logo
American colleges are failing students: How chasing prestige is leading them astray

American colleges are failing students: How chasing prestige is leading them astray

Time of India3 days ago
American education, once a bastion of academic excellence, now stands at the precipice of eroding the very legacy it was once celebrated for. The fracture in the system is not a sudden rupture but a familiar and well-worn narrative, shaped by diminishing state support, politicized culture wars, and the ballooning cost of living.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Yet what is corroding the shine of this academic powerhouse is not pressure from the outside. It is decay festering within. The uncomfortable truth is that many American colleges are themselves complicit in their own slow collapse.
The very institutions once applauded for their world-class education are now peddling learning as though it were a luxury good rather than a public mission. These universities, once citadels of inquiry and intellectual rigor, are drifting steadily away from their core purpose.
What remains are prestige factories, glossy on the surface but increasingly hollow at the core.
The cult of prestige: A costly obsession
Higher education is entangled in a prestige economy that prioritises aesthetics over academics. The competition is to appear and show an elite face to the aspiring students. And yes, the trend has gained ravenous popularity lately. It is no longer enough to educate; it has to be done in style. This has spawned a campus arms race: Multi-million dollar recreation centres, luxury dormitories, artificial rivers, gourmet dining halls, all to impress prospective students and allure college rankings.
The quest for status not only comes with a loss for academics but also puts mounting pressure on finances. Institutions divert funds from classrooms and research labs to amenities that have no role in improving learning for students. Students of today, especially Generation Z ,are more pulled in by the external aesthetics and comfortable lifestyle. Henceforth, universities are quickly adapting to it. The result? Skyrocketing tuition fees and an ever-widening credibility gap between what universities promise and what students actually receive.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Bureaucracy over books
Equally insidious is the administrative sprawl. Since the 1980s, universities have dramatically expanded their non-instructional staff, layering campuses with compliance officers, branding consultants, student life managers, and vice provosts of every imaginable portfolio. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, administrative spending is projected to rise another 7% in the next decade, outpacing faculty hiring and eroding institutional focus.
While administrative roles hold importance, the bloat has climbed to abnormal proportions. Faculty members are increasingly finding themselves buried in paperwork, performance metrics, and bureaucratic gymnastics, all of which pull time and energy away from teaching and research. Students meanwhile, are trying to find a way out of the labyrinth of offices that further adds complexities and are of little value to their education.
Debt as the new diploma
The financial burden this system places on students is staggering. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, the average tuition at public colleges has nearly tripled since 2000, rising far beyond the rate of inflation. The data says that in 2023, student debt hit an unprecedented $1.78 trillion, nearly triple what it was in 2008.
These numbers are not mere statistics, but tools to bring forth a shocking picture of adults who are representing millions of young adults shackled by loans in the prime of their lives, often without the earning power their degrees once guaranteed.
Colleges, eager to balance their books, are looking forward to international students who pay fill freight and flashy programmes that promise employability that is rarely achieved. Education, once a public trust, now behaves like a marketplace, where students are treated as consumers and learning is reduced to transactional value.
A crisis of mission
The drift is more than financial mismanagement; it is a crisis of identity. Universities were once sanctuaries of social mobility, niches of free thought, and hubs of public service.
Those ideals are now increasingly diluted by revenue imperatives, branding strategies, and rankings-based decision making.
In this climate, even well-intentioned academic goals are subjected to optics. The danger is existential: when institutions forget why they exist, they lose the public's trust, and ultimately, their relevance.
Reform or ruin?
Taking a U-turn from here is not easy, but necessary. It is high time that universities ask the needed painful questions, such as: Do we need more vice provosts or more professors? Do we need another climbing wall or a stronger core curriculum? Do we serve our students, or our brand?
Meaningful reform must include:
A hard cap on administrative expansion, with transparent audits of spending priorities.
Refocusing on academic quality, not auxiliary glitz.
Restoring affordability through reallocation of resources and tuition restructuring.
Reconnecting with communities through service, research, and local engagement that demonstrates public value beyond campus gates.
Colleges cannot afford to remain isolated ivory towers.
Their survival depends on rebuilding the social contract with students, with families, and with the communities they once served unconditionally.
Reclaiming the public good
Higher education is not beyond savings. But saving it requires courage: the courage to admit failure, challenge sacred cows, and dismantle the prestige-industrial complex that has attracted universities off course.
The public is watching. Students are questioning. And trust, once lost, will not be won back with a new rec center or a better PR firm. It will be earned by returning to first principles, by proving that education is not a luxury, but a right; not a product, but a public good.
Until then, the very institutions built to enlighten may continue to darken the futures they claim to serve.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tulsi Gabbard unleashes ‘Coup' files targeting Obama-era officials with treason, but is it all a smokescreen to bury Epstein scandal?
Tulsi Gabbard unleashes ‘Coup' files targeting Obama-era officials with treason, but is it all a smokescreen to bury Epstein scandal?

Economic Times

time28 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Tulsi Gabbard unleashes ‘Coup' files targeting Obama-era officials with treason, but is it all a smokescreen to bury Epstein scandal?

AP U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard departs following a closed door meeting with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. at Malacanang Palace in Manila, Philippines Monday, June 2, 2025. (Ezra Acayan/Pool Photo via AP) Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Friday, July 18, unleashed a barrage on posts X, accusing former Obama administration officials of politicizing intelligence ahead of the 2016 US election. She claims that the intelligence community's assessment of Russian election interference was manipulated to falsely suggest that foreign cyber operations influenced Donald Trump's victory. 'These documents detail a treasonous conspiracy by officials at the highest levels of the Obama White House,' Gabbard posted, adding that the effort was to 'subvert the will of the American people.' Also Read: How much is Dylan Dreyer worth in 2025; and who's doing better after her split from Brian Fichera? She further stated she has handed over all related documents to the Department of Justice, calling for a full investigation. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released declassified documents that revisit intelligence assessments made after the 2016 election. The documents, originally circulated within national security agencies, suggested that foreign actors, primarily Russia, did not alter vote counts or directly impact election results via cyber in one such Presidential Daily Brief from December 2016, intelligence officials reportedly assessed it was 'highly unlikely' that Russian actors had succeeded in changing vote outcomes. Despite these conclusions, a separate Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) released on January 6, 2017, indicated that Russia sought to help Trump win. That assessment became central to the narrative of Trump-Russia collusion and later led to investigations, including the Mueller Mueller probe was launched in May 2017 under Special Counsel Robert Mueller to examine Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election, possible links between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives, and whether President Trump obstructed justice. The investigation concluded that Russia did interfere through hacking and propaganda but did not find sufficient evidence to charge Trump or his campaign with conspiracy. Now, with newly declassified documents released by DNI Tulsi Gabbard, questions have resurfaced about the origins and motivations behind the probe, raising claims that the intelligence was politicized to justify a prolonged campaign to undermine Trump's timing of Gabbard's post and document release has also raised eyebrows among political observers. On July 17, the WSJ published a report detailing the involvement of President Donald Trump in a 2003 birthday letter that he allegedly signed in a leather-bound album for Jeffrey Epstein. However, he called it fake and threatened legal renewed interest in the matter, critics point out that Donald Trump has consistently sought to distance himself from the controversial case involving alleged ties between global elites and the now-deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein. Observers also note a sudden shift in both media and political discourse, steering attention back to long-standing Russia-related narratives and raising questions about whether this pivot is intended to divert focus from the unresolved Epstein saga. Online commentators have begun asking: Is the revival of this 2016 controversy meant to bury or distract from Epstein-related revelations?Gabbard, who was confirmed as Director of National Intelligence earlier this year under President Trump's second term, said that her actions are not partisan. 'This is about the integrity of our democratic republic,' she she has called for accountability, none of the individuals named, such as former CIA Director John Brennan, former DNI James Clapper, or former FBI Director James Comey, have publicly responded to the allegations as of publication. The Department of Justice has not confirmed any formal investigations on the newly declassified documents.

AIMPLB urges Union min for safety audit of Ajmer dargah
AIMPLB urges Union min for safety audit of Ajmer dargah

Time of India

time43 minutes ago

  • Time of India

AIMPLB urges Union min for safety audit of Ajmer dargah

Jaipur: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board ( AIMPLB ) has urged Union minority affairs minister Kiran Rijiju to conduct an urgent structural safety audit of Ajmer Sharif Dargah, following two concerning incidents of roof and ceiling collapse in the past two weeks. The Board has also demanded that the 800-year-old shrine be released from central govt control, citing neglect and mismanagement. In a letter addressed to Rijiju, the AIMPLB, which is currently leading the opposition to the Waqf Amendment Act, 2025, reminded the Union govt of the 1955 assurances made when the Dargah was brought under state management. The Board claims those assurances included the complete protection and maintenance of the shrine's heritage structures. "Several parts of the Dargah complex are 500 to 600 years old. With monsoon in full swing, a single spell of heavy rain could cause more damage or even result in tragedy if urgent repairs and safety inspections are not carried out," said Mohammed Fazlur Rahim Mujaddidi, general secretary of AIMPLB. The Board has gone a step further by demanding that the Dargah be freed from central govt control, accusing the current administration of failing in its responsibility. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo "This is example of the Modi govt's neglect of Muslim heritage sites. They haven't even conducted a structural audit of this 800-year-old shrine. If this is how they treat Ajmer Dargah, imagine what they plan to do with Waqf properties under the new amendments," said Syed Qasim Rasool Ilyas, spokesperson of AIMPLB. Ilyas added, "We demand that the Dargah be released from the clutches of the Union govt. Muslim organisations across the country should register their protest." Syed Sarwar Chishty, secretary of the Dargah Anjuman, on Friday released a video showing water seepage in the outer wall of the main sanctum along with the Sandali Mosque, raising alarms about the structural integrity of the shrine. The incessant rains on Friday, which caused flood-like conditions in Ajmer, endangered several other parts of the Dargah complex. Community leaders and shrine authorities are calling for immediate intervention to avert a potential disaster.

Tulsi Gabbard unleashes ‘Coup' files targeting Obama-era officials with treason, but is it all a smokescreen to bury Epstein scandal?
Tulsi Gabbard unleashes ‘Coup' files targeting Obama-era officials with treason, but is it all a smokescreen to bury Epstein scandal?

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Tulsi Gabbard unleashes ‘Coup' files targeting Obama-era officials with treason, but is it all a smokescreen to bury Epstein scandal?

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Friday, July 18, unleashed a barrage on posts X, accusing former Obama administration officials of politicizing intelligence ahead of the 2016 US election. She claims that the intelligence community's assessment of Russian election interference was manipulated to falsely suggest that foreign cyber operations influenced Donald Trump 's victory. 'These documents detail a treasonous conspiracy by officials at the highest levels of the Obama White House,' Gabbard posted, adding that the effort was to 'subvert the will of the American people.' Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category PGDM Project Management Design Thinking Public Policy Cybersecurity Data Science MBA Product Management Leadership CXO Healthcare MCA Operations Management Data Analytics Artificial Intelligence Digital Marketing Degree healthcare Technology Data Science Others Management Finance others Skills you'll gain: Financial Analysis & Decision Making Quantitative & Analytical Skills Organizational Management & Leadership Innovation & Entrepreneurship Duration: 24 Months IMI Delhi Post Graduate Diploma in Management (Online) Starts on Sep 1, 2024 Get Details Also Read: How much is Dylan Dreyer worth in 2025; and who's doing better after her split from Brian Fichera? by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ethiopia: Bathroom Remodeling Trends in 2025 May Surprise You Bathroom Remodeling | Search Ads Search Now Undo She further stated she has handed over all related documents to the Department of Justice , calling for a full investigation. Live Events New declassifications of an old allegation The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released declassified documents that revisit intelligence assessments made after the 2016 election. The documents, originally circulated within national security agencies, suggested that foreign actors, primarily Russia, did not alter vote counts or directly impact election results via cyber means. Earlier, in one such Presidential Daily Brief from December 2016, intelligence officials reportedly assessed it was 'highly unlikely' that Russian actors had succeeded in changing vote outcomes. Despite these conclusions, a separate Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) released on January 6, 2017, indicated that Russia sought to help Trump win. That assessment became central to the narrative of Trump-Russia collusion and later led to investigations, including the Mueller probe . The credibility of Muller Probe The Mueller probe was launched in May 2017 under Special Counsel Robert Mueller to examine Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election, possible links between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives, and whether President Trump obstructed justice. The investigation concluded that Russia did interfere through hacking and propaganda but did not find sufficient evidence to charge Trump or his campaign with conspiracy. Now, with newly declassified documents released by DNI Tulsi Gabbard, questions have resurfaced about the origins and motivations behind the probe, raising claims that the intelligence was politicized to justify a prolonged campaign to undermine Trump's presidency. Why Now? Epstein case receives little attention The timing of Gabbard's post and document release has also raised eyebrows among political observers. On July 17, the WSJ published a report detailing the involvement of President Donald Trump in a 2003 birthday letter that he allegedly signed in a leather-bound album for Jeffrey Epstein. However, he called it fake and threatened legal action. With renewed interest in the matter, critics point out that Donald Trump has consistently sought to distance himself from the controversial case involving alleged ties between global elites and the now-deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein. Observers also note a sudden shift in both media and political discourse, steering attention back to long-standing Russia-related narratives and raising questions about whether this pivot is intended to divert focus from the unresolved Epstein saga. Online commentators have begun asking: Is the revival of this 2016 controversy meant to bury or distract from Epstein-related revelations? Accountability Promised, but Questions Linger Gabbard, who was confirmed as Director of National Intelligence earlier this year under President Trump's second term, said that her actions are not partisan. 'This is about the integrity of our democratic republic,' she wrote. While she has called for accountability, none of the individuals named, such as former CIA Director John Brennan, former DNI James Clapper, or former FBI Director James Comey, have publicly responded to the allegations as of publication. The Department of Justice has not confirmed any formal investigations on the newly declassified documents.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store