National Sports Bill: How its different from National Sports Code
New Delhi, Jul 23 (PTI) With the introduction of the National Sports Governance Bill in Lok Sabha on Wednesday, India has taken a big step towards joining powers like the USA, UK, China, and Japan which have laws in place for streamlined administrative set-ups.
The bill, once it becomes an act, will complete a journey that started back in 2011 when the then Sports Minister Ajay Maken began his push for a legislation to set some benchmarks for the sports administrators.
The mostly long-serving administrators were and still are often accused of indulging in power struggles, infighting, financial misappropriation and showing a distinct lack of intent to overcome any of these issues.
But with the new bill, accountability will be in place through a National Sports Board, a National Sports Tribunal and the National Sports Election Panel.
All of this took shape over months of dialogue that current Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya undertook with stakeholders, soon after taking charge last year.
Once the bill was finalised, Mandaviya gave due credit to Maken, his political opponent from the Congress party, for 'doing good work in shaping the National Sports Code, 2011" which was in operation till now.
'The National Sports Development Code of India, 2011 established good governance practices for sports bodies, essential for healthy development of sports in the country," stated the objectives of the new bill.
Here's a look at the timeline of how the code turned into a bill with significant changes.
The Journey: ========= *In 2011, the Ministry prepared Draft National Sports Development Bill and placed it before Cabinet for approval. However, it was met with vehement opposition due to strict capping of age and tenure for administrators.
*In July 2013, the Ministry prepared a revised Draft National Sports Development Bill and placed it in public domain to invite suggestions and comments. However, this Bill was not pursued and a year later, the Delhi High Court upheld the Sports Code 2011.
*In 2015, a Working Group was constituted for re-drafting of National Sports Development Code, 2011. But the inclusion of Indian Olympic Association top brass in this group was challenged in the Delhi High Court as a case of conflict of interest.
*In 2017, a Committee was constituted under then sports secretary Injeti Srinivas, to prepare the '(Draft) National Code for Good Governance in Sports, 2017'. Olympic gold medal-winning shooter Abhinav Bindra, and other sports greats like Anju Bobby George, and Prakash Padukone, along with then then IOA head Narinder Batra were among the members in the committee.
The Draft Sports Code was also challenged in the Delhi High Court, which ordered that committee's report be submitted to it in a sealed cover.
*In 2019, the Ministry constituted an Expert Committee under Justice (Retd.) Mukundakam Sharma to review the Draft Sports Code 2017 and 'suggest measures for making it acceptable to all the stakeholders".
That same year, the Delhi High Court stayed the constitution of this committee, an order that is in effect till date.
*In October 2024, the Draft National Sports Governance Bill was released to the public for comments and suggestions. There were extensive consultation sessions held with the IOA, the National Sports Federations, athletes, coaches, legal experts and even private bodies that are involved in athlete management. The bill was also shared with the International Olympic Committe and International Federations including World Athletics, FIFA, and the International Hockey Federation (FIH) among others.
The ministry received 'over 700 responses" as part of the feedback from various stakeholders, including general public before it finally made its way to the Parliament.
The differences with Sports Code: ===================== *Age Cap: While the Sports Code capped the age of administrators at 70, the new bill allows an office-bearer to complete his/her tenure if they were less than 70 at the time of filing nominations. A further relaxation of another five years has been made for contesting elections if the international statutes and byelaws allow for it in the concerned sports body.
*Tenure: The Sports Code allowed three terms with a cooling off period after two terms for the President and two terms for Treasurer and Secretary. The new sports bill allows office-bearers (President, Secretary General and Treasurer) to serve three consecutive terms of a maximum of 12 years and remain eligible for election to the Executive Committee after a cooling off period.
'This has been done to ensure continuity and also to keep competent people within the system," a sports ministry source said.
*Executive Committee: The sports code had no provision for mandatory women's representation in the committee whose strength was capped at 15. The new bill mandates that at least four members of the EC must be women along with two sportspersons of outstanding merit.
top videos
View all
*Regulatory Body: The sports code had no provisions for a regulatory body to oversee NSFs, leaving the power to recognise or derecognise in the hands of the sports ministry. But the sports governance bill outlines the creation of a National Sports Board which will fulfill this role.
*The National Sports Tribunal, which will adjudicate sporting disputes, the National Sports Election Panel to oversee polls in NSFs and the Ethics Commission were not a part of the Sports Code. All these bodies will have a significant role to play once the bill becomes an act. PTI PM PM KHS KHS
(This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments
First Published:
July 23, 2025, 17:00 IST
News agency-feeds National Sports Bill: How its different from National Sports Code
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘When Ravan crossed the Laxman Rekha…': Kiren Rijiju on Operation Sindoor ahead of 16 hour debate in Lok Sabha
With the Lok Sabha set to take up a 16-hour discussion on Operation Sindoor, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju Monday took to X to kickstart the day and wrote: 'when Pakistan crossed the red lines drawn by India, terror camps faced the fire.' The Monsoon session enters its second week following a week marked by repeated adjournments. 'Discussion on #OperationSindoor to begin today… When Ravan crossed the Laxman Rekha, Lanka burned. When Pakistan crossed the red lines drawn by India, terrorist camps faced the fire,' Rijiju's post read. Discussion on #OperationSindoor to begin today… When Ravan crossed the Laxman Rekha, Lanka burned. When Pakistan crossed the red lines drawn by India, terrorist camps faced the fire! जब रावण ने लक्ष्मण रेखा पार की, तो लंका जल गई। जब पाकिस्तान ने भारत द्वारा खींची गई लाल रेखा… — Kiren Rijiju (@KirenRijiju) July 28, 2025 Defence Minister Rajnath Singh is set to initiate the 'special discussion on India's strong, successful and decisive 'Operation Sindoor' in response to the terror attack in Pahalgam', PTI reported The opposition is expected to corner the government over US President Donald Trump's '26 claims' that he mediated to avert a nuclear war between India and Pakistan, and got them to agree on a 'ceasefire'. Trump's remarks included claims that he stopped Operation Sindoor by threatening to cut off trade with India. The Congress, on Saturday, said the debate was a long time coming, but 'better late than never'. The Pahalgam terror attack took place on April 22, but the terrorists directly responsible have still not been brought to justice, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh said on Saturday. India has made it clear that the cessation of firing and military activity targeted at Pakistan was paused after 'direct contact' between the directors general of military operations (DGMOs) of both nations, at the instance of Islamabad. –With PTI inputs
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Gautam Gambhir Press Conference: India coach slams Stokes's antics, praises Pant's heroics and Gill and Co
Gautam Gambhir delivered another blockbuster press conference as he called out Ben Stokes for his handshake antics on Day 5 of Manchester Test, besides praising Rishabh Pant and Team India for their fightback. read more Gautam Gambhir in his typical fashion blasted England team and its antics as he praised Rishabh Pant and Team India. Images: PTI/Reuters Indian cricket team coach Gautam Gambhir was in a fiery mood as he hit back at England captain Ben Stokes for his offer of a draw when Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar were nearing their hundreds. Gambhir also praised Rishabh Pant for his heroics during the fourth India-England Test match at Manchester and provided injury updates about the pacers. The five-match Test series between India and England is currently tilted 2-1 in the home team's favour. The last match will be played at The Oval, but England could have sealed the series in Manchester after scoring a mammoth 669 in reply to India's first innings of 358. England had close to two days to bowl out India in the second innings, but a fighting century from skipper Shuman Gill and an unbeaten 203-run partnership between Jadeja and Sundar spoiled England's party. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Gambhir slams Stokes, England for handshake offer Despite India's fightback, Stokes managed to hog the headlines by some late antics on Day 5 as he offered a draw to India. Only 15 overs were left in the day's play, a draw looked imminent, but Jadeja and Sundar were also very close to their respective centuries, batting on scores of 89 and 80, respectively. India refused to take the offer of a handshake as both batters went on to complete their tons. Also Read | Ben Stokes reveals reasoning behind early handshake offer to Jadeja and Sundar England cricketers were upset and were seen moaning, but later in the press conference, Gambhir questioned England's plan to offer a draw after the Indian all-rounders has put in a valiant display and deserved a milestone each. 'If someone is batting on 90 and the other one is batting on 85, don't they deserve a hundred? Would they have walked off? If someone from the England side would have been batting on 90 or 85, if someone had the opportunity to get his first Test hundred, wouldn't you allow him to do it, if they weathered the storm? 'It's up to them. If they want to play that way, that's up to them. I've got nothing more to say,' Gambhir said at the post-match press conference. Gambhir: 'This is best Indian team right now' Gambhir also claimed that he is currently coaching the best possible Indian team, adding that the hard-earned draw at Manchester will only boost the morale of his side. 'You are asking someone who only believes in results,' Gambhir said. 'I've said that in the past as well, that I believe in results. We are still 2-1 down in the series. This is the Indian team. Yes there is inexperience but this is still the best Indian team right now. So for me, I think we are still down 2-1. And hopefully we can try and make it 2-2. That's going to be a good achievement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'When you are put under pressure, and you end up batting five sessions, I think that's great character. Anything that you do in these conditions, when you are put under pressure and you come out of those pressure moments, it is always a great feeling, and it just ends up giving a lot of confidence in the dressing room as well. 'And I'm sure going into The Oval, we will be high on confidence, but we can't take anything for granted. I think it's going to be a new game, it's going to be against a strong England side, and we absolutely will be up for it.' Watch Gautam Gambhir's press conference: Your browser does not support the video tag. The former India opener Gambhir also heaped high praise on Pant, who batted in the first innings despite a fractured toe and was ready to bat again in the second innings if needed. 'It's been declared that he's out of the series,' Gambhir said. 'But one thing I want to say is that the character and the foundation of this team will be built on something Rishabh did for the team and for the country as well.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Any amount of praise is not enough for him — especially batting with a broken foot. I think the generations to come will talk about it and the generations coming forward should talk about it.' Also Read | From Eden Gardens 2001 to Old Trafford 1990, revisiting India's greatest rescue acts in Test cricket N Jagadeesan has been named as Pant's replacement after the wicketkeeper-batter was ruled out of the fifth and final Test of the series. The 43-year-old coach also confirmed that all the pacers are fit for the fifth Test, which starts on 31 July, but no decision has been made on the team combination and resting Jasprit Bumrah. 'All the fast bowlers are fit,' Gambhir said. 'There are no injury concerns. We haven't had any conversation around the combination for the last Test. 'No decision has been made on whether Jasprit Bumrah will play or not. Ultimately, whoever plays, they will try and do the job for the country.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Education Ministry Seeks Explanation From JNU VC For Skipping Key Conference Without Approval
The Education Ministry has asked JNU VC Santishree Pandit to explain her absence from a key VCs' meet, despite a prior invite. The Ministry of Education has sought a written explanation from Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) Vice-Chancellor Santishree Dhulipudi Pandit over her absence from a key conference of Central University heads, sources told PTI. Officials noted that Pandit did not attend the Vice-Chancellors' conference without obtaining prior approval from the Ministry. Her absence was flagged as a serious matter. There has been no official response from the JNU Vice-Chancellor on the issue so far. 'Her absence was viewed seriously. In such circumstances, Vice-Chancellors are required to take prior approval. There was a conference at JNU coinciding with the Vice-Chancellors' conference. But it should have been kept in mind that the invite for this conference was extended much in advance," a source said. While the Ministry's conference was scheduled for July 10–11 in Kevadia, Gujarat, JNU was hosting its own three-day conference on Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS) from July 10 to 12, which former Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar inaugurated. Key discussions at the event focused on assessing how Central Universities are aligning with the NEP's next-phase objectives, fostering dialogue on institutional innovations and challenges, and preparing universities for upcoming policy milestones, regulatory shifts, and the evolving global academic landscape leading up to 2047. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
