
Fast Five Quiz: Management of MPA
What do you know about the management of MPA? Check your knowledge with this quick quiz.
Although renal involvement is common in ANCA vasculitis owing to a high concentration of blood vessels, subtypes of ANCA vasculitis have distinct patterns of extrarenal involvement. These varying clinical presentations correlate with different antibody profiles: MPA commonly associates with myeloperoxidase (MPO) serology while GPA generally presents with proteinase 3 (PR3) serology. Following renal involvement, the pulmonary system is a commonly involved organ system in MPA; cutaneous involvement and neurologic manifestations are also common. MPA typically shows fewer manifestations in the ear, nose, and throat region and eyes than other subtypes. Cardiovascular system and gastrointestinal system involvement are more often seen in EGPA, though patients with MPA can experience cardiovascular and gastrointestinal symptoms.
Learn more about renal involvement in MPA.
The latest Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) guidelines recommend beginning plasma exchange in patients with MPA when serum creatinine rises above > 300 µmol/L (equivalent to 3.4 mg/dL, as stated by KDIGO). This is supported by a recent meta-analysis that reported plasma exchange reduces the risk for end-stage kidney disease at 12 months; the same serum creatinine level for initiation was recommended by the researchers. However, they noted that plasma exchange was not found to improve the combined endpoint of "death and/or end-stage kidney disease."
Additionally, KDIGO also recommends plasma exchange for patients requiring dialysis or those with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage and hypoxemia, but EULAR specifically recommends against routine use of plasma exchange for diffuse alveolar hemorrhage in patients with MPA and GPA.
Learn more about creatinine monitoring in MPA.
The latest KDIGO guidelines recommend considering discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy in patients with MPA who have remained on dialysis for 3 months without extrarenal disease manifestations. This approach acknowledges that patients with MPO-ANCA-associated vasculitis (which is most strongly associated with MPA) who have kidney failure without involvement of other organs face minimal relapse risk. Supporting this, the EULAR cites research demonstrating that patients who are dependent on dialysis and in remission without immunosuppression are significantly more likely to experience serious infectious or cardiovascular complications from continued treatment than suffer disease recurrence; they specifically recommend weighing benefits and harms in continuing immunosuppressive therapy in the MPA subtype of ANCA.
Learn more about immunosuppressive therapy in MPA.
According to a recent review citing data from KDIGO, patients with MPA typically have the worst kidney prognosis due to the chronic damage associated with this subtype. Further, patients with EGPA less often have kidney involvement than GPA or MPA and usually have better kidney prognosis. Kidney prognosis is generally worse in patients with MPA than those with GPA as well.
KDIGO also cites previously developed prognostic scoring systems (which include sclerotic, focal, crescentic, and mixed class), depending on most of the glomeruli histology. For example, focal class (> 50% normal glomeruli) is associated with a favorable outcome, while sclerotic class (≥ 50% sclerotic glomeruli) is associated with poorer outcomes.
Learn more about prognosis in MPA.
Both KDIGO and EULAR guidelines recommend a tapering schedule of 4-5 months after initiating glucocorticoids in patients with MPA, reaching a reduced dose (listed as " 5 mg prednisolone equivalent" per day) by that point. Tapering schedule is generally based on weight and disease severity. For example, for patients weighing > 75 kg (165 lb), EULAR suggests starting at 75 mg, then tapering to 40 mg by week 2, then lowering the dose by approximately 25% every 2 weeks until reaching 5 mg by week 19. This is the same tapering schedule recommended by KDIGO; the full tapering schedule for this weight and others can be found here.
Clinical evidence supporting this strategy comes from the PEXIVAS trial, which demonstrated that lowering steroid exposure by 40% during the initial 6 months maintained therapeutic effectiveness while significantly decreasing serious infection rates compared to conventional dosing. This accelerated reduction strategy effectively balances inflammatory control with minimizing steroid-related complications.
Learn more about glucocorticoids in MPA.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
18 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
ULA's Vulcan and Ariane 6 Rocket Blast Off
United Launch Alliance's Vulcan rocket launches its first national security mission, and Europe's Ariane 6 takes off on just its third mission ever. Bloomberg's Loren Grush discusses the implications of these successful missions with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow on 'Bloomberg Tech.' (Source: Bloomberg)


CNET
an hour ago
- CNET
New Study Shows Smartwatch Stress Sensors Have No Idea What They're Doing
You might want to think twice before you put a lot of stock in the latest stress charts from your fitness wearable. A recent study from the Netherlands' Leiden University, published in the Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science, has found that when smartwatches and similar devices record readings on stress, fatigue, or sleep, they're frequently getting it wrong. Researchers studied 800 young adults using the same Garmin Vivosmart 4 smartwatch model. They compared the data the smartwatches produced with the reports that the users created four times per day about how sleepy or stressed they were feeling. Lead author and associate professor Eiko Fried said the correlation between the wearable data and the user-created data was, "basically zero." A representative for Garmin did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Stressed or sex? Your watch doesn't know So why do wearables like fitness smartwatches get it so wrong? Their sensors are fairly limited in what they can do. Watches like these need to be worn correctly at all times (a loose or tight watch may give poor readings, for example), and they typically use basic information like pulse rate and movement to make guesses about health. Those guesses don't always reflect real-world scenarios. A wearable may identify high stress when the real cause of the change was a workout, excitement over good news, or sex. There are so many potential alternatives to stress or fatigue that the watches in the study never really got it right -- and the devices sometimes guessed the complete opposite emotional state from what users recorded. The Dutch study did note that Garmin's Body Battery readings, which specifically measure physical fatigue, were more reliable than stress indicators, but still inaccurate. And sleep sensing performed the best of them all, with Garmin watches showing a two-thirds chance of noting the differences between a good night's sleep and a bad one. It's also worth noting that smartwatch sensors can become more accurate as technology improves. It would be interesting to run a similar study with the much newer Garmin Vivosmart 5 to see if anything has improved, as well as see if other models like the latest versions of the Apple Watch have similar accuracy results.


Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
Doctors Were Worse at Spotting Cancer After Leaning on AI, Study Finds
Artificial intelligence tools have been shown to help doctors detect pre-cancerous growths in the colon—but don't even think about taking those tools away once you've introduced them. A new study published this week in The Lancet found that doctors who are given AI tools to assist with identifying potential cancer risks in patients get worse at making those same observations when they go back to doing it without AI's help. The study looked at four endoscopy centers in Poland, tracking the success rates of detecting colon cancer for three months before AI tools were introduced and three months after. Once AI was introduced, colonoscopies were randomly assigned to either receive AI support or not. The researchers found that doctors who gave colonoscopies without AI after having its assistance available saw their detection rates drop, producing outcomes 20% worse than what they were before AI was introduced. Making the results all the more troubling is the fact that the 19 doctors who participated in the study were all very experienced and had performed more than 2,000 colonoscopies each. If those doctors can fall prey to de-skilling, seeing their own abilities erode because of reliance on AI tools, the outcomes from inexperienced doctors could be even worse. There is little doubt that AI tools can help in medical settings. There have been numerous studies that suggest that AI can facilitate everything from the detection of cancers to the diagnosis of illnesses based on a patient's medical history. Analyzing information based on a whole wealth of previous examples is kinda the bread and butter of AI (you know, as opposed to generating braindead content slop), and there is evidence that suggests that humans can augment their own abilities by using AI tools. Studies in medical settings have found that doctors who use these tools can produce better outcomes for their patients. But no one, including doctors, is immune to the risk of shutting your brain off and relying on AI rather than their own skills. Earlier this year, Microsoft published a study that found knowledge workers who lean on AI stop thinking critically about the work they are doing and feel confident that the assistance from AI will be enough to get the job done. Researchers at MIT similarly found that relying on ChatGPT for essay writing resulted in less critical engagement with the material. In the long term, there's a real risk that reliance on AI will erode our ability to problem solve and reason, which is not ideal when AI continues to generate bad information. The American Medical Association found that about two in three physicians have already adopted AI to augment their abilities. Hopefully, they're still able to identify when it does something like hallucinating a body part that doesn't exist.