logo
US funding halted, futures at stake - finding a path forward for SA's healthcare workers

US funding halted, futures at stake - finding a path forward for SA's healthcare workers

The Star13-05-2025
Donald McMillan | Published 3 hours ago
As public hospitals struggle with fewer staff and shrinking resources, the country is at risk of losing not only jobs but skills, infrastructure, and hope. But there are still ways to keep services running and people employed, says the writer.
Image: Picture: Oupa Mokoena Independent Newspapers
South Africa's healthcare system is under serious pressure. The sudden suspension of critical US funding has resulted in the loss of around 15 000 healthcare jobs - many of them linked to HIV/AIDS programmes that served as lifelines for vulnerable communities.
Combined with broader public sector budget cuts and a national hiring freeze, the situation threatens to undo decades of progress in healthcare delivery.
As public hospitals struggle with fewer staff and shrinking resources, the country is at risk of losing not only jobs but skills, infrastructure, and hope.
But in the face of these challenges, there are still ways to keep services running and people employed. One of them is through Temporary Employment Services (TES), which provides a flexible staffing approach that can help stabilise the system while longer-term solutions are explored. A healthcare system under pressure
The US aid cut has had an immediate and devastating impact. Programmes focused on HIV, tuberculosis, and reproductive health, many of which were propped up by international donor funding, have been forced to scale back or shut down entirely. Thousands of community healthcare workers, nurses, counsellors, and administrators have found themselves jobless, while patients are left facing longer wait times and reduced access to care.
At the same time, cost-cutting across the public sector has put a freeze on new hires, even in essential departments like health and the impact is already being felt. With public hospitals and clinics stretched thin, they're unable to take on newly trained doctors and nurses. And while the private sector plays a role, it simply cannot absorb the overflow. This isn't just a staffing issue; it's a setback for the entire healthcare system, affecting everything from medical training to frontline care.
Every year, South Africa produces thousands of highly trained doctors and healthcare workers, many of whom move into the public health system after completing their compulsory community service. These roles used to be a given, but with hiring freezes and shrinking budgets, many young professionals are now finishing their training with nowhere to go. Despite their skills and frontline experience, these workers are left in limbo.
This is a double blow as South Africa loses out on the return from its investment in their education, while the risk of a growing skills drain looms large. With countries like the UK, Australia, and Canada actively recruiting healthcare workers, there's a real chance they may leave and not come back.
In response to this crisis, temporary employment solutions have become a practical and effective solution. TES providers offer qualified healthcare professionals short- to medium-term flexible contracts, enabling them to continue working in their field while delivering essential support to overburdened healthcare facilities.
This approach offers a lifeline not just for displaced workers but for clinics and hospitals struggling with limited resources. TES employees can be rapidly deployed where they are needed most, whether to cover staff shortages, serve remote communities, or support seasonal fluctuations in demand. Unlike permanent hires, they don't carry long-term costs such as medical aid or pension contributions, making them a more budget-conscious option in uncertain times.
The benefits of the TES model have already been proven. During the COVID-19 pandemic, temporary staff played a key role in scaling up testing, vaccination, and treatment efforts across the sector. That same adaptability is needed now to respond to the healthcare funding crisis.
While temporary employment solutions cannot solve the problem alone, they can provide an important stopgap and potentially a new way of thinking about workforce planning in the healthcare sector. Rather than relying solely on permanent positions, South Africa may need to adopt a more fluid, demand-based deployment model that allows professionals to move between roles, regions, and areas of urgent need.
Shifting to this model calls for a change in mindset. Permanent posts have traditionally been seen as the gold standard in healthcare, valued for their stability and benefits. But in a time of uncertainty, contract and locum roles - especially when managed by trusted TES providers - can offer a practical alternative, combining income, ongoing experience, and flexibility. Retaining talent, restoring hope
Avoiding long-term damage to South Africa's healthcare system will require urgent, coordinated action. Government departments must urgently reprioritise spending toward essential services like health and education.
At the same time, private healthcare providers and staffing agencies must step up and work together to ensure that skilled professionals are not lost to the system or the country.
Despite the current turbulence, South Africa's healthcare workers remain among the best trained and most resilient in the world and with the right support structures, including flexible employment options like TES, we can preserve our healthcare capacity and continue to serve those who need it most.
Donald McMillan, Managing Director at Allmed Healthcare Professionals
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Here's what SA's teen girls want you to know about their state of mind
Here's what SA's teen girls want you to know about their state of mind

TimesLIVE

time14 hours ago

  • TimesLIVE

Here's what SA's teen girls want you to know about their state of mind

Think of a young woman's world like a series of circles, each one influencing the next. At the centre is the girl herself — her thoughts, feelings and personal struggles. Around her are her relationships with family and friends, and with school and the community. And then there's the bigger picture: a society fraught with inequality and impossible expectations. Our team of researchers used this framework to make sense of the ways those circles of influence affect the mental health of South Africa's teen girls and young women. The data is limited, but what we do know shows numbers that are staggering. A 2022 study of learners in the Western Cape found that one in three were experiencing symptoms of depression, while research in Mpumalanga showed that just over a quarter did — with girls far more likely to be depressed than boys of the same age. Our earlier work highlighted what we called a sexual and reproductive mental health syndemic — a messy mix of overlapping sexual and reproductive health risks and emotional struggles. When girls feel isolated, unsupported and under constant pressure, it often leads to taking bigger risks, such as having sex with the wrong people for the wrong reasons, or not using a condom, heightening their chances of contracting HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, falling pregnant without planning for it, and mental health problems. Several studies have looked at the social, economic, environmental, physiological and interpersonal factors that play a part in mental health struggles among young people in South Africa. But there has been scant focus on how young women themselves see the different issues influencing their mental health and wellbeing. We sat down with over 50 young women between the ages of 15 and 24 from two communities — one in KwaZulu-Natal and the other in North West — with high rates of HIV, early pregnancy and school drop-outs. What they shared with us showed how stress doesn't just come from one place — it strikes from every angle. But they also told us how despite the challenges they face, they somehow manage to keep it together.

Why South African women still lack access to reproductive health services
Why South African women still lack access to reproductive health services

IOL News

time21 hours ago

  • IOL News

Why South African women still lack access to reproductive health services

Despite South Africa's progressive Constitution guaranteeing sexual and reproductive health rights, women face significant barriers in accessing these services, says the writer. Image: AI Ron South Africa's Constitution articulates one of the world's most progressive visions for human rights. But after 30 years into democracy, the daily reality of women's sexual and reproductive health rights (SRHR) boldly contradicts the spirit of that promise. Section 27(1)(a) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa guarantees access to health care services, including reproductive health, to everyone living in the country, regardless of their immigration status. South Africa's legal architecture around SRHR is extensive. Beyond Section 27, the Constitution affirms the right to bodily and psychological integrity under Section 12(2)(a), explicitly including reproductive decision-making. The Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act 92 of 1996 translated these rights into policy, permitting abortion on request within the first 12 weeks of pregnancy and under specific conditions thereafter. No parental or spousal consent is required. This is a rare marker of autonomy on the African continent. In theory, SRHR includes far more than abortion. It spans contraception, antenatal and postnatal care, treatment for sexually transmitted infections, cancer screening, and comprehensive sex education. These are essential tools not just for health, but for women's autonomy. Services like antenatal care, family planning, HIV testing, and termination procedures are rights and not privileges in South Africa. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Although South African law guarantees access to SRHR services, several gaps persist, including: • Adolescents face judgment from health workers when requesting contraception, even though the Children's Act allows access from age 12. • Women with disabilities report being denied services due to a lack of trained providers and physical infrastructure. • Many rural clinics lack midwives, specialist doctors, and even running water, turning basic care into a logistical marathon.• Migrant and undocumented women are being denied health services in certain areas, due to their status in the country. The result? Women resort to unsafe abortions, suffer undiagnosed infections, and navigate pregnancies without professional support. Rights exist, but implementation remains uneven, inaccessible, and in some cases, non-existent. Seshni Moodley , admitted attorney , director of Seshni Moodley attorneys incorporated. Image: Supplied The statistics speak volumes. According to the research I conducted for my LLM dissertation—a comparative analysis of women's SRHR in South Africa and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, unsafe abortions account for approximately 52–58% of the 260,000 estimated abortions performed annually in South Africa. Maternal mortality remains disproportionately high in underserved areas. Women with HIV are often denied appropriate fertility treatment or cervical cancer screening, despite being at increased risk. This research also makes it clear that South African women do not lack rights. They lack access. Rights remain theoretical unless they are realised at the point of need, the clinic, the hospital, the mobile unit. Based on the findings in that research, the following recommendations offer a pathway forward: • Implement the National Health Insurance Act: This will equalise access to comprehensive SRHR across socioeconomic lines, including free services at private practitioners for those who need them most. • Deploy more mobile clinics to remote areas: Rural women should not be penalised for their geography. Mobile clinics offer a direct bridge to primary services such as contraception, antenatal care, and family planning. • Increase specialist staff and midwives at public facilities: More obstetricians and gynaecologists, not only in urban centres but rural hospitals, are essential to addressing maternal morbidity. Midwives, often the first contact for SRHR, are a critical resource and their numbers should be increased especially in rural health facilities. This will reduce maternal mortality and improve reproductive outcomes. • Strengthen youth-focused SRHR programming: The National Adolescent SRHR Strategy must be revitalised with consistent sexual education and confidential services in all provinces.• Prioritise reproductive justice for marginalised groups. This includes migrant and undocumented women, women with disabilities, and women living with HIV. All face compounded discrimination in accessing care. Targeted policy shifts and service adaptations are essential. These are not luxuries. They are constitutional obligations and moral imperatives. South Africa's National Human Rights Commission must also step up. Monitoring the implementation of SRHR across public hospitals, rural clinics, and community-based services is central to its mandate. Human rights are not realised in courtrooms alone. They are lived in the everyday spaces where women seek care, and where care is often not available. The bottom line is South African women do not lack rights. They lack access. Until the state commits to investing not only in legislation but in delivery as well as staffing, infrastructure, outreach, and education, then SRHR will remain a constitutional promise, not a public health reality. South African women are still waiting. *Seshni Moodley is an admitted attorney, director of Seshni Moodley attorneys incorporated , with expertise in digital, civil and criminal law. She holds a masters in human rights law and is currently pursuing her PhD in human rights law. Cape Argus

Health Minister highlights challenges in reclaiming treatment costs for undocumented migrants
Health Minister highlights challenges in reclaiming treatment costs for undocumented migrants

IOL News

timea day ago

  • IOL News

Health Minister highlights challenges in reclaiming treatment costs for undocumented migrants

Health Minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi. Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Newspapers Provincial health departments lack a mechanism to reclaim unpaid costs incurred for treating migrants in the public health facilities from their countries of origin. This was revealed by Health minister Aaron Motsoaledi in response to parliamentary questions posed by EFF MP Nqobile Mhlongo. Mhlongo asked about the expenditure by provincial health departments on emergency and/or triage healthcare for undocumented migrants in the 2024/25 financial year. 'Currently there is no mechanism for the provincial departments of health to recover the costs from the countries of origins for all immigrants if their accounts remain unpaid,' Motsoaledi said. Motsoaledi also said the departments do not segregate any data related to documented and undocumented migrants. 'The department is working on finalising the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response Strategy, which aims at strengthening surveillance systems including improvements on collection of data about nationality, irrespective of the legal status of clients in the country,' he said when asked about the number of public health facilities that exceeded capacity due to migrant patient volumes. Motsoaledi explained that the National Health Insurance Act provides that nobody may be refused emergency medical treatment in line with the Constitution. 'Section 27(1) of the Constitution provides that everyone has the right to have access to health care services within the state's available resources. Section 4 of the NHIA mandates who will be required to pay for elements of their health care. It does not exclude anyone from accessing healthcare,' he said. Motsoaledi's response comes amid ActionSA slamming the department for not keeping track of nationalities of patients treated in public healthcare facilities. Activists from Operation Dudula have until recently attempted to turn away foreign nationals seeking treatment at public health facilities. Responding to ActionSA MP Kgosi Letlape, the minister cited the Constitution which provides that everyone has the right to access healthcare services, including reproductive healthcare, and that no one may be refused emergency medical treatment. 'Health care is provided based on clinical need, not on nationality or documentation status," he said. However, Letlape said in the absence of tracking, verification or appropriate data collection, the department was unable to account for the full scope of service delivery liabilities. 'We believe that this is particularly concerning given that millions of foreign nationals, many of whom are undocumented or lack any form of medical insurance, reasonably make use of taxpayer-funded public healthcare services. 'In a public health system already buckling under pressure, with overcrowded hospitals, long queues, understaffing and medicine shortages, this lack of oversight is reckless and unsustainable.' Letlape also said the absence of patient categorisation severely compromises effective planning, budgeting, and policy formulation. 'This is further compounded by the lack of any identification or status verification mechanism, which means patients are not required to present identification, preventing healthcare providers from verifying legal status or maintaining accurate and continuous patient records,' he said. Motsoaledi clarified that the country's health system was under pressure due to several factors that included but were not limited to budget cuts, infrastructure challenges and human resources constraints. The clarification was a response to EFF MP Chumani Matiwane who asked whether he has found that the ongoing crisis in the public healthcare system stemmed primarily from structural under-investment, maladministration and systemic weaknesses, rather than the treatment of foreign nationals. He was also asked about steps his department has taken to ensure that healthcare access remained non-discriminatory amid the increasing public pressure and demonstrations targeting foreign nationals in public healthcare facilities. Motsoaledi stated that it was only the Department of Home Affairs, which has the ability to know whether a person is legal or not in the country. 'However, we do not refer patients to Home Affairs, but we can report that provincial Departments of Health and health facilities have reported a high number of undocumented patients accessing health services. As we have stated above, we do not legally know the nationalities of such undocumented patients.' Cape Times

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store