'Live in my house for a week': Usyk message to Trump
World heavyweight champ Oleksandr Usyk has invited US president Donald Trump to live in his house for one week to get a clearer understand of wha life is like in the Ukraine war.
Trump vowed to resolve the conflict "in 24 hours" upon taking office but more than three years on from Russia president Vladimir Putin launching a full scale invasion of Ukraine, no end appears in sight.
Usyk, the former undisputed world champion at cruiserweight and heavyweight, painted a bleak picture of what life is like in Ukraine and believes Trump needs to have a clearer comprehension of the situation.
"I advise American president Donald Trump to go to Ukraine and live in my house for one week, only one week," Usyk, the WBC, WBA and WBO heavyweight champion, told the BBC.
"Watch what is going on. Every night there are bombs, rockets flying above my house.
"People who don't live in Ukraine, who don't support Ukraine, who haven't watched what's going on, don't understand what's going on."
Usyk, who has won all 23 of his professional contests, is currently in a training camp to prepare for a rematch with IBF champion Daniel Dubois on July 19 at Wembley Stadium.
"I worry about what happens in my country," 38-year-old Usyk added. "It's very bad because Ukrainian people have died. It's not just military people - children, women, grandmothers and grandfathers, too."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
13 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
‘A significant risk': Prime Minister Albanese warned not budge on beef import rules during trade negotiations with President Trump
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is being warned not to cave to US demands on beef imports during upcoming trade negotiations with President Donald Trump. The Prime Minister is expected to meet with President Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit this week in order to discuss the tariffs imposed on Australian goods earlier this year. America's 47th President has imposed a massive tariff regime since taking office in January, including a 50 per cent tariff on steel and aluminium and a 10 per cent across the board tax on all Australian imports. Trump's tariffs are a breach of the existing Australia-US free trade agreement, but White House officials have defended the President's decision by claiming Australia bans the importation of US beef. A blanket ban on US beef imports - imposed in 2003 - was repealed in 2019, however biosecurity rules remain in place and no American beef has been imported under the new scheme. Mr Albanese has previously ruled out watering down the rules, but reports indicate government officials have been reviewing the scheme in order to provide the Prime Minister with a bargaining chip. Speaking to Sky News Australia on Monday, Nationals Leader David Littleproud said weakening Australia's biosecurity regime was 'not something we should entertain', as he called on the Prime Minister to again rule it out. Mr Littleproud said there were 'strict protocols' around the importation of US beef because Australia needed to ensure the cattle had been 'born in the United States and bred all the way through to their slaughter in the United States'. 'What Anthony Albanese and his departments were (considering)… was a relaxation of beef that was born in Mexico and Canada, where we don't have the traceability that we have over the US production system,' he said. 'Cattle can come into Mexico and then end up in a slaughterhouse in the United States, and then end up in Australia. 'We could be seeing those pests and diseases like mad cow… that's not something that we should entertain.' 'That's why Anthony Albanese needs to rule out straight away that he would open that up to those cattle that were born in Canada, Mexico or anywhere else in the Americas, because that poses a significant risk unless we can trace those cattle.' The former agriculture minister acknowledged the Prime Minister had previously ruled out weakening the biosecurity rules but that recent reports had called this into question. 'When you see reports from departments saying this is what's on the table in terms of negotiations where there's smokeless fire, and that's why the Prime Minister needs to rule this out,' Mr Littleproud said. The Nationals Leader said Australia had been 'fair' in its restrictions, which were based on science, and that traceability is also a requirement imposed on Australian beef. 'Every beast here in Australia has an ear tag from the moment they're marked through to the time they go to slaughter. They've got an ear tag that we can trace, what property they've been on, where they are, what they come into contact with,' he said. 'We have traceability in this country, and all we're saying to our foreign competitors is, if you're going to bring a product in this country, we need to know where your animals have been so that we can… protect our environment and our production.' Cattle Australia boss Chris Parker also backed standing firm on traceability, describing it as a 'pretty simple requirement' and adding that the US had similar requirements for the importation of Australian beef. "They insist that we provide that level of traceability for our beef going to their country and it's not unreasonable for us to have a requirement where we want to see at least equivalence of traceability so we have a good sense of where this is coming from,' Mr Parker told the ABC.
Sky News AU
42 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Australian journalist caught in crossfire as LA protests turn violent over Trump immigration raids
An Australian journalist has been shot by a rubber bullet in Los Angeles while reporting on police using rubber bullets against protesters amid riots about President Donald Trump's immigration raids. An Australian journalist has been shot by a rubber bullet in Los Angeles amid riots and protests over immigration raids. Channel Nine News' US Correspondent Lauren Tomasi was reporting on authorities firing rubber bullets when she was shot. The officer can be seen lining up his weapon at Ms Tomasi and fires at her after she finished her report. Ms Tomasi can be heard wincing and grabbing her calf before saying she was 'good' as she and the cameraman ran away. — 9News Australia (@9NewsAUS) June 9, 2025 California National Guard troops arrived in Los Angeles to quell demonstrations over President Donald Trump's immigration enforcement. The National Guard began deploying as demonstrations over federal immigration raids continued for a third day in Los Angeles, culminating in confrontations between protesters and police. Los Angeles police declared one rally near City Hall to be an "unlawful assembly", alleging that some protesters threw concrete, bottles and other objects at police. "Arrests are being initiated," the department wrote in a post on social media. Demonstrators shouted "shame on you" at police and some appeared to throw objects, according to a video. A group of protesters blocked the 101 Freeway, a major thoroughfare in downtown Los Angeles. Groups of protesters, many carrying Mexican flags and signs denouncing US immigration authorities, gathered in several spots around the city. The Los Angeles branch of the Party for Socialism and Liberation organised speakers outside of City Hall for an afternoon rally. California Governor Gavin Newsom said he requested the Trump administration withdraw its order to deploy 2,000 National Guard troops in Los Angeles County, calling it unlawful. Newsom accused Trump of trying to manufacture a crisis and violating California's state sovereignty. "These are the acts of a dictator, not a President," he wrote in a post on X. The White House disputed Newsom's characterisation, saying in a statement that "everyone saw the chaos, violence and lawlessness". Earlier, about a dozen National Guard members, along with Department of Homeland Security personnel, pushed back a group of demonstrators that amassed outside a federal building in downtown Los Angeles, video showed. US Northern Command said 300 members of the California National Guard had been deployed to three areas in the Los Angeles area. Their mission was limited to protecting federal personnel and property. Trump in a social media post on Sunday, called the demonstrators "violent, insurrectionist mobs" and said he was directing his cabinet officers "to take all such action necessary" to stop what he called "riots". Speaking to reporters in New Jersey, he threatened violence against demonstrators who spit on police or National Guard troops, saying "they spit, we hit". He did not cite any specific incidents. "If we see danger to our country and to our citizens, it will be very, very strong in terms of law and order," Trump said. National Guard troops were also seen in Paramount, in southeast Los Angeles, near the Home Depot, the site of altercations between protesters and police on Saturday. Law enforcement faced off with a few hundred protesters in Paramount and 100 in downtown Los Angeles on Saturday, with federal officers firing gas canisters in efforts to disperse crowds, according to Reuters witnesses. Authorities in Los Angeles arrested about 30 people on Saturday, including three on suspicion of assaulting an officer. The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Office said three deputies sustained minor injuries. Sky News / Reuters
Sydney Morning Herald
43 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Trump v Musk is the final battle before a catastrophe
In any case, against total federal spending last year of nearly $US7 trillion, it is but a drop in the ocean, and only goes to show how difficult it is to find serious savings in government administration, even when given a free hand with the headcount. The rampant corruption and incompetence that Musk's Department of Government Efficiency expected to find in the Washington and wider government machine has turned out to be largely an illusion, and many of the cuts he has managed to make seem to have done more harm than good. This is not to argue that it's not worth trying, or that you cannot make public services more efficient. But it takes time, substantial upfront investment, and the savings are generally not as big as anticipated. To nobody's great surprise, it transpires that the skills needed to run a successful business do not transfer easily to the public sector, where the disciplines of the bottom line, the profit motive and competitive markets don't exist. Loading The shame of it is that the Musk who built Tesla and SpaceX into two of the world's most successful companies over a period of nearly two decades has been almost entirely absent while at DOGE these past four or five months. Instead, we have seen a reckless, chainsaw-wielding – and if the American press is to be believed, drug-fuelled – Musk who, like his one-time boss Donald Trump, seems to regard government more as performative art than public service. We can all point to myriad examples of public sector waste, of unfathomable spending decisions and stultifying, jobsworth bureaucracy, but the imagined savings from addressing these things nearly always turn out to be a mirage. In Britain, Nigel Farage's Reform UK claims there is £7 billion to be saved by scrapping public sector spending on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs. Sadly, no such saving exists. Recent government figures showed just £27 million ($56 million) was spent by the civil service on DEI measures during 2022-23. This might well be £27m too much, but it is not going to solve Britain's debt crisis. The two big cash-burners in advanced economies' state spending are public sector salaries and welfare, and both desperately need to be addressed if Western democracies are ever to extract themselves from now mountainous debt. Musk has comprehensively failed on the first of these missions, and not surprisingly so. The sort of productivity-improving automation and digitalisation we see widely applied in the private sector to stay competitive is a marathon, not a sprint, and it requires precision in planning and execution. None of these characteristics was on display from the tech bros sent in to tackle the bloated size of the American state. Their approach was one of slash and burn rather than the slow, methodical re-engineering of government needed to achieve sustainable savings and productivity improvement. What's more, Trump shows little or no appetite for meaningful entitlement reform. OK, some attempt is being made to trim spiralling Medicaid spending, but it's half-hearted and is really only there as a gesture to appease fiscal hawks among House Republicans. Nobody can tell you exactly when the storm will break, but Musk's failure brings the final reckoning that much closer. The bottom line is that Trump is as much a creature of fantasy economics as any. He wants both low taxes and high spending, and expects economic growth to make up the difference. It's the same delusion as Liz Truss, only very much more dangerous in its seeming rejection of fiscal orthodoxies. Unlike Britain, America is the beating heart of the global financial system, and if US debt markets go belly-up they'll take everyone else down with them. Back here in Britain, Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, shows similarly little sign of getting to grips with the leviathan of public spending as she puts the finishing touches to next Wednesday's spending review. Public sector salary costs are rising, not falling, and while ministers talk the talk on welfare reform, their approach to the issue is no more convincing than that of Trump. It's just a little tinkering around the edges. Simply getting working-age benefits back to their pre-pandemic level would save £49 billion a year – more than enough to avoid tax rises and fund the desired increase in defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP, Jeremy Hunt, Reeves' Conservative predecessor as chancellor, points out. Spending on disability benefits alone has surged from £37 billion just before the pandemic to £56 billion now, much more than in any comparable economy, with the bulk of the growth coming from mental health conditions. Loading Yet Reeves used up almost all her political capital axing the winter fuel allowance to all but the poorest pensioners, a course of action that saves only £1.5 billion a year. This has left her with virtually no space for more serious entitlement reform. In both the US and Britain, cutting state spending back to size is simply not happening on the scale needed to stem the rising tide of debt. Attempts by Musk to draw a line in the sand have ended in acrimony and recrimination. Nobody can tell you exactly when the storm will break, but Musk's failure brings the final reckoning that much closer.
