Najib's addendum review could have been heard earlier, lawyer says
Published on: Wed, Jul 09, 2025
By: V Anbalagan, FMT Text Size: Najib Razak wants the court to compel the government to enforce an addendum issued by the former king allowing him to serve the remainder of his jail sentence under house arrest. PUTRAJAYA: Najib Razak's application for a judicial review would have been heard in the High Court if the attorney-general (AG) had admitted to the existence of a royal addendum linked to the former prime minister's jail sentence, the Federal Court was told today. Lawyer Shafee Abdullah said the AG objected to Najib's application for leave on grounds that the supporting affidavits were based on hearsay evidence, speculative, and that the addendum order purportedly did not exist. 'Even at the Court of Appeal, he (the AG) did not confirm its existence but finally made a concession in the Federal Court,' Shafee told a three-member bench chaired by Chief Judge of Malaya Hasnah Hashim. Also hearing the appeal were Justices Zabariah Yusof and Hanipah Farikullah. At the last hearing on July 2, Shafee submitted that AG Dusuki Mokhtar had conceded that the addendum existed, and that he was only disputing its genuineness and validity. The AG is appealing to set aside a majority 2-1 ruling on Jan 6 that allowed Najib's application to adduce additional evidence and order the High Court to hear Najib's judicial review. Najib wants the government to implement the Jan 29, 2024 order in the addendum which allows him to serve the remainder of his jail sentence under house arrest. Shafee said Najib should be granted leave as he had an arguable case. The lawyer said his client was sent from 'pillar to post' as the putative respondents refused to give an affirmative reply on whether the addendum order exists. Shafee said the AG should have provided the addendum but the High Court judge said he had no duty of candour at the leave stage, which was a 'tragedy'. 'The judge went on to say we were on a fishing expedition,' Shafee added. He argued that the AG had a duty of candour to disclose the addendum order and said that the AG was guilty of not enforcing the royal decree. Najib got wind of the addendum order soon after the Federal Territories Pardons Board announced in early February last year that his 12-year jail term was halved and the RM210 million fine reduced to RM50 million. He is currently serving a six-year jail sentence in connection with the SRC International case. Najib filed leave for judicial review last April, relying on affidavits filed by Umno president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi and Pahang menteri besar Wan Rosdy Wan Ismail based on what they had read on Tengku Zafrul Aziz's mobile phone. The High Court however refused to grant leave last July. Najib's son, Nizar, filed an affidavit just before the Court of Appeal hearing in support of his father's application to also adduce fresh evidence, which the appellate court allowed. When replying to Shafee's submission, senior federal counsel Shamsul Bolhassan acknowledged that AG Dusuki had confirmed the existence of the addendum when he was addressing the bench on July 2. Hasnah then said the matter of fresh evidence was no longer an issue. Shamsul however submitted that it was not academic as the criteria to admit fresh evidence were not fulfilled. 'The case laws referred to by Shafee on the duty of candour by the public authorities are also not relevant,' he said, adding that the AG was standing by the written submission filed earlier. Hasnah said parties would be informed of the decision date. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Barnama
9 hours ago
- Barnama
AI Must Remain As An Assistive Tool, Not Decision Maker
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 20 (Bernama) -- Any use of artificial intelligence (AI) that impacts individuals' rights must only be deployed after rigorous testing and with clear oversight, says former Federal Court judge Tan Sri Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal. He said while AI had the potential to transform human endeavour, it must remain an assistive tool and not a decision-maker, particularly in the criminal justice system. "AI should be an assistant, not a decision maker. In Sabah, where AI sentencing tools were piloted, the model once recommended a 10-month imprisonment with a probability of 54 per cent for an offence under the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, but the magistrate imposed 12 months instead. "The message is clear, AI can assist, but human judgment must prevail,' he said during a plenary session titled 'Criminal Justice Reforms: Ensuring Ethical AI in Criminal Justice Proceedings' held in conjunction with the ASEAN Law Forum 2025 at the Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre today. Harmindar, who is also chairman of the Criminal Law Review Committee, emphasised the need for proper rules, safeguards and a clear risk-based approach before adopting AI in judicial processes. "Singapore has already issued guidelines for AI use in courts, and the Philippines is drafting an AI governance framework for its judiciary. Malaysia and other ASEAN member countries must follow suit. "We need a framework for ensuring responsible use of AI. This includes an assessment of risks, mitigation measures, and ensuring AI use cases are tested for bias, reliability and transparency before adoption,' he said while cautioning that while AI was a powerful technology, its application in criminal justice should be approached with vigilance. 'We must always remain accountable. If AI is to be used in the justice system, we must approach it with our eyes wide open, ready to address the risks in order to reap the benefits,' he added. Speaking from Singapore's perspective, counsel Colin Seow of Colin Seow Chambers said the Singapore Police Force had incorporated AI into digital forensics, enabling investigators to automatically sift through seized devices for child sexual abuse material and significantly improve the speed and accuracy of investigations.
The Sun
13 hours ago
- The Sun
Former teacher pleads not guilty to false statement charge
SHAH ALAM: A former private teacher has pleaded not guilty to charges of transmitting false statements about the Prime Minister. S. Chandrasegaran, 46, entered his plea at the Sessions Court here today. The charge relates to allegedly using TikTok to knowingly transmit false statements intended to disparage an individual. The transmission occurred at 1.36 pm on December 30, 2024. It was later viewed at a Bandar Sunway restaurant at 6.30 pm that same day. He faces charges under Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998. If convicted, he could face a fine up to RM50,000 or one year imprisonment or both. An additional daily fine of RM1,000 may apply if the offence continues after conviction. The prosecution requested bail of RM30,000 with additional conditions. Conditions included monthly police station reporting and passport surrender. The accused was also to be prohibited from interfering with prosecution witnesses. Defense lawyer Muhammad Nor Tamrin requested reasonable bail for his client. He noted the accused currently has no regular income due to permanent disability. The accused is also suffering from throat cancer. He must support a wife and two children. The lawyer stated there was no risk of absconding. Judge Norazlin Othman allowed bail at RM7,000 with a local guarantor. She approved the additional conditions proposed by the prosecution. Case mention has been set for October 13. - Bernama
The Star
13 hours ago
- The Star
UK faces more protests and legal action after asylum seekers hotel injunction
FILE PHOTO: Protesters attend an anti-immigration demonstration, in Epping, Britain, August 8, 2025. REUTERS/Jaimi Joy/File Photo LONDON (Reuters) -The British government policy of housing thousands of asylum seekers in hotels was facing severe pressure on Wednesday, as opponents leapt on a court ruling to call for protests and legal action to have them all evicted. According to a regular tracker of voters' concerns, immigration has overtaken the economy as the biggest issue amid anger over record numbers of asylum seekers arriving in small boats across the Channel, including more than 27,000 this year. On Tuesday, the High Court in London granted a temporary injunction to stop asylum seekers from being housed in the Bell Hotel in Epping, about 20 miles (32 km) northeast of London in the county of Essex. The hotel had become a focal point for regular protests after a resident was charged with sexual assault, a crime he denies, with large numbers of police separating anti-immigration protesters and pro-immigration groups. The injunction in the Epping case centred around a specific planning issue and could be reversed when the case is heard in full later this year. But other councils said they would also urgently seek legal advice on evicting asylum seekers from hotels in their areas. Nigel Farage, the leader of the populist Reform Party which is leading in opinion polls, said all the 12 local authorities his party controlled would do everything in their power to do so. "Let's hold peaceful protests outside the migrant hotels, and put pressure on local councils to go to court to try and get the illegal immigrants out; we now know that together we can win," Farage wrote in the Daily Telegraph newspaper. "No doubt we will be attacked as 'far Right' provocateurs for daring to suggest that people follow the lead of Epping's parents and residents by protesting peacefully." ASYLUM HOTELS Britain currently houses about 30,000 asylum seekers who are awaiting decisions on their claims in more than 200 hotels across the country and, although the government has said it intended to close all of these by 2029, it now faces a major headache if others are able to follow Epping's lead. In the court hearing, the Home Office (interior ministry) said the injunction would have a "substantial impact" on the government's ability to comply with its legal duty to provide accommodation, and security minister Dan Jarvis said they would look closely at the decision and whether to appeal it. "The big challenge remains, which is, we need to process asylum claims much more speedily and much more effectively than was the case previously," Jarvis told BBC TV. Critics say that housing asylum seekers in hotels, often young men who are not allowed to work, puts the local community at risk, and point to recent incidents such as in Epping and other locations where some migrants have been accused of serious crimes including the rape and sexual assault of young girls. They also contrast the facilities provided to migrants in hotels with the difficulties many in Britain are facing with rising living costs and shortages of affordable housing. However, pro-migrant groups say far-right groups and opportunistic politicians are deliberately seeking to exploit and enflame tensions for their own ends. Across Europe governments have struggled with how to house asylum seekers, with far-right and anti-migrant groups in France also leading protests against dedicated centres in recent years. During riots in Britain last year, hotels containing migrants were attacked when unrest involving some far-right supporters erupted after misinformation that the murderer of three girls in Southport was a radical Islamist migrant. (Reporting by Michael Holden and Sachin Ravikumar; Editing by Alex Richardson)
