logo
I ran 40 miles in the New Balance Rebel v5 and I don't want to take them off

I ran 40 miles in the New Balance Rebel v5 and I don't want to take them off

Tom's Guide10-07-2025
The New Balance Rebel v5 is a shoe runners need to know about. For me, it outperforms wildly popular shoes like the Nike Pegasus 41 and Hoka Clifton 10 as a daily trainer thanks to its comfortable, versatile ride.
It's not an exceptionally fast shoe, but even there it works well enough owing to its lightweight design, and it's also highly stable for such a light shoe.
Overall it ticks almost all the boxes, and its reasonable price also helps to make it one of the best running shoes available.
Unless you want a speedier daily trainer like the Adidas Adizero Evo SL, or even more cushioning from a shoe like the Asics Novablast 5, then the Rebel v5 should be at the top of your list.
The New Balance Rebel v5 launched in May 2025 and costs $140 in the U.S. and £140 in the U.K., which is about par for a daily trainer and in line with its main rivals like the Asics Novablast 5 and Adidas Adizero Evo SL.
The New Balance Rebel v5 is currently available in eight colors including the 'angora with earth shadow and sea salt' design I tested.
I found the shoe fit me well in my normal running shoe size. It has a comfortable fit with a fairly wide toe-box, and there's a wide version of the shoe available if needed.
The shoe has a midsole stack height of 35mm at the heel and 29mm at the forefoot for a 6mm heel-to-toe- drop. It has a higher midsole than the Rebel v4 to increase the underfoot comfort, and a wide base to ensure it's a stable shoe.
Despite the considerable amount of foam underfoot, the Rebel v5 is still a very lightweight shoe at 7.9oz in my US men's size 9.5 — that's a lot lighter than rival daily trainers like the Asics Novablast 5 and Nike Pegasus 41.
The Rebel v5 has a thin and breathable upper that has a little padding around the collar but is more focused on being lightweight than a very plush feel.
I still found the upper comfortable on long runs, and the fit is secure during faster efforts. It's a great, simple upper that breathes well in hot conditions.
The FuelCell midsole foam in the Rebel v5 is made from a blend of PEBA and EVA materials, as opposed to the full PEBA version of FuelCell used in New Balance SC Elite v5 — the flagship carbon plate racing shoe in the range.
This blended foam is less springy than the full-PEBA FuelCell, but it still has a little bounce and delivers a comfortable ride that protects the body well from the impact of running
The forefoot and heel of the Rebel v5 are covered with a pretty thick layer of rubber, and while there is exposed foam in the midfoot I have no concerns about the durability of the shoe so far, with no wear and tear even after running on light trails in the shoe.
It has also gripped well for me during testing, though I have been using it in the summer and haven't had to tackle any runs in wet or icy conditions.
It's rare for a shoe as light as the New Balance Rebel v5 to also be as stable and comfortable as it is, and as a result it's a highly versatile shoe.
I found it comfortable enough for cruising through easy and long runs, where the wide base gives a secure and stable feel to the ride.
Max-cushioned shoes like the Asics Novablast 5 have even more foam underfoot, which some runners might prefer, but the Rebel v5 is certainly soft and comfortable enough for the long haul.
It's also light enough for faster workouts, though I'd say the design lends itself more to easy and steady runs rather than all-out speedwork
That's because the foam in the midsole isn't that springy, it feels more like it's designed to soak up the impact of running rather than be very responsive.
The wide midsole also detracts from how nimble the Rebel v5 feels during faster runs, and it doesn't have a very aggressive rocker like the Adidas Adizero Evo SL, or early models of the Rebel line.
It certainly can handle tempo runs and interval sessions and if you want one running shoe to do it all it's one of the better options on the market, but if you have a running shoe rotation I'd pair the Rebel v5 with a more speed-focused shoe myself.
The New Balance Rebel v5 is a great daily trainer and it will suit a wide range of runners thanks to its comfort and versatility.
There are faster daily shoes like the Adidas Adizero Evo SL and Hoka Mach 6, but they are not as comfortable and stable as the Rebel v5.
Similarly you can get a more cushioned daily trainer for extra comfort, like the Asics Novablast 5 or Hoka Clifton 10, but they aren't as lightweight and speedy as the Rebel.
It is more comfortable than the Rebel v4 thanks to the higher midsole stack, though if you spot the older shoe in the sales I still think it's worth considering because it does have a similar ride to the Rebel v5.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Asics Novablast 5 vs. Nike Pegasus 41: Which running shoe should you get?
Asics Novablast 5 vs. Nike Pegasus 41: Which running shoe should you get?

Tom's Guide

time6 hours ago

  • Tom's Guide

Asics Novablast 5 vs. Nike Pegasus 41: Which running shoe should you get?

The Asics Novablast 5 is more cushioned and rockered than the Nike Pegasus 41, while also being a little lighter. It's not as good-looking as the Nike, though, and some runners might prefer the more natural, grounded feel of the Pegasus 41. The Nike Pegasus 41 largely sticks to the formula that has made it a successful shoe for over four decades, offering a balance between comfort and speed for daily training. It's great for the gym as well as running, and the Pegasus 41 has a more sprightly ride than its predecessor. The Asics Novablast 5 and Nike Pegasus 41 are among the best running shoes I've tested, and both are very popular with new and experienced runners alike. Both shoes are good value and have comfortable and hardy designs that work well for a wide range of runners and running styles. I've logged over 40 miles in both shoes during my testing, using them for a mix of training runs, and there are pros and cons to each that might make one or the other more suitable for you. I've focused on their comparative strengths and weaknesses below, and for more detail on either shoe, check out our Nike Pegasus 41 review and Asics Novablast 5 review. The Nike Pegasus 41 is the slightly cheaper shoe at $145 vs $150 for the Asics Novablast 5, and the Pegasus is also the shoe that appears more frequently in sales. The Novablast 5 is yet to really be discounted, though you can find deals on the Novablast 4 quite easily, and it's a pretty similar shoe in my opinion. The Nike Pegasus 41 is currently available in 16 colors, and you can also design your own. There are also special editions of the shoe for college and pro sports teams, so you can really get a Pegasus that suits your personal preferences all round. There is less choice with the Novablast 5, but it is still available in 15 colors. Both shoes are available in wide fits as well, and I found they both fit me well in my normal running shoe size. The Novablast 5 is the higher stack shoe, standing 41.5mm at the heel and 33.5mm at the forefoot for an 8mm drop. The Pegasus 41 has 37mm of cushioning at the heel and 27mm at the forefoot for a 10mm drop. Despite having more foam underfoot, the Novablast 5 is lighter, weighing 9.6oz in my US men's size 10. The Pegasus 41 weighs 10.3oz in the same size. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Both shoes have comfortable uppers with padding around the tongue and collar that hold the foot securely on the run. Neither is especially breathable, though, and the thick tongue on the Pegasus 41 means it can get a bit warm on hot days. The Novablast 5 uses Asics' FF Blast Max Plus foam in its midsole, which provides plenty of comfort without being too soft or unstable. It has sidewalls of foam that your foot sits within to create more stability, and a mild rocker to ease you from heel to toe as you run. There are two foams in the midsole of the Pegasus 41. Most of the midsole is made from ReactX, which is designed for comfort, while two Air Zoom pods — one under the heel and one under the forefoot — add a bit more pop and responsiveness to the ride. The Pegasus 41 has a thicker outsole than the Novablast 5, and rubber covers more of the bottom of the shoe. This is one reason it weighs more, but the benefit is increased durability, and the Pegasus 41 will stand up better to use on light trails than the Novablast 5. It also offers slightly better grip on wet pavements than the Novablast 5, which can be a bit slippery, especially on your first couple of runs. After that, I found the rubber outsole roughed up a bit and provided better traction. Both shoes are capable daily trainers, in that they can handle a variety of runs quite well while being best suited to easy efforts. The Novablast 5 has a smoother ride and is more comfortable. It also has a wider base and feels stable on the run despite its high stack. I particularly enjoyed long runs in the shoe, and while it's not a bouncy or particularly exciting ride, it's a bit more lively underfoot than the Pegasus 41 at fast paces. There's a snappier feel to the Nike Pegasus 41, partly because it has a higher drop but also because it doesn't have as much of a rockered design as the Novablast 5. It's not as comfortable, especially under the forefoot, but it has a nimbler ride that gives you more feel for the ground. At faster paces, I found the Novablast 5 to be a little more effective, and I prefer the smoother feel of the Asics for easy and long runs, too. The Pegasus 41 was still comfortable, though, and some runners might favor its more traditional and agile design, because the Novablast 5 can feel quite large on the foot, even though it's not heavy. While the Novablast 5 and Pegasus 41 are both good shoes, I prefer the Novablast 5 myself as a running shoe. I would recommend it over the Pegasus 41 if you want a comfortable shoe for all your runs, or one to add to a rotation just for easy and long sessions. However, there are a few factors that could swing me to the Pegasus 41. For one, it's cheaper and often drops nearer $100 in sales. It's also more durable thanks to its thick outsole, and will work better as your only workout shoe if you also use it in the gym or for other sports. Also, looks aren't everything in a running shoe, but the Pegasus 41 is better for casual use in my opinion. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

New Balance 2000 ABZORB Arrives in a Sleek "Triple Black"
New Balance 2000 ABZORB Arrives in a Sleek "Triple Black"

Hypebeast

timea day ago

  • Hypebeast

New Balance 2000 ABZORB Arrives in a Sleek "Triple Black"

Name:New Balance 2000 ABZORB 'Triple Black'Colorway:Triple BlackSKU:U2000ETBRetail Price:$170 USDRelease Date:Fall 2025Retailers:New Balance TheNew Balance 2000 ABZORBarrives in a sleek 'Triple Black' colorway, offering a refined interpretation of early 2000s running shoe aesthetics. This release is a testament to New Balance's commitment to both innovation and heritage, blending a bold, futuristic silhouette with a timeless monochromatic palette. The shoe's silhouette is a key feature, distinguished by a progressive and experimental design. The upper is constructed with a breathable mesh base, overlaid with subtle, screen-printed patterns on the mudguard, midfoot, and eyestays. This layered construction provides depth and visual texture, preventing the all-black design from appearing one-dimensional. The iconic 'N' logo is present, rendered in a tonal application that underscores the shoe's sleek, minimalist influence. At the core of its design is the advanced sole unit. The full-length ABZORB SBS pod system is meticulously integrated into the midsole, showcasing New Balance's visible technology. This cushioning system, a hallmark of the brand's performance heritage, is engineered to provide superior impact absorption and comfort. The segmented midsole, complete with a Stability Web shank, not only delivers a distinctive aesthetic but also ensures a stable and supportive make.

Plug Power (PLUG) Q2 Earnings Report Preview: What To Look For
Plug Power (PLUG) Q2 Earnings Report Preview: What To Look For

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Plug Power (PLUG) Q2 Earnings Report Preview: What To Look For

Fuel cell technology Plug Power (NASDAQ:PLUG) will be announcing earnings results this Monday afternoon. Here's what investors should know. Plug Power beat analysts' revenue expectations by 1.3% last quarter, reporting revenues of $133.7 million, up 11.2% year on year. It was a mixed quarter for the company, with a solid beat of analysts' adjusted operating income estimates but a significant miss of analysts' EBITDA estimates. Is Plug Power a buy or sell going into earnings? Read our full analysis here, it's free. This quarter, analysts are expecting Plug Power's revenue to grow 9.9% year on year to $157.6 million, a reversal from the 44.9% decrease it recorded in the same quarter last year. Adjusted loss is expected to come in at -$0.16 per share. Heading into earnings, analysts covering the company have grown increasingly bullish with revenue estimates seeing 4 upward revisions over the last 30 days (we track 11 analysts). Looking at Plug Power's peers in the renewable energy segment, some have already reported their Q2 results, giving us a hint as to what we can expect. Generac delivered year-on-year revenue growth of 6.3%, beating analysts' expectations by 3.4%, and Sunrun reported revenues up 8.7%, topping estimates by 4%. Generac traded up 28.9% following the results while Sunrun was also up 16.5%. Read our full analysis of Generac's results here and Sunrun's results here. Investors in the renewable energy segment have had steady hands going into earnings, with share prices flat over the last month. Plug Power is down 9% during the same time and is heading into earnings with an average analyst price target of $1.94 (compared to the current share price of $1.48). Unless you've been living under a rock, it should be obvious by now that generative AI is going to have a huge impact on how large corporations do business. While Nvidia and AMD are trading close to all-time highs, we prefer a lesser-known (but still profitable) semiconductor stock benefiting from the rise of AI. Click here to access our free report on our favorite semiconductor growth story. StockStory is growing and hiring equity analyst and marketing roles. Are you a 0 to 1 builder passionate about the markets and AI? See the open roles here. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store