Trump plans $340m White House ballroom
Trump, a former real estate developer with a penchant for decorating, has long complained the White House lacked a large-scale ballroom for entertaining.
The White House on Thursday announced plans to break ground in September on the project, which could prove to be the most extensive one since Harry Truman completed an entire renovation in 1952.
The White House was originally finished in 1800 and partially rebuilt after being burned by the British during the War of 1812.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that work on the 8360 sq m facility will be completed "long before" Trump's four-year term ends in January 2029.
The $US200 million ($NZ340 million) cost of the ballroom, which will be able to seat 650 people, will be donated by Trump and other donors, she said.
Presidents have used the intimate State Dining Room for events, as well as the larger East Room for bigger VIP lists, and sometimes will have a tent temporarily constructed on the South Lawn to host big dinners.
"When it rains, it's a disaster," Trump said of the tents when asked about the new ballroom on Thursday.
Trump's home at his Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, has a grand ballroom and a smaller one, both with glittering chandeliers and white walls decorated with gold flourishes.
The Republican president has been determined to put his stamp on the executive mansion. He installed gold-filigreed decorations in the Oval Office and erected giant flagpoles on the north and south lawns.
The Rose Garden is currently a construction site with the grass uprooted and replaced by a concrete patio of the type Trump enjoys at Mar-a-Lago.
Trump first offered to build a $US100 million ballroom at the White House back in 2010, an offer to then-President Barack Obama that went unanswered.
The East Wing of the White House will be "modernised" as part of the project. Offices there, including the one used by First Lady Melania Trump, will be temporarily relocated, Leavitt said.
As if to reassure traditionalists, the White House said the theme and architectural heritage will be "almost identical" to the rest of the house.
It said Trump in recent weeks held meetings with members of the White House staff, the National Park Service, the White House Military Office and the US Secret Service to discuss design features and planning.
"It'll be a great legacy project," Trump said on Thursday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
29 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Russia, China hold war games, Japan voices security worries
Some of the vessels from Russia and China taking part in the three-day exercise that began on Sunday in an area near to Japan and South Korea. Photo / Vanguard Intel Group Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Already a subscriber? Sign in here Access to Herald Premium articles require a Premium subscription. Subscribe now to listen. Some of the vessels from Russia and China taking part in the three-day exercise that began on Sunday in an area near to Japan and South Korea. Photo / Vanguard Intel Group Russia and China are staging mock combat drills and other war games near Japan and South Korea in a sign of strengthening military ties. Though pre-planned, the joint naval exercises that began on Sunday came a day after President Donald Trump moved United States nuclear submarines closer to Russia in response to inflammatory comments from Russia's former President Dmitry Medvedev. The Joint Sea-2025 drills were launched in waters near Vladivostok, Russia's largest port on the Pacific Ocean, according to a statement from China's Defence Ministry. Four Chinese vessels, including guided-missile destroyers Shaoxing and Urumqi, will be participating in the three-day exercises. This will include 'submarine rescue, joint anti-submarine, air defence and anti-missile operations, and maritime combat', followed by naval patrols in 'relevant waters of the Pacific'.
NZ Herald
5 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Ex-Fox News host, prosecutor and judge was nominated after Trump's first choice, podcaster Ed Martin was blocked
Republicans have accused Democrats of obstruction for forcing time-consuming votes to confirm the President's picks, rather than allowing some of them to be confirmed by voice vote or unanimous consent, as was common under previous administrations. Republicans in the majority spent days negotiating with Democrats to allow the Senate to confirm more nominees before senators left town, but no deal came together. 'Do not accept the offer, go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing, and have done, for our Country,' Trump wrote on social media. 'In a fit of rage, Trump threw in the towel, sent Republicans home and was unable to do the basic work of negotiating,' Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (Democrat-New York) told reporters. Pirro is one of a number of Fox hosts that Trump has recruited for the administration and fits the mould of many of his appointees: combative, camera-ready, and loyal enough to have sought to discredit the results of the 2020 election that he lost, the Washington Post reported previously. In the days leading up to the January 6 insurrection, Pirro had cast doubt on the credibility of Joe Biden's election victory in statements that aired on Fox. After Trump supporters stormed the Capitol, however, she walked back those comments, instead calling the attack 'deplorable, reprehensible, outright criminal'. Pirro's claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election were included in the US$2.1 billion ($3.5b) defamation lawsuit filed by Dominion Voting Systems against Fox News, which led the broadcaster to settle the case for US$787.5 million in 2023. She is also a defendant in a similar defamation lawsuit by voting software maker Smartmatic. That case is pending. In a written response to senators' questions ahead of her confirmation that was obtained by the Washington Post, Pirro declined to offer thoughts on whether those convicted in the January 6 riot cases should have been pardoned. She sidestepped several other questions, including whether there would ever be a legal basis for someone from the executive branch of government to defy a federal court order. Pirro's confirmation to one of the nation's highest-profile prosecutor's offices was met with mixed reactions. Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, described her record on issues including the January 6 riot, election denialism, and Trump's immigration policies as 'deeply troubling'. 'President Trump has been using the Justice Department to protect his allies and go after his enemies, and Ms Pirro has proven to be a willing accomplice in weaponizing the justice system,' Durbin said in a statement. 'She is not fit to be the US Attorney for our nation's capital, and I believe it's a grave mistake my Republican colleagues voted to confirm her.' 'She is simply a loyal political acolyte and sycophant of the President,' Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut) said in a floor speech ahead of the confirmation vote. Attorney-General Pam Bondi called Pirro 'a warrior for law and order' in a post on X. The DC Police Union congratulated Pirro and said it looked forward to working with her 'to hold criminals accountable and reduce crime'. Pirro thanked the union in response and promised to work with police to 'clean up DC'. Deadlines are looming for dozens of Trump loyalists handpicked as interim US Attorneys, whose 120-day terms are set to expire in the coming months. The Justice Department last month deployed a complex procedural manoeuvre to keep Alina Habba, a former personal lawyer for Trump, as New Jersey's top federal prosecutor, in a playbook it has used to extend the tenures of other polarising prosecutors that bypasses the Senate's role in confirming official nominees for the job. During Pirro's time as interim US Attorney, she instituted a policy of scrutinising the immigration status of all criminal defendants in the district, as part of the Trump Administration's efforts to ramp up deportations. She will also oversee a portfolio of major cases, including the shooting deaths of Yaron Lischinsky, 30, and Sarah Lynn Milgrim, 26, a couple who had just left a reception at the Capital Jewish Museum. Pirro said her office intends to investigate the killings as an act of terrorism and a hate crime. For decades, Trump and Pirro have fraternised in the same Republican circles in New York. On her Saturday Fox News show, Justice With Judge Jeanine, Pirro delivered strident defences of the President during his first term. In 2018, Pirro published a book titled Liars, Leakers and Liberals: The Case Against the Anti-Trump Conspiracy. Pirro's former husband, Albert Pirro, served as Trump's real estate lawyers before being convicted of federal tax evasion in 2000 when she was district attorney. He was sentenced to 29 months and was released from federal custody in 2002, court records show. Trump pardoned him in 2021, during his first term. In 2006, Pirro was investigated by federal prosecutors for seeking to bug the family's boat to determine whether her husband was having an affair. Pirro called the investigation a 'political witch hunt and smear campaign', and said her marital discord was not the business of the prosecutors. No charges were filed. In a statement on her confirmation, Pirro said: 'The confidence placed in me by the President and affirmed by the Senate will not be in vain. I am committed to ensuring that the nation's capital once again reflects the quality, safety, and promise of the citizens and our great country.'
NZ Herald
7 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Trump's tariffs are making money. That may make them hard to quit
Indeed, Trump has routinely cited the tariff revenue as evidence that his trade approach, which has sowed uncertainty and begun to increase prices for consumers, is a win for the US. Members of his Administration have argued that the money from the tariffs would help plug the hole created by the broad tax cuts Congress passed last month, which are expected to cost the Government at least US$3.4 trillion. 'The good news is that Tariffs are bringing Billions of Dollars into the USA!' Trump said on social media shortly after a weak jobs report showed signs of strain in the labour market. Over time, analysts expect that the tariffs, if left in place, could be worth more than US$2t in additional revenue over the next decade. Economists overwhelmingly hope that doesn't happen and the US abandons the new trade barriers. But some acknowledge that such a substantial stream of revenue could end up being hard to quit. 'I think this is addictive,' said Joao Gomes, an economist at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School. 'I think a source of revenue is very hard to turn away from when the debt and deficit are what they are.' Trump has long fantasised about replacing taxes on income with tariffs. He often refers fondly to American fiscal policy in the late 19th century, when there was no income tax and the government relied on tariffs, citing that as a model for the future. And while income and payroll taxes remain by far the most important sources of government revenue, the combination of Trump's tariffs and the latest Republican tax cut does, on the margin, move the US away from taxing earnings and towards taxing goods. Such a shift is expected to be regressive, meaning that rich Americans will fare better than poorer Americans under the change. That's because cutting taxes on income does, in general, provide the biggest benefit to richer Americans who earn the most income. The recent Republican cut to income taxes and the social safety net is perhaps the most regressive piece of major legislation in decades. Placing new taxes on imported products, however, is expected to raise the cost of everyday goods. Lower-income Americans spend more of their earnings on those more expensive goods, meaning the tariffs amount to a larger tax increase for them compared with richer Americans. US President Donald Trump. Photo / Tierney L. Cross, The New York Times Tariffs have begun to bleed into consumer prices, with many companies saying they will have to start raising prices as a result of added costs. And analysts expect the tariffs to weigh on the performance of the economy overall, which in turn could reduce the amount of traditional income tax revenue the Government collects every year. 'Is there a better way to raise that amount of revenue? The economic answer is: Yes, there is a better way, there are more efficient ways,' said Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Yale Budget Lab and a former Biden Administration official. 'But it's really a political question.' Tedeschi said that future leaders in Washington, whether Republican or Democrat, may be hesitant to roll back the tariffs if that would mean a further addition to the federal debt load, which is already raising alarms on Wall Street. And replacing the tariff revenue with another type of tax increase would require Congress to act, while the tariffs would be a legacy decision made by a previous president. 'Congress may not be excited about taking such a politically risky vote when they didn't have to vote on tariffs in the first place,' Tedeschi said. Some in Washington are already starting to think about how they could spend the tariff revenue. Trump recently floated the possibility of sending Americans a cash rebate for the tariffs, and Senator Josh Hawley, (Republican-Missouri), recently introduced legislation to send US$600 to many Americans. 'We have so much money coming in, we're thinking about a little rebate, but the big thing we want to do is pay down debt,' Trump said last month of the tariffs. Democrats, once they return to power, may face a similar temptation to use the tariff revenue to fund a new social programme, especially if raising taxes in Congress proves as challenging as it has in the past. As it is, Democrats have been divided over tariffs. Maintaining the status quo may be an easier political option than changing trade policy. 'That's a hefty chunk of change,' Tyson Brody, a Democratic strategist, said of the tariffs. 'The way that Democrats are starting to think about it is not that 'these will be impossible to withdraw.' It's: 'Oh, look, there's now going to be a large pot of money to use and reprogramme.'' Of course, the tariffs could prove unpopular, and future elected officials may want to take steps that could lower consumer prices. At the same time, the amount of revenue the tariffs generate could decline over time if companies do, in fact, end up bringing back more of their operations to the US, reducing the number of goods that face the import tax. 'This is clearly not an efficient way to gather revenue,' said Alex Jacquez, a former Biden official and the chief of policy and advocacy at Groundwork Collaborative, a liberal group. 'And I don't think it would be a long-term progressive priority as a way to simply collect revenue.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Andrew Duehren Photographs by: Alyssa Schukar, Tierney L. Cross ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
