Opinion: It's time to put Canada back on the investment map
In national terms, it takes investment to generate economic growth. But in recent years, Canada's economic policy has lost sight of that basic principle.
Article content
Article content
A major reason for Canada's stalled economic growth and declining standard of living over the past decade is that business investment — a critical driver of growth — has been weak, suffering under a federal policy environment that has ranged from unhelpful to counterproductive. The result is a country struggling to compete, attract capital and generate the kind of prosperity Canadians expect and deserve.
Article content
Article content
When businesses look for opportunities to grow and invest, Canada has not been a clear choice for some time and the reasons aren't mysterious. Investors want to know that when they make a bet on a country, that bet won't be derailed by unpredictable policy shifts, misguided regulatory frameworks or political interference.
Article content
Article content
If we want to reverse this trend, we must act — and quickly. At a time of global uncertainty and geopolitical turmoil, countries are seeking reliable trading partners and investors are looking for stable, competitive environments. Canada can offer both.
Article content
According to recent polling, 80 per cent of Canadians supported growing investment in Canada by focusing on competitiveness. With bold leadership, we can restore confidence, attract investment and build a stronger, more prosperous future for all Canadians.
Article content
That starts with a national commitment to positioning Canada not just as a top choice for business but the top choice.
Article content
Canadians' famous modesty can sometimes work against us. We are often reluctant to say we want to be the 'first' or the 'best,' but we must. We need to send a clear message to the world: Canada is refocused on competitiveness and committed to growth. This message must be reinforced consistently, on global stages, in major speeches and in every international engagement.
Article content
But rhetoric alone won't get us there. We must back it up with action. We need to eliminate the friction that makes doing business here harder than it should be. That includes eliminating barriers to labour and trade between provinces, a long-standing Canadian problem that we've tolerated for too long.
Article content
We also need levels of government to play to their strengths and, frankly, stay in their lanes. Canada's constitution gives provinces jurisdiction over many key areas that affect investment — from natural resource development to permitting and electricity generation. To successfully build business and investor confidence, the federal government must respect this.
Article content
Playing to our strengths also applies to how we manage natural resources. Canada has a generational opportunity to meet growing global demand for responsibly produced energy, minerals and food. But to seize it, we need a policy environment that enables — rather than obstructs — investment.
Article content
This will also require a better process for Indigenous consultation, one that ensures both partnership and consistency.
Article content
And we must take a sharper, more targeted approach to immigration. Canada has the potential to attract the world's best and brightest, but we must prioritize pathways that match our economic needs and select those with the skills and capabilities to meet those needs and be set up for a long-term trajectory of success. Seven in 10 Canadians support this market-driven economic approach to immigration.
Article content
Finally, we can't talk about investment without talking about infrastructure. Moving Canadian goods to global markets efficiently is essential to our competitiveness. That means faster approvals and more significant and expansive investments in trade infrastructure — starting now.
Article content
None of this requires reinvention. These are pragmatic, achievable steps, ones we outline in a new report, From Barriers to Breakthroughs, that can strengthen Canada's economic foundation and restore our competitiveness on the world stage.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Duty-free shops facing ‘full-blown crisis' with no relief in sight
John Slipp took over his father's duty-free store in 1994, which had been started more than a decade earlier. This month, he closed the Woodstock Duty Free Shop Inc. as lower traffic at the U.S.-Canada border dealt the final blow to a business already weakened by the COVID-19 pandemic. Now, at 59, Slipp says he will have to find another source of income and is advocating for more government support for stores like his. Fewer Canadians have been heading south in recent months in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war with Canada, his comments about annexing the country and because of fears among travellers about treatment at the border. In the duty-free industry, Slipp said less border traffic directly correlates to fewer sales. 'It was very difficult. The business had many good years. I certainly didn't want to be in the position of calling an end to a business career, giving up, calling it quits, both personally and in terms of my late father,' Slipp said. At the store's peak in the early 2000s, Slipp said there were about 15 people on staff. In March 2020, he said he laid off four people and reopened after the pandemic with two employees. Late in the summer of 2021, Slipp said duty-free stores were 'all starting from zero to rebuild again.' By the end of 2024, his business was still down about one-fifth from where it was in 2019. Then Trump returned to the White House. From January to April this year, things got worse for Slipp's store, and he ultimately decided to close based on declining sales and traffic numbers. 'Just realizing that even after the U.S. administration changes down the road, in our industry, we do not expect the border traffic to change overnight as a result of that. We believe it's going to take years,' he said. Recent figures from Statistics Canada noted that return trips from the U.S. dropped again in July as Canadians continue to shun travel to the U.S. The number of Canadian residents returning from the U.S. by automobile was down 36.9 per cent on an annual basis in July, marking the seventh consecutive month of year-over-year declines. Barbara Barrett, executive director of the Frontier Duty Free Association, said the stores her association represents have been feeling the decline in traffic for months. 'I would describe our industry as being in a full-blown crisis, and we've been saying that for a number of months now,' she said. Sales at duty-free stores have fallen between 40 and 50 per cent year-over-year across the country since late January, with some remote crossings reporting annual declines of up to 80 per cent, the association said. Barrett added that duty-free stores are often a microcosm of what is happening at the border. 'This should be our busy season during the summer, but it is not; it is pandemic-level traffic in the parking lots, and it has led to one store closing in the east. We are unfortunately afraid that we will likely see more closures as we draw to the end of the summer,' she said. Unlike airport stores, which are often owned by international companies, Barrett noted all of the land border stores are independently owned and are often family-run businesses. While Canadians shun U.S. trips, travel expert Claire Newell said many are opting for domestic and other international destinations. 'We live in a country where it's still very expensive to travel domestically. And while there are many people who are choosing to travel within Canada, we also see more people heading to popular destinations,' she said. She said she doesn't see Canadians changing their travel habits back to normal until there is a trade deal 'that feels fair.' As lower border traffic weighs on the industry, Barrett said she is advocating for 'small regulatory changes.' 'We have some taxes on our products that, believe it or not, in a tax- and duty-free industry that our U.S. competitors don't have. So we're asking for those to be changed so we can be more competitive,' she said. 'Also, we're asking to qualify for some of these tariff relief programs or pandemic-level supports along the lines of what they did during the pandemic with wage subsidy or rent subsidy.' Barrett said the government is the landlord for many duty-free stores and said a rent deferral or subsidy would help the industry until travel patterns normalize. She added that there have been conversations between her organization and senior government officials. Barrett said those officials agreed the association was putting forward 'small asks' to support the industry. An Aug. 2 release announcing the Woodstock Duty Free Shop's closure mentioned that the federal and provincial governments had promised tariff relief support programs to help businesses impacted by trade tensions. 'I pinned a lot of hopes on those when both levels of government made those announcements. I was reminded of the pandemic support programs,' Slipp said, adding that his business had benefited from such programs. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. His attention has now turned to advocating for rent deferral programs for duty-free shops renting land from either the federal government or from a bridge authority as well as loan programs for duty-free stores. When he looks at the future of the industry, he said the prospects 'are not bright.' 'I'm grieving the loss of my business, but I'm also accepting the reality that the business environment has changed and there is nothing in the bag of tricks that would suggest positive changes in this industry in the short to medium term,' Slipp said. 'I'm feeling bad that I was not able to succeed in the end and that I am having to lay to rest this business that my father and I have built and spent so many years working so hard on.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 17, 2025.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Economists expect tariffs lifted food prices, core inflation in July
OTTAWA – Tariff impacts are expected to keep underlying inflation elevated in July, a Desjardins economist says, even if the headline figure retreats. Statistics Canada is set to report inflation figures for July on Tuesday. A poll of economists expects annual inflation cooled last month to 1.7 per cent, according to LSEG Data & Analytics. June's consumer price index showed the annual rate of inflation ticked up to 1.9 per cent. Randall Bartlett, deputy chief economist at Desjardins, said he expects the headline inflation figure slowed beyond expectations to 1.6 per cent in July as lower energy costs continue to take steam out of price pressures. 'We're kind of expecting it to be a bit softer than what we saw back in June. So, from a headline perspective anyway, that's overall pretty positive news for Canadians,' he said in an interview. RBC is above the economists' consensus, expecting July's annual inflation reading will match the 1.9 per cent seen in June. Economists Nathan Janzen and Claire Fan wrote in a note to clients Friday that the removal of the consumer carbon price at the start of April 'continues to artificially lower headline inflation.' But they warned that price pressures below the surface should remain stubborn in July. 'Underlying trends have surprised upward this year, partly due to tariff impacts on products like food and vehicles, but also from higher prices for domestic services,' Janzen and Fan wrote. The Bank of Canada's preferred metrics of core inflation floated a bit above three per cent in June, according to Statistics Canada. Bartlett said Desjardins foresees these metrics holding between 2.5 per cent and three per cent for the rest of the year as Canada's tariff dispute with the United States drives up prices. He said he'll be looking to see whether more businesses were passing costs from tariffs onto consumers in July. Consumer price index data from the United States this past week appeared to show a tariff impact in the form of higher prices for shoes and furniture. While he believes the bulk of tariff price impacts were passed through in April and May, Bartlett said Canada will continue to feel the pinch from border levies on food and durable goods. 'That's going to put persistent upward pressure on price growth in Canada,' he said. The Bank of Canada held its benchmark interest rate steady at 2.75 per cent on July 30 as it waits for more information on how the Canada-U.S. trade dispute is affecting the economy. The summary of deliberations from that decision released this past week show the central bank's governing council remains wary of the effect of tariffs on inflation. Members indicated in those minutes that the impact on consumer prices 'appeared to be modest so far,' but the tariff influence is only just starting to show up in the data. While businesses' inflation expectations remain well-anchored according to recent surveys, the governing council said the costs of finding new suppliers amid shifting global trade could still push prices higher. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. 'Overall, members agreed that it was still too early to assess how tariffs and the rewiring of trade would affect economic activity and inflation in Canada,' the summary read. Bartlett said he expects economic data will open the door to a quarter-point interest rate cut at the Bank of Canada's next decision on Sept. 17. But that's contingent on core inflation readings getting back under control in the upcoming CPI releases for July and August. 'If we see that there's less passthrough from tariffs into inflation than we're expecting … we think there there's an opportunity for the Bank of Canada to cut further,' he said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 17, 2025.
National Post
2 hours ago
- National Post
Letters: Liberty versus wildfire risk and other burning issues
Article content Prime Minister Mark Carney is so far out of his league when it comes to Israel, it's an embarrassment to all Canadians with a conscience. Firstly, Carney knows absolutely nothing about what it's like to live in a country that has had to defend its existence from the moment it became the State of Israel in 1948. Carney has never had to actually live in a nation where thousands of rockets and missiles have been indiscriminately fired into the country to kill as many as possible. Article content I don't recall Carney having any military experience in the Middle East on his resume. And yet he has the chutzpah to declare, on behalf of all Canadians, that Israel's plan for Gaza won't work. It may or may not work, but Carney has zero skin in the game and zero credibility to attempt to tell a fellow democracy how to manage the war that was started and will be ever perpetuated by Hamas. Article content Carney should be managing/focusing on the faltering Canadian economy rather than singling out and threatening Israel. Article content Article content Catherine Lévesque reports that Premiers Danielle Smith of Alberta and Doug Ford of Ontario agree that more pipelines are required to transport Alberta crude across the country. Article content So, with the quick passage of Prime Minister Mark Carney's Bill C-5 it would seem that all that is needed now is for a private-sector consortium to put forward a proposal that Ottawa deems is worthy of using Bill C-5 to bypass other existing Liberal legislation. Article content Perhaps it would have been more straightforward to follow the Conservative plan: i.e. Scrap the offending legislation — Bill C-69 (the no more pipelines act) and the bill prohibiting tanker traffic off the West Coast. In other words, to eliminate federal interference entirely. Article content Article content Article content The Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) and Canada as a nation reached a new low in the suppression of free expression and antisemitism by cancelling the showing of a documentary about the October 7 attacks by Hamas terrorists. Although it has since walked back that decision, and now says it will be showing the documentary, in its initial cancelling TIFF was either cowering in fear of anti-Israel activists or demonstrating support for Hamas.
