PTI to submit CCTV footage of police raids
The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Wednesday allowed Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) to submit CCTV footage of alleged police raids as part of the official court record.
The decision was made by Justice Khalid Ishaq while hearing a petition filed by senior PTI member Akmal Khan, who sought judicial intervention against what he termed illegal police actions targeting party supporters.
In his petition, Khan requested the court to restrain police officials from conducting raids and harassing PTI workers and supporters involved in mobilizing for the party's August 5 protest.
The petitioner named the Inspector General of Police Punjab, the CCPO Lahore, DIG Operations, and the Station House Officers (SHOs) of Shahdara and Ferozwala (District Sheikhupura) as respondents. He argued that the alleged police actions were in violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution.
Read More: APC calls for abolishing SIFC, 26th Amendment, creating new 'Charter of Democracy'
Citing constitutional protections, Khan submitted that every citizen has the right to move freely within Pakistan, reside in any part of the country, and assemble peacefully — subject to reasonable legal restrictions in the public interest.
He further argued that citizens also have the right to form or join political parties unless such activities are declared prejudicial to national sovereignty or integrity by the federal government and later upheld by the Supreme Court.
Justice Ishaq, while accepting PTI's request to include CCTV footage as evidence, noted that any material relevant to the alleged harassment and unlawful actions by police may assist the court in assessing the facts of the case.
The court will continue proceedings after examining the submitted footage and hearing responses from the concerned police officials.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Regressive jirgas
Listen to article The federal government's recent move to revive the jirga system in the newly merged districts of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa is not just regressive, but also unconstitutional and dangerously reminiscent of the colonial-era governance. A committee led by the Federal Minister for Kashmir Affairs and Gilgit-Baltistan has been formed to explore alternative justice systems in these districts, raising fears of a de facto rollback of the 25th Constitutional Amendment, which integrated the former tribal areas into Pakistan's legal and administrative mainstream and abolished the jirga system — a move celebrated as a step towards constitutional equality, rule of law, and human rights for the region's long-neglected population. Nonetheless, the initiative to reinstate this system signals not only a betrayal of the promises made to the tribal population but also a troubling attempt to offload state responsibility for justice onto a parallel, informal, and often brutal institution. Undoubtedly, jirgas operate entirely outside the constitutional framework and the rule of law. They violate the principle of separation of powers, usurp judicial authority, and often lead to egregious human rights violations. Most disturbingly, jirgas are structurally biased against women. The recent tragic case of a 19-year-old bride murdered in Pirwadhai, Rawalpindi, allegedly on the orders of a jirga, and the killing of a couple in Balochistan on the pretext of an illicit relationship are only the latest examples in a long list of so-called "honour" killings facilitated by these illegal forums. Such incidents are a stark reminder that when justice is privatised, it is the most vulnerable who suffer. The Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 makes it abundantly clear that only the state has the authority to administer justice, and such illicit practices of informally adjudicating on civil and criminal matters are violative of Articles 4, 8, 10-A, 25 and 175(3) of the Constitution. In 2004, the Sindh High Court declared jirgas unconstitutional and illegal, a position reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in 2006 and again in 2017. The top court also noted that the jirga and panchayat systems violate Pakistan's international legal obligations, including commitments under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Yet, the persistence and now potential formal revival of these forums illustrate the state's failure to assert its monopoly on justice and its hesitance to challenge entrenched tribal and feudal power structures. Supporters of jirgas argue they provide swift and culturally resonant dispute resolution. But this is a false economy. The real reason people turn to jirgas is not their efficiency or fairness, but because the formal justice system remains slow, expensive and inaccessible, particularly in rural and tribal areas. Instead of reinstating medieval mechanisms, the state should commit to making the judiciary accessible, the police accountable, and the legal system responsive to citizens' needs. Worse still, this regressive proposal comes at a time when the federal government has failed to meet its financial and developmental promises to the merged districts. The commitment to provide Rs100 billion annually in development funds, along with a 3% share in the NFC award, remains unfulfilled. The resurgence of militancy, ongoing political tussles between the Centre and K-P, and administrative chaos in the merged districts have only compounded public disillusionment. The state's failure to deliver tangible benefits post-merger has created a vacuum, one it now dangerously proposes to fill with a broken, discredited system. Let us be clear: reinstating jirgas is not a neutral administrative measure; it is a reversal of constitutional progress and a betrayal of the people of the tribal districts. It reinforces outdated power hierarchies, legitimises violence against women, and undermines national unity. The path forward lies not in restoring colonial relics but in upholding the Constitution, investing in institutional reform, and ensuring equal protection of the law for every citizen. Pakistan must decisively reject the politics of appeasement cloaked in cultural nostalgia. It is time to bury jirgas for good.
Express Tribune
8 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Opposition slams govt for Kashmir-like treatment at home
Listen to article The Opposition in the Punjab Assembly lambasted the government for its double standards, stating that, on one hand, it expresses solidarity with Kashmiris against their mistreatment and cruelty, but on the other hand, it subjects the Opposition to similar treatment. Speaker of the Punjab Assembly, Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan, condemned the act of setting fire to houses, banks, and state properties under the guise of a protest or rally. Speaking to journalists, he said, 'Peaceful protest is everyone's right, but turning such an event into chaos and violence cannot be allowed under any circumstances.' He added that August 5 is the day of 'Youm-e-Istehsal' (Day of Exploitation), and everyone should stand by the Kashmiris. However, PTI created division by announcing protests on August 14, a national day. 'Today, the focus should have been on voicing against the cruelty towards the people of Palestine and Kashmir, rather than damaging the national cause under the guise of protests,' Speaker Khan warned. He further stated that turning protests into anarchy is unjustifiable. On the other hand, the Opposition's parliamentary leader, Ali Imtiaz Warraich, condemned the government's dual conduct, adding that, on one side, the government observes August 5 as a day to voice against the exploitation of Kashmiris and Palestinians, but on the other hand, it treats the Opposition with the same cruelty. He mentioned that PTI had called for a nationwide protest on August 5. In response to this call, PTI lawmakers assembled outside DHA Rehbar, but the police arrested nine of their lawmakers. 'PTI conducted a peaceful protest, yet even its lawmakers and workers were arrested,' he said. Warraich warned that PTI would devise a future strategy if its lawmakers and workers were not released.
Business Recorder
8 hours ago
- Business Recorder
ECP disqualifies several PTI lawmakers including Shibli Faraz, Omar Ayub, Zartaj Gul
The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on Tuesday disqualified several Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) legislators including Shibli Faraz, Omar Ayub and Zartaj Gul as well as its ally Sahibzada Hamid Raza, following their conviction by an anti-terrorism court (ATC) in Faisalabad in the case pertaining to May 9 riots. In a notification, the election commission announced since they had been convicted by the ATC, therefore, they were disqualified and de-notified. Hence, the ECP said, their seats have become vacant. 'Senator Shibli Faraz, Omar Ayub Khan, MNA from NA-18 Haripur, Rai Haider Ali Khan, MNA from NA-96 Faisalabad-II, Sahibzada Muhammad Hamid Raza, MNA from NA-104 Faisalabad-X, Rai Hassan Nawaz Khan, MNA from NA-143 Sahiwal-III, Zartaj Gul, MNA from NA-185 DG Khan-II, Muhammad Ansar Iqbal, MPA from PP-73 Sargodha-III, Junaid Afzal Sahi, MPA from PP-98 Faisalabad-I and Rai Muhammad Murtaza Iqbal, MPA from PP-203 Sahiwal-VI, have been convicted and sentenced for imprisonment.' As a consequence, the election body said, they had been 'disqualified under Article 63(1)(h) of the Constitution and are hereby de-notified' as well. ATC Faisalabad on July 31 sentenced more than 100 members of jailed former prime minister Imran Khan's party to prison terms on charges related to riots that targeted military installations in 2023, a court order seen by Reuters said. Fifty-eight of the defendants, who included parliamentarians and senior officials, were sentenced to 10 years in prison and the rest were given sentences ranging from one to three years, the court said. May 9 riots: Court sentences Omar Ayub, Shibli, Zartaj to 10 years imprisonment The accused included Ayub and Faraz, the leaders of PTI in the lower and upper houses of the parliament respectively, the court order read. 'The prosecution has proved its case against the accused without a shadow of doubt,' it said in announcing the sentences. Imran, who has been in prison since 2023 facing charges of corruption, land fraud and disclosure of official secrets, is being tried separately on similar charges related to the riot. The government accused him and other leaders of inciting the May 9, 2023, protests, during which demonstrators attacked military and government buildings, including the army headquarters in Rawalpindi. The former prime minister denies wrongdoing and says all the cases are politically motivated to dismantle his party. Imran's arrest had prompted the countrywide violent protests. The ATC ruling does not directly affect the incitement case against him in which prosecution is still presenting witnesses. The PTI party said it will challenge the verdict. The ruling is the third such mass conviction in a month.
