From airlines to trainers, this German NGO stops companies from greenwashing products
ADVERTISEMENT
It's not uncommon to see products sold on shop shelves that market themselves as 'carbon neutral' or 'environmentally friendly'. But these claims are not always clear or backed up by evidence - and courts are forcing companies to take them down.
German non-profit Deutsche Umwelthilfe (DUH) has been on an anti-greenwashing litigation spree over the last three years, stopping more than 100 firms from advertising their products or corporate activities as good for the environment. These include the makers of shower gel and trainers, and cruise and airline operators.
Agnes Sauter, head of ecological market surveillance at DUH, says companies are increasingly advertising their products and services with purported environmental benefits as shoppers become more aware of the impacts of the things they buy.
But the claims do not always stand up to scrutiny. A 2020 study by the European Commission found more than half of environmental claims in the EU to be vague, misleading or unfounded and 40 per cent were unsubstantiated.
'
Greenwashing
has become a growing problem that misleads consumers and hinders real progress in climate protection and the sustainable use of resources,' says Sauter.
Related
'Their determination is heroic': Portuguese youth mount fresh climate lawsuit against government
Which companies have been accused of greenwashing?
Although it has been filing greenwashing claims since May 2022, DUH stepped up its action last year following a judgment by the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) against sweet company Katjes.
The court ruled that ambiguous terms like 'climate neutral' - which could mean that a company has actually cut its emissions or that it has bought controversial
carbon offsets
- would only be allowed if they were properly explained within the advert itself.
In the last few months alone, DUH has confronted around 20 companies about their advertising claims under Germany's Act against Unfair Competition, arguing that information is missing or challenging companies to show that the climate protection projects they use to achieve neutrality can meet their promises.
Sauter says the non-profit sees itself as an advocate for consumers 'because correct information about the quality of a product enables informed purchasing decisions to be made'.
Judges have proved sympathetic. Last month, sporting goods brand Adidas was ordered to stop advertising that it would become 'climate neutral by 2050' because it had not clearly explained how it would meet this goal.
'Climate protection is an increasingly important topic for consumers, dominating not only the news but also everyday life,' says Cologne Regional Court. 'And advertising a company or its products with supposed climate neutrality can therefore have a significant impact on the purchasing decision.'
In a statement, Adidas says the decision relates exclusively to 'specific wording' on its website, which has since been changed.
Related
Going round in circularity: Most Brits confused by sustainability language, survey finds
Climate neutral promises can confuse or deceive consumers
Sauter says corporate announcements that companies would be CO2 or climate neutral in the coming decades convey the impression of acting sustainably and responsibly, 'but in most cases, this is nothing more than blatant consumer deception'.
She says these measures are often formulated vaguely and are difficult or even impossible to verify. 'Such advertising claims must be credibly substantiated and presented in a way that is understandable to consumers. In our opinion, anything else is massive greenwashing and must be stopped immediately."
Aviation group
Lufthansa
, headquartered in Germany, was also banned by Cologne Regional Court in March from advertising that passengers can 'compensate' for carbon emissions from its flights. The adverts gave the false impression that a payment would make flying completely carbon neutral.
ADVERTISEMENT
DUH previously won a similar legal victory specifically against airline
Eurowings
, which Lufthana operates. Lufthansa says it is carefully considering the latest ruling.
Last year, Hamburg Regional Court upheld a greenwashing lawsuit against Shell Germany.
DUH argued that giving customers the option of offsetting emissions from filling their cars with petrol or diesel gave a misleading impression that they could drive without any environmental impacts, because it was done via carbon credits from forest protection projects in Peru and Indonesia.
Shell
Germany said the decision obliged it to stop CO2 offsetting and to stop selling Shell Helix bottles with the logo 'CO2-neutral'.
ADVERTISEMENT
Similarly, Karlsruhe Regional Court found consumers had been misled by cruise line TUI Cruises' advertising promise that its cruise operations would be decarbonised by 2050.
Some of DUH's claims target specific products. Following a successful lawsuit, home improvement chain Obi has been told it cannot advertise a wall paint as 'climate-neutral'.
Related
Oatly found to have 'overstated' environmental claims in adverts
Legal action is sending a 'strong signal' to greenwashing companies
Some of these cases are still subject to appeal, and DUH will be watching to make sure that any final rulings are followed through. It enforced an injunction it had won in 2023 against drugstore chain dm for misleading consumers with the terms 'climate neutral' and 'environmentally neutral' on particular products.
When the company started to readvertise with the new slogan 'act environmentally neutral', DUH started fresh legal proceedings until dm agreed to stop using that too.
ADVERTISEMENT
A number of DUH's legal claims are still ongoing and some could be appealed. But Sauter says most of the companies it has legally threatened have withdrawn specific
advertising
claims and made a declaration that they will stop.
These include gas suppliers who marketed fossil gas as climate-neutral green gas, a company in the Bauhaus Group that advertised a disposable grill made of '100% natural materials' and Poco furniture stores that marketed a chair as 'environmentally friendly'.
Sauter says DUH's activities were having a 'strong signalling effect' and advertising with climate neutrality on the basis of offsetting claims 'has rapidly decreased'.
Related
Companies will soon have to prove that they really are taking climate action, under draft EU law
Fish door bells, plastic-eating fungi and tree hugging: Positive environmental stories from 2025
Regulators are cracking down on greenwashing in Europe too
And DUH is not done yet. It recently sent cease-and-desist letters to five companies that it claims advertise environmental benefits without providing information about them: beauty Coty over its 'ocean-friendly' sunscreen; Deichmann and Tchibo about shoes and clothing marketed as 'sustainable'; DIY brand Toom over a laminate marketed as 'good for the environment'; and L'Oreal's over its 'sustainability commitment'.
ADVERTISEMENT
DUH's victories only apply directly to corporate activities in
Germany
. But Sauter points out that competition law is regulated at the EU level and so, if a German court finds an advert to be misleading, there is a good chance that a court in another EU country would agree.
Regulators have also been cracking down on greenwashing. The UK's Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), for example, previously banned an advert by
Lufthansa
for making unjustified climate claims. And both the
ASA
and the Netherlands' equivalent have ordered Shell and its subsidiaries to take down greenwashed adverts.
DUH is now calling on Germany's new federal government to set clearer rules and fines for consumer deception. It is already required to put into law new EU rules aimed at empowering consumers for the green transition. And in future it will likely have to implement a proposed
greenwashing
law expected to tackle both product and company-level claims.
Sauter says sustainability cannot just be a marketing ploy and must lead to real improvements in the design of products. 'After all, honest climate and environmental protection is urgently needed in the face of the climate crisis and can only be strengthened by clear regulations.'
ADVERTISEMENT
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
3 days ago
- Euronews
Europe's right caught in wake of broken Trump-Musk bromance
The very public fallout between Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk, once among the US president's closest advisors, has rippled across the Atlantic, drawing fascination as well as anxiety from Europe's right-wing and far-right political circles. The collapse of the Trump-Musk alliance, marked by bitter exchanges over government contracts and personal insults, has left many on Europe's right politically adrift. Online, the moment has already spawned memes comparing European parties to children caught in a bitter divorce. Yet beyond the humour, the European right woke up in shock. For many of its leaders, Trump had served as proof that a nationalist 'wave' was not only possible but already underway. Musk, meanwhile, became an unlikely champion of their causes, lending legitimacy, visibility, and even a platform to far-right movements like Germany's AfD and Italy's Lega, with particularly close ties to Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. So far, there has been no official comment from Europe's right-wing leaders on the Trump-Musk rift. That silence is striking as these politicians are usually quick to react to global events, especially those involving figures they admire. Their hesitation suggests a deeper unease: being forced to choose sides could present a strategic dilemma that reshapes the future of Europe's right-wing landscape. Germany's far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) faces a delicate balancing act. While the party has long admired Trump's nationalist politics – often calling for a 'Germany First' approach – it has also benefited significantly from Musk's support. Musk has repeatedly praised the AfD, once stating, 'Only the AfD can save Germany.' Ahead of Germany's federal elections, he even participated in livestreamed discussions with AfD co-leader Alice Weidel and used his platform X (formerly Twitter) to amplify the party's messaging. Meanwhile, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who was present at the White House during part of the unfolding dispute between the pair, hasn't commented, though his CDU party competes directly with the AfD and is likely watching developments closely. Italy's Lega and its leader Matteo Salvini face a similar dilemma but from a slightly different angle. Salvini has long styled himself as Italy's most pro-Trump figure, even more so than his rival Giorgia Meloni. Yet Musk has also courted Lega. In April, he addressed the party's national congress in Florence via video link as a star guest, echoing his involvement with the AfD. For Meloni, the situation is even more complex as she has cultivated relationships with both men. As the first Western European leader to meet Trump following the announcement of US tariffs on EU goods, she positioned herself as a diplomatic bridge between Washington and Brussels. At the same time, she has maintained a pragmatic, deal-oriented relationship with Musk, particularly regarding potential SpaceX contracts for Italian defence communications. Despite their ties to Musk and shared ideological overlaps, both Meloni and Salvini are likely to side with Trump in the event of a political schism since Trump remains a key political ally and, unlike Musk, is an elected leader. In other parts of Europe, the choice appears clearer. Parties such as Hungary's Fidesz under Viktor Orbán and France's National Rally, now led by Jordan Bardella, have consistently aligned themselves with Trump's nationalist agenda. Orbán, one of Trump's closest allies in Europe, frequently echoes his anti-immigration rhetoric and strongman leadership style. Bardella has praised Trump's patriotism and nationalist policies, while showing little public admiration for Musk. Elsewhere, parties like Poland's Law and Justice (PiS), Austria's Freedom Party (FPÖ), and Spain's Vox have seen Musk act more as a sympathetic amplifier of their messages rather than as a political partner. While Musk has given visibility to far-right narratives on his social media platform, he lacks the political authority or ideological consistency that many of these parties find in Trump. As the Trump-Musk feud continues to unfold, Europe's right-wing movements may be forced into a reckoning. Do they align with a political icon who has shaped modern populism or with a tech mogul whose influence lies in platforms, not policies? For now, many are watching and waiting. But if tensions escalate further, silence may no longer be an option. A new YouGov study shows that the favourability towards Israel in Britain, France, Germany, Denmark, Spain and Italy is at or near its lowest level in Western Europe since 2016. The research interviewed 8,625 people from these six key Western European countries between November 2016 and May 2025. Net favourability towards Israel in Germany (-44), France (-48), and Denmark (-54) has reached its lowest level since YouGov started tracking in 2016, while public sentiment in Italy (-52) and Spain (-55) are likewise at their lowest or joint lowest levels, despite a shorter timespan from 2021 onwards. A number of Europeans across these six countries think Israel was right to send troops into Gaza, but believe they have since gone too far and caused too many civilian casualties. This opinion won the most support in Germany at 40%, followed by Denmark at 39% and Britain at 38%. Israel's military campaign has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Food supplies have also been blocked, with the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC)'s latest report stating half a million people face starvation. Between 7% and 18% of European respondents say they sympathise most with the Israeli side, the lowest figure in most countries since the Hamas attacks. By contrast, between 18% and 33% say they sympathise more with the Palestinian side. Only in Germany are the figures for each side similar, with 17% for Israel and 18% for Palestine. Despite permanent peace in the Middle East seeming distant to Europeans, French people are the most optimistic that both sides will set aside their differences within the next 10 years. Meanwhile, Danes are the least optimistic at 15%. Across all countries, the opinion that peace is realistic has fallen in popularity by between four and ten percentage points.
Euronews
3 days ago
- Euronews
Baku conference tackles rising Islamophobia and global intolerance
Baku hosted the third International Conference on Combating Islamophobia, drawing over 120 guests from 40 countries. Held under the theme 'Unveiling Bias and Shattering Stigmas,' the forum addressed the rise of anti-Muslim sentiment worldwide. Speakers highlighted the role of social media, rising far-right ideologies, and misinformation in fuelling discrimination. The event promoted interfaith dialogue, cooperation, and global action, including a new digital observatory to track Islamophobia. Azerbaijan's leadership called for unity and implementation of UN resolutions, stressing the need for shared solutions to protect human rights and uphold religious tolerance. Germany's industrial production and exports fell in April after a recent growth spurt in the first quarter, suggesting that the prior uptick was linked to a pre-tariff rush. Output in the manufacturing sector fell 1.4% month-on-month and declined 1.8% compared to April 2024. In March, this total grew 2.3% month-on-month, and it fell 0.7% year-on-year. Exports from Germany, meanwhile, also disappointed in April, dropping 1.7% month-on-month and falling 2.1% on the year. Imports rose 3.9% from March to April, while the annual jump was 3.8%. 'Today's industrial production data reflects the feared reversal of the frontloading effect of the first quarter and suggests that the structural weakness in industry is not over, yet,' Carsten Brzeski, global head of macro at ING, said in a note. 'At the same time, however, there are growing indications that the German industrial cycle is gradually turning, as industrial orders have also improved and inventory levels have started to fall.' Despite some bright spots in the data, tariff threats from the US administration are weighing on Germany's outlook, which is already hampered by structural issues. In recent years, Germany has been dubbed the 'sick man of Europe', with growth constrained by an ageing workforce, excessive bureaucracy, high energy costs, and sluggish productivity. GDP nonetheless grew by a better-than-expected 0.4% in the first quarter of the year, fuelled by businesses seeking to get ahead of Trump's tariffs. Economists hope that this week's ECB rate cut, along with increased defence spending, will support Germany's expansion going forward. Germany has approved a constitutional amendment to its 'debt brake' rule, meaning defence spending above 1% of GDP will not be subject to borrowing limits. The government has also created a €500bn extrabudgetary fund for additional infrastructure spending. "In two weeks, the government is expected to present its budget plans for 2025 and 2026, which should include more details on how and when the government intends to spend the €500bn of the new infrastructure investment fund," said Brzeski. "While it is still very early days and far-reaching structural reforms have not been presented yet, the policy action of the government's first month in office is promising and could spark positive momentum."
Euronews
3 days ago
- Euronews
Production and exports fall in Germany as pre-tariff rush wears off
Germany's industrial production and exports fell in April after a recent growth spurt in the first quarter, suggesting that the prior uptick was linked to a pre-tariff rush. Output in the manufacturing sector fell 1.4% month-on-month and declined 1.8% compared to April 2024. In March, this total grew 2.3% month-on-month, and it fell 0.7% year-on-year. Exports from Germany, meanwhile, also disappointed in April, dropping 1.7% month-on-month and falling 2.1% on the year. Imports rose 3.9% from March to April, while the annual jump was 3.8%. 'Today's industrial production data reflects the feared reversal of the frontloading effect of the first quarter and suggests that the structural weakness in industry is not over, yet,' Carsten Brzeski, global head of macro at ING, said in a note. 'At the same time, however, there are growing indications that the German industrial cycle is gradually turning, as industrial orders have also improved and inventory levels have started to fall.' Despite some bright spots in the data, tariff threats from the US administration are weighing on Germany's outlook, which is already hampered by structural issues. In recent years, Germany has been dubbed the 'sick man of Europe', with growth constrained by an ageing workforce, excessive bureaucracy, high energy costs, and sluggish productivity. GDP nonetheless grew by a better-than-expected 0.4% in the first quarter of the year, fuelled by businesses seeking to get ahead of Trump's tariffs. Economists hope that this week's ECB rate cut, along with increased defence spending, will support Germany's expansion going forward. Germany has approved a constitutional amendment to its 'debt brake' rule, meaning defence spending above 1% of GDP will not be subject to borrowing limits. The government has also created a €500bn extrabudgetary fund for additional infrastructure spending. "In two weeks, the government is expected to present its budget plans for 2025 and 2026, which should include more details on how and when the government intends to spend the €500bn of the new infrastructure investment fund," said Brzeski. "While it is still very early days and far-reaching structural reforms have not been presented yet, the policy action of the government's first month in office is promising and could spark positive momentum." The eurozone economy posted a stronger-than-expected performance in the first quarter of 2025, with growth largely driven by investments and exports, reinforcing expectations that the European Central Bank (ECB) will adopt a more cautious approach to further rate reductions. Gross domestic product (GDP) in the euro area expanded by 0.6% quarter-on-quarter, marking the fifth consecutive quarter of expansion, according to Eurostat's third estimate released on Friday. This figure represents an upward revision from the previous 0.3% estimate and marks the highest quarterly growth rate since the third quarter of 2022. For the broader European Union, economy also grew by 0.6% in the first quarter. On an annual basis, GDP grew by 1.5% in the euro area and by 1.6% across the European Union in the first quarter of 2025. This comes after a quarterly growth of 0.3% in the euro area and 0.4% in the EU during the final quarter of 2024. Among member states, Ireland recorded the most significant quarterly GDP increase, surging by 9.7%, followed by Malta (+2.1%) and Cyprus (+1.3%). On the other end, the largest contractions were observed in Luxembourg (-1.0%), Slovenia (-0.8%), and both Denmark and Portugal (each -0.5%). Household final consumption expenditure rose by 0.2% in both the euro area and the EU, a slowdown from the 0.5% and 0.6% increases recorded in the previous quarter, respectively. Government final consumption expenditure remained stable in the euro area but declined by 0.1% in the EU, following respective increases of 0.4% and 0.5% in the fourth quarter of 2024. Gross fixed capital formation posted strong growth, rising by 1.8% in both the euro area and the EU, marking a notable acceleration from the previous gains of 0.7% and 0.6%. Exports also rebounded, increasing by 1.9% in the euro area and by 1.6% in the EU, after recording marginal growth of 0.0% and 0.1% in the preceding quarter. Meanwhile, imports rose by 1.4% in both regions, recovering from the 0.1% decline observed in the prior period. The stronger economic performance was released just one day after the ECB announced its eighth rate cut in the current cycle, lowering the deposit facility rate by 25 basis points to 2%. Yet, during the press conference, ECB President Christine Lagarde signalled caution, repeatedly affirming that the Governing Council is in a 'good position' to handle prevailing uncertainties. The ECB's macroeconomic projections remained largely unchanged from March. Real GDP is expected to expand by 0.9% in 2025, 1.1% in 2026 and 1.3% in 2027. Meanwhile, headline inflation is forecast to average 2.0% in 2025, dip to 1.6% in 2026, and return to 2.0% in 2027. In a separate release, Eurostat reported a 0.2% quarter-on-quarter rise in the number of employed persons in the euro area, slightly revised down from the previous 0.3% estimate. Employment remained stable in the EU. Year-on-year, employment increased by 0.7% in the euro area and by 0.4% in the EU during the first quarter of 2025. April's seasonally adjusted retail trade volume rose marginally by 0.1% month-on-month in the euro area and by 0.7% in the EU, offering early indications of consumption trends in the second quarter. Economists and market analysts reacted swiftly to the signals from Lagarde and the stronger-than-expected GDP figures. 'We no longer expect a July cut,' said Goldman Sachs economist Sven Jari Stehn, interpreting Lagarde's remarks as a sign that a pause is now the baseline scenario. Goldman Sachs now sees the ECB's final rate cut taking place in September, although it expects economic activity to soften and core inflation to trend lower than the ECB's forecasts over the summer. ING's global head of macro, Carsten Brzeski, concurred, stating: 'Comments from the ECB's press conference suggest Board members are in no hurry to cut rates again at the July meeting – unless there is a new escalation of trade tensions.' BBVA echoed the sentiment, concluding: 'We now consider the rate-cutting cycle to be finished at the current level. The ECB appears comfortable pausing from here unless financial conditions deteriorate.' The ECB's June move can be labelled as a 'hawkish cut' by Gian Marco Salcioli, Head of Global Markets Strategy at Intesa Sanpaolo. 'The pandemic phase taught us how little it takes to reignite inflationary pressures,' Salcioli noted, adding that 'prudence is necessary – the pace of cuts seems to be shifting toward a wait-and-see approach.'
