neighbor': A red carpet for Putin, no ceasefire for Trump
‘Dear neighbor': A red carpet for Putin, no ceasefire for Trump

Japan Times

time13 minutes ago

  • Japan Times

‘Dear neighbor': A red carpet for Putin, no ceasefire for Trump

What Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump shared in the back of the U.S. presidential limousine on the short ride to their longest on-the-record meeting will likely remain a mystery. There was a lot the two presidents left unsaid at the end of an inconclusive Alaska summit — most notably, they made no mention of a ceasefire in Russia's war in Ukraine, Trump's stated goal in going into the talks. Their get-together was capped by one of the shortest news conferences Trump has ever held. The much-anticipated event was surprising for the lack of fireworks and the unusual restraint of a free-wheeling president who'd been upstaged by Putin in Helsinki seven years ago. This time, they took no questions from the packed room of journalists in Anchorage, leaving them to wonder about the details of the tantalizing agreement the pair had mentioned but kept under wraps. The fear going in had been that Ukraine would get sold out. The implication going out was that Trump planned to relay a message that Kyiv and European allies didn't want to hear as he made his way back to Washington on Air Force One. "I'm going to start making a few phone calls and tell them what happened, but we had an extremely productive meeting,' Trump said. "Many points were agreed to. There are just a very few that are left. Some are not that significant, one is probably the most significant, but we have a very good chance of getting there. We didn't get there but we have a very good chance of getting there.' In the moment, Ukraine's worst fears weren't realized — Trump didn't give anything away, at least publicly. But that sentiment could change quickly over the weekend as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy starts piecing together what Trump and Putin hashed out in that nearly three-hour meeting. What exactly were the outstanding points of issue? Russian leader Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump shake hands during a joint news conference at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday. | BLOOMBERG There were plenty of intimations of Russian contentment. Putin seized the initiative by speaking first at the podium alongside Trump, typically the privilege of the host. The Russian leader spoke of an "understanding' that he and Trump had reached that he said may even open the door to ending the war that he'd started. Then Putin issued a warning. "We expect that Kyiv and the European capitals will take all this in a constructive manner and will not put up any obstacles, will not attempt to disrupt the planned progress through provocations or backstage intrigues,' he said. There was little solace for Ukraine in an interview Trump then gave to Fox News' Sean Hannity, in which he explicitly put the ball in Zelenskyy's court to "get it done.' He said he might be at a meeting between the Ukrainian leader and Putin, but didn't entirely commit, and still he offered no details of what had been discussed. "There's one or two pretty significant items but I think they can be reached,' Trump said. "It's really up to President Zelenskyy to get it done. And I would also say the European nations, they have to get involved a little bit.' John Herbst, a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, said Trump may well tell his allies "to keep their mouth shut' once he briefs them on the secret details of the meeting with Putin. That will be hard for them to do, especially if the U.K., France and Germany conclude that Ukraine is about to be told to accept a bad deal. "We're in the early stage of a poker game,' said Benjamin Jensen, a senior fellow for the Defense and Security Department at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. By inviting the Russian president onto American soil and giving him an audience, Trump had already delivered a diplomatic win for the strongman leader who became an international pariah for ordering the 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Putin, by all accounts, has ceded nothing in return. The shadows of U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin are cast during a news conference following their meeting to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday. | REUTERS Trump had talked a big game in the lead-up to the summit, saying that he'd know in an instant whether Putin was serious and that he wouldn't hesitate to walk out if he wasn't convinced. In the end he walked down the red carpet — not always in a straight line — and clapped as a jaunty Putin walked over to grab his hand. Perhaps taking stock of the lessons of previous encounters, when the two were left unsupervised without note takers or aides, the White House announced that top aides would join Putin and Trump for their sit-down this time. And yet minutes after the two leaders got off the tarmac, Putin was spotted beaming from inside the "Beast," as the armored limousine is known, seated alone with Trump. The U.S. president appeared solicitous of his guest, urging Putin to walk ahead as they stepped off a podium in front of reporters. The Russian leader had made a point of showing he couldn't hear questions lobbed at him. "President Putin, will you stop killing civilians?' one reporter shouted. Putin put his hand up to his ear but didn't answer. Those private 10 minutes were all the time Putin needed to feel the flight across the Bering Strait had been worth it. He was in Alaska, the U.S. state the Russian czar had sold to the Americans more than 150 years ago, for about as long as the flight over: four hours. His pool reporters were treated to "Chicken Kiev" (pointedly spelled the Russian way) along the way. Putin's veteran foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, played his part by arriving in Anchorage in jeans and a white sweater emblazoned with USSR in black Cyrillic letters. Earlier in the day, Trump had made of point of saying he'd consulted with Belarus's autocratic leader, Alexander Lukashenko. U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin speak after a joint news conference following a U.S.-Russia summit on Ukraine at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday. | Sputnik / POOL / VIA AFP-JIJI That was an alarming signal for many traditional U.S. allies. Dubbed "the last dictator in Europe' by the Republican administration of President George W. Bush, Lukashenko is Putin's closest ally and under international sanctions, including by the U.S. None of that seemed to bother Trump, who said they'd had a "wonderful' chat. Putin laid the flattery on thick in Anchorage, putting the focus firmly on the relationship with the U.S. as Russia's neighbor separated by a only a few kilometers of water across the Bering Strait. "When we met, we got off the planes, I said 'good afternoon, dear neighbor, it's very nice to see you in good health and alive.' And it sounds very neighborly, in my opinion, kind,' he told the assembled reporters. "We are close neighbors, that is a fact.' He made little reference to the Ukrainian neighbor that Russia invaded. In a day punctuated by memorable images though ultimately wrapped in enigma, there was a telling moment of clarity. Putin, in power for more than a quarter of a century, has studied English but rarely resorts to speaking it in public. Even before he landed in Alaska, it was clear that Putin was already angling for another meeting with Trump, this time on Russian soil. Just as he opened the briefing to reporters, he also found a way to close it. "Next time in Moscow,' Putin suggested in English. "Oh, that's an interesting one,' Trump replied. "I'll get a little heat on that one, but I could see it possibly happening.'

Trump administration agrees to keep DC police chief in place, but with immigration enforcement order
Trump administration agrees to keep DC police chief in place, but with immigration enforcement order

The Mainichi

time2 hours ago

  • The Mainichi

Trump administration agrees to keep DC police chief in place, but with immigration enforcement order

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Trump administration on Friday reversed course and agreed to leave the Washington, D.C., police chief in control of the department, while Attorney General Pam Bondi, in a new memo, directed the District's police to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement regardless of any city law. The order from Bondi came after officials in the nation's capital sued Friday to block President Donald Trump's takeover of the Washington police. The night before, his administration had escalated its intervention into the city's law enforcement by naming a federal official as the new emergency head of the department, essentially placing the police force under the full control of the federal government. The attorney general's new order represents a partial retreat for the Trump administration in the face of intense skepticism from a judge over the legality of Bondi's earlier directive. But Bondi also signaled the administration would continue to pressure D.C. leaders to help federal authorities aggressively pursue immigrants in the country illegally, despite city laws on the books that limit cooperation between police and immigration authorities. In a social media post Friday evening, Bondi criticized D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb, saying he "continues to oppose our efforts to improve public safety." But she added, "We remain committed to working closely with Mayor Bowser." Mayor Muriel Bowser's office said late Friday that it was still evaluating how it can comply with the new Bondi order on immigration enforcement operations. The police department already eased some restrictions on cooperating with federal officials facilitating Trump's mass-deportation campaign but reaffirmed that it would follow the district's sanctuary city laws. In a letter sent Friday night to D.C. citizens, Bowser wrote: "It has been an unsettling and unprecedented week in our city. Over the course of a week, the surge in federal law enforcement across D.C. has created waves of anxiety." She added that "our limited self-government has never faced the type of test we are facing right now," but added that if Washingtonians stick together, "we will show the entire nation what it looks like to fight for American democracy -- even when we don't have full access to it." The legal battle was the latest evidence of the escalating tensions in a mostly Democratic city that now has its police department largely under the control of the Republican president's administration. Trump's takeover is historic, yet it had played out with a slow ramp-up in federal law enforcement officials and National Guard troops to start the week. As the weekend approached, though, signs across the city -- from the streets to the legal system -- suggested a deepening crisis over who controls the city's immigration and policing policies, the district's right to govern itself and daily life for the millions of people who live and work in the metro area. A push for compromise The two sides sparred in court for hours Friday before U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes, who is overseeing the district's lawsuit. She indicated the law likely doesn't grant the Trump administration power to fully take over city police, but it probably does give the president more power than the city might like. "The way I read the statute, the president can ask, the mayor must provide, but the president can't control," said Reyes, who was nominated to the bench by Democratic President Joe Biden. The judge pushed the two sides to make a compromise. An attorney for the Trump administration, Yaakov Roth, said the move to sideline Metropolitan Police Department Chief Pamela Smith came after an immigration order that still held back some aid to federal authorities. He argued that the president has broad authority to determine what kind of help police in Washington must provide. The police takeover is the latest move by Trump to test the limits of his legal authorities to carry out his agenda, relying on obscure statutes and a supposed state of emergency to bolster his tough-on-crime message and his plans to speed up the mass deportation of people in the United States illegally. It also marks one of the most sweeping assertions of federal authority over a local government in modern times. While Washington has grappled with spikes in violence and visible homelessness, the city's homicide rate ranks below those of several other major U.S. cities, and the capital is not in the throes of the public safety collapse the Trump administration has portrayed. The president has more power over the nation's capital than other cities, but D.C. has elected its own mayor and city council since the Home Rule Act was signed in 1973. Trump is the first president to exert control over the city's police force since it was passed. The law limits that control to 30 days without congressional approval, though Trump has suggested he'd seek to extend it. Chief had agreed to share immigration information Bondi's Thursday night directive to place the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration, Terry Cole, in charge of the police department came even after Smith had told MPD officers hours earlier to share information with immigration agencies regarding people not in custody, such as someone involved in a traffic stop or checkpoint. The Justice Department said Bondi disagreed with the police chief's instructions because they allowed for continued practice of "sanctuary policies," which generally limit cooperation by local law enforcement with federal immigration officers. Meanwhile, advocates in Washington were trying to advise immigrants on how to respond. Anusce Sanai, associate legal director for the Washington-based immigrant nonprofit Ayuda, said they're still parsing the legal aspects of the policies. "Even with the most anti-immigrant administration, we would always tell our clients that they must call the police, that they should call the police," Sanai said. "But now we find ourselves that we have to be very careful on what we advise." Amy Fischer, an organizer with Migrant Solidarity Mutual Aid, said that before the federal takeover, most of what they had seen in the nation's capital was Immigration and Customs Enforcement targeting specific individuals. But since last Friday night they've seen a "really significant change," she said, with ICE and federal officers doing roving patrols around the city. She said a hotline set up by immigration advocates to report ICE activity "is receiving calls almost off the hook." ICE said in a post on X that their teams had arrested "several" people in Washington Friday. A video posted on X showed two uniformed personnel putting handcuffs on someone while standing outside a white transport van. Residents are seeing a significant show of force A population already tense from days of ramp-up has begun seeing more significant shows of force across the city. National Guard troops watched over some of the world's most renowned landmarks, and Humvees took position in front of the busy main train station. Volunteers helped homeless people leave long-standing encampments -- to where was often unclear. Friday night along the district's U Street, a popular nightlife corridor, an Associated Press photographer saw officers from the FBI, the DEA, the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Park Police, U.S. Marshals and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store