Poor access to patient notes makes outsourcing risky, say doctors
Photo:
123RF
"Ad hoc" sharing of patient information between public and private hospitals is putting patients at risk, warn doctors, with the government push to outsource thousands more operations.
Health NZ says it is working on a new national electronic patient data service - but insists critical records are already available to clinicians when they need it.
College of Surgeons spokesperson and Christchurch urologist Sharon English said staff spent "a lot of time" tracking down patient records from other hospitals or districts.
Private surgeons who also worked in the public system could at least log in and see patient notes held there, she said.
"It would be different for a surgeon who works only in private, who would have to be either given access or ensure that a full copy of the notes is there.
"And that's actually very hard, to get every single file."
It was even more difficult extracting notes from private hospitals on patients sent back to public for post-op care, she said.
Even within the public system, it was not seamless.
"Just having all the public hospital systems talking to each other for a start would be fantastic."
Rather than expensive outsourcing, the public system should be resourced properly to look after public patients, she said.
"We see this as a work-around rather than a permanent solution."
Health Minister Simeon Brown wants another 21,000 procedures outsourced over the next 12 months, on top of the more than 12,764 done so far this year.
The Association of Salaried Medical Specialists - which represents senior hospital doctors and dentists - said "the scale" of outsourcing made the lack of consistent record sharing an urgent problem.
Director of policy and research Harriet Wild said canny patients often showed up for specialist appointments with their own ring-binders of notes and test results.
"It's really ad hoc across the board: the data sharing between primary care and secondary care, public hospitals and private hospitals, it's higgledy-piggledy and all over the place."
In some cases, missing patient information could be life-threatening: "If you're talking allergies, or medications that do not mix".
Outdated legacy IT systems were also a curb on efficiency in many public hospitals, she said.
"Any doctor will tell you the shambles of their current hospital IT system and whether their computer can be safely updated because all their software is hopelessly out of date.
"We're really operating many years in the past and it's very unsafe."
Society of Anaesthetists president Morgan Edwards said access to patient records was a basic requirement.
"In order to provide adequate care we need to be able to see patient notes, but what we receive from the private hospitals is a very rudimentary patient questionnaire most of the time, it's filled in by the patients.
"They may say they 'get out of breath sometimes', but that could be from running a marathon or getting out of bed. So, it's really vague."
Health Minister Simeon Brown wants another 21,000 procedures outsourced over the next 12 months.
Photo:
Nathan Mckinnon / RNZ
Public hospitals within Auckland could at least see each others' records, although they were all in slightly different formats, she said.
"Once you start to get patients from outside the bounds of Tāmaki Makaurau we can't see really anything. Often bloods will be visible, but not clinic letters. And the real question is, has this patient been adequately pre-op assessed? Because that information doesn't necessarily follow the patient.
"For example, at Waitematā we've got a huge amount of capacity, so we're getting patients from further and further afield all the time, like from Northland, but we can't see their notes very well."
Patients who had not been assessed properly and were too sick to be treated in the private system sometimes had their surgery cancelled, which allowed "inefficiency to creep in".
"While the outsourcing has got some potential huge benefits, it's also just so expensive, that in many ways it does feel like a short-sighted solution.
"It's difficult to jump on board with a concept that is not the most cost-effective use of health money, if we're looking at a 20-year plan."
She said anaesthetists raised the patient record problem with the Minister at a recent meeting.
"He was also surprised at this information, it was new information to him. We're now trying very hard to meet with Health NZ to ensure there is consistency of process across the country."
Health NZ spokesperson Cath Cronin said outsourcing planned surgical care to private hospitals to reduce wait times was "not new".
"Patient safety and the protection of patient information is taken very seriously for anyone treated in public or private facilities. There are multiple checks and balances built into the referral and surgical treatment process."
All decisions regarding which patients were appropriate to receive care in private hospitals were made by the relevant specialist multi-disciplinary clinical team.
"Critical patient information will always be available to the treating clinicians. A surgical operation will not proceed without the surgeon and anaesthetist first reviewing the patient's clinical record. If the surgeon and anaesthetist are not comfortable with the information they have, the patient will not be accepted for surgery."
Health NZ was working on a new electronic patient data service called the Shared Digital Health Record to "help" secure sharing of health information nationwide, and was looking to centralise radiology and diagnostic results data, she said.
Private Surgical Hospitals Association chief executive Chris Roberts said outsourcing had been going on for decades and there were "long-established processes in place to protect patient safety and privacy".
Private hospitals already carried out 70 percent of elective operations, and more than 90 percent of ACC-funded operations.
Outsourcing had been "ad hoc and varied" until now, he said.
"What is now being proposed by the Minister and Health NZ is a more consistent approach."
Regarding information sharing, there could be "some legacy issues from the district health board model", which allowed for different approaches in different regions".
"But Health NZ is now providing national guidelines. It is for Health NZ to comment on their processes and requirements."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Booze Warnings On Hold
, for The Detail Outdated alcohol guidelines put New Zealand out of step with modern research, but our health authorities are in no hurry to update them. In Canada, proposed guidelines for low-risk drinking set the weekly limit at two drinks. Here in New Zealand, the recommendation is to cap alcohol at 10 drinks weekly for women, and 15 for men, with two alcohol-free days per week. Despite these guidelines being nearly 15 years old, and documents from Health NZ showing that they consider a review of the guidelines to be 'necessary', for now, the guidelines are staying as they are. "The complication is that the Ministry of Health has come in over the top of [Health NZ] and has said 'actually these are our guidelines ... we want to control this and we're putting a pause on that work'," says RNZ's Guyon Espiner. "It certainly does show that they're listening to the alcohol industry, who are pretty exercised about this - because as you can imagine, this could have a significant effect on sales if people did take this advice and did drink significantly less." In a series of articles over the past few months, Espiner has reported on issues of alcohol harm and how the alcohol lobby has impacted policy in New Zealand. Through documents he received through the Official Information Act (OIA), he found that Health NZ commissioned a review of the low-risk guidelines. But in October 2024, a lobbyist emailed Ross Bell, who is a manager in the Ministry of Health's Public Health Agency, asking why Health NZ's website said the guidelines were under review. In December, following a second email which again asked about the review and also complained about mention of the Canadian guidelines on Health NZ-run website ' Bell emailed Health NZ saying "All work on this project will now pause. You will update relevant Health NZ websites to remove references to the review and also to other jurisdictions' guidelines (including the Canadian one)." But in a statement to The Detail, the Ministry of Health says it "understands Health New Zealand has continued some work related to the review. The Ministry is working with Health New Zealand on potential next steps, including how Health New Zealand's progress on the review to date can be used to inform any future work in this area" and that "the Ministry is currently considering where the next phase (Phase 2) will fit as it prioritises its work programme for 2025/26." The Ministry's statement, which is attributed to Dr Andrew Old, Deputy Director-General, Public Health Agency, goes on to say that "as part of good policy process, the Ministry engages with a broad range of interested parties-including community organisations, public health experts, and the industry-to ensure any regulatory approaches are well-informed and transparent. Reference to the drinking guidelines review was removed from the website to avoid confusion about roles and responsibilities as the guidelines are now led by the Ministry of Health - rather than Health New Zealand which has responsibility for the site. This was an internal Ministry decision." In today's episode of The Detail, Espiner details other examples of contact between the alcohol lobby and health policy makers. "The material I've got shows that yes they've had a lot of meetings, a lot of email contact, in fact one looked like a regular meeting between alcohol lobbyists and Ministry of Health staff. They've also shared with the alcohol industry their plans on how they will combat Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder ... they shared that entire draft document with them and also shared with them plans about how they might spend the alcohol levy." Espiner says that while this contact is going on, tobacco lobbyists are completely 'locked out of the policy process". "We're signatory to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, [which is] a World Health initiative, and there's a clause in there that New Zealand is signed up to that says you won't allow the vested interests of the tobacco industry to shape policy. "What's interesting is that the alcohol industry has escaped most of that scrutiny." For Massey University associate professor Andy Towers, who has worked on the Health NZ review, it is a clear mistake for New Zealand to allow lobbyists a role. "It's very, very clear that you don't invite the wolf into the henhouse," he says. "Unfortunately the alcohol industry makes money based on alcohol use and resulting alcohol harms and in a space where we are trying to reduce the harmful use of alcohol and reduce those harms for society and for communities, there is not space for the alcohol industry there. They do not get to sit at the table, just as you wouldn't invite an arms manufacturer to the table to talk about cessation of violence." In this episode of The Detail, Towers explains how knowledge around the harm of alcohol has evolved in the past 20 years, and where New Zealand sits on alcohol use compared to other countries. Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here.

RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Two popular regional flights on the chopping block
Two popular regional flights in the South Island are on the chopping block due to what is has been described as 'out of control' costs. Sounds Air will soon can its flights from Blenheim to Christchurch and Christchurch to Wanaka. It comes after the airline cancelled its services from Wellington to Taupo and Wellington to Westport last December, and sold an aircraft. It has been seen as not just a blow to hopes of boosting tourism but also for healthcare and those needing treatment at Christchurch Hospital. Tess Brunton reports. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.

RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Havelock residents told to boil water as council seeks solution
Photo: AFP The Marlborough District Council is considering temporarily treating Havelock's water supply with ultraviolet light after the regulator issued a boil water notice. Taumata Arowai issued the notice last Wednesday as a precautionary measure due to the risk of parasitic contamination. A new treatment plant was due to be completed by 2028, however, if a temporary solution was found the notice could be lifted well ahead of that date. Council assets and services manager Richard Coningham said the risk of contamination in Havelock had not changed, but the drinking water requirements in the Water Services Act 2021 were more stringent. Water supplies in New Zealand required a multi-barrier approach - a range of processes, procedures and tools to protect and treat water. "Although chlorine is used in the Havelock supply, it doesn't protect from the risk - however small - of protozoa getting into the supply," Coningham said. Protozoa are single-celled parasites, like cryptosporidium and giardia, that make can make people sick. They can be removed from water with filters or inactivated using UV light so they do not pose a health risk. People in Havelock were being told to boil water used for drinking, cooking, brushing teeth and washing food. Coningham said the council was working through a number of options and planned to have a solution by the end of the week. The new $14 million water treatment plant planned for Havelock would use a multi-barrier approach, including filtration, chlorine and UV. "The plant upgrade has been planned for some years and budget is set aside in the council's Long Term Plan. However it has been difficult to secure a new site, with few land options available in the town or nearby," Coningham said. The council had now found a site and was planning and designing a new treatment plant, for completion in early 2028. Land purchase negotiations were in the final stages and a new road would be built to provide access. Construction tendering would follow.