Homeowners could find it easier to remortgage or reduce their mortgage term
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said the shake-up is part of reforms to mortgage rules to help people navigate their financial lives.
The FCA is removing guidance that has 'served its purpose' to reduce the regulatory burden on firms.
Under the changes, borrowers could find it easier to reduce their mortgage term, helping to lower the total cost of borrowing and reduce the risk of repayment extending into retirement, the regulator said.
It is removing a requirement for a full affordability assessment when reducing the term of a mortgage, but lenders are still expected to consider affordability where they choose to use the changes.
For example, firms must act to avoid causing foreseeable harm and must monitor and regularly review the outcomes customers are experiencing, the regulator said.
People should also find it easier to switch to a new lender to remortgage, if they wish to, helping them to access cheaper products.
Consumers could see their choice improved by allowing for simpler affordability assessments, where a proposed remortgage is on similar terms to an existing contract, but more affordable than a new deal indicated by a customer's existing lender.
The FCA expects many borrowers to continue to benefit from regulated mortgage advice.
Lenders are expected to consider what is appropriate to identify consumers who need advice or other support.
Emad Aladhal, director of retail banking at the FCA, said: 'We are helping more people navigate their financial lives by supporting those who can afford to buy a home and supporting competition in the mortgage market.
'Consumer needs have changed over recent years, and our rules are changing too.
'Today's changes support growth by simplifying some of our rules, saving consumers time and money, while ensuring they still benefit from advice, where needed.
'We want lenders to use these changes to innovate and better serve aspiring homeowners and existing borrowers.
'These reforms are another significant step in our mortgage rule review, which we're delivering quickly.
'They are supported by the strong protections we've already put in place for consumers in the mortgage market.'
The regulator said reform of the mortgage market is possible due to the continuation of high standards, such as the Consumer Duty, which requires lenders to put customers at the heart of what they do, as well as effective affordability checks and support for people in financial difficulty.
The FCA's policy statement said regulatory reforms introduced after the 2008 financial crisis have improved standards across the mortgage market, with overall mortgage arrears and repossessions remaining low by long-term standards.
The regulator said that, while changes are voluntary for firms, supporting sustainable home ownership and a competitive mortgage market is a collective responsibility.
Changes to mortgage rules were included in the FCA's letter to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer earlier this year, linking with the Government's aims to support economic growth.
As part of its wider mortgage rule review, the regulator has opened a public discussion on the future of the mortgage market.
It is inviting feedback until September 19 2025.
Many lenders have recently made changes enabling some people to potentially borrow more, following clarification from the regulator.
Paul Matthews, senior director of risk at leading financial services consultancy Broadstone, said: 'The FCA is taking significant steps to make it easier for consumers to make changes to their mortgages and get better support on their available options.
'The easing of regulation will allow lenders greater flexibility to innovate in the market.'
Charles Roe, director of mortgages at UK Finance, said: 'The FCA's reforms are a welcome step to help lenders respond more effectively to customer needs and widen access to homeownership.
'Their optional nature means that firms can apply them in line with their own risk appetites. By reducing regulatory friction and enhancing switching flexibility, the reforms will enable the mortgage sector to continue to support the Government's growth agenda, by supporting both new and existing mortgage customers.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
15 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
FCA considers £950 car finance compensation for motorists
The announcement was made as many motor finance firms were not complying with rules or the law by not providing customers with relevant information about commission paid by lenders to the car dealers who sold the loans, the FCA said. It comes after Friday's (August 1) ruling by the Supreme Court on cases in which the FCA had intervened. While some motor finance customers will not get compensation because in many cases commission payments were legal, the court ruled that in certain circumstances the failure to properly disclose commission arrangements could be unfair and therefore unlawful, the FCA added. Our aim is a compensation scheme that's fair and easy so there's no need to use a claims management company or law firm. We'll publish the consultation by early October and finalise any scheme in time for people to start receiving compensation next — Financial Conduct Authority (@TheFCA) August 3, 2025 The UK's highest court ruled that car dealers did not have a relationship with their customers that would require them to act 'altruistically' in the customers' interest. FCA issues statement on car finance compensation scheme Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the FCA, commented: 'It is clear that some firms have broken the law and our rules. It's fair for their customers to be compensated. 'We also want to ensure that the market, relied on by millions each year, can continue to work well and consumers can get a fair deal. 'Our aim is a compensation scheme that's fair and easy to participate in, so there's no need to use a claims management company or law firm. If you do, it will cost you a significant chunk of any money you get. What can fail an MOT test? 'It will take time to establish a scheme but we hope to start getting people any money they are owed next year.' Recommended reading: The FCA currently estimates that most individuals will probably receive less than £950 in compensation. If the compensation scheme goes ahead, the first payments should be made in 2026. The final total cost of any compensation scheme is currently estimated to be between £9 billion and £18 billion, the FCA added. The consultation will launch by early October.
The Independent
16 hours ago
- The Independent
Lloyds leads FTSE 100 up as European stocks rally
The FTSE 100 rebounded on Monday after Friday's tariff-related sell-off, lifted by gains in Lloyds Banking Group after a less severe than forecast motor finance ruling. The FTSE 100 index closed up 59.72 points, 0.7%, at 9,128.30. The FTSE 250 ended 167.50 points higher, 0.8%, at 21,866.84, and the AIM All-Share closed up 1.73 points, 0.2%, at 758.89. Lloyds rose 8.4% after a more favourable outcome to the probe into motor finance than had been expected. The Financial Conduct Authority said it would consult on an industry-wide redress scheme for consumers 'treated unfairly' by car financing agreements, which it estimated will cost lenders between £9 billion and £18 billion. The UK's financial regulator said it will publish the consultation by early October and finalise any scheme in time for people to start receiving compensation next year. This followed Friday's ruling by the Supreme Court which partially overturned judgments that said controversial car loans were unlawful, although it did uphold one case, which allows the claimant to seek compensation on different grounds. AJ Bell's Russ Mould said this was not a 'complete win' for the banking industry, but that the 'worst-case scenario, like a particularly ugly pothole, has been swerved'. 'Essentially, while this issue could still cause some damage, it looks unlikely to be a repeat of the PPI scandal which blighted the banking industry in the 2010s,' he said. Other motor finance providers were in the green. Close Brothers jumped 23%, S&U 8.6% and Vanquis Banking 6.7%. 'While the ultimate liability remains difficult to quantify, the industry-wide impact appears less severe than previously expected,' analysts at Peel Hunt said. The pound rose to 1.3287 dollars late on Monday afternoon in London, compared to 1.3247 dollars at the equities close on Friday. The euro traded at 1.1568 dollars, higher against 1.1538 dollars. Against the yen, the dollar was trading lower at 147.30 yen compared to 148.12 yen. In Europe on Monday, the CAC 40 in Paris climbed 1.1%, while the DAX 40 in Frankfurt rose 1.4%. In New York, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 1.1%, the S&P 500 was 1.2% higher, and the Nasdaq Composite advanced 1.5%. Tesla shares rose 1.6% as the electric vehicle maker handed its chief executive Elon Musk a 29 billion dollar pay package, as a lengthy legal battle over his compensation winds on. The company said in a statement it will award an 'interim' distribution of 96 million Tesla shares to Mr Musk as it 'intends to compensate its CEO for his future services commensurate with his contributions to our company and shareholders'. 'We have recommended this award as a first step, 'good faith' payment,' it added when announcing the board's approval of granting new shares to Mr Musk. 'Retaining Elon is more important than ever before.' Dan Ives at Wedbush Securities said: 'We believe this grant will now keep Musk as CEO of Tesla at least until 2030 and removes an overhang on the stock. Musk remains Tesla's big asset and this comp issue has been a constant concern of shareholders once the Delaware soap opera began.' The yield on the US 10-year Treasury was at 4.22%, trimmed from 4.24%. The yield on the US 30-year Treasury was unchanged at 4.81% from Friday. Back in London, ConvaTec fell 1.4% as it said chief executive Karim Bitar will take a medical leave of absence for an undetermined period of time. Current chief financial officer Jonny Mason will assume the role of interim chief executive, and current group financial controller Fiona Ryder will become interim chief financial officer. BP rose 1.8% despite a fall in the oil price after the news that Opec+ endorsed an additional 547,000 barrels per day production increase from September. The London-based oil major maintained its aims to grow its global upstream production to 2.3 to 2.5 million barrels of oil equivalent a day in 2030, with the capacity to increase production out to 2035, after announcing a discovery at the Bumerangue exploration well, offshore Brazil. Berenberg noted BP said it was the largest discovery it has made in 25 years. In a blue-sky scenario, this discovery could have the potential to be 'highly material' for BP, Berenberg said. 'With such a large hydrocarbon column combined with a very large areal extent, the potential oil in place is very material,' the broker added. BP reports half year results on Tuesday. Brent oil was quoted lower at 69.20 dollars a barrel in London on Monday, down from 69.78 dollars late on Friday. Stephen Innes at SPI Asset Management said the move by Opec+ completes the reversal of the 'massive' supply cut orchestrated in 2023, a full year ahead of schedule. 'This wasn't just symbolic; it was a power move aimed at clawing back market share and, intentionally or not, offering a tailwind to President Trump as he heads into a mid-term election cycle looking to keep pump prices tame,' he said. The setup for the oil price heading into the fourth quarter is 'increasingly bearish,' Mr Innes said. 'While demand has weathered 2025 reasonably well so far, the tailwinds are weakening. China is wobbling, and non-Opec supply – particularly from US shale and Latin America – is swelling,' he noted. Gold firmed to 3,372.82 dollars an ounce against 3,349.92 dollars. The biggest risers on the FTSE 100 were Lloyds Banking Group, up 6.4 pence at 82.2p, St James's Place, up 55.5p at 1,353.5p, Endeavour Mining, up 84p at 2,424p, London Stock Exchange, up 294p at 9,608p and NatWest, up 15.4p at 527p. The biggest fallers on the FTSE 100 were Haleon, down 8.4p at 357p, Rentokil Initial, down 7.2p at 354.4p, Next, down 200p at 12,130p, IMI, down 30p at 2,146p and Croda International, down 35p at 2,592p. Tuesday's local corporate calendar has half-year results from oil major BP and miner Fresnillo plus full year results from Guinness owner Diageo. The global economic calendar on Tuesday sees a slew of composite PMI readings, new car sales figures in the UK and trade balance data in the US.
Times
17 hours ago
- Times
Can I still get car finance compensation?
Drivers who bought their car on finance could still claim back up to £950 as part of a long-running investigating into hidden commission, despite a landmark court win for lenders last week. On Friday the Supreme Court spared the car finance industry from a worst-case scenario, which could have resulted in paying out a total of £44 billion to 15 million drivers. But the ruling was swiftly followed by intervention by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the City watchdog, which yesterday announced it would consult on a redress scheme that could see lenders on the hook for a total compensation bill of between £9 billion and £18 billion. The FCA is expected to confirm the details of its consultation in October and the first compensation payouts could start next year — so what does it mean for drivers, and will you be eligible for a payout? The FCA began an investigation into historic car finance lending in January 2024, prompted by a rising number of complaints to the courts and to the Financial Ombudsman Service, a free dispute service, about hidden commissions in car finance deals. In particular the FCA was looking at discretionary commission arrangements, where the fee paid to dealers was linked to the interest rate borrowers paid, which in some cases incentivised dealers to give customers a higher rate. This model was used in about 35 per cent of car finance deals, according to the FCA, before it banned the practice in January 2021. The FCA said borrowers could have paid about £1,100 more in interest over a four-year £10,000 car finance deal under the commission model. The regulator was looking at whether consumers were fully told about how to commission worked and the impact it could have on their repayments. Nikhil Rathi, the chief executive of the FCA, warned yesterday that it was 'clear that some firms have broken the law and our rules'. The Court of Appeal had ruled in October that car dealers had a duty to make clear the nature and value of any commission paid to them to ensure that borrowers could give 'informed consent' before agreeing to a deal. The judgment involved three cases brought by drivers who argued that they had been treated unfairly because they had not been told about commission involved in their deals. The ruling triggered a backlash from lenders and from the Treasury, which tried to intervene, arguing that a massive bill for the industry would damage the economy. On Friday the decision was largely overturned by the Supreme Court, although it did uphold one of the three cases — in favour of Marcus Johnson, a factory worker from south Wales, because in his case the £1,651 commission he paid was 55 per cent of the cost of finance on his five-year loan. The court said: 'The fact that the undisclosed commission was so high is a powerful indication that the relationship between Mr Johnson and the lender was unfair.' • Common sense has triumphed over compensation culture Most of the money paid out under a redress scheme will compensate those who were charged discretionary commission — but claims that do not involve discretionary commission could also be successful. The Supreme Court ruling has given hope to drivers with deals that contained a high level of commission, such as in the Johnson case, or where the commission model caused them to pay more. Philip Salter, a former FCA regulator now at the consultancy Sicsic Advisory, said: 'The key development is not just the confirmation of a scheme for discretionary commission arrangements, but the explicit inclusion of non-discretionary models as well. This is a direct consequence of the Supreme Court's ruling and widens the net of lenders that will be impacted.' The FCA suggested it would look at the size of commission in absolute terms, and also relative to the overall cost of the interest, in deciding whether an agreement was unfair. The size of the payout would likely be a refund of the commission, plus compensatory interest. The FCA suggested that the majority of successful claimants would get less than £950 per finance deal. The FCA said it would decide whether any scheme would be opt-in (where drivers would have to complain to their lender) or opt-out, which would require lenders to contact customers directly if they thought they were due compensation for loans taken out since 2007. These details are expected to be confirmed towards the end of this year. Adrian Dally from the Finance & Leasing Association trade body said: 'We have concerns about whether it is possible to have a fair redress scheme that goes back to 2007 when firms have not been required to hold such historic information, and the evidence will be patchy at best.' Since the FCA began its investigation last year it has been clear that any redress scheme would be free to use, like the financial services ombudsman, where customers can take a complaint if the company rejects it. But consumers have been bombarded with adverts from claims management companies and no-win no-fee law firms offering to take on their cases, in return for up to 30 per cent of any payout. If you have already signed a contract with a claims management company to represent your claim, it is worth checking it for any details of an exit fee. Under FCA rules you have the right to exit an agreement with a claims company, subject to a fee. But some consumer law firms have exit fees of £150 or more. If you feel a claims firm is charging an unfair exit fee — these charges must reflect the work the firm has done — you can complain about them either to the FCA (which regulates claims management companies) or, if it is a law firm, the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
