logo
Power bank warning: Anker and Baseus among chargers recently recalled as Singapore Airlines and Qantas issue bans

Power bank warning: Anker and Baseus among chargers recently recalled as Singapore Airlines and Qantas issue bans

7NEWS15-07-2025
Experts warn they are 'playing catch-up' with new lithium batteries flooding the market as Australia's consumer watchdog issues a safety alert to any Australian buying the popular wireless chargers.
A lack of regulation and soaring demand has contributed to a growing number of wireless power banks getting recalled, experts added.
The competition watchdog warns 34,000 defective portable chargers are still being used by customers, after a surging number of recalls of the product.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has issued 17 different recalls of power banks since 2020, with more than half being made since 2024.
Popular brands including Anker, Baseus and SnapWireless power banks were the most recent products to be recalled.
Power banks are portable battery chargers designed to power devices on-the-go.
They use rechargeable lithium-ion or lithium-polymer batteries that are highly flammable, can explode or vent toxic gas, the commission says.
Product recalls for some of the bigger brands is a surprise for Chris Barnes, a senior project officer for consumer advocacy group Choice.
'You're always playing catch-up with new technologies, always having to implement specific new mandatory standards or a product ban to cover these sorts of situations,' he told AAP.
'Consumers should be able to trust that anything they buy through a reputable retailer is OK.'
The uptick in recalls is being caused by more products on the market, a lack of regulation and differing materials inside the models, University of Melbourne head of chemical biomedical engineering Amanda Ellis says.
While most power banks are safe to use, a person's safety rests on how they use them, she said.
'We don't have Australian standards for batteries at the moment so that's one of the problems,' Ellis told AAP.
'We don't really know what is in these batteries because it's all (intellectual property) protected, so it's challenging, and more and more people are using them than five years ago.'
The extreme end of people carrying dangerous power banks was felt by South Korea's Air Busan in January when a fire started in one of its planes' overhead lockers.
The blaze, believed to have started from a power bank, destroyed the plane with all 179 passengers on-board managing to evacuate safely.
Some of the ways to lower the risk are following manufacturer instructions, not charging near flammable furniture and never using damaged or leaking power banks, the commission said.
'Some consumers have suffered serious burn injuries, and some have had their property damaged because of power banks overheating and catching fire,' the watchdog's deputy chair Catriona Lowe said.
Suppliers offer a full refund or free replacement under the recalls, Ms Lowe said.
Power bank restrictions for airlines including Qantas, Virgin and Singapore Airlines
The horrific incident involving Air Busan has prompted a number of airlines to completely ban power banks in its carry-on luggage to ensure passengers' safety.
Back in April, Singapore Airlines went a step further, banning passengers from using their seat's USB charging port to juice up their power banks.
'Effective 1st April 2025, Singapore Airlines customers will not be allowed to charge portable power banks via the onboard USB ports, or use power banks to charge their personal devices, throughout the duration of the flight,' the airline said.
'This means power banks must be carried in cabin baggage on all SIA flights and are not permitted in checked baggage. Customers may bring power banks with a capacity of up to 100Wh without special approval, while those between 100Wh and 160Wh require airline approval.
'We seek customers' understanding that safety will always be our top priority.'
Qantas has also cracked down on power banks.
'Baggage fitted with non-removable lithium batteries or power banks are forbidden,' the national carrier said.
'If in checked baggage the lithium battery or lithium power bank must be removed from the bag.
'The removed lithium battery or power bank must be in carry-on baggage only.
'Non-lithium batteries/power banks can remain fitted in the bag and carried as carry-on or checked baggage.'
Virgin Australia has similar rules.
'Spare/loose batteries (including power banks/packs must be in carry-on baggage only and must be protected against short circuit by, placing in its original retail packaging, placing each battery in a separate plastic bag or protective pouch or insulating terminals by taping over exposed terminals,' the airline said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

XL Express leaves hundreds of employees out of pocket as it faces almost $42m in debt, administrator FTI Consulting says
XL Express leaves hundreds of employees out of pocket as it faces almost $42m in debt, administrator FTI Consulting says

Sky News AU

time9 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

XL Express leaves hundreds of employees out of pocket as it faces almost $42m in debt, administrator FTI Consulting says

An Australian transport company that collapsed earlier this year faces almost $42m of debt, including $5.3m to former employees and $3.5m to the tax office. XL Express appointed FTI Consulting's Kelly-Anne Trenfield, Ross Blakely and Joanne Dunn as its administrators in June and went into liquidation at the beginning of this month after 35 years in business. About 200 employees were sacked prior to FTI's appointment and left without large sums of pay. The company was locked out of its Western Sydney premises on June 23 for failing to pay rent while workers were let go the next day, according to the administrator. It suffered losses throughout the 2023 and 2024 financial years and had solid tax debts from at least March 2023. FTI predicts XL could have been insolvent as far back as January 2023. Alongside hefty debts to its employees and the ATO, the company also owes almost $19m to major lenders, including NAB, ScotPac and Judo Bank. Other unsecured creditors are owed an additional $12.4m, according to the report. An unknown amount is owed to out-of-pocket former employees for injury compensation alongside the $5.3m of debt owed to former employees. This includes about $925,000 of superannuation, at least $970,000 of annual leave and more than $1.6m of redundancy pay. XL's attempted to sooth some of the crippling debt by engaging with Manheim Auctions to sell its fleet of vehicles just before appointing FTI as its administrator. Prior to its collapse, the Queensland-headquartered company offered transport services for an array of consumer and business customers across the country. On its website, XL Express said it delivered to retail stores, all major distribution centres and residential locations across the nation. It also boasted of a 'national network', which includes its parcel sortation systems and technology that allowed package tracking. 'We're a business that's built on the challenger model,' the company's website states. 'We're here to disrupt the status quo and think harder and act smarter for our clients and their businesses.' The company's collapse follows it establishing a partnership with the Brisbane Lions between 2020 and 2022. XL Express's logo featured on the front of the AFL team's jersey, while the Lions logo was seen on the company's trucks. The Brisbane-headquartered company operated depots around the country including Sydney, Melbourne, Cairns, Darwin, Perth and Adelaide.

Bold plan to give you extra $3,300 a year
Bold plan to give you extra $3,300 a year

Perth Now

time9 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

Bold plan to give you extra $3,300 a year

Teal independent Kate Chaney has floated a radical plan to hand everyone $3,300 a year in exchange for a hike in the GST. Ms Chaney has been working with Australian economist Richard Holden on a proposal to raise the GST from 10 to 15 per cent, and apply the tax to education, food and health. In exchange for the tax hike, every adult would be paid $3300 - effectively wiping out the GST expenses on someone's first $22,000 of spending. Ms Chaney and Professor Holden's plan has been submitted to the federal government to be considered at the productivity-focused economic roundtable, a summit to be held in Canberra from August 19 to 21. 'GST is an efficient tax – it is hard to avoid – and with lower and middle-income groups potentially better off under this proposal, it can be progressive,' Ms Chaney said. Kate Chaney supports the plan which would leave the lowest 60 per cent of income earners better off. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia 'Unlike personal income tax, it doesn't hamper productivity. 'Intergenerational inequity is built into our tax system - younger generations are facing the growing burden of funding an ageing population and will bear the cost of future interest payments to cover the structural deficit forecast for the next decade.' The WA MP's plan has been costed and would raise an additional $95.2bn for the government in its first year of operation, minus the $3300 rebate to every adult. Low and middle-income earners would be up to $371 better off, but the top-20 per cent of earners would be $2200 worse off. All that leaves the government with an additional $24bn a year. The Prime Minister and Treasurer have been hesitant in their language around GST reform leading up to the economic roundtable meetings. The economic roundtable meetings are being held in Canberra later this month. Mark Stewart / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia 'I expect that there'll be a whole range of ideas put forward, much of which is contradictory with each other,' Anthony Albanese said this week. 'It doesn't mean that they're government decisions we're making, because they're not.' But Mr Albanese was more explicit in his language on Thursday. 'The only tax policy that we're implementing is the one that we took to the election,' he said. While the current GST scheme is considered regressive, Professor Holden's plan is pitched as progressive. 'I'm a supporter of progressive taxation,' Mr Albanese told Sky News in July. 'Consumption taxes, by definition, are regressive in their nature. So that's something that you know doesn't fit with the agenda.' Parliamentary Budget Office costings of Professor Holden and Ms Chaney's scheme show the bottom 60 per cent of income earners would be better with the GST hike and $3300 rebate. Food is currently exempt from GST - Professor Holden's plan would remove that exemption. NewsWire / David Crosling Credit: News Corp Australia 'Our proposal would make our taxation system more efficient, make our economy more dynamic and provide the impetus for productivity growth,' Professor Holden said. 'It is widely accepted that the GST is an efficient tax, but it is thought to be regressive. 'This plan shows that it doesn't have to be that way. By providing every adult Australian with a $22,000 GST-free threshold the GST can be both efficient and progressive.' The government has promoted the roundtable meetings as being focused on productivity. The Australian Council of Social Services says the country's lagging productivity is widening inequality. In the council's submission to the roundtable, chief executive Cassandra Goldie calls for reform to the tax system to raise more revenue, reduce inequality and drive action to address climate change. 'For too long now, people with plenty have been showered with tax breaks that pull investment away from productive purposes and rob essential public services of the revenue they need,' Dr Goldie said. The council is advocating for changes to employment opportunities and streamlining income support. 'The extra revenue we need to fund care and community services, schools, and an income support system that protects people from poverty must come from those with the most capacity to pay - not those doing it toughest,' Dr Goldie said. 'We must better prepare and train people for jobs and finally lift income support to levels that don't trap people in poverty and destitution.'

Australia ‘very concerned' by Donald Trump's 250 per cent pharmaceutical tariff threat
Australia ‘very concerned' by Donald Trump's 250 per cent pharmaceutical tariff threat

West Australian

time21 minutes ago

  • West Australian

Australia ‘very concerned' by Donald Trump's 250 per cent pharmaceutical tariff threat

Australia's Health Minister has admitted he's 'very concerned' by Donald Trump's threat to raise pharmaceutical tariffs as high as 250 per cent and insisted PBS is off limits. Mark Butler has vowed Australia will continue to 'press the case' for the continuation of free trade with America — acknowledging it would be a major blow to Australian patients and producers. US President Donald Trump told CNBC this week he would expand this tariff regime by slapping new tariffs on foreign-made pharmaceuticals. 'It's going to go to 150 per cent and then it's going to go to 250 per cent,' he told the US business news channel. He said the final rate is expected to be announced within the next week or so, with a transitional period to give drug manufacturers time to adjust their supply chains. 'We are very concerned about the latest announcement from the administration around the possibility of pharmaceutical tariffs going as high as 250 per cent over the next couple of years,' Mr Butler told reporters in Melbourne on Thursday. 'That is why we're working so hard to press the case for the continuation of free trade.' Under the $18 billion-dollar Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, the government negotiates with the drug companies to enable Australians to buy life-saving drugs worth thousands of dollars for as little as $25 a script. In a series of letters to 17 drug manufacturers on Friday, Mr Trump had also demanded they negotiate harder with 'foreign freeloading nations' he blamed for higher US drug prices. It comes after a submission was made to the US government March by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) claiming Australia's subsidised medical system was 'egregious and discriminatory'. Mr Butler said the US and Australian pharmaceutical trade relationship benefited both nations. 'America exports more pharmaceuticals to Australia than we do to them. They do it on a tariff-free basis,' he said. 'That's served both of our countries very well and we'll continue to argue the case for a continuation of free trade in pharmaceuticals.' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Australia would continue to support the PBS and spruiked his government's recent legislation in the first sitting black of the 48th Parliament to make PBS medicines even cheaper. 'We support the PBS. It is part of who we are as Australia. We're a sovereign nation, it's something that has produced massive benefits for Australia. It's a proud Labor creation and we are building on it,' he said on Thursday when asked if he was concerned by the latest development of Trump's ever-expanding tariffs. 'That's why we introduced legislation last week to reduce the cost of medicines to $25 that are listed on the PBS.' It comes as Mr Trump's country-specific 'reciprocal' tariffs, first floated on 'Liberation Day' in April, were scheduled to take effect on August 7. The US imposed a 10 per cent baseline tariff on imported goods from Australia which was the lowest rate of other nations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store